xkcd: What If?

Off topic discourse and banter encouraged.
User avatar
bystander
Apathetic Retiree
Posts: 21571
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Oklahoma

xkcd: What If? #79 - Lake Tea

Post by bystander » Tue Feb 18, 2014 6:35 am

Lake Tea
  • What if we were to dump all the tea in the world into the Great Lakes?
    How strong, compared to a regular cup of tea, would the lake tea be? — Alex Burman
Know the quiet place within your heart and touch the rainbow of possibility; be
alive to the gentle breeze of communication, and please stop being such a jerk.
— Garrison Keillor

User avatar
bystander
Apathetic Retiree
Posts: 21571
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Oklahoma

xkcd: What If? #80 - Pile of Viruses

Post by bystander » Tue Feb 18, 2014 6:43 am

Pile of Viruses
  • What if every virus in the world were collected into one area? How
    much volume would they take up and what would they look like? — Dave
Know the quiet place within your heart and touch the rainbow of possibility; be
alive to the gentle breeze of communication, and please stop being such a jerk.
— Garrison Keillor

User avatar
bystander
Apathetic Retiree
Posts: 21571
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Oklahoma

xkcd: What If? #81 - Catch!

Post by bystander » Tue Feb 18, 2014 6:48 am

Catch!
  • Is there any way to fire a gun so that the bullet flies through the air and
    can then be safely caught by hand? e.g. shooter is at sea level and catcher
    is up a mountain at the extreme range of the gun. — Ed Hui, London
Know the quiet place within your heart and touch the rainbow of possibility; be
alive to the gentle breeze of communication, and please stop being such a jerk.
— Garrison Keillor

User avatar
bystander
Apathetic Retiree
Posts: 21571
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Oklahoma

xkcd: What If? #82 - Hitting a comet

Post by bystander » Tue Feb 18, 2014 6:51 am

Hitting a comet
  • Astrophysicists are always saying things like "This mission to this comet is
    equivalent to throwing a baseball from New York and hitting a particular
    window in San Francisco." Are they really equivalent? — Tom Foster
Know the quiet place within your heart and touch the rainbow of possibility; be
alive to the gentle breeze of communication, and please stop being such a jerk.
— Garrison Keillor

User avatar
bystander
Apathetic Retiree
Posts: 21571
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Oklahoma

xkcd: What If? #83 - Star Sand

Post by bystander » Tue Feb 18, 2014 6:56 am

Star Sand
  • If you made a beach using grains the proportionate size of the stars
    in the Milky Way, what would that beach look like? — Jeff Wartes
Know the quiet place within your heart and touch the rainbow of possibility; be
alive to the gentle breeze of communication, and please stop being such a jerk.
— Garrison Keillor

User avatar
Ann
4725 Å
Posts: 13370
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am

Re: xkcd: What If? #83

Post by Ann » Tue Feb 18, 2014 9:45 am

Very interesting, bystander.

Your post made me think of what stars are resolved in typical Hubble galaxy images. An interesting example is vigorously starforming dwarf galaxy NGC 2414, which has a large underlying population of old mostly reddish stars. This Hubble page allows you to look at NGC 4214 at various resolutions. You can easily spot the young blue giants and supergiants, and you can see the bright orange-red stars that tend to keep the blue supergiants company: these are the red supergiants, the Antareses and Betelgeuses. But much of the field is filled with much fainter red points of light. These are the much more ordinary red giants, the Arcturuses and Dubhes. But the bulk of the galaxy is made up of stars smaller than the Sun, the K- and M-type red dwarfs.

I have to wonder if Hubble has spotted any star in NGC 4214 that is smaller than the Sun.

Ann
Color Commentator

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18105
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: xkcd: What If? #83

Post by Chris Peterson » Tue Feb 18, 2014 2:58 pm

Ann wrote:Your post made me think of what stars are resolved in typical Hubble galaxy images.
Me too, although in a slightly different way. Of course, no stars are spatially resolved in HST images, they are only resolved in the sense of being isolated from their backgrounds. The apparent diameter of stars in images is many orders of magnitude larger than their actual diameter. Taking a "typical" star to have a diameter of a million kilometers, and an average distance between stars of a light year, we could say that stars tend to be separated from one another by ten million times their diameter. What the sand analysis fails to point out is that the beach would look very different from any ordinary beach because of this, with sand grains now separated by 10 million millimeters- 10 km between each grain. You'd have to search for years just to find any grains at all!
Ann wrote:I have to wonder if Hubble has spotted any star in NGC 4214 that is smaller than the Sun.
Why not? "Resolving" a star in another galaxy has nothing at all to do with the star's size, and is only determined by its brightness and separation from other stars.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

User avatar
geckzilla
Ocular Digitator
Posts: 9180
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: Modesto, CA
Contact:

Re: xkcd: What If? #83

Post by geckzilla » Tue Feb 18, 2014 3:00 pm

I think the point was just to have the numbers of stars be represented by the sand, not the distance between them.
Just call me "geck" because "zilla" is like a last name.

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18105
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: xkcd: What If? #83

Post by Chris Peterson » Tue Feb 18, 2014 3:01 pm

geckzilla wrote:I think the point was just to have the numbers of stars be represented by the sand, not the distance between them.
I agree- that wasn't a criticism of the analysis. Just that Ann's thinking about what it means in terms of seeing stars in other galaxies brings to mind the other component of the analysis, which is the low density of galaxies compared with beaches.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

User avatar
Ann
4725 Å
Posts: 13370
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am

Re: xkcd: What If? #83

Post by Ann » Tue Feb 18, 2014 4:33 pm

Chris wrote:
"Resolving" a star in another galaxy has nothing at all to do with the star's size, and is only determined by its brightness and separation from other stars.
Small stars typically aren't very bright. Are they bright enough for Hubble to resolve them if they are, say, half as bright as the Sun and located in the disk of a galaxy at the distance of the Virgo Cluster? Let's say that the separation of the stars in this galactic disk is similar to the separation between stars in the Sun's neighborhood.

Ann
Color Commentator

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18105
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: xkcd: What If? #83

Post by Chris Peterson » Tue Feb 18, 2014 4:44 pm

Ann wrote:Small stars typically aren't very bright. Are they bright enough for Hubble to resolve them if they are, say, half as bright as the Sun and located in the disk of a galaxy at the distance of the Virgo Cluster? Let's say that the separation of the stars in this galactic disk is similar to the separation between stars in the Sun's neighborhood.
Instrumentally, I think we could detect a star half as bright as the Sun at that distance (I'll do the calculation later). The real problem is separation. Probably, the star would need to be more isolated than is typical.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

User avatar
geckzilla
Ocular Digitator
Posts: 9180
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: Modesto, CA
Contact:

Re: xkcd: What If? #83

Post by geckzilla » Tue Feb 18, 2014 4:57 pm

I think Hubble's M82 mosaic is good for getting the feel for resolving different types of stars because it's a smooth haze of stars with plenty of globular clusters to compare the individually resolved stars to because you know more or less what globular clusters are made of. Here is a 12 megabyte JPEG file to pan around in without any sharpening applied so it's easy to tell the difference between a globular and a foreground star... http://www.geckzilla.com/astro/m82_flat.jpg

Unfortunately, the JPEG compression muddles some of it but you can still see clearly that the smaller stars aren't resolved at all but become part of a fine mist or haze. I imagine them like fog particles.
Just call me "geck" because "zilla" is like a last name.

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: xkcd: What If? #83

Post by neufer » Tue Feb 18, 2014 4:59 pm

Ann wrote:
Small stars typically aren't very bright. Are they bright enough for Hubble to resolve them if they are, say, half as bright as the Sun and located in the disk of a galaxy at the distance of the Virgo Cluster?
  • 1) The Hubble Space Telescope has located stars with apparent magnitudes of 30 at visible wavelengths.

    2) At (the Virgo Cluster's distance of) 16.5 Mpc this corresponds to an absolute magnitude of -1

    3) Our own Sun has an absolute magnitude of +4.83

    4) If our own Sun was 10 times closer than the Virgo Cluster it still would not be visible in Hubble.
Art Neuendorffer

User avatar
rstevenson
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Posts: 2704
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 1:24 pm
Location: Halifax, NS, Canada

Re: xkcd: What If? #83

Post by rstevenson » Tue Feb 18, 2014 6:43 pm

geckzilla wrote:... Here is a 12 megabyte JPEG file to pan around in without any sharpening applied so it's easy to tell the difference between a globular and a foreground star... http://www.geckzilla.com/astro/m82_flat.jpg ...
I've never seen such an image before processing, so this is a learning experience for me. Here's a piece of it, for those not able to deal with a 12 MB file, roughly 30% from the left, about in the middle vertically. In this piece I'm sure there are 3 globular clusters. Would all the other spots be stars? And can we say that about a third of them are orange(ish) and perhaps twice that many are blue or white? Or is any apparent colour an illusion at this point in the processing?
m82_zoom.jpg
And here's a 5X blowup of a bit of that, including the largest of the GCs, so you can see how fuzzy everything is.
m82_5x_globular.jpg
m82_5x_globular.jpg (61.54 KiB) Viewed 5282 times
Rob
Last edited by bystander on Tue Feb 18, 2014 9:46 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Reason: replaced images with less JPEG compressed ones from original image

User avatar
geckzilla
Ocular Digitator
Posts: 9180
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: Modesto, CA
Contact:

Re: xkcd: What If? #83

Post by geckzilla » Tue Feb 18, 2014 7:05 pm

rstevenson wrote:I've never seen such an image before processing, so this is a learning experience for me. Here's a piece of it, for those not able to deal with a 12 MB file, roughly 30% from the left, about in the middle vertically. In this piece I'm sure there are 3 globular clusters. Would all the other spots be stars? And can we say that about a third of them are orange(ish) and perhaps twice that many are blue or white? Or is any apparent colour an illusion at this point in the processing?
Thanks, I was going to put some little close up crops but I was in a rush to go somewhere. I replaced the images you posted with some clearer ones. Yes, the little orange spots are probably big ol' stars or close binary systems or whatever. Panning around you can find a few blue ones, too.

Also, just to clarify it's still processed, there is just no deconvolving/sharpening so it's I guess a little more natural? If you want to view some truly raw data you'd have to view the FITS files themselves.
Just call me "geck" because "zilla" is like a last name.

User avatar
rstevenson
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Posts: 2704
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 1:24 pm
Location: Halifax, NS, Canada

Re: xkcd: What If? #83

Post by rstevenson » Tue Feb 18, 2014 7:25 pm

geckzilla wrote:... I replaced the images you posted with some clearer ones. ...
Oops! I forgot my software is set to 80% by default, since that's almost always the best I need.

Rob

User avatar
geckzilla
Ocular Digitator
Posts: 9180
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: Modesto, CA
Contact:

Re: xkcd: What If? #83

Post by geckzilla » Tue Feb 18, 2014 7:29 pm

I mean because yours were second generation JPEGs. I just brought them back up to first generation.
Just call me "geck" because "zilla" is like a last name.

User avatar
BMAONE23
Commentator Model 1.23
Posts: 4076
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 6:55 pm
Location: California

Re: xkcd: What If? #83

Post by BMAONE23 » Tue Feb 18, 2014 10:21 pm

So, If you shrunk the Stars down to the sizes of Sand Grains (and boulders) as appropriate, How far away from Our grain of sand, would Alpha Centauri be?

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18105
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: xkcd: What If? #83

Post by Chris Peterson » Tue Feb 18, 2014 10:39 pm

BMAONE23 wrote:So, If you shrunk the Stars down to the sizes of Sand Grains (and boulders) as appropriate, How far away from Our grain of sand, would Alpha Centauri be?
Something like 40 km.

It's easy to forget just how empty space is.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: xkcd: What If? #83

Post by neufer » Tue Feb 18, 2014 10:41 pm

BMAONE23 wrote:
So, If you shrunk the Stars down to the sizes of Sand Grains (and boulders) as appropriate,
How far away from Our grain of sand, would Alpha Centauri be?
About 9.4 kilometres.
Art Neuendorffer

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18105
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: xkcd: What If? #83

Post by Chris Peterson » Tue Feb 18, 2014 11:32 pm

Chris Peterson wrote:
BMAONE23 wrote:So, If you shrunk the Stars down to the sizes of Sand Grains (and boulders) as appropriate, How far away from Our grain of sand, would Alpha Centauri be?
Something like 40 km.
neufer wrote:About 9.4 kilometres.
You want better than that, you're going to have to define what size sand grain represents the Sun.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

User avatar
geckzilla
Ocular Digitator
Posts: 9180
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: Modesto, CA
Contact:

Re: xkcd: What If? #83

Post by geckzilla » Tue Feb 18, 2014 11:38 pm

Use the USGS's wonderful chart! How about the medium sized grain of sand right smack in the middle of medium: .354mm
Just call me "geck" because "zilla" is like a last name.

User avatar
geckzilla
Ocular Digitator
Posts: 9180
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: Modesto, CA
Contact:

xkcd: What If? #84 - Paint the Earth

Post by geckzilla » Tue Feb 18, 2014 11:43 pm

Paint the Earth
  • Has humanity produced enough paint to cover the entire land area of the Earth? —Josh (Bolton, MA)
Just call me "geck" because "zilla" is like a last name.

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18105
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: xkcd: What If? #83

Post by Chris Peterson » Wed Feb 19, 2014 12:01 am

geckzilla wrote:Use the USGS's wonderful chart! How about the medium sized grain of sand right smack in the middle of medium: .354mm
So d = 0.354e-6 km * 4.1e13 km / 1.391e6 km = 10.4 km.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: xkcd: What If? #83

Post by neufer » Wed Feb 19, 2014 2:18 pm

Chris Peterson wrote:
geckzilla wrote:
Use the USGS's wonderful chart! How about the medium sized grain of sand right smack in the middle of medium: .354mm
So d = 0.354e-6 km * 4.1e13 km / 1.391e6 km = 10.4 km.
  • The distance to that far speck of sand is determined by
    alternately blinking one's eyes separated by 2AU (i.e., ~ 3 inches).
Art Neuendorffer

Post Reply