Raufu wrote:I agree - according to the Wikipedia definition, APOD should be cast as a blog. The trouble is that in use, the word blog has subtly altered its definitionand is tending towards something approaching spam - that is - it tends to express views and influence recipients, and APOD is definitely NOT in this category!
It is informative, neutral, interesting and educational, but NOT political or influencing, and this takes it out of the developing blog meaning in my view.
And above all - it is FUN!!
Many thanks to all the team who work on this project.
ExNihilo wrote:In a broad definition it is a blog, but I still voted "no" because it is just doesn't have the look and feel of a blog. This look and feel notion is something the Wikipedia definition didn't really include.
Users browsing this forum: CommonCrawl [Bot] and 1 guest