APOD: Apollo 17 VIP Site Anaglyph (2014 Mar 15)

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :ssmile: :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol2: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: APOD: Apollo 17 VIP Site Anaglyph (2014 Mar 15)

Re: APOD: Apollo 17 VIP Site Anaglyph (2014 Mar 15)

by Nitpicker » Tue Mar 18, 2014 5:24 am

I'm not judging anyone, just describing the view from down here.

Huh, I just learnt that America got its name from the European "discoverer" of South America (or at least, the European who was first supposed to have demonstrated it wasn't Asia):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amerigo_Vespucci

What a funny planet we live on. Maybe we should be downgraded by the IAU.

Re: APOD: Apollo 17 VIP Site Anaglyph (2014 Mar 15)

by geckzilla » Tue Mar 18, 2014 5:09 am

Nitpicker wrote:A bit like how Canadians, Mexicans, Brazilians, etc, are not considered to be Americans.
Hey, we can't help it that United States citizen is such an awkward and long descriptor so that we have to monopolize the "American" adjective.

Re: APOD: Apollo 17 VIP Site Anaglyph (2014 Mar 15)

by Nitpicker » Tue Mar 18, 2014 4:47 am

A bit like how Canadians, Mexicans, Brazilians, etc, are not considered to be Americans.

Re: APOD: Apollo 17 VIP Site Anaglyph (2014 Mar 15)

by Chris Peterson » Tue Mar 18, 2014 4:25 am

geckzilla wrote:It seems kind of strange that for a dwarf planet and a planet one is a planet while the other is not. It's like saying this is a cheese pizza and that is a pepperoni pizza but only the pepperoni pizza is a pizza. Understanding the concept being conveyed, however, it is clear that our vocabulary is limiting us in trying to describe these worlds.
Indeed. The mistake the IAU made was in trying to narrow down the definition, when what was really required was a broader, more general definition and a wide set of qualifiers, which could be fairly rigorously defined. What we have now is clearly illogical, and not applicable at all to extrasolar planets, which are by far the largest category of planets we know about.

Re: APOD: Apollo 17 VIP Site Anaglyph (2014 Mar 15)

by geckzilla » Tue Mar 18, 2014 4:19 am

It seems kind of strange that for a dwarf planet and a planet one is a planet while the other is not. It's like saying this is a cheese pizza and that is a pepperoni pizza but only the pepperoni pizza is a pizza. Understanding the concept being conveyed, however, it is clear that our vocabulary is limiting us in trying to describe these worlds.

Re: APOD: Apollo 17 VIP Site Anaglyph (2014 Mar 15)

by Nitpicker » Tue Mar 18, 2014 3:51 am

Yeah, it should have been on a black background, too, to look like space.

Re: APOD: Apollo 17 VIP Site Anaglyph (2014 Mar 15)

by geckzilla » Tue Mar 18, 2014 3:33 am

They used Comic Sans for that graphic so it's invalid.

Re: APOD: Apollo 17 VIP Site Anaglyph (2014 Mar 15)

by Nitpicker » Mon Mar 17, 2014 11:46 pm

The current IAU classifications show Planets and Dwarf Planets as separate and distinct classes:

See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IAU_definition_of_planet

and the graphic within: New Horizons will hopefully discover all sorts of interesting things about Pluto, but it will not discover that Pluto has "cleared the neighbourhood" around its orbit, because we can tell from Earth that it hasn't. Hence it fails the IAU's third criterion for a Planet.

Re: APOD: Apollo 17 VIP Site Anaglyph (2014 Mar 15)

by ta152h0 » Mon Mar 17, 2014 11:25 pm

we shall see !!!!

Re: APOD: Apollo 17 VIP Site Anaglyph (2014 Mar 15)

by Anthony Barreiro » Mon Mar 17, 2014 10:33 pm

ta152h0 wrote:When New Horizons arrive at Pluto, they may reconsider classifying it as a planet. One can only wish and hope
Pluto is a planet. Pluto -- along with Ceres, Haumea, Makemake, and Eris -- is a dwarf planet.

Re: APOD: Apollo 17 VIP Site Anaglyph (2014 Mar 15)

by ta152h0 » Mon Mar 17, 2014 10:17 pm

When New Horizons arrive at Pluto, they may reconsider classifying it as a planet. One can only wish and hope

Re: APOD: Apollo 17 VIP Site Anaglyph (2014 Mar 15)

by Anthony Barreiro » Mon Mar 17, 2014 8:58 pm

JohnD wrote:
Milky Waster wrote:From an astrological perspective, Harrison Schmitt, as a Cancer born July 3rd, 1935, is the only human so far to set foot on his ruling planet - the Moon.
First, the Moon is not a planet.
The same word can have more than one meaning.

The original meaning of "planet", "wanderer" from the Greek, is a celestial object that appears to move against the background of the fixed stars. By this definition, the Sun, Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn are the planets that have been known since antiquity. After Copernicus and Kepler worked out the orbits of Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn around the Sun, and Galileo observed moons orbiting Jupiter, planets (including Earth) orbiting the Sun were distinguished from moons orbiting planets. There have been further tweaks after it was figured out that comets are orbiting the Sun rather than being atmospheric phenomena, after the discovery of asteroids, and after the discovery of Kuiper belt objects. Now that we're finding planets orbiting other Suns, and things that look like planets in interstellar space, the definition of "planet" is under new strain and will probably have to be elaborated again.

As our understanding of the universe grows, we need to develop our language. But it's also helpful to remember the history of our words, as they hold the story of our understanding.
Then, why do you, apparently an astrologer, come to an astronomer's messageboard, if not to proslytise?
I fear your words will fall on stony ground, as bare, stony and infertile as the Taurus-Littrow valley.
John
When I'm doing public outreach and somebody says something astrological, I don't spit venom and condemn them as a proselytizing heretic. I try to find a connection between what they're talking about and current scientific understanding. In this case, I might talk about the different meanings of the word "planet." I find you can interest more people in astronomy by understanding where they're at and teaching them something new than by telling them they're wrong, stupid, and evil. That's just my experience, yours may be different.

Re: APOD: Apollo 17 VIP Site Anaglyph (2014 Mar 15)

by FloridaMike » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:07 pm

JohnD wrote:
Milky Waster wrote:From an astrological perspective, Harrison Schmitt, as a Cancer born July 3rd, 1935, is the only human so far to set foot on his ruling planet - the Moon.
First, the Moon is not a planet.
Then, why do you, apparently an astrologer, come to an astronomer's messageboard, if not to proslytise?
I fear your words will fall on stony ground, as bare, stony and infertile as the Taurus-Littrow valley.
John

Overreact much John?

Re: APOD: Apollo 17 VIP Site Anaglyph (2014 Mar 15)

by randall macdonald » Sun Mar 16, 2014 3:16 am

Chris Peterson wrote:For those preferring a crossed-eye stereo pair, here's today's image with the channels separated:
Thanks, Chris. Great images.

Problem: how is it possible that the rover had no license plates, no headlights or tail lights, no wind shield, no horn? That thing sure isn't street legal now, is it? NASA spent millions of dollars making that and they forgot all those things? It seems to me that, since they left it parked there, not only will they get ticketed for all those problems, but they sure are over-parked!

Re: APOD: Apollo 17 VIP Site Anaglyph (2014 Mar 15)

by LocalColor » Sat Mar 15, 2014 10:48 pm

Last evening we were reading through the various theories of how the moon was formed, so seeing this image today was very special. Thank you APOD for bringing us another piece of our astronomy history!

Re: APOD: Apollo 17 VIP Site Anaglyph (2014 Mar 15)

by therm » Sat Mar 15, 2014 7:18 pm

I had lots of trouble focusing on the image, particularly the left side. The one posted by Nitpicker is fine.

Re: APOD: Apollo 17 VIP Site Anaglyph (2014 Mar 15)

by Chris Peterson » Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:42 pm

rstevenson wrote:
Gary S wrote:Unfortunately, it looks like you could only see this in 3D if you looked at it SIDEWAYS!
Notice that the red/green parts are separated vertically. Could someone create the more reasonable version for normal viewing?
I had no trouble viewing either of these images in their as-shown orientation, using my standard red-blue glasses.
I could see it fine, but I think there might be some minor scaling issues between the two frames.

For those preferring a crossed-eye stereo pair, here's today's image with the channels separated:
moon_split.jpg

Re: APOD: Apollo 17 VIP Site Anaglyph (2014 Mar 15)

by rstevenson » Sat Mar 15, 2014 3:55 pm

Gary S wrote:Unfortunately, it looks like you could only see this in 3D if you looked at it SIDEWAYS!
Notice that the red/green parts are separated vertically. Could someone create the more reasonable version for normal viewing?
I had no trouble viewing either of these images in their as-shown orientation, using my standard red-blue glasses.

Rob

Re: APOD: Apollo 17 VIP Site Anaglyph (2014 Mar 15)

by Gary S » Sat Mar 15, 2014 3:26 pm

Unfortunately, it looks like you could only see this in 3D if you looked at it SIDEWAYS!
Notice that the red/green parts are separated vertically. Could someone create the more reasonable version for normal viewing?

Re: APOD: Apollo 17 VIP Site Anaglyph (2014 Mar 15)

by JohnD » Sat Mar 15, 2014 11:44 am

Milky Waster wrote:From an astrological perspective, Harrison Schmitt, as a Cancer born July 3rd, 1935, is the only human so far to set foot on his ruling planet - the Moon.
First, the Moon is not a planet.
Then, why do you, apparently an astrologer, come to an astronomer's messageboard, if not to proslytise?
I fear your words will fall on stony ground, as bare, stony and infertile as the Taurus-Littrow valley.
John

Re: APOD: Apollo 17 VIP Site Anaglyph (2014 Mar 15)

by Nitpicker » Sat Mar 15, 2014 11:27 am

Following the last link in the caption, led me to this one:
... which is another great anaglyph. Superb!

Re: APOD: Apollo 17 VIP Site Anaglyph (2014 Mar 15)

by Milky Waster » Sat Mar 15, 2014 10:43 am

From an astrological perspective, Harrison Schmitt, as a Cancer born July 3rd, 1935, is the only human so far to set foot on his ruling planet - the Moon.

Re: APOD: Apollo 17 VIP Site Anaglyph (2014 Mar 15)

by randall macdonald » Sat Mar 15, 2014 6:50 am

Is it possible to post left-eye/right-eye photo links (either crosseyed or wide-eyed) whenever a red/blue anaglyph is posted? Often I watch 3d movies in left-eye/right-eye videos.

Re: APOD: Apollo 17 VIP Site Anaglyph (2014 Mar 15)

by ta152h0 » Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:27 am

memories return. My colleage at the Big Kite Kompany painted the red stripe on the wheel

Re: APOD: Apollo 17 VIP Site Anaglyph (2014 Mar 15)

by Boomer12k » Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:15 am

Oh, cool....more 3d!!!!!

:---[===] *

Top