APOD: M72: A Globular Cluster of Stars (2012 Aug 19)

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :ssmile: :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol2: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: APOD: M72: A Globular Cluster of Stars (2012 Aug 19)

Re: APOD: M72: A Globular Cluster of Stars (2012 Aug 19)

by eltodesukane » Mon Aug 20, 2012 11:12 pm

some galaxies (bottom left corner):
Image

Re: APOD: M72: A Globular Cluster of Stars (2012 Aug 19)

by Chris Peterson » Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:27 pm

Starswarm Magellan wrote:Since globular clusters contain the oldest stars, wouldn't they be the most apt to nurture life on any orbiting bodies? I suppose they are too distant to investigate for "planet wobble" and such. One imagines inhabitants by now having very large, pulsing veined heads and wearing identical clothing as advanced races do. Then again, the current Mars mission could prove that any rocky planet's ability to support life is naturally finite. BTW, congrats, NASA. America is proud of you. I'd personally get elected just to award you all medals except I can't stand kissing babies.
Besides what Rob pointed out, there is also the fact that the dense nature of globular clusters, along with the rather chaotic orbits experienced by member stars, makes it unlikely that any planetary systems will survive more than a few hundred million years- or at the least, the positions of planets around their stars will be jostled every few tens of millions of years. That's probably not a situation very conducive to supporting life- at least, not advanced life.

Re: APOD: M72: A Globular Cluster of Stars (2012 Aug 19)

by rstevenson » Mon Aug 20, 2012 7:34 pm

Starswarm Magellan wrote:Since globular clusters contain the oldest stars, wouldn't they be the most apt to nurture life on any orbiting bodies? I suppose they are too distant to investigate for "planet wobble" and such. ...
Stars that are that old (and any planets that may have formed with them) are primarily composed of hydrogen and helium, and have few of the heavier elements in them that we have in our star and its system of planets. Since many of those heavier elements are necessary for life (as we know it) -- elements such as carbon, iron and oxygen, to pick just a few obvious examples -- we assume there could be no life (as we know it) in such systems. Whether any other kind of life could evolve, we don't know, but it seems unlikely.

Rob

Re: APOD: M72: A Globular Cluster of Stars (2012 Aug 19)

by Starswarm Magellan » Mon Aug 20, 2012 7:17 pm

Since globular clusters contain the oldest stars, wouldn't they be the most apt to nurture life on any orbiting bodies? I suppose they are too distant to investigate for "planet wobble" and such. One imagines inhabitants by now having very large, pulsing veined heads and wearing identical clothing as advanced races do. Then again, the current Mars mission could prove that any rocky planet's ability to support life is naturally finite. BTW, congrats, NASA. America is proud of you. I'd personally get elected just to award you all medals except I can't stand kissing babies.

Re: APOD: M72: A Globular Cluster of Stars (2012 Aug 19)

by Ann » Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:05 am

ThePiper wrote:
ThePiper wrote:Missing / Wanted: Supernovae and Remnants in Star Clusters.
There are a lot of old Red Giants. Will they never die? :?:
Ann wrote: Supernova remnants are not missing in globular clusters...
Thank you Ann, for the good description. My question was influenced by the sharp HST-pictures of various star clusters.
Like balls of glittering diamonds in a black environment, clean, clear, no dust, no colorfull Gas clouds, no chaotic nebulas - clean and transparent.

It seems that the swinging through the galacitc center or disk works like a carwash... :mrgreen:
Indeed, a passage through the galacitc disk - not to mention several passages through the galacitc disk - certainly works like a carwash!

As a matter of fact, nebulae are brief phenomena. Many young clusters contain no nebulae at all - they have completely lost their "natal clouds". An example of such a "naked young cluster" is NGC 2362. Gaseous supernova remnants, too, can be expected to evaporate quickly in cosmic terms - in less than a million years.

Ann

Re: APOD: M72: A Globular Cluster of Stars (2012 Aug 19)

by ThePiper » Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:49 am

ThePiper wrote:Missing / Wanted: Supernovae and Remnants in Star Clusters.
There are a lot of old Red Giants. Will they never die? :?:
Ann wrote: Supernova remnants are not missing in globular clusters...
Thank you Ann, for the good description. My question was influenced by the sharp HST-pictures of various star clusters.
Like balls of glittering diamonds in a black environment, clean, clear, no dust, no colorfull Gas clouds, no chaotic nebulas - clean and transparent.

It seems that the swinging through the galacitc center or disk works like a carwash... :mrgreen:

Re: APOD: M72: A Globular Cluster of Stars (2012 Aug 19)

by bystander » Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:14 am

Beyond wrote:Sort of like being on it's 'last' gasps, then?
See Stellar evolution: Maturity of a star

Re: APOD: M72: A Globular Cluster of Stars (2012 Aug 19)

by Beyond » Mon Aug 20, 2012 4:20 am

Ann wrote:This is how I understand it (but I may very well be wrong, mind you).

Even though the star runs out of hydrogen in its core, and helium in its core, it still contains hydrogen and helium in shells around the core. So the stars fuse hydrogen or helium (not both at the same time, I think) in those shells. The fusion process takes place closer to the surface of the star, making it swell. It could be, too, although I'm not sure, that more of the mass of the star is being used for fusion when the fusion process "has moved outwards" in the star than when it was confined to the core.

Stars also swell and get very bright just when their cores "go dead", or stop fusing. Then the cores shrink, a lot of energy is released, and the stars swell and get brighter.

Ann
Sort of like being on it's 'last' gasps, then?

Re: APOD: M72: A Globular Cluster of Stars (2012 Aug 19)

by Ann » Mon Aug 20, 2012 4:02 am

This is how I understand it (but I may very well be wrong, mind you).

Even though the star runs out of hydrogen in its core, and helium in its core, it still contains hydrogen and helium in shells around the core. So the stars fuse hydrogen or helium (not both at the same time, I think) in those shells. The fusion process takes place closer to the surface of the star, making it swell. It could be, too, although I'm not sure, that more of the mass of the star is being used for fusion when the fusion process "has moved outwards" in the star than when it was confined to the core.

Stars also swell and get very bright just when their cores "go dead", or stop fusing. Then the cores shrink, a lot of energy is released, and the stars swell and get brighter.

Ann

Re: APOD: M72: A Globular Cluster of Stars (2012 Aug 19)

by Beyond » Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:52 am

Say Ann, if the sun runs out of hydrogen and becomes a red giant, then also runs out of helium and gets brighter, just how the heck can it keep getting brighter when it keeps running out of things to burn?? What's left after the hydrogen and helium goes, that it could burn at all, never mind get brighter??

Re: APOD: M72: A Globular Cluster of Stars (2012 Aug 19)

by Ann » Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:29 am

ThePiper wrote:Missing / Wanted: Supernovae and Remnants in Star Clusters.
There are a lot of old Red Giants. Will they never die? :?:
Supernova remnants are not missing in globular clusters.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/47_Tucanae wrote:

47 Tuc's dense core contains a number of exotic stars of scientific interest.

...

47 Tuc has 23 known millisecond pulsars, the second largest population of pulsars in any globular cluster.
A pulsar is almost certainly a supernova remnant. If there are 23 millisecond pulsars in globular cluster 47 Tuc, then this globular may well have seen at least 23 supernovae in the past.

However, the red giants that exist today in the globular clusters of the Milky Way are not going to explode as supernovae. The reason is that they are not even remotely massive enough to explode. Most of the brightest red giants in today's Milky Way clusters are probably not that much more massive than the Sun. The Sun, too, will become a bright red giant when it runs out of hydrogen in its core, and it will be even brighter when it runs out of helium in its core. But the Sun will never go supernova.

Of course there were massive stars in globular clusters in the past. The massive stars were there long long ago, when the globular clusters were young, and the universe was young. But the massive stars exploded as supernovae long ago, leaving, for example, 23 millisecond pulsars behind in 47 Tucanae.

The bright red giants in the globular clusters of today are actually dying and disappearing "all the time", although the process still takes too long for us to have "caught one in the act". But as a matter of fact, the brightest red giants in globular clusters are on their way out. Very soon, in cosmic terms, they will shed their outer envelopes and become white dwarfs. And as white dwarfs they may actually still go supernova, provided they have just the right sort of companion to interact with. But since the last white dwarf supernova actually witnessed in the Milky Way was seen in the sixteenth (or possibly seventeenth) century, don't hold your breath waiting for one to explode in a globular cluster.

As red giants die in globular clusters, others take their place. Not only are red giants dying all the time in globular clusters, but low-mass stars are leaving the main sequence to become red giants and other stars are leaving the blue horizontal branch to become (red) asymtotic giant branch stars.

Ann

Re: APOD: M72: A Globular Cluster of Stars (2012 Aug 19)

by Chris Peterson » Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:03 am

Moonlady wrote:Do you see where the sun's shadow is? Is the telescope positioned toward the sun?
Looks like it's pretty close to noon... so the dog is safe enough.

Re: APOD: M72: A Globular Cluster of Stars (2012 Aug 19)

by Moonlady » Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:21 pm

orin stepanek wrote:I have to get Sassy to use a telescope! :D She's kind of snoopy anyhow! :lol2:

Do you see where the sun's shadow is? Is the telescope positioned toward the sun? :shock: :?

Re: APOD: M72: A Globular Cluster of Stars (2012 Aug 19)

by Moonlady » Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:17 pm

Chris Peterson wrote:
neufer wrote:
Chris Peterson wrote:
About the smallest and lowest power telescope that anybody uses to look at stars is a pair of binoculars, and even at the lowest power the field of view is not wide enough to see entire constellations.
Some birder binoculars have a field of view exceeding 8º which is sufficient to view Crux.
Yes. Delphinus is another constellation that fits in a binocular field. (Technically, Delphinus is too large for a binocular field, but the asterism we associate with the constellation is not... something that is true for a handful of cases.) But I think my point stands, that constellations are not telescopic objects.

well, if a very simple binocular is used reversed, holding it on the eyes with the wide part to the night sky, a whole constellation could be theoretical seen, but it would make it
hard to a human eye to see a constellation...physically correct? But totally useless :lol2:

Re: APOD: M72: A Globular Cluster of Stars (2012 Aug 19)

by orin stepanek » Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:14 pm

I have to get Sassy to use a telescope! :D She's kind of snoopy anyhow! :lol2:

Re: APOD: M72: A Globular Cluster of Stars (2012 Aug 19)

by ThePiper » Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:09 pm

Missing / Wanted: Supernovae and Remnants in Star Clusters.
There are a lot of old Red Giants. Will they never die? :?:

Re: APOD: M72: A Globular Cluster of Stars (2012 Aug 19)

by neufer » Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:32 pm

Beyond wrote:
It's not what is being looked at that i was referring to. It's who/what that's doing the looking.

Did you actually click on the small telescope link :?: :?:
That dog's been well trained :!:

Re: APOD: M72: A Globular Cluster of Stars (2012 Aug 19)

by Beyond » Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:44 pm

Boomer12k wrote:
Beyond wrote:I should think that the viewer looking through the 'small' telescope, would be looking at a 'certain' constellation, instead of a globular cluster. :mrgreen:

Well....Constellations are hard to fit into the view of a small telescope...you really need a regular camera, that can take good pictures at night. As for "small" it is a relative term. My old Jason 60mm refractor could have done the job of seeing it, but not resolve it....but my 10" Meade, definitely can do the job...and it is a "small" telescope. My Jason would not be wide enough to see the whole constellation though. But my wide angel eye piece on my Meade gets a good swath of sky....

:---[===] *
It's not what is being looked at that i was referring to. It's who/what that's doing the looking. Did you actually click on the small telescope link :?: :?:

Re: APOD: M72: A Globular Cluster of Stars (2012 Aug 19)

by Chris Peterson » Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:42 pm

Ann wrote:One star is a standout, however. It is found around 6 o'clock (or 5.45-ish). This star is extremely red. It looks stellar to me, so I assume it's a member of M72. Does anyone have any idea why this star would be so incredibly infrared? Chris?
No idea, but there are lots of stars that are bright in the IR- maybe because they are very cool, because they are surrounded with a dusty shell, or because of stimulated IR emission (OH/IR stars).

Re: APOD: M72: A Globular Cluster of Stars (2012 Aug 19)

by Chris Peterson » Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:35 pm

zbvhs wrote:The mystery to me is what sustains them. According to n-body simulations I've read about, they should either collapse into, perhaps, a black hole or simply evaporate with individual stars flying off every which way. So, why do we see some that are apparently extremely old? Are these stable structures with stars in complex stable orbits or is something else keeping them alive?
N-body simulations show them surviving just fine. Why would they collapse? There's certainly no mechanism that could cause that. The stars are in orbit around the center of mass of the cluster. Because of the density of the cluster, those orbits are somewhat perturbed, but it is rare for enough angular momentum to be transferred that an individual star ends up in a hyperbolic orbit (that is, reaches escape velocity with respect to the cluster). But it does happen, and over a long time- tens of billions of years- globular clusters do evaporate away. Like all naturally occurring orbital systems, they are only semi-stable.

Re: APOD: M72: A Globular Cluster of Stars (2012 Aug 19)

by zbvhs » Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:28 pm

The mystery to me is what sustains them. According to n-body simulations I've read about, they should either collapse into, perhaps, a black hole or simply evaporate with individual stars flying off every which way. So, why do we see some that are apparently extremely old? Are these stable structures with stars in complex stable orbits or is something else keeping them alive?

Re: APOD: M72: A Globular Cluster of Stars (2012 Aug 19)

by Ann » Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:20 pm

Boomer12k wrote:
Ann wrote:Nice to see your globular cluster pictures here, Boomer12k!

Ann

Thanks, Ann....Do you see any Blue Stragglers in today's APOD???? :wink:

:---[===] *
You know about blue stragglers! That's good! :D

Can't say that I spotted any. It's hard to extract that kind of color information from a color picture made from exposures through only two filters, one clear and one infrared one.

One star is a standout, however. It is found around 6 o'clock (or 5.45-ish). This star is extremely red. It looks stellar to me, so I assume it's a member of M72. Does anyone have any idea why this star would be so incredibly infrared? Chris?

Ann

Re: APOD: M72: A Globular Cluster of Stars (2012 Aug 19)

by Chris Peterson » Sun Aug 19, 2012 4:52 pm

jonpugh wrote:The thing that I've always wondered about globular clusters is how they relate to and interact with the spiral arms of the galaxy. It seems that the mechanism which creates the arms should also perturb the clusters, smearing them out over time. Perhaps it's just my lack of appreciation for the intrinsic low density of a galaxy that makes it seem odd that they continue to survive rotation after rotation.
They are far enough outside the disc, and small enough relative to their distance from the galaxy, that tidal forces are small compared with the internal gravitation holding them together. So they are relatively stable, with their evaporation resulting from internal transfers of angular momentum, not external.
It also seems obvious, but aren't all identified clusters in our own galaxy? There's no way we can identify them in any other galaxies, right?
There are probably a few around our own galaxy that haven't been identified; we can't see very well through the dense, dusty core. And the vast majority of globular clusters we know of- tens of thousands or more- are around other galaxies (nearly 500 around Andromeda alone).

Re: APOD: M72: A Globular Cluster of Stars (2012 Aug 19)

by jonpugh » Sun Aug 19, 2012 4:45 pm

The thing that I've always wondered about globular clusters is how they relate to and interact with the spiral arms of the galaxy. It seems that the mechanism which creates the arms should also perturb the clusters, smearing them out over time. Perhaps it's just my lack of appreciation for the intrinsic low density of a galaxy that makes it seem odd that they continue to survive rotation after rotation.

It also seems obvious, but aren't all identified clusters in our own galaxy? There's no way we can identify them in any other galaxies, right?

Re: APOD: M72: A Globular Cluster of Stars (2012 Aug 19)

by Boomer12k » Sun Aug 19, 2012 4:44 pm

Ann wrote:Nice to see your globular cluster pictures here, Boomer12k!

Ann

Thanks, Ann....Do you see any Blue Stragglers in today's APOD???? :wink:

:---[===] *

Top