APOD: Mimas: Small Moon with a Big Crater (2014 Oct 21)

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :ssmile: :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol2: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: APOD: Mimas: Small Moon with a Big Crater (2014 Oct 21)

Re: APOD: Mimas: Small Moon with a Big Crater (2014 Oct 21)

by Nitpicker » Sat Oct 25, 2014 4:47 am

Chris Peterson wrote:
Nitpicker wrote:My simple estimation of the pressure at the core of Mimas is ~14.5 MPa. (Based on <mean density>*<surface gravity>*<mean radius>, which works quite well for Earth's core pressure of ~350 GPa.)

At that pressure in Mimas, the phase diagram for water shows ice/solid phase only below 273 K, much like in my kitchen freezer.
Right. The question is whether ice is fluid at that pressure, though.
If it is above 273 K, it would be liquid, so definitely fluid. And below that, maybe an exotic phase of ice would be (at least partially) fluid too.

Re: APOD: Mimas: Small Moon with a Big Crater (2014 Oct 21)

by Chris Peterson » Sat Oct 25, 2014 4:43 am

Nitpicker wrote:My simple estimation of the pressure at the core of Mimas is ~14.5 MPa. (Based on <mean density>*<surface gravity>*<mean radius>, which works quite well for Earth's core pressure of ~350 GPa.)

At that pressure in Mimas, the phase diagram for water shows ice/solid phase only below 273 K, much like in my kitchen freezer.
Right. The question is whether ice is fluid at that pressure, though.

Re: APOD: Mimas: Small Moon with a Big Crater (2014 Oct 21)

by Nitpicker » Sat Oct 25, 2014 3:15 am

My simple estimation of the pressure at the core of Mimas is ~14.5 MPa. (Based on <mean density>*<surface gravity>*<mean radius>, which works quite well for Earth's core pressure of ~350 GPa.)

At that pressure in Mimas, the phase diagram for water shows ice/solid phase only below 273 K, much like in my kitchen freezer. (Though the situation changes rapidly above pressures of a few hundred MPa, a situation I wasn't previously aware of, so thanks for making me read up on it.)

Re: APOD: Mimas: Small Moon with a Big Headache

by Chris Peterson » Thu Oct 23, 2014 2:02 pm

Nitpicker wrote:I can't tell if you are saying water can or cannot exist in liquid form at high pressure (is water one of the few materials or not)?
At high pressures water exists only as exotic forms of ice.
I assume you must be saying that water (and other materials) can only exist in supercritical form (behaving like both a liquid and a gas) beyond a certain temperature and pressure.
No.
But are you still talking about a large body as small as Mimas? I'm fairly confident that at some point in between the surface and the centre of Mimas, the conditions might be right for liquid water to exist.
Sure, there could be a region of liquid water a few tens of kilometers below the icy surface. But the pressures very deep would result in solid forms, which would very likely be fluid (like most of the Earth's interior, although that consists of fluidic silicates in solid phase, not ice).

Re: APOD: Mimas: Small Moon with a Big Headache

by Nitpicker » Thu Oct 23, 2014 5:09 am

Chris Peterson wrote:
Nitpicker wrote:My reading of the recent study, is that the possibilities are either a somewhat oblong solid core, or a liquid water ocean beneath the surface (but above a more spherical solid core). The (rocky?) core may have a certain fluidity, but I imagine -- without much evidence to back me up -- that would require more energy than would be necessary for a liquid ocean above it. (To me, "fluid" is a term which includes liquids and gases, where molten rock would be a more viscous liquid than water in liquid phase.)
I wasn't commenting on the interior of Mimas, only pointing out that the work looking at the propagation of impact energy through bodies considers fluid interiors, not simply liquid. In fact, the interior of nearly any large body is going to be some combination of solid and fluid. At the pressures found far below the surface, few materials can exist in liquid form (including water).
I can't tell if you are saying water can or cannot exist in liquid form at high pressure (is water one of the few materials or not)? I assume you must be saying that water (and other materials) can only exist in supercritical form (behaving like both a liquid and a gas) beyond a certain temperature and pressure. But are you still talking about a large body as small as Mimas? I'm fairly confident that at some point in between the surface and the centre of Mimas, the conditions might be right for liquid water to exist.

Edit: ultimately, what I think you are saying is that the work looking at the propagation of impact energy through bodies, will probably not be able to help determine which possibility from the recent Mimas study, is more likely. I'll agree with you there (not that I was disagreeing with you before, just not quite understanding).

Re: APOD: Mimas: Small Moon with a Big Headache

by Chris Peterson » Thu Oct 23, 2014 4:36 am

Nitpicker wrote:My reading of the recent study, is that the possibilities are either a somewhat oblong solid core, or a liquid water ocean beneath the surface (but above a more spherical solid core). The (rocky?) core may have a certain fluidity, but I imagine -- without much evidence to back me up -- that would require more energy than would be necessary for a liquid ocean above it. (To me, "fluid" is a term which includes liquids and gases, where molten rock would be a more viscous liquid than water in liquid phase.)
I wasn't commenting on the interior of Mimas, only pointing out that the work looking at the propagation of impact energy through bodies considers fluid interiors, not simply liquid. In fact, the interior of nearly any large body is going to be some combination of solid and fluid. At the pressures found far below the surface, few materials can exist in liquid form (including water).

Re: APOD: Mimas: Small Moon with a Big Headache

by Nitpicker » Thu Oct 23, 2014 3:01 am

Chris Peterson wrote:
dlw wrote:There have been studies of impact on spherical bodies containing liquid, e.g., (US) football players' heads. The bottom line is that a significant impact on one side may cause damage on the far side, directly opposite to the impact. If Mimas does have a liquid interior, it might show damage on the other side.
Not liquid so much as fluid.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mimas_(moo ... cteristics
Mimas's most distinctive feature is a giant impact crater 130 kilometres (81 mi) across, named Herschel after the discoverer of Mimas. ...<snip>... The impact that made this crater must have nearly shattered Mimas: fractures can be seen on the opposite side of Mimas that may have been created by shock waves from the impact travelling through Mimas's body.
My reading of the recent study, is that the possibilities are either a somewhat oblong solid core, or a liquid water ocean beneath the surface (but above a more spherical solid core). The (rocky?) core may have a certain fluidity, but I imagine -- without much evidence to back me up -- that would require more energy than would be necessary for a liquid ocean above it. (To me, "fluid" is a term which includes liquids and gases, where molten rock would be a more viscous liquid than water in liquid phase.)

Re: APOD: Mimas: Small Moon with a Big Headache

by Chris Peterson » Wed Oct 22, 2014 5:31 pm

dlw wrote:There have been studies of impact on spherical bodies containing liquid, e.g., (US) football players' heads. The bottom line is that a significant impact on one side may cause damage on the far side, directly opposite to the impact. If Mimas does have a liquid interior, it might show damage on the other side.
Not liquid so much as fluid.

Re: APOD: Mimas: Small Moon with a Big Headache

by dlw » Wed Oct 22, 2014 5:27 pm

There have been studies of impact on spherical bodies containing liquid, e.g., (US) football players' heads. The bottom line is that a significant impact on one side may cause damage on the far side, directly opposite to the impact. If Mimas does have a liquid interior, it might show damage on the other side.

Are there any high res pictures of the other side?

Re: APOD: Mimas: Small Moon with a Big Crater (2014 Oct 21)

by Chris Peterson » Wed Oct 22, 2014 5:00 pm

BDanielMayfield wrote:I wonder if tidal flexing could be strong enough to keep Mimas' interior partially above the freezing temperature.
Well, it's quite close to Saturn, and has a pretty eccentric orbit, which is what's required for high tidal forces. It's twice as close to Saturn as Io is to Jupiter, and has a considerably more eccentric orbit. But it's awfully small; I'm not sure how effective such a small body would be at holding internal heat.

Re: APOD: Mimas: Small Moon with a Big Crater (2014 Oct 21)

by Ann » Wed Oct 22, 2014 3:37 pm

BDanielMayfield wrote:
I wonder if tidal flexing could be strong enough to keep Mimas' interior partially above the freezing temperature. Or, could the great impact that created the crator Hershel have knocked Mimas' core off center? Or perhaps the remnants of the impacter itself could be unbalancing this moon?
Very interesting possibilities, Bruce. We have seen that other moons in the solar system are strongly affected by tidal flexing. Whether that is possible for Mimas depends, I guess, on how much this little moon gets tugged "this way and that" by other bodies in the "Saturninan system".

And certainly the "bulls-eye" hit that caused the huge crater could have unbalanced Mimas. Just look at Uranus for comparison.

Ann

Re: APOD: Mimas: Small Moon with a Big Crater (2014 Oct 21)

by BDanielMayfield » Wed Oct 22, 2014 12:22 pm

Nitpicker wrote:
Historian wrote:The wobble, could it not just be the rocky center is off center? Liquid water seems unlikely since Mimas has been there for a very long time, at very low temperatures.
Yes, a somewhat oval core is suggested as another possibility in the recent study. Neither possibility has conclusive evidence at this stage.
I wonder if tidal flexing could be strong enough to keep Mimas' interior partially above the freezing temperature. Or, could the great impact that created the crator Hershel have knocked Mimas' core off center? Or perhaps the remnants of the impacter itself could be unbalancing this moon?

Re: APOD: Mimas: Small Moon with a Big Crater (2014 Oct 21)

by Paw Steve » Wed Oct 22, 2014 2:25 am

Hmmm, I think I know where Lucas got his idea for what a death star should look like. At least that's what I thought when I first saw this picture

Re: APOD: Mimas: Small Moon with a Big Crater (2014 Oct 21)

by Nitpicker » Wed Oct 22, 2014 1:59 am

Historian wrote:The wobble, could it not just be the rocky center is off center? Liquid water seems unlikely since Mimas has been there for a very long time, at very low temperatures.
Yes, a somewhat oval core is suggested as another possibility in the recent study. Neither possibility has conclusive evidence at this stage.

Re: APOD: Mimas: Small Moon with a Big Crater (2014 Oct 21)

by Historian » Wed Oct 22, 2014 1:52 am

The wobble, could it not just be the rocky center is off center? Liquid water seems unlikely since Mimas has been there for a very long time, at very low temperatures.

Re: APOD: Mimas: Small Moon with a Big Crater (2014 Oct 21)

by Nitpicker » Wed Oct 22, 2014 12:54 am

Ann wrote:
Nitpicker wrote:
geckzilla wrote:For some reason, only one of Saturn's hemispheres has blue skies. It's also very easy to end up with weird fringes when objects are moving around between exposures. That picture of the thin rings in front of Saturn's limb would have used the rings as the registration point rather than the background Saturn. Maybe it's really like that but there's a good chance that the misalignment between channels is emphasizing it, too.

I found the original image release for that picture.
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/photos/image ... ageId=3444
I was just looking for other examples upon which Supportstorm (the final digital processor of the APOD) might have based the colourisation. I was expecting to find more examples of a blue limb on an otherwise golden Saturn and was surprised to find only one. (And apologies for originally providing questionable links in need of replacement, geck -- my Greek extends no further than knowledge of the alphabet.)
I have never seen a blue limb on Saturn. (And as some people know, I look for blue details quite carefully.)

Titan, on the other hand, really has a blue limb. This blue limb isn't visible in all pictures of Titan, but it is really there. Here is one good picture of it.

On the other hand, as I searched for information about the nature about this blue limb, I came across this site. It says that the blue limb on Titan is a layer of haze, and that its true color is ultraviolet, not actually blue.

Ann
Yes, but Titan could never look so big behind Mimas, unless they were imaged from a much greater distance (which then couldn't give us the spectacular resolution on Mimas). I notice geometry more than colour, but it is hard to miss Titan's colourful atmosphere in Cassini images. The blue in the APOD is much more tenuous, but still mysterious.

Re: APOD: Mimas: Small Moon with a Big Crater (2014 Oct 21)

by LocalColor » Wed Oct 22, 2014 12:52 am

Sure looks like one of the beat up golf balls we put in the chicken nest boxes (fake eggs.)

Re: APOD: Mimas: Small Moon with a Big Crater (2014 Oct 21)

by Ann » Tue Oct 21, 2014 11:55 pm

Nitpicker wrote:
geckzilla wrote:For some reason, only one of Saturn's hemispheres has blue skies. It's also very easy to end up with weird fringes when objects are moving around between exposures. That picture of the thin rings in front of Saturn's limb would have used the rings as the registration point rather than the background Saturn. Maybe it's really like that but there's a good chance that the misalignment between channels is emphasizing it, too.

I found the original image release for that picture.
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/photos/image ... ageId=3444
I was just looking for other examples upon which Supportstorm (the final digital processor of the APOD) might have based the colourisation. I was expecting to find more examples of a blue limb on an otherwise golden Saturn and was surprised to find only one. (And apologies for originally providing questionable links in need of replacement, geck -- my Greek extends no further than knowledge of the alphabet.)
I have never seen a blue limb on Saturn. (And as some people know, I look for blue details quite carefully.)

Titan, on the other hand, really has a blue limb. This blue limb isn't visible in all pictures of Titan, but it is really there. Here is one good picture of it.

On the other hand, as I searched for information about the nature about this blue limb, I came across this site. It says that the blue limb on Titan is a layer of haze, and that its true color is ultraviolet, not actually blue.

Ann

Re: APOD: Mimas: Small Moon with a Big Crater (2014 Oct 21)

by RJN » Tue Oct 21, 2014 11:24 pm

I have been alerted that the flyby in this image occurred in 2010 February, and so the APOD text has been updated to indicate this. I apologize for the oversight. - RJN

Re: APOD: Mimas: Small Moon with a Big Crater (2014 Oct 21)

by Nitpicker » Tue Oct 21, 2014 11:05 pm

geckzilla wrote:For some reason, only one of Saturn's hemispheres has blue skies. It's also very easy to end up with weird fringes when objects are moving around between exposures. That picture of the thin rings in front of Saturn's limb would have used the rings as the registration point rather than the background Saturn. Maybe it's really like that but there's a good chance that the misalignment between channels is emphasizing it, too.

I found the original image release for that picture.
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/photos/image ... ageId=3444
I was just looking for other examples upon which Supportstorm (the final digital processor of the APOD) might have based the colourisation. I was expecting to find more examples of a blue limb on an otherwise golden Saturn and was surprised to find only one. (And apologies for originally providing questionable links in need of replacement, geck -- my Greek extends no further than knowledge of the alphabet.)

Re: APOD: Mimas: Small Moon with a Big Crater (2014 Oct 21)

by Boomer12k » Tue Oct 21, 2014 9:50 pm

KarelVreeburg wrote:What I don't understand is why the so called huge impact crater on this thiny snowball moon has the form of a Hexagon. On some pictures of Jupiter and other planets on the pole area also Hexagons are present , WHY?"

As far as Mimas is concerned...I think it is the "Chunky-ness" of the material. Mostly Ice evidently...so maybe it "cracks" wrong. In the photo there are many such smaller craters.
As for Hexagon shaped Polar clouds on Jupiter and Saturn, there is some information on Wikipedia...about Saturn's North Pole Hexagon Pattern.
"The pattern's origin is a matter of much speculation. Most astronomers believe it was caused by some standing-wave pattern in the atmosphere. Polygonal shapes have been replicated in the laboratory through differential rotation of fluids"

:---[===] *

Re: APOD: Mimas: Small Moon with a Big Crater (2014 Oct 21)

by Boomer12k » Tue Oct 21, 2014 9:38 pm

When it was FREE....it might have made a great COMET.....but it got captured.

:---[===] *

Re: APOD: Mimas: Small Moon with a Big Crater (2014 Oct 21)

by KarelVreeburg » Tue Oct 21, 2014 6:42 pm

What I don't understand is why the so called huge impact crater on this thiny snowball moon has the form of a Hexagon. On some pictures of Jupiter and other planets on the pole area also Hexagons are present , WHY?"

Re: APOD: Mimas: Small Moon with a Big Crater (2014 Oct 21)

by Ron-Astro Pharmacist » Tue Oct 21, 2014 4:43 pm

Beyond wrote:Ahh, the golf ball returns. I like Mimas. It looks so... clean and spiffy.
Usually golf balls often find the water hazard but "Mimas" has one on the inside. From the looks of it this one was pounded although it looks more like it was the driving range. Judging from the size of the Herschel crater some "Samim" really got a hold of one and left quite the ball mark. :roll:

I love symmetrys - well close enough, one simian to another. Hope that's reciprocated.

On a serious note, today's APOD does have a 3D character to it. Is it the crater shadows on the left or conversation above re: the background? (Guess that would be 1/3D to me but I digress)...

Re: APOD: Mimas: Small Moon with a Big Crater (2014 Oct 21)

by geckzilla » Tue Oct 21, 2014 3:54 pm

For some reason, only one of Saturn's hemispheres has blue skies. It's also very easy to end up with weird fringes when objects are moving around between exposures. That picture of the thin rings in front of Saturn's limb would have used the rings as the registration point rather than the background Saturn. Maybe it's really like that but there's a good chance that the misalignment between channels is emphasizing it, too.

I found the original image release for that picture.
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/photos/image ... ageId=3444

Top