APOD: An Unexpected Rocket Plume over San... (2015 Nov 11)

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :ssmile: :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol2: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: APOD: An Unexpected Rocket Plume over San... (2015 Nov 11)

Re: APOD: An Unexpected Rocket Plume over San... (2015 Nov 11)

by BMAONE23 » Fri Nov 13, 2015 3:27 am

Patrick Reed wrote:Whereas I believe that the Blue Plume is what is stated, There are questions of scale and vector. The scale of the visible missile clearly shows a misconnect in the photograph, unless the photographer is asking me to believe that the Trident is larger than one of the Struts on a tower of the GG Bridge. As to vector, if I am to believe that the missile is where it is represented would indicate that it has been fired from somewhere between Angel Island and Tiburon, which I cannot but believe is rather unlikely. I am not sure, but I do not think that the waters of Richardson Bay are anywhere deep enough for a Trident Submarine to be at launch depth. There is one more (still unplausible,) explanation, namely a misfire at an inopportune moment at Mare Island. I would bet that though the photograph of the missile is a great catch where and whenever it occurred, it was not in the same frame as the beautiful exposure of the Golden Gate Bride and adjacent headlands....PHOTOSHOP!
Try this vimeo. The third stage separation, firing and travel distance is what is creating the illusion of the visible missile

The entire event clearly visible over the golden gate bridge

Re: APOD: An Unexpected Rocket Plume over San... (2015 Nov 11)

by geckzilla » Thu Nov 12, 2015 11:59 pm

Patrick Reed wrote:PHOTOSHOP!
Ignorance!

Re: APOD: An Unexpected Rocket Plume over San... (2015 Nov 11)

by Chris Peterson » Thu Nov 12, 2015 11:45 pm

Patrick Reed wrote:Whereas I believe that the Blue Plume is what is stated, There are questions of scale and vector. The scale of the visible missile clearly shows a misconnect in the photograph, unless the photographer is asking me to believe that the Trident is larger than one of the Struts on a tower of the GG Bridge. As to vector, if I am to believe that the missile is where it is represented would indicate that it has been fired from somewhere between Angel Island and Tiburon, which I cannot but believe is rather unlikely. I am not sure, but I do not think that the waters of Richardson Bay are anywhere deep enough for a Trident Submarine to be at launch depth. There is one more (still unplausible,) explanation, namely a misfire at an inopportune moment at Mare Island. I would bet that though the photograph of the missile is a great catch where and whenever it occurred, it was not in the same frame as the beautiful exposure of the Golden Gate Bride and adjacent headlands....PHOTOSHOP!
The missile itself is not visible in this image. And you're looking at an upper atmospheric phenomenon, and hence something that is several hundred miles away. It is almost straight south of San Francisco, which puts it far out into the Pacific. For scale, we can see Capricornus above and to the left, and part of Sagittarius to the right, showing us that the entire trail is about 30° long. We know there's an east-to-west component of the path, but from this image we can't tell to what extent the missile is moving towards or away from us.

Re: APOD: An Unexpected Rocket Plume over San... (2015 Nov 11)

by Patrick Reed » Thu Nov 12, 2015 11:12 pm

Whereas I believe that the Blue Plume is what is stated, There are questions of scale and vector. The scale of the visible missile clearly shows a misconnect in the photograph, unless the photographer is asking me to believe that the Trident is larger than one of the Struts on a tower of the GG Bridge. As to vector, if I am to believe that the missile is where it is represented would indicate that it has been fired from somewhere between Angel Island and Tiburon, which I cannot but believe is rather unlikely. I am not sure, but I do not think that the waters of Richardson Bay are anywhere deep enough for a Trident Submarine to be at launch depth. There is one more (still unplausible,) explanation, namely a misfire at an inopportune moment at Mare Island. I would bet that though the photograph of the missile is a great catch where and whenever it occurred, it was not in the same frame as the beautiful exposure of the Golden Gate Bride and adjacent headlands....PHOTOSHOP!

Re: APOD: An Unexpected Rocket Plume over San... (2015 Nov 11)

by geckzilla » Thu Nov 12, 2015 7:27 am

What BMA said. And camera settings are wrong all the time.

Re: APOD: An Unexpected Rocket Plume over San... (2015 Nov 11)

by BMAONE23 » Thu Nov 12, 2015 4:14 am

Your "shot" appears to be a frame capture from a video file, the Vimeo "Time Lapse" linked below the image. During the recording of the image, you can clearly see the effect of a wider iris opening on the brightness of the image as the video file plays. You can also clearly see the 3 stage separations as the flight progresses. The only real difference between the "more realistic" image and the APOD image is the amount of time that the CCD was allowed to gather photons before the Image was completed.

Re: APOD: An Unexpected Rocket Plume over San... (2015 Nov 11)

by howdydoody » Thu Nov 12, 2015 3:30 am

This is the pic from the other photographer he was with. Take a look at the difference when shot at the exact same time. This one is more realistic and looks like it is not manipulated. http://www.slrlounge.com/lucky-photogra ... ime-lapse/

Also on that NEF file link you posted the time is 9:15 but he said it was shot after sunset, unless his camera settings are wrong.

Re: APOD: An Unexpected Rocket Plume over San... (2015 Nov 11)

by Ann » Thu Nov 12, 2015 1:36 am

geckzilla wrote:
howdydoody wrote:There's another photo from a different photographer that was with this guy and hia photo shows the missile smaller and farther away. Plus the other photo does not have all the color saturation added like this photo. You should ask for the RAW image NEF file.
You should keep in mind the evolving and expanding nature of the cloud produced by the rocket. At some earlier point in time it was smaller. Because you did not add any links to the pictures you were talking about, I took a look at the Facebook page linked to in the APOD description and found a picture Abe took of the RAW image in the preview screen on his camera.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid ... =3&theater

Here is another link to the image that will probably work even if one is not logged into Facebook:
https://scontent-lga3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hp ... 7777_o.jpg

(If it still doesn't work for someone, I'll attach the image to a post.)
Interesting, Geck. Thanks. But even though the wide "halo" of the plume is now yellowish, the bright, narrow "jet-like contrail" is still very blue.

Ann

Re: APOD: An Unexpected Rocket Plume over San... (2015 Nov 11)

by MarkBour » Wed Nov 11, 2015 11:46 pm

Amazing shot. This view is looking South, so I guess from the description, the missile was headed North up the coast and then, just before this shot, banked to the West, out to sea. I suppose there would have been lots more fears, if it had turned inland.

Re: APOD: An Unexpected Rocket Plume over San... (2015 Nov 11)

by BMAONE23 » Wed Nov 11, 2015 10:13 pm

Although I can't open the photo information my Kindle, this looks like it would be about a 5 second exposure. Your eye processes light in 1/30th second and so the locale wouldn't appear as depicted in the image to your eyes if you were standing there. But with the camera iris open for 5 seconds, the CCD receives about 150 times the light that your eyes normally do. Any available light will be increased in the image compared to normal visual perception

Re: APOD: An Unexpected Rocket Plume over San... (2015 Nov 11)

by geckzilla » Wed Nov 11, 2015 10:07 pm

howdydoody wrote:There's another photo from a different photographer that was with this guy and hia photo shows the missile smaller and farther away. Plus the other photo does not have all the color saturation added like this photo. You should ask for the RAW image NEF file.
You should keep in mind the evolving and expanding nature of the cloud produced by the rocket. At some earlier point in time it was smaller. Because you did not add any links to the pictures you were talking about, I took a look at the Facebook page linked to in the APOD description and found a picture Abe took of the RAW image in the preview screen on his camera.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid ... =3&theater

Here is another link to the image that will probably work even if one is not logged into Facebook:
https://scontent-lga3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hp ... 7777_o.jpg

(If it still doesn't work for someone, I'll attach the image to a post.)

Re: APOD: An Unexpected Rocket Plume over San... (2015 Nov 11)

by howdydoody » Wed Nov 11, 2015 9:51 pm

This WAS photoshopped although photoshop might not what he did to it, maybe another software. I have seen this photographers other work and he brags that he does not photoshop, but he does boost everything in lightroom and says it is straight our of the camera even when it's not. Although I applaud him for getting A shot, it just wasn't the same shot he has posted here. I'm in SF....The hills are not that green at night nor the lights that yellow gold or the sky that blue after 6pm now. There's another photo from a different photographer that was with this guy and hia photo shows the missile smaller and farther away. Plus the other photo does not have all the color saturation added like this photo. You should ask for the RAW image NEF file.

Re: APOD: An Unexpected Rocket Plume over San... (2015 Nov 11)

by BMAONE23 » Wed Nov 11, 2015 9:25 pm

Boomer12k wrote:Ok....if this was launched from a submarine...why does it look like it came from the landward side of the picture?
Unless it is waaaaay to the South, and shot from Monterrey Bay, or off of Los Angeles, or San Diego...

:---[===] *
The Trident missile was fired from the USS Kentucky off shore from Los Angeles with LAX air traffic being rerouted to exclude flying over the Pacific Ocean. Apparently the U.S. Government keeps tests like this from the public (for obvious reasons) but will inform Airports as needed for flight safety

Re: APOD: An Unexpected Rocket Plume over San... (2015 Nov 11)

by Chris Peterson » Wed Nov 11, 2015 7:40 pm

Medik 1-7 wrote:Sorry, as a long retired military veteran I take exception to the labeling the missile as a "Trident II D5 nuclear missile" for two reasons: A. the caption stated it was "unarmed" indicating that none of the potentially 14 thermonuclear MIRVs were on board and B. it's a 3 stage solid-fuel, guided missile with no nuclear fuel, therefore it's not a "nuclear missile".

The used label is misleading and typical of writers that don't really do their homework.
While your point is taken, it is worth noting that the Trident SLBM is specifically intended to carry nuclear weapons, and is conventionally referred to (including in Navy literature and technically oriented defense information sources) as the Trident II D5 nuclear missile system, with tests qualified by "unarmed". While you are technically correct, this usage is conventional, and as such doesn't reflect on the quality of reporting.

Re: APOD: An Unexpected Rocket Plume over San... (2015 Nov 11)

by Medik 1-7 » Wed Nov 11, 2015 5:46 pm

Sorry, as a long retired military veteran I take exception to the labeling the missile as a "Trident II D5 nuclear missile" for two reasons: A. the caption stated it was "unarmed" indicating that none of the potentially 14 thermonuclear MIRVs were on board and B. it's a 3 stage solid-fuel, guided missile with no nuclear fuel, therefore it's not a "nuclear missile".

The used label is misleading and typical of writers that don't really do their homework.

Medik 1-7 <;,><

Re: APOD: An Unexpected Rocket Plume over San... (2015 Nov 11)

by Ann » Wed Nov 11, 2015 5:00 pm

Ron-Astro Pharmacist wrote:After yesterday's teaser I thought it was going to be this.
Space_center.jpeg
Luckily he survived!

Aww, poor frog! :(

I can't help it, I like certain animals because I find them cute, like hedgehogs and kittens and frogs. Mr Spock would not be pleased with my illogical reactions.

On a different note, I've been wanting to say that you've posted some tremendously interesting articles, videos and comics lately, Ron. Thanks a lot! :D

Ann

Re: APOD: An Unexpected Rocket Plume over San... (2015 Nov 11)

by Visual_Astronomer » Wed Nov 11, 2015 4:35 pm

Boomer12k wrote:Ok....if this was launched from a submarine...why does it look like it came from the landward side of the picture?
Unless it is waaaaay to the South, and shot from Monterrey Bay, or off of Los Angeles, or San Diego...

:---[===] *
The sub was in the Pacific Test Range, north west of Los Angeles.

Re: APOD: An Unexpected Rocket Plume over San... (2015 Nov 11)

by Ron-Astro Pharmacist » Wed Nov 11, 2015 2:35 pm

After yesterday's teaser I thought it was going to be this.
Space_center.jpeg
Space_center.jpeg (20.7 KiB) Viewed 3701 times
Luckily he survived!

Re: APOD: An Unexpected Rocket Plume over San... (2015 Nov 11)

by Boomer12k » Wed Nov 11, 2015 2:21 pm

Ok....if this was launched from a submarine...why does it look like it came from the landward side of the picture?
Unless it is waaaaay to the South, and shot from Monterrey Bay, or off of Los Angeles, or San Diego...

:---[===] *

Re: APOD: An Unexpected Rocket Plume over San... (2015 Nov 11)

by neufer » Wed Nov 11, 2015 2:05 pm

HellCat wrote:
Why does it appear that the image seems abnormally large? The apparent image of the rocket itself seems to be leading the plume. But at the likely distance from the rocket, it shouldn't be nearly that large.
You are seeing a rocket shaped plume. The rocket is quite tiny in comparison.

Re: APOD: An Unexpected Rocket Plume over San... (2015 Nov 11)

by geckzilla » Wed Nov 11, 2015 1:59 pm

HellCat wrote:No chance there was some photo manipulation here?
The event was captured by many cameras all along the coast. It's a real depiction of a real event. There was surely editing done for colors and other nuances like sharpening, but probably not resizing the plume or moving it around in some way.

Re: APOD: An Unexpected Rocket Plume over San... (2015 Nov 11)

by HellCat » Wed Nov 11, 2015 12:49 pm

Is it only me, or...

Why does it appear that the image seems abnormally large? The apparent image of the rocket itself seems to be leading the plume. But at the likely distance from the rocket, it shouldn't be nearly that large.

No chance there was some photo manipulation here?

Re: APOD: An Unexpected Rocket Plume over San... (2015 Nov 11)

by RedFishBlueFish » Wed Nov 11, 2015 12:33 pm

heehaw wrote:Funny there was a photographer poised so ideally, at just the right time, on Veterans day, as military budgets are under debate in congress....
"Hee-haw" indeed.

And if there were *not* this image of the event then it would seem "Funny that there were *no* photographers who were shooting the sunset at one of the most photographed sites in the world..."

Moreover, whilst it may be true that "...military budgets are under debate in congress..." (when are they not? And just how much debate about such there actually is is debatable) an image such as this, with the whisper of the horrors of nuclear war hidden in the bright blue rocket plume, could as well fuel opprobrium as approval for increased military spending.

Freemasonry must get a bye this round ... and, yes, one does feel the photographer got a bit too carried away with the blue-saturation slider.

Re: APOD: An Unexpected Rocket Plume over San... (2015 Nov 11)

by heehaw » Wed Nov 11, 2015 10:33 am

Funny there was a photographer poised so ideally, at just the right time, on Veterans day, as military budgets are under debate in congress....

Re: APOD: An Unexpected Rocket Plume over San... (2015 Nov 11)

by geckzilla » Wed Nov 11, 2015 10:02 am

There was most likely a hefty dose of saturation boost given to the photo. You can see other images of the same plume are nowhere near this blue.

Top