NatGeo: Chile Earthquake (Slightly) Shortens Earth's Day

Find out the latest thinking about our universe.
Post Reply
User avatar
RJN
Baffled Boffin
Posts: 1668
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 1:58 pm
Location: Michigan Tech

NatGeo: Chile Earthquake (Slightly) Shortens Earth's Day

Post by RJN » Wed Mar 03, 2010 2:18 pm

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... tened-day/
By speeding up Earth's rotation, the magnitude 8.8 earthquake—the fifth strongest ever recorded, according to the USGS—should have shortened an Earth day by 1.26 millionths of a second, according to new computer-model calculations by geophysicist Richard Gross of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California.

User avatar
BMAONE23
Commentator Model 1.23
Posts: 4076
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 6:55 pm
Location: California

Re: NatGeo: Chile Earthquake (Slightly) Shortens Earth's Day

Post by BMAONE23 » Wed Mar 03, 2010 5:49 pm

As the temblor didn't happen at the point where the plates meet, it occured deeper along the subduction zone of the fault. Their explanation of the compressive forcing of material closer to the core creating a slightly faster spin makes sence, initially, but being in a subduction zone, wouldn't the slip also have forced the upper layer (south american plate) to raise away from the core possibly offsetting any spin rate gain from comperssion?

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: NatGeo: Chile Earthquake (Slightly) Shortens Earth's Day

Post by neufer » Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 pm

BMAONE23 wrote:As the temblor didn't happen at the point where the plates meet, it occurred deeper along the subduction zone of the fault. Their explanation of the compressive forcing of material closer to the core creating a slightly faster spin makes sense, initially, but being in a subduction zone, wouldn't the slip also have forced the upper layer (south american plate) to raise away from the core possibly offsetting any spin rate gain from compression?
What went down was denser than what went up.
Art Neuendorffer

Post Reply