APOD: Gibbous Europa (2013 Dec 15)

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :ssmile: :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol2: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: APOD: Gibbous Europa (2013 Dec 15)

Re: APOD: Gibbous Europa (2013 Dec 15)

by owlice » Mon Dec 16, 2013 1:47 pm

TheGuybrarian wrote:I was a little disappointed to see the same photo of Europa re-used on the APOD blog. It was previously featured on January 30, 2011.
Q4: Have some APOD pictures been run more than once?
A4: Yes. Many of our readers have been with us less than a year and are unaware of some really spectacular or important astronomy pictures. New information about old pictures is becoming available over the WWW. The text and links for rerun pictures will make use of this newly available information. So although the picture might be old, some of the text and links of each APOD will be new. Also, more web surfers have larger bandwidth connections, which allows us to post higher-resolution image files that can be transferred conveniently. Software to handle more sophisticated image file formats has also become more common, so the picture's size and/or format might be new. Lastly, rerunning APODs saves us time and helps us update our archive. In general, our rerun policy currently is to only rerun APODs more than one year old to keep the pictures relatively "new" to new APOD viewers. We will almost never rerun more than two pictures in any given week. So when you load the current APOD,it is still, most probably, a new picture.
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap_faq.html

Re: APOD: Gibbous Europa (2013 Dec 15)

by TheGuybrarian » Mon Dec 16, 2013 1:39 pm

I was a little disappointed to see the same photo of Europa re-used on the APOD blog. It was previously featured on January 30, 2011.

Re: APOD: Gibbous Europa (2013 Dec 15)

by BDanielMayfield » Sun Dec 15, 2013 11:23 pm

eltodesukane wrote:
Ann wrote:Europa just becomes more and more interesting. I hope we can find a way to explore it.

Ann
JUICE is planning to go there, but not before 2031, (JUICE = JUpiter ICy moons Explorer)

JUICE is the first large-class mission in ESA's Cosmic Vision 2015-2025 programme. Planned for launch in 2022 and arrival at Jupiter in 2030, it will spend at least three years making detailed observations of the giant gaseous planet Jupiter and three of its largest moons, Ganymede, Callisto and Europa.

http://sci.esa.int/juice/
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/opag/mar2012/pr ... ummary.pdf
From the JUICE mission website:
During the tour, gravity assists with Callisto and Ganymede will shape the trajectory. Two targeted Europa flybys are included focusing on composition of the non water-ice material, and the first subsurface sounding of an icy moon. Additional, Callisto gravity assists will be also used to raise the orbit inclination to almost 30° and to enable observations of the Jupiter polar regions. The frequent Callisto flybys will enable unique remote observations of the moon and in situ measurements in its vicinity. The mission will culminate in a dedicated eight months orbital tour around Ganymede during which the spacecraft will perform detailed investigation of the moon and its environment and will eventually impact on Ganymede.
There’s so much to investigate in the Jovian system that this mission is a great step, but with only two Europa flybys and no sample return this mission will leave many open questions re today’s lunar attraction.

Bruce

Re: APOD: Gibbous Europa (2013 Dec 15)

by Boomer12k » Sun Dec 15, 2013 10:59 pm

Baci wrote:Are there any thoughts in relation to the square structure below centre in the middle of the picture?

Central Processing Station for OBAMACARE in the Jovian System.... :lol2:

Actually, I think it is an "intersection" or someplace where ice has "bunched up"...an Ice Mound, if you will...

:---[===] *

Re: APOD: Gibbous Europa (2013 Dec 15)

by Boomer12k » Sun Dec 15, 2013 10:55 pm

At 1,900 miles in diameter, it would make an AWESOME COMET....if free to roam the Solar system, like a comet....
Or at least, I imagine it would....

:---[===] *

Re: APOD: Gibbous Europa (2013 Dec 15)

by Boomer12k » Sun Dec 15, 2013 10:49 pm

Somebody been "cutting cookies" in the ice.....

:---[===] *

Re: APOD: Gibbous Europa (2013 Dec 15)

by eltodesukane » Sun Dec 15, 2013 8:16 pm

Ann wrote:Europa just becomes more and more interesting. I hope we can find a way to explore it.

Ann
JUICE is planning to go there, but not before 2031, (JUICE = JUpiter ICy moons Explorer)

JUICE is the first large-class mission in ESA's Cosmic Vision 2015-2025 programme. Planned for launch in 2022 and arrival at Jupiter in 2030, it will spend at least three years making detailed observations of the giant gaseous planet Jupiter and three of its largest moons, Ganymede, Callisto and Europa.

http://sci.esa.int/juice/
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/opag/mar2012/pr ... ummary.pdf

Re: APOD: Gibbous Europa (2013 Dec 15)

by stephen63 » Sun Dec 15, 2013 5:18 pm

Chris Peterson wrote: I don't know if I'd go so far as to say that's the best explanation, just that it's a good one.

Don't think I'm arguing against a subsurface sea on Europa. In fact, I think the best evidence supports that conclusion. I'm simply pointing out that there remains a good deal of uncertainty in the matter, and as good skeptics we shouldn't get too enamored of our beliefs.
I usually read a few abstracts before I become too enamored!
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001AGUFM.U12B..06P
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007AGUFM.P51E..03K
However, as is often the case, I usually come away with more questions than answers!

Re: APOD: Gibbous Europa (2013 Dec 15)

by BDanielMayfield » Sun Dec 15, 2013 5:11 pm

geckzilla wrote:Or, perhaps, the most wishful explanation...
Percivel Lowell would be proud.

Re: APOD: Gibbous Europa (2013 Dec 15)

by Chris Peterson » Sun Dec 15, 2013 5:01 pm

stephen63 wrote:
Chris Peterson wrote:
stephen63 wrote:From what I can tell, it's believed that the liquid ocean on Europa is 100km deep, which would probably make it global. If there were life there, then it would necessarily be expelled through a geyser, wouldn't it? It would be a lot easier to look there than going through all that ice.
Very likely. But the important point is that while there is good reason to believe there is a liquid ocean beneath the ice, it remains far from certain. The possibility that the ice extends to the underlying rock remains.
True, but the best explanation for the lineae being global would be water, or at least warm ice filling the cracks of surface ice that has shifted.
I don't know if I'd go so far as to say that's the best explanation, just that it's a good one.

Don't think I'm arguing against a subsurface sea on Europa. In fact, I think the best evidence supports that conclusion. I'm simply pointing out that there remains a good deal of uncertainty in the matter, and as good skeptics we shouldn't get too enamored of our beliefs.

Re: APOD: Gibbous Europa (2013 Dec 15)

by geckzilla » Sun Dec 15, 2013 4:37 pm

Or, perhaps, the most wishful explanation...

Re: APOD: Gibbous Europa (2013 Dec 15)

by stephen63 » Sun Dec 15, 2013 4:31 pm

Chris Peterson wrote:
stephen63 wrote:From what I can tell, it's believed that the liquid ocean on Europa is 100km deep, which would probably make it global. If there were life there, then it would necessarily be expelled through a geyser, wouldn't it? It would be a lot easier to look there than going through all that ice.
Very likely. But the important point is that while there is good reason to believe there is a liquid ocean beneath the ice, it remains far from certain. The possibility that the ice extends to the underlying rock remains.
True, but the best explanation for the lineae being global would be water, or at least warm ice filling the cracks of surface ice that has shifted.

Re: APOD: Gibbous Europa (2013 Dec 15)

by BDanielMayfield » Sun Dec 15, 2013 4:25 pm

stephen63 wrote:If there were life there, then it would necessarily be expelled through a geyser, wouldn't it?
Microscopic, single celled “life as we know it” should be. But even if whole cells aren’t ejected then chemical byproducts of life would almost certainly be. And they’d be fresh, rapidly freeze dried samples too. :)

Re: APOD: Gibbous Europa (2013 Dec 15)

by Chris Peterson » Sun Dec 15, 2013 4:10 pm

stephen63 wrote:From what I can tell, it's believed that the liquid ocean on Europa is 100km deep, which would probably make it global. If there were life there, then it would necessarily be expelled through a geyser, wouldn't it? It would be a lot easier to look there than going through all that ice.
Very likely. But the important point is that while there is good reason to believe there is a liquid ocean beneath the ice, it remains far from certain. The possibility that the ice extends to the underlying rock remains.

Re: APOD: Gibbous Europa (2013 Dec 15)

by BDanielMayfield » Sun Dec 15, 2013 4:03 pm

Art has some interesting info on this here: http://asterisk.apod.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=32580

Re: APOD: Gibbous Europa (2013 Dec 15)

by stephen63 » Sun Dec 15, 2013 3:58 pm

BDanielMayfield wrote: Thanks. I didn't realize the water or ice layer was so thin. I have to repete what Ann said then, 'Europa keeps getting more and more interesting.'

Yes. But all the fractured terrane on the surface shows that at least in the past chunks of crust were rearranged enormously, like ice flows on the Artic Ocean. So to me it looks like a global ocean must have existed on Europa at some point.

Bruce
From what I can tell, it's believed that the liquid ocean on Europa is 100km deep, which would probably make it global. If there were life there, then it would necessarily be expelled through a geyser, wouldn't it? It would be a lot easier to look there than going through all that ice.

Re: APOD: Gibbous Europa (2013 Dec 15)

by BDanielMayfield » Sun Dec 15, 2013 3:20 pm

Chris Peterson wrote:
BDanielMayfield wrote:Is there still uncertainty about the current presence of a liquid ocean under the icy crust of Europa? Wouldn’t at least some of its interior have to be liquid due to continuous heating from tidal forces?
Europa isn't a water planet- it's made of rock with a differentiated iron core. The water is just a film on the surface- perhaps 100 km thick. How much of that is ice and how much is liquid (if any) isn't known. Yes, there's good reason to believe that tidal heating, radioactive decay, and other internal heat sources might be sufficient to create a liquid water ocean under the ice. But it's not certain, and much depends on assumptions about the internal structure of the Moon that haven't been well tested.
Thanks. I didn't realize the water or ice layer was so thin. I have to repete what Ann said then, 'Europa keeps getting more and more interesting.'
If liquids at times find there way to the surface then there must be liquids inside this moon, at least locally if not globally.
That distinction between local and global is critical, though, isn't it?
Yes. But all the fractured terrane on the surface shows that at least in the past chunks of crust were rearranged enormously, like ice flows on the Artic Ocean. So to me it looks like a global ocean must have existed on Europa at some point.

Bruce

Re: APOD: Gibbous Europa (2013 Dec 15)

by Chris Peterson » Sun Dec 15, 2013 2:58 pm

BDanielMayfield wrote:Is there still uncertainty about the current presence of a liquid ocean under the icy crust of Europa? Wouldn’t at least some of its interior have to be liquid due to continuous heating from tidal forces?
Europa isn't a water planet- it's made of rock with a differentiated iron core. The water is just a film on the surface- perhaps 100 km thick. How much of that is ice and how much is liquid (if any) isn't known. Yes, there's good reason to believe that tidal heating, radioactive decay, and other internal heat sources might be sufficient to create a liquid water ocean under the ice. But it's not certain, and much depends on assumptions about the internal structure of the Moon that haven't been well tested.
Sky and Telescope’s site reported on Friday a finding of geyser or plume activity on Europa. If liquids at times find there way to the surface then there must be liquids inside this moon, at least locally if not globally.
That distinction between local and global is critical, though, isn't it?

Re: APOD: Gibbous Europa (2013 Dec 15)

by BDanielMayfield » Sun Dec 15, 2013 2:57 pm

Chris Peterson wrote:
Ann wrote:Europa just becomes more and more interesting. I hope we can find a way to explore it.
That's a proposal with interesting scientific and ethical considerations. Europa is such a strong candidate for life- possibly the strongest in the Solar System- that we need to be extra careful not to contaminate it with our probes. But it's unclear how to avoid that. Despite our best efforts, evidence suggests every probe we've launched has carried Earth microbes (including Martian probes that we actually tried to sterilize). Apparently, ensuring an entire lander is germ-free is a very difficult task- something that would need to be figured out, I think, before we land on Europa.
It could very well be possible to get material from beneath Europa's crust without even needing to land :!:

The plumes reportedly reached altitudes of 125 miles above the moon's surface, so an orbiter in a polar orbit could collect material ejected from the interior.

Bruce

Re: APOD: Gibbous Europa (2013 Dec 15)

by geckzilla » Sun Dec 15, 2013 2:51 pm

A_Z wrote:Why we don't see latest and greatest images of those same objects using Hubble ?
Latest and greatest images of Europa's plumes are available in this thread: http://asterisk.apod.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=32580
Also check out the paper which was linked to because there are more images in there.

Those are pretty low resolution images but even if Hubble switches over to its highest resolution camera, the images are not even close to being as detailed as images taken from a nearby probe's camera. Here is an example of the best Hubble can do. It's a picture of Ganymede (Europa is comparable but slightly smaller) about to disappear behind the limb of Jupiter. I grabbed this data straight from the archive. It was taken using Hubble's ACS/HRC (Advanced Camera for Surveys / High Resolution Channel) which displays Ganymede at just under 60 pixels wide. That's great, but it's not necessarily very impressive to a lay person who is used to giant close-ups, either. Oh, and the black bar on the left is the occulting finger.
HST_10192_02_ACS_HRC_F435W_02_sci.jpg
Edit: I should have also mentioned that the HRC is currently disabled.

Re: APOD: Gibbous Europa (2013 Dec 15)

by BDanielMayfield » Sun Dec 15, 2013 2:44 pm

APOD Robot wrote:[/ Explanation: Evidence and images from the Galileo spacecraft, indicated that liquid oceans might exist below the icy surface.
Is there still uncertainty about the current presence of a liquid ocean under the icy crust of Europa? Wouldn’t at least some of its interior have to be liquid due to continuous heating from tidal forces?

Sky and Telescope’s site reported on Friday a finding of geyser or plume activity on Europa. If liquids at times find there way to the surface then there must be liquids inside this moon, at least locally if not globally.

Bruce

Re: APOD: Gibbous Europa (2013 Dec 15)

by Chris Peterson » Sun Dec 15, 2013 2:21 pm

Ann wrote:Europa just becomes more and more interesting. I hope we can find a way to explore it.
That's a proposal with interesting scientific and ethical considerations. Europa is such a strong candidate for life- possibly the strongest in the Solar System- that we need to be extra careful not to contaminate it with our probes. But it's unclear how to avoid that. Despite our best efforts, evidence suggests every probe we've launched has carried Earth microbes (including Martian probes that we actually tried to sterilize). Apparently, ensuring an entire lander is germ-free is a very difficult task- something that would need to be figured out, I think, before we land on Europa.

Re: APOD: Gibbous Europa (2013 Dec 15)

by Europagazer » Sun Dec 15, 2013 1:08 pm

dasher251 wrote:Europa is a gorgeous planet. I noticed a faint line like a gorge that extended right across planets surface (right to left ,It's easy to notice if you imagine drawing a line around the top half of an egg Was wondering if any one else noticed it ?
Thank you, thank you, very much indeed. Europa looks just like the back of my head when I step out of the shower, so I appreciate the compliment. 8-)

Re: APOD: Gibbous Europa (2013 Dec 15)

by dasher251 » Sun Dec 15, 2013 1:02 pm

Europa is a gorgeous planet. I noticed a faint line like a gorge that extended right across planets surface (right to left ,It's easy to notice if you imagine drawing a line around the top half of an egg Was wondering if any one else noticed it ?

Re: APOD: Gibbous Europa (2013 Dec 15)

by rstevenson » Sun Dec 15, 2013 12:43 pm

Baci wrote:Are there any thoughts in relation to the square structure below centre in the middle of the picture?
Pareidolia. Either that or it's a parking lot. Given the scale of the picture, I can't quite tell.

Rob

Top