UT: The Nice Way To Build A Solar System

Find out the latest thinking about our universe.
Post Reply
User avatar
bystander
Apathetic Retiree
Posts: 21577
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Oklahoma

UT: The Nice Way To Build A Solar System

Post by bystander » Sun Apr 25, 2010 3:04 am

The Nice Way To Build A Solar System
Astronomy Without A Telescope
Universe Today - 24 April 2010

Image
When considering how the solar system formed, there a number of problems with the idea of planets just blobbing together out of a rotating accretion disk. The Nice model (and OK, it’s pronounced ‘niece’ -- as in the French city) offers a better solution.

In the traditional Kant/Laplace solar nebula model you have a rotating protoplanetary disk within which loosely associated objects build up into planetesimals, which then become gravitationally powerful centers of mass capable of clearing their orbit and voila planet!

It’s generally agreed now that this just can’t work since a growing planetesimal, in the process of constantly interacting with protoplanetary disk material, will have its orbit progressively decayed so that it will spiral inwards, potentially crashing into the Sun unless it can clear an orbit before it has lost too much angular momentum.

The Nice solution is to accept that most planets probably did form in different regions to where they orbit now. It’s likely that the current rocky planets of our solar system formed somewhat further out and have moved inwards due to interactions with protoplanetary disk material in the very early stages of the solar system's formation.

It is likely that within 100 million years of the Sun's ignition, a large number of rocky protoplanets, in eccentric and chaotic orbits, engaged in collisions -- followed by the inward migration of the last four planets left standing as they lost angular momentum to the persisting gas and dust of the inner disk. This last phase may have stabilized them into the almost circular, and only marginally eccentric, orbits we see today.
Image
The hypothesized collision between 'Earth Mk 1' and Theia may have occurred late in rocky planet
formation creating the Earth as we know it with its huge Moon of accreted impact debris.
Meanwhile, the gas giants were forming out beyond the 'frost line' where it was cool enough for ices to form. Since water, methane and CO2 were a lot more abundant than iron, nickel or silicon -- icy planetary cores grew fast and grew big, reaching a scale where their gravity was powerful enough to hold onto the hydrogen and helium that was also present in abundance in the protoplanetary disk. This allowed these planets to grow to an enormous size.

Jupiter probably began forming within only 3 million years of solar ignition, rapidly clearing its orbit, which stopped it from migrating further inward. Saturn's ice core grabbed whatever gases Jupiter didn't -- and Uranus and Neptune soaked up the dregs. Uranus and Neptune are thought to have formed much closer to the Sun than they are now -- and in reverse order, with Neptune closer in than Uranus.

And then, around 500 million years after solar ignition, something remarkable happened. Jupiter and Saturn settled into a 2:1 orbital resonance -- meaning that they lined up at the same points twice for every orbit of Saturn. This created a gravitational pulse that kicked Neptune out past Uranus, so that it ploughed in to what was then a closer and denser Kuiper Belt.

The result was a chaotic flurry of Kuiper Belt Objects, many being either flung outwards towards the Oort cloud or flung inwards towards the inner solar system. These, along a rain of asteroids from a gravitationally disrupted asteroid belt -- delivered the Late Heavy Bombardment, which pummelled the inner solar system for several hundred million years - the devastation of which is still apparent on the surfaces of the Moon and Mercury today.

Then, as the dust finally settled around 3.8 billion years ago and as a new day dawned on the third rock from the Sun -- voila life!
<-- Previous

Post Reply