500 or 600 rule

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :ssmile: :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol2: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: 500 or 600 rule

Re: 500 or 600 rule

by Chris Peterson » Sun Nov 30, 2014 5:13 am

Astromontufar wrote:I understand the 500 rule or 600 rule perfectly fine, however a question came up while talking about the rule, does any knows why is 500 or 600, I mean where did that number came from?
It's just an approximation based on a more rigorous calculation for the distance stars move during a long exposure at the image plane of a camera or telescope of some given focal length. If you want to know exactly what the trail length will be, you need to do the full calculation, and also take into consideration the declination range of the sky you're imaging.

500 or 600 rule

by Astromontufar » Sun Nov 30, 2014 12:32 am

Hi all,

I understand the 500 rule or 600 rule perfectly fine, however a question came up while talking about the rule, does any knows why is 500 or 600, I mean where did that number came from?

Thank you,

Sergio

Top