APOD: A Crumbling Layered Butte on Mars (2016 Oct 05)

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :ssmile: :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol2: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: APOD: A Crumbling Layered Butte on Mars (2016 Oct 05)

Re: APOD: A Crumbling Layered Butte on Mars (2016 Oct 05)

by Chris Peterson » Thu Oct 06, 2016 2:05 pm

Kaarlo wrote:Chris,
The geological record of Proto-Earth is (literally) frozen in meteorites, asteroids and comets.
No. The formation history of the Solar System is frozen in meteorites, asteroids, and comets. Making inferences about the Earth's own history at any given time from that is a tricky business. For instance, comets almost certainly formed in a very different part of the Solar System, and from a very different ingredient mix, than the terrestrial planets. What comets tell us about terrestrial planet formation is very indirect. Asteroids, and the meteorites they produce, also formed somewhat differently and have undergone metamorphic processes.

All of this evidence allows us to formulate and test different hypotheses about how the Solar System formed. But it's a mistake to argue any case too strongly. You seem to think I'm forcefully disagreeing with the conclusions you draw. Mostly I'm arguing that you're demonstrating poor scientific thinking in how certain you seem to be that they are right.

Re: APOD: A Crumbling Layered Butte on Mars (2016 Oct 05)

by neufer » Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:59 pm

geckzilla wrote:
I think the droughts on Mars would put the Sahara to shame.

Sure, go to Mars if you don't mind being freeze dried.
  • Or to the northern margin of Mercury's Caloris basin:
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA17496 wrote:
[img3=""To freeze a being solid, then hang him on a wall like some trophy?"
―Han Solo, expressing disdain for the Galactic Alliance's carbon-freezing methods"]http://cdnph.upi.com/sv/b/i/UPI-3241379 ... ercury.jpg[/img3]
<<If there are two things you should remember, it's not to cross a Hutt, and that Mercury's surface can throw up all kinds of surprises. In this image, a portion of the terrain surrounding the northern margin of the Caloris basin hosts an elevated block in the shape of a certain carbonite-encased smuggler who can make the Kessel Run in less than twelve parsecs. This block may be part of the original surface that pre-dates the formation of Caloris, which was shaped by material ejected during the basin-forming event.>>
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Carbon-freezing/Legends wrote: "Oh, they've encased him in carbonite. He should be quite well protected. If he survived the freezing process, that is." ―C-3PO

<<Carbon-freezing was the process of freezing stored tibanna gas in carbonite to preserve it while it was being transported over long distances. In the freezing process, the gas was pumped into a freezing chamber where it was mixed with molten carbonite into a solid block. The gas was released later at its destination or at the processing center. Carbon-freezing could induce hibernation sickness after being released, as was the case with Han Solo. The Alderaanian Medical Association established that inhaling carbon-freezing smoke was a health risk.

Darth Vader ordered the modification of a freezing chamber on Bespin's Cloud City so that he could freeze Luke Skywalker—eliminating any chance of escape—to transport him to the Emperor. As a test, the process was tried on Han Solo, who survived the freezing process through the use of a special device and was eventually freed from his trap.

During the Galactic Civil War, a large number of Sith Troopers and possibly a Sith Master, frozen in carbonite, were discovered by the Nightsister Silri with the help of a Sith holocron stolen from Jabba the Hutt by Tyber Zann. Additionally, bodies were sometimes preserved in carbonite, as in the case of the Senatorial Tombs on Coruscant.>>

Re: APOD: A Crumbling Layered Butte on Mars (2016 Oct 05)

by geckzilla » Thu Oct 06, 2016 12:44 pm

I think the droughts on Mars would put the Sahara to shame. Sure, go to Mars if you don't mind being freeze dried.

Re: APOD: A Crumbling Layered Butte on Mars (2016 Oct 05)

by heehaw » Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:27 am

BMAONE23 wrote:
Asterhole wrote:
heehaw wrote:Can you imagine a human colony on the surface of this planet? Growing crops, to feed themselves ... somehow? With no water to speak of? Their energy sources being ... what? Not solar power, from a very very distant sun.
No water on Mars? Au contraire... There's plenty to be found, but it's locked up as ice in the Polar caps and subsurface permafrost. Exposed to the thin Martian atmosphere, water ice quickly sublimates as vapor and never has the chance to exist as a liquid. However Human technology could find ways to extract and store water.

Those multilayered formations are testament a wetter, warmer past of Mars' history billions of Earth years ago. Did Life have a chance to form back then? I think probably not, but who's to know?
All that is needed is a Biosphere (with an air lock) set into the ground and given an earthlike Atmospheric pressure and temperature. Once both are approaching that similar to Earth, the Permafrost would thaw and the water would be released in a liquid form
Sorry, that isn't going to even come close to doing it: "How much water does the average person use at home per day? [USGS] Estimates vary, but each person uses about 80-100 gallons of water per day" Maybe deep drilling on Mars will produce gushers. Maybe!

Re: APOD: A Crumbling Layered Butte on Mars (2016 Oct 05)

by geckzilla » Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:49 am

Kaarlo, please stop posting speculation and opinion as if they are already-proven facts or so obvious that they couldn't possibly be wrong. Treat your own ideas with the same skepticism that you treat others. Consider this an official warning.

Re: APOD: A Crumbling Layered Butte on Mars (2016 Oct 05)

by Kaarlo » Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:38 am

Chris,
The geological record of Proto-Earth is (literally) frozen in meteorites, asteroids and comets.
There's plenty of potential evidence available for open mind.
Find BIF (on Mars, asteroid..) and you have located Photogenic Life!

Re: APOD: A Crumbling Layered Butte on Mars (2016 Oct 05)

by Chris Peterson » Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:18 am

Kaarlo wrote:Chris,
Please don't (on purpose?) forget/omit the BIF evidence: the very first life was oxygen-generating (and consequently CO2-consuming).
Here's a new term applicable to the firs life ("proto-life") on any young planet, Earth and Mars included: Photogenic. How's that?
All the evidence suggests is that the earliest life which has left obvious traces was oxygen generating. Most people who study abiogenesis consider that the first life on Earth was most likely some type of very simple chemoautotroph (which may or may not have produced oxygen, depending on the reactions involved). It may have formed early enough that little or no trace of it remains in the geological record.

Re: APOD: A Crumbling Layered Butte on Mars (2016 Oct 05)

by Kaarlo » Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:07 am

Chris,
Please don't (on purpose?) forget/omit the BIF evidence: the very first life was oxygen-generating (and consequently CO2-consuming).
Here's a new term applicable to the first life ("proto-life") on any young planet, Earth and Mars included: Photogenic. How's that?

Re: APOD: A Crumbling Layered Butte on Mars (2016 Oct 05)

by neufer » Thu Oct 06, 2016 3:05 am

Cygnus X-1 wrote:
This is the most amazing pic ever back from Mars!!!

Layers! Amazing!!!!! :shock:
GEORGE COSTANZA: This thing is like an onion. The more layers you peel, the more it stinks.

Re: APOD: A Crumbling Layered Butte on Mars (2016 Oct 05)

by Cygnus X-1 » Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:25 am

This is the most amazing pic ever back from Mars!!!

Layers! Amazing!!!!! :shock:

Re: APOD: A Crumbling Layered Butte on Mars (2016 Oct 05)

by neufer » Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:59 pm

Mr Spif wrote:
Weird side question ... Who is Dr Kremer and why does he get to label the picture with his name?

LANDLORD: And you must be Professor Von Nostrand?
.
KRAMER: Yes, yes I am.
.
LANDLORD: I've read your book, Professor, and I was quite intrigued by it.
.
KRAMER: Uh, yes. Well, it's, uh, very intriguing.
.
LANDLORD: Tell me, is it your contention that Shakespeare was an imposter?
.
KRAMER: My contention?
.
LANDLORD: Yes, your contention.
.
KRAMER: Yes, that's my contention.
.
ELAINE: I heard him contend that.

Re: APOD: A Crumbling Layered Butte on Mars (2016 Oct 05)

by Mr Spif » Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:26 pm

Weird side question ... Who is Dr Kremer and why does he get to label the picture with his name?

Does he own it? (that is usually the implication of a watermark)...

Re: APOD: A Crumbling Layered Butte on Mars (2016 Oct 05)

by Chris Peterson » Wed Oct 05, 2016 10:57 pm

ta152h0 wrote:earthuakes on that dead planet ?
What makes a planet "dead"?

Mars almost certainly had tectonic activity in the past, and it's far from certain that it is completely ended. And there are other things which can generate quakes, like thermal variation and impacts. Until there's a seismometer on Mars, nobody will know for sure. But most people believe that there are quakes there, even now.

(There was a mission scheduled to launch this year that would put a seismometer on the martian surface. That instrument failed before launch and the entire mission was postponed until 2018.)

Re: APOD: A Crumbling Layered Butte on Mars (2016 Oct 05)

by ta152h0 » Wed Oct 05, 2016 10:37 pm

earthuakes on that dead planet ?

Re: APOD: A Crumbling Layered Butte on Mars (2016 Oct 05)

by Fred the Cat » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:03 pm

This seems a good object for observing the Martian angle of repose. Depending on the conditions under which it formed and the weathering which it has endured, we are left to view a pile of Martian history worthy of understanding.

While it does look more like a boobe than a butte I give NASA props for their naming conventions . :wink:

Re: APOD: A Crumbling Layered Butte on Mars (2016 Oct 05)

by BMAONE23 » Wed Oct 05, 2016 5:18 pm

Asterhole wrote:
heehaw wrote:Can you imagine a human colony on the surface of this planet? Growing crops, to feed themselves ... somehow? With no water to speak of? Their energy sources being ... what? Not solar power, from a very very distant sun.
No water on Mars? Au contraire... There's plenty to be found, but it's locked up as ice in the Polar caps and subsurface permafrost. Exposed to the thin Martian atmosphere, water ice quickly sublimates as vapor and never has the chance to exist as a liquid. However Human technology could find ways to extract and store water.

Those multilayered formations are testament a wetter, warmer past of Mars' history billions of Earth years ago. Did Life have a chance to form back then? I think probably not, but who's to know?
All that is needed is a Biosphere (with an air lock) set into the ground and given an earthlike Atmospheric pressure and temperature. Once both are approaching that similar to Earth, the Permafrost would thaw and the water would be released in a liquid form

Re: APOD: A Crumbling Layered Butte on Mars (2016 Oct 05)

by BMAONE23 » Wed Oct 05, 2016 5:13 pm

jnnel@shaw.ca wrote:In the center of the scree are more than ten rocks whose surface have multiple round nodules.
All the other rocks have flat planes as would be if cleaved from sedimentary formation.

What are the nodules?
Sedimentary conglomerate?

Did Curiosity have a close look to be sure they were not signs of life (eg coral-like)?
jnnel
Down at the bottom of this image, near that same butte, lies a similar rock to the ones you are asking about Note the same "Nodules"

Re: APOD: A Crumbling Layered Butte on Mars (2016 Oct 05)

by Chris Peterson » Wed Oct 05, 2016 4:58 pm

Kaarlo wrote:Chris,
With "photosynthesis" I mean here this: "central-sun-UV-radiation-driven-oxygen-gneration-in-primordial-hydrocarbons-and-CO2".
Since such term is a bit clumsy, I simply used photosynthesis. Perhaps you coud suggest a proper - possibly a new - term instead?
No alternate term. But "photosynthesis" is not so good, since it already has a different and well understood meaning.

Also, there's very good reason to believe that the first life utilized chemical energy unrelated (except in the most distant way) to the Sun. So again, I'd avoid saying that the first life "likely" depended upon solar radiation in any form.

Re: APOD: A Crumbling Layered Butte on Mars (2016 Oct 05)

by Kaarlo » Wed Oct 05, 2016 4:09 pm

Chris,
With "photosynthesis" I mean here this: "central-sun-UV-radiation-driven-oxygen-gneration-in-primordial-hydrocarbons-and-CO2".
Since such term is a bit clumsy, I simply used photosynthesis. Perhaps you coud suggest a proper - possibly a new - term instead?

Re: APOD: A Crumbling Layered Butte on Mars (2016 Oct 05)

by Chris Peterson » Wed Oct 05, 2016 2:53 pm

Asterhole wrote:The earliest beginnings of Life on Earth were only complex protein chains. How stable they were in an aqueous environment (which at the time was probably quite toxic by today's standards) is not known. Nor is it known by exactly which process caused the protein chains to become self-replicative. Lots of educated guesses such as lightning and volcanism, but all the same we'd have to know what conditions on either Earth or Mars were like 4 - 5 billion years ago - and we don't.

But hope springs eternal in the search...
I think there is good reason to believe we will learn what conditions were like on Earth from the very beginning. I think there's good reason to believe that we'll create primitive lifeforms in the lab under those conditions. These things will let us say, with reasonable certainty, how life originated on Earth (and help us in our search for it elsewhere). But it's entirely possible that there simply is no surviving physical evidence from the time life formed here, so we'll end up good theories that are well supported by indirect evidence only.

Re: APOD: A Crumbling Layered Butte on Mars (2016 Oct 05)

by Asterhole » Wed Oct 05, 2016 2:39 pm

The earliest beginnings of Life on Earth were only complex protein chains. How stable they were in an aqueous environment (which at the time was probably quite toxic by today's standards) is not known. Nor is it known by exactly which process caused the protein chains to become self-replicative. Lots of educated guesses such as lightning and volcanism, but all the same we'd have to know what conditions on either Earth or Mars were like 4 - 5 billion years ago - and we don't.

But hope springs eternal in the search...

Re: APOD: A Crumbling Layered Butte on Mars (2016 Oct 05)

by Chris Peterson » Wed Oct 05, 2016 2:37 pm

Kaarlo wrote:The first life on Earth likely was photosynthetic. Evidence: Banded Iron Formation (BIF) deposits 4+ billion years of age: free oxygen generated by floating algal mats was immediately and totally consumed by water-soluble ferrous iron (Fe2+, greenish in color) that immediately precipitated as ferric iron (Fe3+, rust red in color) that - together with pale colored silica - deposited on ocean floor as BIF.
On Mars - and on any young planet, early Earth included - find FIB (apply geology and geophysics: magnetometer, gravimeter..) and you'll find the microfossil you're looking for.
The idea you express here is sound, but it's an overstatement to say that the first life on Earth was likely photosynthetic. Early life, certainly. But photosynthesis is a complex process that probably required significant time to evolve. The existence of non-photosynthetic autotrophs today, as well as an understanding of the conditions on the very young Earth, strongly support the notion that such life forms may have evolved earlier and are at least as likely to have been the first life as any photosynthetic organisms.

Re: APOD: A Crumbling Layered Butte on Mars (2016 Oct 05)

by Kaarlo » Wed Oct 05, 2016 2:36 pm

There was running water on Mars probably quite recently - maybe still is. See this: https://acrobat.com/#d=goS32GApItpLaosC9AqSDg

Re: APOD: A Crumbling Layered Butte on Mars (2016 Oct 05)

by Guest » Wed Oct 05, 2016 1:58 pm

I'm just an amateur here, but it seems to me that this structure and surrounding sedimentary rock formations would be a great place to look for evidence of life. I would bet that there are folks in NASA who would give anything to be up there right now with a rock hammer and an electron microscope, just to see what they could find. Think of the adventure and opportunity for discovery.

Re: APOD: A Crumbling Layered Butte on Mars (2016 Oct 05)

by Steve Dutch » Wed Oct 05, 2016 1:36 pm

Something like this tells a much more interesting story. That cap rock is visible in the background as well. That layer was once continuous. On Earth that's no surprise because chemical weathering helps break down the softer rocks below and water erosion removes loose material. On Mars, either there was a lot of active water erosion in the past, or material has been removed by wind. But a LOT of material has been moved.

Top