APOD: Horsehead: A Wider View (2013 May 03)

Comments and questions about the APOD on the main view screen.
User avatar
APOD Robot
Otto Posterman
Posts: 5368
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 3:27 am
Contact:

APOD: Horsehead: A Wider View (2013 May 03)

Post by APOD Robot » Fri May 03, 2013 4:05 am

Image Horsehead: A Wider View

Explanation: Combined image data from the massive, ground-based VISTA telescope and the Hubble Space Telescope was used to create this wide perspective of the interstellar landscape surrounding the famous Horsehead Nebula. Captured at near-infrared wavelengths, the region's dusty molecular cloud sprawls across the scene that covers an angle about two-thirds the size of the Full Moon on the sky. Left to right the frame spans just over 10 light-years at the Horsehead's estimated distance of 1,600 light-years. Also known as Barnard 33, the still recognizable Horsehead Nebula stands at the upper right, the near-infrared glow of a dusty pillar topped with newborn stars. Below and left, the bright reflection nebula NGC 2023 is itself the illuminated environs of a hot young star. Dense clouds below the base of the Horsehead and on the outskirts of NGC 2023 show the tell-tale far red emission of energetic jets, known as Herbig-Haro objects, also associated with newborn stars.

<< Previous APOD This Day in APOD Next APOD >>
[/b]

User avatar
Beyond
500 Gigaderps
Posts: 6889
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:09 am
Location: BEYONDER LAND

Re: APOD: Horsehead: A Wider View (2013 May 03)

Post by Beyond » Fri May 03, 2013 4:21 am

Here's the wider view I've got. It does look a little pink in seeing more of the horse. Must be the way the light is reflecting in the wider view.
The horse shoes do look a little thick at the bottom of the nebulegs.
1365980983.jpg
To find the Truth, you must go Beyond.

Boomer12k
:---[===] *
Posts: 2691
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 12:07 am

Re: APOD: Horsehead: A Wider View (2013 May 03)

Post by Boomer12k » Fri May 03, 2013 5:48 am

Beyond.....I can even see the Herbig-Haro Objects... :D
LOL....NEBULEGS....

It is awesome to see into this area...Ngc 2023...is not blue here...no offence, Ann...but the webbing structure is fascinating. the "Spiderweb Nebula"??? Looks like allot of shock going on...whereas above it is just murky/cloudy...

Another revealing look into this remarkable area...

:---[---] *

saturno2
Commander
Posts: 758
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:05 pm

Re: APOD: Horsehead: A Wider View (2013 May 03)

Post by saturno2 » Fri May 03, 2013 7:55 am

The cloud in the Horsehead is very dense.
The Herbig-Haro Objects have a bright intense.

User avatar
Ann
4725 Å
Posts: 13417
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am

Re: APOD: Horsehead: A Wider View (2013 May 03)

Post by Ann » Fri May 03, 2013 11:31 am

It's a very fine picture, masterfully processed by the master of processing, Robert Gendler! :D

I like it even if NGC 2023 doesn't look blue here! :wink:

Beyond, uhhh... nebulegs??? :shock:

Ann
Color Commentator

starsurfer
Stellar Cartographer
Posts: 5325
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 7:25 pm

Re: APOD: Horsehead: A Wider View (2013 May 03)

Post by starsurfer » Fri May 03, 2013 12:05 pm

OMG this wider view is the standard conventional field of view of most amateur closeups! It's so cool to see the regular optical colours transformed into infrared weirdness! :D

Rieg Ladru

Re: APOD: Horsehead: A Wider View (2013 May 03)

Post by Rieg Ladru » Fri May 03, 2013 12:43 pm

You miss the link to apod of 2013 April 22 with it's beautiful picture of the Horsehead Nebula :?: :)

FloridaMike
Science Officer
Posts: 413
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2011 2:21 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Re: APOD: Horsehead: A Wider View (2013 May 03)

Post by FloridaMike » Fri May 03, 2013 1:10 pm

Thank you for a wonderfull image.
Certainty is an emotion. So follow your spindle neurons.

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: APOD: Horsehead: A Wider View (2013 May 03)

Post by neufer » Fri May 03, 2013 1:26 pm

Beyond wrote:
Here's the wider view I've got. It does look a little pink in seeing more of the horse.
Must be the way the light is reflecting in the wider view.
The horse shoes do look a little thick at the bottom of the nebulegs.
  • InfraPink? (Ed will want to know her IP address.)
Art Neuendorffer

User avatar
Ron-Astro Pharmacist
Resistored Fizzacist
Posts: 889
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 10:34 pm
AKA: Fred
Location: Idaho USA

Re: APOD: Horsehead: A Wider View (2013 May 03)

Post by Ron-Astro Pharmacist » Fri May 03, 2013 2:58 pm

Now there's a horse for the Derby. I hope it's not too late for "InfraPink" to get her chance at the Roses.
Make Mars not Wars

User avatar
LocalColor
Science Officer
Posts: 266
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 9:11 pm
Location: Central Idaho, USA
Contact:

Re: APOD: Horsehead: A Wider View (2013 May 03)

Post by LocalColor » Fri May 03, 2013 4:24 pm

Another work of art from Robert Gendler. Wow - just wow!

User avatar
MargaritaMc
Look to the Evenstar
Posts: 1836
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 10:14 pm
Location: 28°16'7"N 16°36'20"W

Re: APOD: Horsehead: A Wider View (2013 May 03)

Post by MargaritaMc » Fri May 03, 2013 7:10 pm

I would be most grateful if someone would check my comprehension of this, please, taken from Dr Gendler's information about this image on his website
IR Filters:
J (1.25u) = Blue
H (1.635u) = Green
K (2.12u) = Red
Although I know that this gives information about how infrared wavelengths have been mapped to 'false' visual colours, and that the letters J, H, and K refer to the midpoint of the wave bands (? I'm not sure of the correct term) by their photometric letters, I would like to check that letter 'u' in these references means micrometres (e.g. "J (1.25u)"), the usual abbreviation of which is μm.

Many thanks
Margarita

PS. Robert Gendler's images are ALWAYS so magnificent, that I almost forgot to say so about this lovely, and informative image. And to thank him again for his skill and artistry.
"In those rare moments of total quiet with a dark sky, I again feel the awe that struck me as a child. The feeling is utterly overwhelming as my mind races out across the stars. I feel peaceful and serene."
&mdash; Dr Debra M. Elmegreen, Fellow of the AAAS

User avatar
MargaritaMc
Look to the Evenstar
Posts: 1836
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 10:14 pm
Location: 28°16'7"N 16°36'20"W

Re: APOD: Horsehead: A Wider View (2013 May 03)

Post by MargaritaMc » Fri May 03, 2013 7:33 pm

Today's Apod wrote:
... the tell-tale far red emission of energetic jets, known as Herbig-Haro objects ...
This is indirectly from a link on today's Apod, about Herbig-Haro objects.
Click to play embedded YouTube video.
Uploaded on Aug 31, 2011
In this episode of the Hubblecast, Joe Liske (aka Dr J) looks at newborn stars firing out jets of matter. These jets may cast new light on how the Sun formed 4.5 billion years ago.

An international team of scientists led by astronomer Patrick Hartigan of Rice University in Houston, USA, has collected enough high-resolution Hubble images over a 14-year period to stitch together time-lapse movies of these jets.

Credit:

ESA/Hubble, STScI
Margarita - who found this fascinating.
"In those rare moments of total quiet with a dark sky, I again feel the awe that struck me as a child. The feeling is utterly overwhelming as my mind races out across the stars. I feel peaceful and serene."
&mdash; Dr Debra M. Elmegreen, Fellow of the AAAS

User avatar
emc
Equine Locutionist
Posts: 1307
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 12:15 pm
AKA: Bear
Location: Ed’s World
Contact:

Re: APOD: Horsehead: A Wider View (2013 May 03)

Post by emc » Fri May 03, 2013 9:44 pm

neufer wrote:
Beyond wrote:
Here's the wider view I've got. It does look a little pink in seeing more of the horse.
Must be the way the light is reflecting in the wider view.
The horse shoes do look a little thick at the bottom of the nebulegs.
  • InfraPink? (Ed will want to know her IP address.)
All I can say is to repeat what Mrs. Ed said when she caught me gazing at Beyond’s pink girly horse with the nebulegs… “Astronomy, huh!” I tried explaining how Beyond is isolated in Beyonder Land and isolation can creep up on a fella… I was doin’ ok until she saw Art’s post… THANKS A LOT ART! You pretty well cut off my head… now Mrs. Ed is Furyious… I had to call her friend Flicka to calm her down.
Ed
Casting Art to the Net
Sometimes the best path is a new one.

User avatar
Anthony Barreiro
Turtles all the way down
Posts: 793
Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 7:09 pm
Location: San Francisco, California, Turtle Island

Re: APOD: Horsehead: A Wider View (2013 May 03)

Post by Anthony Barreiro » Fri May 03, 2013 11:54 pm

APOD Robot wrote: Explanation: Combined image data from the massive, ground-based VISTA telescope and the Hubble Space Telescope was used to create this wide perspective of the interstellar landscape surrounding the famous Horsehead Nebula. ...
If the subject of this sentence is the plural noun "data", then the verb should be the plural verb "were", not the singular verb "was".

This tiny grammatical quibble notwithstanding, this is an awesome image!
May all beings be happy, peaceful, and free.

User avatar
bystander
Apathetic Retiree
Posts: 21577
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Re: APOD: Horsehead: A Wider View (2013 May 03)

Post by bystander » Fri May 03, 2013 11:59 pm

[attachment=0]Horsehead_of_a_Different_Color.jpg[/attachment] Here you go ed, a "horsehead of a different color" avatar.
Attachments
Horsehead of a <br />Different Color
Horsehead of a
Different Color
Horsehead_of_a_Different_Color.jpg (4.7 KiB) Viewed 2350 times
Know the quiet place within your heart and touch the rainbow of possibility; be
alive to the gentle breeze of communication, and please stop being such a jerk.
— Garrison Keillor

User avatar
bystander
Apathetic Retiree
Posts: 21577
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Re: APOD: Horsehead: A Wider View (2013 May 03)

Post by bystander » Sat May 04, 2013 12:19 am

Anthony Barreiro wrote: If the subject of this sentence is the plural noun "data", then the verb should be the plural verb "were", not the singular verb "was".
It is a collective noun and a singular verb is appropriate.
Know the quiet place within your heart and touch the rainbow of possibility; be
alive to the gentle breeze of communication, and please stop being such a jerk.
— Garrison Keillor

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: APOD: Horsehead: A Wider View (2013 May 03)

Post by neufer » Sat May 04, 2013 2:00 am

bystander wrote:
Anthony Barreiro wrote:
If the subject of this sentence is the plural noun "data", then the verb should be the plural verb "were", not the singular verb "was".
It is a collective noun and a singular verb is appropriate.
  • <<Many academic and scientific fields, as well as many publishers and newspapers,
    INSIST on the plural count noun use of data, as in "The data are compelling."
    >>
http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/is-data-singular-or-plural.aspx wrote: Is "Data" Singular or Plural?
Episode 139: October 3, 2008
by [guest-writer] Charles Carson, managing editor of the journal American Speech

We've received several requests to address Latin plurals, so today we're going to tackle a tricky one. A listener called with this request:

Hi, Grammar Girl. This is Adam from Peoria. I was wondering if you could go over the usage of the word data, as in The data are correct or The data is correct. Thanks.

The question seems easy enough: is data singular or plural? Unfortunately, the answer is that both usages are standard (1). However, before we can address this fully, we need to review a couple of linguistic concepts.

Mass Nouns Versus Count Nouns

Count nouns are used for objects that can be counted; that is, they're distinct objects that can be numbered. For example, in my refrigerator there are eggs, apples, and lemons. These are all count nouns. Count nouns can be singular or plural, and when you use them as the subject of a sentence, the verb must correctly reflect that number, as in The last apple IS on the bottom shelf or The eggs ARE fresh.

Mass nouns, on the other hand, are used for things that don't have a natural boundary and can't be counted. Also in my fridge are butter, iced tea, and bacon. These are all mass nouns. Mass nouns always take a singular verb, as in The iced tea IS already sweetened and They say bacon IS bad for you, but I love it.*

How Many or How Much?

An easy way to tell these two types of nouns apart is to ask yourself how many or how much. If it makes sense to ask how many there are of a noun, as in how many cars or how many people, then it's a count noun. If, however, it makes more sense to ask how much there is of a noun, as in how much butter or how much rain, then it's a mass noun.†

The use of many and much parallels the use of fewer and less: many and fewer are used with count nouns (like items in a grocery cart) and much and less are used with mass nouns, like tea or bacon.

How Many Data or How Much Data?

Now let's get back to our original question, is data singular or plural? Or, more accurately, is data a mass noun — remember, a mass noun always takes a singular verb — or is data a count noun,‡ the plural of datum.§

As I said, both usages are standard. The count noun datum and its plural data, meaning "a given fact or assumption," were adopted from Latin into English by the 17th century (2); however, it wasn't till the late 19th century that data took on the modern sense of facts and figures. This shift in meaning also led some to start treating data as a mass noun.**

So if data is correct as both a count noun and as a mass noun, which should you use? It comes down to style and personal preference. Many academic and scientific fields, as well as many publishers and newspapers, still insist on the plural count noun use of data, as in The data are compelling, but it is more commonly used as a singular mass noun, as in The data is compelling.

If you write for an organization or discipline that insists on the plural count noun usage, pay attention to other words in the sentence that are sensitive to number. For example, an author might write the following sentence:

Much of this data is useless because of its lack of specifics.

If the publisher allows for the singular mass noun usage, that is an acceptable sentence. If, however, the publisher insists on the plural count noun usage, an author might change the verb is to are, making the sentence read as follows:

Much of this data are useless because of its lack of specifics.

That change, however, makes the sentence ungrammatical. Note that the author wrote MUCH of THIS data. Count nouns answer how many, not how much. It should be changed to MANY of THESE data. The sentence also reads because of ITS lack of specifics; the author here should use the plural pronoun their, because of THEIR lack of specifics. Thus, the correct sentence should be as follows:

Many of these data are useless because of their lack of specifics.

If that sounds odd to you, as it does to me, then you probably use data as a mass noun and would treat data as singular — and there's nothing wrong with that. Just be aware that if you do write or edit for a publisher or in a discipline that insists on plural data, you should make sure the surrounding words properly reflect the plural treatment of the word data. Even if you don't have a style guide insisting on the plural usage but you decide to use it anyway because you like Latin plurals, be sure to do it consistently throughout the document — in other words, don't mix up your datas, using it as a count noun in one place and as a mass noun in another.

A Quick and Dirty Way to Check Your Writing

Here's a quick and dirty tip to check your own use of data. If you wish to use data as a singular mass noun, you should be able to replace it in the sentence with the word information, which is also a mass noun. For example,

Much of this information is useless because of its lack of specifics.

If, however, you want to or need to use data as a plural count noun, you should be able to replace it with the word facts, which is also a plural count noun. For example,

Many of these facts are useless because of their lack of specifics.>>
Art Neuendorffer

User avatar
rstevenson
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Posts: 2705
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 1:24 pm
Location: Halifax, NS, Canada

Re: APOD: Horsehead: A Wider View (2013 May 03)

Post by rstevenson » Sat May 04, 2013 1:24 pm

English are complex languages.

Rob

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18174
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: APOD: Horsehead: A Wider View (2013 May 03)

Post by Chris Peterson » Sat May 04, 2013 1:39 pm

rstevenson wrote:English are complex languages.
Especially as she are spoke.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

User avatar
MargaritaMc
Look to the Evenstar
Posts: 1836
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 10:14 pm
Location: 28°16'7"N 16°36'20"W

Re: APOD: Horsehead: A Wider View (2013 May 03)

Post by MargaritaMc » Sat May 04, 2013 1:40 pm

rstevenson wrote:English are complex languages.

Rob
:lol2:
George Bernard Shaw
It is impossible for an Englishman to open his mouth without making some other Englishman hate or despise him. German and Spanish are accessible to foreigners: English is not accessible even to Englishmen.
But - I did find the debate interesting... Pedant that I am. :D
Margarita
"In those rare moments of total quiet with a dark sky, I again feel the awe that struck me as a child. The feeling is utterly overwhelming as my mind races out across the stars. I feel peaceful and serene."
&mdash; Dr Debra M. Elmegreen, Fellow of the AAAS

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18174
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: APOD: Horsehead: A Wider View (2013 May 03)

Post by Chris Peterson » Sat May 04, 2013 1:52 pm

MargaritaMc wrote:But - I did find the debate interesting... Pedant that I am. :D
An excellent rule that should be followed by anybody considering correcting somebody's English usage: check that what you believe to be the correct grammar or spelling really are, or that they really are the only acceptable options. Then, check again. English is incredibly fluid, incredibly versatile, and what is "right" is determined purely by common usage.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

User avatar
geckzilla
Ocular Digitator
Posts: 9180
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: Modesto, CA
Contact:

Re: APOD: Horsehead: A Wider View (2013 May 03)

Post by geckzilla » Sat May 04, 2013 1:56 pm

This is the only forum I visit where English usage is a common topic beyond simple your/you're corrections. There are entire APOD threads which have been almost entirely compromised due to some detailed analysis of what is grammatically correct.
Just call me "geck" because "zilla" is like a last name.

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18174
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: APOD: Horsehead: A Wider View (2013 May 03)

Post by Chris Peterson » Sat May 04, 2013 2:09 pm

geckzilla wrote:This is the only forum I visit where English usage is a common topic beyond simple your/you're corrections. There are entire APOD threads which have been almost entirely compromised due to some detailed analysis of what is grammatically correct.
I wouldn't say "compromised". Many of those discussions have been very good. This is a forum populated by well educated, smart people, many with an interest in language. It is also quite international, with some excellent speakers of English as a secondary language. The occasional linguistic diversion strikes me as quite reasonable.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

User avatar
MargaritaMc
Look to the Evenstar
Posts: 1836
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 10:14 pm
Location: 28°16'7"N 16°36'20"W

Re: APOD: Horsehead: A Wider View (2013 May 03)

Post by MargaritaMc » Sat May 04, 2013 2:10 pm

geckzilla wrote:This is the only forum I visit where English usage is a common topic beyond simple your/you're corrections. There are entire APOD threads which have been almost entirely compromised due to some detailed analysis of what is grammatically correct.
Could we therefore usefully have a separate Grammar thread, into which such posts could go? Or be moved by administrators?

PS. Edit after reading Chris's post. I do agree that the discussions are useful - and perhaps, gathered together, could form a useful resource for speakers of English both as a first and as a second language.
"In those rare moments of total quiet with a dark sky, I again feel the awe that struck me as a child. The feeling is utterly overwhelming as my mind races out across the stars. I feel peaceful and serene."
&mdash; Dr Debra M. Elmegreen, Fellow of the AAAS

Post Reply