APOD: Fermi Epicyles: The Vela Pulsar's Path (2012 May 04)

Comments and questions about the APOD on the main view screen.
User avatar
APOD Robot
Otto Posterman
Posts: 5344
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 3:27 am
Contact:

APOD: Fermi Epicyles: The Vela Pulsar's Path (2012 May 04)

Post by APOD Robot » Fri May 04, 2012 4:06 am

Image Fermi Epicyles: The Vela Pulsar's Path

Explanation: Exploring the cosmos at extreme energies, the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope orbits planet Earth every 95 minutes. By design, it rocks to the north and then to the south on alternate orbits in order to survey the sky with its Large Area Telescope (LAT). The spacecraft also rolls so that solar panels are kept pointed at the Sun for power, and the axis of its orbit precesses like a top, making a complete rotation once every 54 days. As a result of these multiple cycles the paths of gamma-ray sources trace out complex patterns from the spacecraft's perspective, like this mesmerising plot of the path of the Vela Pulsar. Centered on the LAT instrument's field of view, the plot spans 180 degrees and follows Vela's position from August 2008 through August 2010. The concentration near the center shows that Vela was in the sensitive region of the LAT field during much of that period. Born in the death explosion of a massive star within our Milky Way galaxy, the Vela Pulsar is a neutron star spinning 11 times a second, seen as the brightest persistent source in the gamma-ray sky.

<< Previous APODDiscuss Any APOD Next APOD >>

User avatar
geckzilla
Ocular Digitator
Posts: 9180
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: Modesto, CA
Contact:

Re: APOD: Fermi Epicyles: The Vela Pulsar s Path (2012 May 0

Post by geckzilla » Fri May 04, 2012 4:14 am

This is such a strange APOD. Does this have any use other than to explain that Fermi doesn't always look in the same direction and looking cool? Not that it needs a use, I just want to know if it does have one.
Just call me "geck" because "zilla" is like a last name.

User avatar
Beyond
500 Gigaderps
Posts: 6889
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:09 am
Location: BEYONDER LAND

Re: APOD: Fermi Epicyles: The Vela Pulsar s Path (2012 May 0

Post by Beyond » Fri May 04, 2012 4:19 am

The pattern looks kinda neat, but it deals with gamma rays, so i'm not going to get too close to it. We all know what happened to Bill Bixby when he got too close to gamma rays. He turned into Lou Ferrigno and became green :!: :!: :yes: :mrgreen:
To find the Truth, you must go Beyond.

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18102
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: APOD: Fermi Epicyles: The Vela Pulsar s Path (2012 May 0

Post by Chris Peterson » Fri May 04, 2012 4:58 am

geckzilla wrote:This is such a strange APOD. Does this have any use other than to explain that Fermi doesn't always look in the same direction and looking cool? Not that it needs a use, I just want to know if it does have one.
I think the purpose isn't simply to show that it doesn't always look in the same direction, but that its multiple modes of motion result in a very interesting coverage pattern of the sky.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: APOD: Fermi Epicyles: The Vela Pulsar s Path (2012 May 0

Post by neufer » Fri May 04, 2012 5:18 am

Chris Peterson wrote:
geckzilla wrote:
This is such a strange APOD. Does this have any use other than to explain that Fermi doesn't always look in the same direction and looking cool? Not that it needs a use, I just want to know if it does have one.
I think the purpose isn't simply to show that it doesn't always look in the same direction, but that its multiple modes of motion result in a very interesting coverage pattern of the sky.
I think the purpose is that Fermi is NEVER looking in the same direction. Rather, it is performing an cool exotic dance that scans the whole sky about once every 3 hours. We are much more accustomed to space craft that contort themselves in order to track the single object they are focused upon.
_________ The Gymnast

KRAMER: Yeah, it's 3-D art. Computers generate 'em. BIG computers.

MR. PITT: Yes, I've heard about these. How do they work?

KRAMER: Well, you blur your eyes like you're starin' straight through the picture. And you keep your eyes unfocused. And then... (Kramer and Pitt stare at picture) Oh, oh, oh, YEAH!

MR. PITT: I don't see it.

KRAMER: Yeah, it's a spaceship, surrounded by planets, asteroids...

MR. PITT: I still don't see it.

ELAINE: Okay, Kramer, that's enough. Mr. Pitt has got work to do.

KRAMER: Ya' ever dream in 3-D? It's like the boogeyman is comin' right at you.

MR. PITT: A spaceship, where?

KRAMER: (pointing) Right in here. Just keep your eyes unfocused.
Last edited by neufer on Fri May 04, 2012 5:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
Art Neuendorffer

Boomer12k
:---[===] *
Posts: 2691
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 12:07 am

Re: APOD: Fermi Epicyles: The Vela Pulsar s Path (2012 May 0

Post by Boomer12k » Fri May 04, 2012 5:21 am

Pretty SPIROGRAPH...

:---[===] *

tnzkka
Ensign
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 8:14 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: APOD: Fermi Epicyles: The Vela Pulsar s Path (2012 May 0

Post by tnzkka » Fri May 04, 2012 7:46 am

Beautifully asymmetric. No spirograph-drawing seen.

User avatar
orin stepanek
Plutopian
Posts: 8200
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: Nebraska

Re: APOD: Fermi Epicyles: The Vela Pulsar s Path (2012 May 0

Post by orin stepanek » Fri May 04, 2012 12:44 pm

geckzilla wrote:This is such a strange APOD. Does this have any use other than to explain that Fermi doesn't always look in the same direction and looking cool? Not that it needs a use, I just want to know if it does have one.
I didn't get much out of it either; but than again much of it was beyond my understanding. :?
Orin

Smile today; tomorrow's another day!

User avatar
geckzilla
Ocular Digitator
Posts: 9180
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: Modesto, CA
Contact:

Re: APOD: Fermi Epicyles: The Vela Pulsar s Path (2012 May 0

Post by geckzilla » Fri May 04, 2012 12:49 pm

Ok, so "never" is a better way of saying "does not always", but I'm not sure it changes the meaning of my post, Neufer. :wink: So Fermi has to be paranoid and look everywhere. The gamma rays are out to get it.
Just call me "geck" because "zilla" is like a last name.

copper5817
Asternaut
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 12:06 am

Re: APOD: Fermi Epicyles: The Vela Pulsar s Path (2012 May 0

Post by copper5817 » Fri May 04, 2012 1:16 pm

Ok, I have a question for you guys. With the pulsar spinning 11 times a second is the density or the gravitational field of the pulsar what keeps the centrifugal forces from flinging material away? Pulsars are know for having extremely dense structures. With this type of density would the structure of the star be hard like a non-porous surface might be? I guess what I'm really wondering is, how much faster can these things spin, and ultimately does the use of the fuel contained within the pulsar eventually contribute to a density loss that would lead to a catastrophic failure of the structure of the pulsar due to centrifugal forces? I imagine that would be spectacular if it did. Kind of like an accretion disk in reverse!

cxd207
Asternaut
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 1:16 pm
Location: Philadelphia

Re: APOD: Fermi Epicyles: The Vela Pulsar s Path (2012 May 0

Post by cxd207 » Fri May 04, 2012 1:29 pm

Just a beautiful picture. A spirograph in space.

DCStone
Ensign
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:32 pm

Re: APOD: Fermi Epicyles: The Vela Pulsar s Path (2012 May 0

Post by DCStone » Fri May 04, 2012 1:34 pm

cxd207 wrote:Just a beautiful picture. A spirograph in space.
An awfully expensive spirograph, but still fun!

User avatar
emc
Equine Locutionist
Posts: 1307
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 12:15 pm
AKA: Bear
Location: Ed’s World
Contact:

Re: APOD: Fermi Epicyles: The Vela Pulsar s Path (2012 May 0

Post by emc » Fri May 04, 2012 1:43 pm

I see a dancing Owl
Ed
Casting Art to the Net
Sometimes the best path is a new one.

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18102
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: APOD: Fermi Epicyles: The Vela Pulsar s Path (2012 May 0

Post by Chris Peterson » Fri May 04, 2012 2:08 pm

neufer wrote:I think the purpose is that Fermi is NEVER looking in the same direction.
Every place on the image where there is an intersection represents a point in the sky where Fermi is looking twice. Given the field-of-view of the camera, what this image demonstrates is that, despite the exotic dance, Fermi spends a lot of time looking at the same places repeatedly.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: APOD: Fermi Epicyles: The Vela Pulsar s Path (2012 May 0

Post by neufer » Fri May 04, 2012 2:12 pm

geckzilla wrote:
Ok, so "never" is a better way of saying "does not always", but I'm not sure it changes the meaning of my post, Neufer. :wink:
'Does not always' is pretty vague.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Sagan wrote:
Billions and Billions: <<I never said it. Honest. Oh, I said there are maybe 100 billion galaxies and 10 billion trillion stars. It's hard to talk about the Cosmos without using big numbers. I said 'billion' many times on the Cosmos television series, which was seen by a great many people. But I never said 'billions and billions.' For one thing, it's imprecise. How many billions are 'billions and billions'? A few billion? Twenty billion? A hundred billion? 'Billions and billions' is pretty vague... For a while, out of childish pique, I wouldn't utter the phrase, even when asked to. But I've gotten over that. So, for the record, here it goes: 'Billions and billions.'>>
geckzilla wrote:
So Fermi has to be paranoid and look everywhere. The gamma rays are out to get it.
Just because Fermi is paranoid doesn't mean that gamma rays are not out to get it.
Art Neuendorffer

User avatar
geckzilla
Ocular Digitator
Posts: 9180
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: Modesto, CA
Contact:

Re: APOD: Fermi Epicyles: The Vela Pulsar s Path (2012 May 0

Post by geckzilla » Fri May 04, 2012 2:22 pm

Given Chris's contradiction to your statement, perhaps it is necessary for it to be vague.
Just call me "geck" because "zilla" is like a last name.

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: APOD: Fermi Epicyles: The Vela Pulsar s Path (2012 May 0

Post by neufer » Fri May 04, 2012 2:24 pm

Chris Peterson wrote:
neufer wrote:
I think the purpose is that Fermi is NEVER looking in the same direction.
Every place on the image where there is an intersection represents a point in the sky where Fermi is looking twice. Given the field-of-view of the camera, what this image demonstrates is that, despite the exotic dance, Fermi spends a lot of time looking at the same places repeatedly.
I think the purpose is that Fermi is NEVER looking in precisely the same direction with the same orientation.
Art Neuendorffer

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18102
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: APOD: Fermi Epicyles: The Vela Pulsar s Path (2012 May 0

Post by Chris Peterson » Fri May 04, 2012 2:36 pm

copper5817 wrote:Ok, I have a question for you guys. With the pulsar spinning 11 times a second is the density or the gravitational field of the pulsar what keeps the centrifugal forces from flinging material away? Pulsars are know for having extremely dense structures. With this type of density would the structure of the star be hard like a non-porous surface might be? I guess what I'm really wondering is, how much faster can these things spin, and ultimately does the use of the fuel contained within the pulsar eventually contribute to a density loss that would lead to a catastrophic failure of the structure of the pulsar due to centrifugal forces? I imagine that would be spectacular if it did. Kind of like an accretion disk in reverse!
A pulsar is a rotating neutron star. Neutron stars are inert; they have no fuel left to burn and are, therefore, stable. The stars are incredibly dense (although they may have a fluid surface), and have very strong gravitational fields, which hold them together against centripetal breakup. The theoretical maximum speed of rotation for a neutron star (pulsar) is around 1500 rotations per second, although they probably can't get much above 1000 rps in practice because of energy loss by gravitational radiation. Many pulsars are known that rotate hundreds of times per second.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18102
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: APOD: Fermi Epicyles: The Vela Pulsar s Path (2012 May 0

Post by Chris Peterson » Fri May 04, 2012 2:41 pm

neufer wrote:I think the purpose is that Fermi is NEVER looking in precisely the same direction with the same orientation.
I don't know what that means. The diagram shows where the camera is aimed; the rotation angle of the camera about the optical axis isn't indicated. But certainly, every intersection on the diagram is a point where the camera is pointing in precisely the same direction twice. The very high density of intersections in certain areas reveals that the camera field (if not the exact center of the field) has high repeat coverage in those areas- a point made specifically in the image caption.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: APOD: Fermi Epicyles: The Vela Pulsar s Path (2012 May 0

Post by neufer » Fri May 04, 2012 3:33 pm

Chris Peterson wrote:
neufer wrote:
I think the purpose is that Fermi is NEVER looking in precisely the same direction with the same orientation.
I don't know what that means. The diagram shows where the camera is aimed; the rotation angle of the camera about the optical axis isn't indicated.
The diagram shows where the Vela Pulsar is located vis-a-vis as to where the LAT camera is aimed and how the camera is oriented (at least, when the Vela Pulsar is NOT located in the center of the field of view). Given the complexity of the pattern it is unlikely that LAT is EVER looking in precisely looking the same direction with the same orientation.
Art Neuendorffer

Spin Dizzy

Re: APOD: Fermi Epicyles: The Vela Pulsar s Path (2012 May 0

Post by Spin Dizzy » Fri May 04, 2012 3:42 pm

Chris Peterson wrote:
copper5817 wrote:Ok, I have a question for you guys. With the pulsar spinning 11 times a second is the density or the gravitational field of the pulsar what keeps the centrifugal forces from flinging material away? Pulsars are know for having extremely dense structures. With this type of density would the structure of the star be hard like a non-porous surface might be? I guess what I'm really wondering is, how much faster can these things spin, and ultimately does the use of the fuel contained within the pulsar eventually contribute to a density loss that would lead to a catastrophic failure of the structure of the pulsar due to centrifugal forces? I imagine that would be spectacular if it did. Kind of like an accretion disk in reverse!
A pulsar is a rotating neutron star. Neutron stars are inert; they have no fuel left to burn and are, therefore, stable. The stars are incredibly dense (although they may have a fluid surface), and have very strong gravitational fields, which hold them together against centripetal breakup. The theoretical maximum speed of rotation for a neutron star (pulsar) is around 1500 rotations per second, although they probably can't get much above 1000 rps in practice because of energy loss by gravitational radiation. Many pulsars are known that rotate hundreds of times per second.
How is the gamma ray energy generated if the neutron star is no longer burning fuel? Is it like a black hole's Hawking radiation where matter/energy is being sucked in, mangled and blasted out as gamma energy? Or perhaps stored energy from before its collapse that's now bleeding out?

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: APOD: Fermi Epicyles: The Vela Pulsar s Path (2012 May 0

Post by neufer » Fri May 04, 2012 3:44 pm

Chris Peterson wrote:
A pulsar is a rotating neutron star. Neutron stars are inert; they have no fuel left to burn and are, therefore, stable. The stars are incredibly dense (although they may have a fluid surface), and have very strong gravitational fields, which hold them together against centripetal breakup. The theoretical maximum speed of rotation for a neutron star (pulsar) is around 1500 rotations per second, although they probably can't get much above 1000 rps in practice because of energy loss by gravitational radiation. Many pulsars are known that rotate hundreds of times per second.
It should be noted that rapidly rotating neutron stars are also constantly gaining rotational momentum/energy by being fed from the outside; and that they start to get into trouble not so much by overwhelming centrifugal accelerations as by relativistic equatorial velocities.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PSR_J1748-2446ad wrote:
<<PSR J1748-2446ad is the fastest-spinning pulsar known, at 716 Hz. This pulsar was discovered by Jason W. T. Hessels of McGill University on November 10, 2004 and confirmed on January 8, 2005. It has been calculated that the neutron star contains slightly less than two times the mass of the Sun, which is approximately the same for all neutron stars. Its radius is constrained to be less than 16 km. At its equator it is spinning at approximately 24% of the speed of light, or over 70,000 km per second.

The pulsar is located in a globular cluster of stars called Terzan 5, located approximately 18,000 light-years from Earth in the constellation Sagittarius. It is part of a binary system and undergoes regular eclipses with an eclipse fraction of about 40%. Its orbit is highly circular with a 26 hour period. The other object is about 0.14 solar masses, with a radius of 5–6 solar radii. Hessels states that the companion may be a "bloated main-sequence star, possibly still filling its Roche Lobe". Hessels goes on to speculate that gravitational radiation from the pulsar might be detectable by LIGO.>>
Art Neuendorffer

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: APOD: Fermi Epicyles: The Vela Pulsar s Path (2012 May 0

Post by neufer » Fri May 04, 2012 3:55 pm

Spin Dizzy wrote:
How is the gamma ray energy generated if the neutron star is no longer burning fuel? Is it like a black hole's Hawking radiation where matter/energy is being sucked in, mangled and blasted out as gamma energy? Or perhaps stored energy from before its collapse that's now bleeding out?
It is like a black hole's gamma radiation where matter is being sucked in, mangled and blasted out as gamma energy.

However, this has nothing to do a typical black hole's negligible black body Hawking radiation.
Art Neuendorffer

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18102
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: APOD: Fermi Epicyles: The Vela Pulsar s Path (2012 May 0

Post by Chris Peterson » Fri May 04, 2012 3:58 pm

neufer wrote:The diagram shows where the Vela Pulsar is located vis-a-vis as to where the LAT camera is aimed and how the camera is oriented (at least, when the Vela Pulsar is NOT located in the center of the field of view). Given the complexity of the pattern it is unlikely that LAT is EVER looking in precisely looking the same direction with the same orientation.
Ah... I misread things and took this to be where the camera points in the sky. So I'll agree that any particular source (in this case the Vela pulsar) is unlikely to ever be in exactly the same place on the focal plane. I don't think that's remotely the point of the image, however. What it illustrates, if anything, is how much time this object spends on the camera's detector despite the complex path it follows over the sky.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18102
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: APOD: Fermi Epicyles: The Vela Pulsar s Path (2012 May 0

Post by Chris Peterson » Fri May 04, 2012 4:02 pm

Spin Dizzy wrote:How is the gamma ray energy generated if the neutron star is no longer burning fuel? Is it like a black hole's Hawking radiation where matter/energy is being sucked in, mangled and blasted out as gamma energy? Or perhaps stored energy from before its collapse that's now bleeding out?
High energy radiation is produced from the kinetic energy released as external material falls onto the surface of the neutron star (the same thing that allows us to detect black holes; Hawking radiation has never been observed). The neutron star is also hot because of the energy it contained at the time it's progenitor ceased fusing. It is cooling, but only very slowly. We see that thermal energy as light, but it's not hot enough to produce gamma rays.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

Post Reply