Starship Asterisk*

NGC 1579: Trifid of the North

Explanation: Colorful NGC 1579 resembles the better known Trifid Nebula, but lies much farther north in planet Earth's sky, in the heroic constellation Perseus. About 2,100 light-years away and 3 light-years across, NGC 1579 is, like the Trifid, a study in contrasting blue and red colors, with dark dust lanes prominent in the nebula's central regions. In both, dust reflects starlight to produce beautiful blue reflection nebulae. But unlike the Trifid, in NGC 1579 the reddish glow is not emission from clouds of glowing hydrogen gas excited by ultraviolet light from a nearby hot star. Instead, the dust in NGC 1579 drastically diminishes, reddens, and scatters the light from an embedded, extremely young, massive star, itself a strong emitter of the characteristic red hydrogen alpha light.

<< Previous APOD

Discuss Any APOD

Next APOD >>

[/b]

Congratulations, Adam, a lovely picture as always!

Ann

It does have an uncanny similarity to the Trifid Nebula!

The dark cloud blocking the blue reflection nebula looks like a rat and the red emission nebula looks like a cat looking down at him. I guess the cat is still determined to become a part of the zodiac ^v^

Don't young stars emit blue light? What is alpha light?

Robinegg wrote:Don't young stars emit blue light? What is alpha light?

Hot stars produce a black body spectrum that makes them appear blue to our eyes. They also produce a lot of UV, which ionizes any surrounding hydrogen, producing the red light of the Balmer alpha line. Stars which are fusing hydrogen also produce a strong peak for this hydrogen alpha wavelength. We don't see it visually, because the shorter wavelength light swamps it out, but it's still there, and in a dusty nebula like this, the dust can absorb the bluer light, and scatter the red, acting as a sort of filter to let us see it.

Isn't it more correct to say that we are indeed seeing a red emission nebula, where hydrogen has been ionized by the ultraviolet light of a hot star so that the hydrogen emits red light?

Ann

Great picture....looks like a Dinosaur head to me....


:---[===] *

Chris Peterson wrote:
Hot stars produce a black body spectrum that makes them appear blue to our eyes. They also produce a lot of UV, which ionizes any surrounding hydrogen, producing the red light of the Balmer alpha line. Stars which are fusing hydrogen also produce a strong peak for this hydrogen alpha wavelength. We don't see it visually, because the shorter wavelength light swamps it out, but it's still there, and in a dusty nebula like this, the dust can absorb the bluer light, and scatter the red, acting as a sort of filter to let us see it.

What is hidrogen alpha?

neufer wrote:We don't see it visually, because it is a strong absorption peak, but it's still there.

That is NOT why we don't see H-alpha visually. The reason is the same that we don't see any narrow emission lines: because they simply contain too little energy compared with the broad thermal spectrum. In other words, the continuum light washes out the emission lines. The strong H-alpha output of stars is readily apparent when you make an image through a narrow Ha filter, or view our own star with one.

saturn2 wrote:What is hidrogen alpha?

Hydrogen alpha is red light whose wavelength is 656 nanometers. The interesting thing is how it is produced. It takes hydrogen being hit by ultraviolet photons to produce it.

It works like this. A hydrogen atom consists of one proton and one electron. The electron is in orbit around the proton, although it must be said that "orbit" doesn't mean the same thing when we talk about subatomic particles as when we talk about planets orbiting a sun. The electron is moving around in a much more unpredictable way than a planet orbiting a sun.

Anyway, the electron is moving around in an "electron shell". Inside this shell, the electron has a certain energy. There are several electron shells, but the electron tries to stay in the lowest shell, where its energy is the lowest.

But if the electron is hit by an ultraviolet photon, it will be "kicked" into a higher electron shell. In the case of the so-called Balmer series" (and you don't have to worry about what exactly that is) the second shell represents an "extra energy" comparable to a photon of the wavelength of 656 nanometers.

When the electron has been "kicked" into this second shell by an ultraviolet photon, it will want to "fall down" again. As it does so, the electron emits a photon of the wavelength of 656 nanometers.

656 nanometers represent red light. In other words, if a photon has been kicked into the second shell of the Balmer series, it will release its extra energy as a photon of 656 nm red light, so that it can fall down into its lowest electron shell again.
Here you can see the Balmer series. The lowest shell is shell number 2 (and no, I can't explain why it's called 2 and not 1). If the electron is kicked into shell number 3, it will emit red light as it falls down. If it is kicked into shell number 4 it will emit blue-green light as it falls down. (This picture says that the electron will emit pure green light, but that is not true.) If the electron is kicked into shell number 5, it will emit blue light as it falls down, and if it is kicked into shells number 6 and 7 it will emit violet light. Electrons are often kicked "one shell up", but it is a rare event indeed that they are kicked more than "two shells up". Therefore electrons often emit red light, but extremely rarely violet light.
Here you can see the colors of the Balmer series. These are the colors that can be emitted by an electron as it is falling down from a higher shell into shell number 2.






This is the Rosette Nebula. It is glowing red because huge numbers of electrons are emitting red light. These electrons have been kicked into shell number 3 by ultraviolet photons from the hot stars at the center of the Rosette nebula. As the electrons fall down into shell number 2 again, they emit red light of 656 nanometers. As long as the stars stay hot and bright, and as long as there is a large cloud of hydrogen surrounding the hot stars, electrons will keep being kicked into shell number 3, and they will keep emitting red light as they fall down into shell number 2.

Ann

What is the name of the obvious blue nebula to the bottom left (assuming that it has a name).

Ann wrote:

saturn2 wrote:What is hidrogen alpha?

In the case of the so-called Balmer series" (and you don't have to worry about what exactly that is) the second shell represents an "extra energy" comparable to a photon of the wavelength of 656 nanometers.

When the electron has been "kicked" into this second shell by an ultraviolet photon, it will want to "fall down" again. As it does so, the electron emits a photon of the wavelength of 656 nanometers.

656 nanometers represent red light. In other words, if a photon has been kicked into the second shell of the Balmer series, it will release its extra energy as a photon of 656 nm red light, so that it can fall down into its lowest electron shell again.

Here you can see the Balmer series. The lowest shell is shell number 2 (and no, I can't explain why it's called 2 and not 1). If the electron is kicked into shell number 3, it will emit red light as it falls down. If it is kicked into shell number 4 it will emit blue-green light as it falls down. (This picture says that the electron will emit pure green light, but that is not true.) If the electron is kicked into shell number 5, it will emit blue light as it falls down, and if it is kicked into shells number 6 and 7 it will emit violet light. Electrons are often kicked "one shell up", but it is a rare event indeed that they are kicked more than "two shells up". Therefore electrons often emit red light, but extremely rarely violet light.

This is the Rosette Nebula. It is glowing red because huge numbers of electrons are emitting red light. These electrons have been kicked into shell number 3 by ultraviolet photons from the hot stars at the center of the Rosette nebula. As the electrons fall down into shell number 2 again, they emit red light of 656 nanometers. As long as the stars stay hot and bright, and as long as there is a large cloud of hydrogen surrounding the hot stars, electrons will keep being kicked into shell number 3, and they will keep emitting red light as they fall down into shell number 2.

The lowest shell in the visible Balmer series is shell number 2 because when the electron finally
drops into the actual lowest shell (number 1) it emits an ultraviolet photon of the Lyman series.

http://www-pi.physics.uiowa.edu/sai/gallery/text.htmlx wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyman-alpha_blob wrote:

A Lyman alpha blob (left) and an artists impression of what one might look like if viewed at a relatively close distance (right).

---

<<In astronomy, a Lyman-alpha blob (LAB) is a huge concentration of a gas emitting the Lyman-alpha emission line. LABs are some of the largest known individual objects in the Universe. Some of these gaseous structures are more than 400,000 light years across. So far they have only been found in the high-redshift universe because of the ultraviolet nature of the Lyman-alpha emission line. Since the Earth's atmosphere is very effective at filtering out UV photons, the 121.6 nanometer Lyman-alpha photons must be redshifted in order to be transmitted through the atmosphere.

The most famous Lyman-alpha Blobs were discovered in 2000 by Steidel et al. Matsuda et al., using the Subaru Telescope of the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan extended the search for LABs and found over 30 new LABs in the original field of Steidel et al., although they were all smaller than the originals. These LABs form a structure which is more than 200 million light-years in extent. It is currently unknown whether LABs trace overdensities of galaxies in the high-redshift universe (as high redshift radio galaxies — which also have extended Lyman-alpha halos — do, for example), nor which mechanism produces the Lyman-alpha emission line, or how the LABs are connected to the surrounding galaxies. Lyman-alpha Blobs may hold valuable clues for scientists to determine how galaxies are formed.>>