UBuffalo: Did the Early Universe Have One Dimension?

Find out the latest thinking about our universe.
Post Reply
User avatar
bystander
Apathetic Retiree
Posts: 21577
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Oklahoma

UBuffalo: Did the Early Universe Have One Dimension?

Post by bystander » Mon Apr 25, 2011 1:38 am

Primordial Weirdness: Did the Early Universe Have One Dimension?
University of Buffalo | 2011 Apr 20
Scientists outline a test for the theory, which, if proven, would address major problems in particle physics

Did the early universe have just one spatial dimension?

That's the mind-boggling concept at the heart of a theory that University at Buffalo physicist Dejan Stojkovic and colleagues proposed in 2010.

They suggested that the early universe -- which exploded from a single point and was very, very small at first -- was one-dimensional (like a straight line) before expanding to include two dimensions (like a plane) and then three (like the world in which we live today).

The theory, if valid, would address important problems in particle physics.

Now, in a new paper in Physical Review Letters, Stojkovic and Loyola Marymount University physicist Jonas Mureika describe a test that could prove or disprove the "vanishing dimensions" hypothesis.

Because it takes time for light and other waves to travel to Earth, telescopes peering out into space can, essentially, look back into time as they probe the universe's outer reaches.

Gravitational waves can't exist in one- or two-dimensional space. So Stojkovic and Mureika have reasoned that the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA), a planned international gravitational observatory, should not detect any gravitational waves emanating from the lower-dimensional epochs of the early universe.

Stojkovic, an assistant professor of physics at UB, says the theory of evolving dimensions represents a radical shift from the way we think about the cosmos -- about how our universe came to be.

The core idea is that the dimensionality of space depends on the size of the space we're observing, with smaller spaces associated with fewer dimensions. That means that a fourth dimension will open up -- if it hasn't already -- as the universe continues to expand.

The theory also suggests that space has fewer dimensions at very high energies of the kind associated with the early, post-big bang universe.

If Stojkovic and his colleagues are right, they will be helping to address fundamental problems with the standard model of particle physics, including the following:
  • The incompatibility between quantum mechanics and general relativity. Quantum mechanics and general relativity are mathematical frameworks that describe the physics of the universe. Quantum mechanics is good at describing the universe at very small scales, while relativity is good at describing the universe at large scales. Currently, the two theories are considered incompatible; but if the universe, at its smallest levels, had fewer dimensions, mathematical discrepancies between the two frameworks would disappear.
  • The mystery of the universe's accelerating expansion. Physicists have observed that the expansion of the universe is speeding up, and they don't know why. The addition of new dimensions as the universe grows would explain this acceleration. (Stojkovic says a fourth dimension may have already opened at large, cosmological scales.)
  • The need to alter the mass of the Higgs boson. The standard model of particle physics predicts the existence of an as yet undiscovered elementary particle called the Higgs boson. For equations in the standard model to accurately describe the observed physics of the real world, however, researchers must artificially adjust the mass of the Higgs boson for interactions between particles that take place at high energies. If space has fewer dimensions at high energies, the need for this kind of "tuning" disappears.

"What we're proposing here is a shift in paradigm," Stojkovic said. "Physicists have struggled with the same problems for 10, 20, 30 years, and straight-forward extensions of extensions of the existing ideas are unlikely to solve them.

"We have to take into account the possibility that something is systematically wrong with our ideas," he continued. "We need something radical and new, and this is something radical and new."

Because the planned deployment of LISA is still years away, it may be a long time before Stojkovic and his colleagues are able to test their ideas this way.

However, some experimental evidence already points to the possible existence of lower-dimensional space.

Specifically, scientists have observed that the main energy flux of cosmic ray particles with energies exceeding 1 teraelectron volt -- the kind of high energy associated with the very early universe -- are aligned along a two-dimensional plane.

If high energies do correspond with lower-dimensional space, as the "vanishing dimensions" theory proposes, researchers working with the Large Hadron Collider particle accelerator in Europe should see planar scattering at such energies.

Stojkovic says the observation of such events would be "a very exciting, independent test of our proposed ideas."
Detecting Vanishing Dimensions via Primordial Gravitational Wave Astronomy - Jonas R. Mureika, Dejan Stojkovic Comment on: Detecting Vanishing Dimensions Via Primordial Gravitational Wave Astronomy - Thomas P. Sotiriou, Matt Visser, Silke Weinfurtner Vanishing Dimensions and Planar Events at the LHC - L Anchordoqui et al
  • arXiv.org > hep-ph > arXiv:1003.5914 > 30 Mar 2010 (v1), 17 Sep 2010 (v2)
Know the quiet place within your heart and touch the rainbow of possibility; be
alive to the gentle breeze of communication, and please stop being such a jerk.
— Garrison Keillor

User avatar
owlice
Guardian of the Codes
Posts: 8406
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 4:18 pm
Location: Washington, DC

Re: UBuffalo: Did the Early Universe Have One Dimension?

Post by owlice » Tue Apr 26, 2011 9:51 am

Vanishing dimensions? Propogating or increasing dimensions strikes me as a better name for the theory.
A closed mouth gathers no foot.

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: UBuffalo: Did the Early Universe Have One Dimension?

Post by neufer » Tue Apr 26, 2011 2:50 pm

owlice wrote:
Vanishing dimensions? Propogating or increasing dimensions strikes me as a better name for the theory.
Vanishing dimensions as the Large Hadron Collider investigates higher energies
or as various astronomical instruments peer back in time (e.g., to pre-woman's lib).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatland wrote: <<Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions is an 1884 satirical novella by the English schoolmaster Edwin Abbott Abbott. Writing pseudonymously as "A Square", Abbott used the fictional two-dimensional world of Flatland to offer pointed observations on the social hierarchy of Victorian culture.

The story is about a two-dimensional world referred to as Flatland which is occupied by geometric figures. Women are simple line-segments, while men are regular polygons with various numbers of sides. The narrator is a humble square, a member of the social caste of gentlemen and professionals in a society of geometric figures, who guides us through some of the implications of life in two dimensions. The square has a dream about a visit to a one-dimensional world (Lineland) which is inhabited by "lustrous points." He attempts to convince the realm's ignorant monarch of a second dimension but finds that it is essentially impossible to make him see outside of his eternally straight line. He is then visited by a three-dimensional sphere, which he cannot comprehend until he sees Spaceland for himself. This sphere, who remains nameless, visits Flatland at the turn of each millennium to introduce a new apostle to the idea of a third dimension in the hopes of eventually educating the population of Flatland of the existence of Spaceland. From the safety of Spaceland, they are able to observe the leaders of Flatland secretly acknowledging the existence of the sphere and prescribing the silencing of anyone found preaching the truth of Spaceland and the third dimension. After this proclamation is made, many witnesses are massacred or imprisoned (according to caste).

After the Square's mind is opened to new dimensions, he tries to convince the Sphere of the theoretical possibility of the existence of a fourth (and fifth, and sixth ...) spatial dimension. Offended by this presumption and incapable of comprehending other dimensions, the Sphere returns his student to Flatland in disgrace. The Square then has a dream in which the Sphere visits him again, this time to introduce him to Pointland. The point (sole inhabitant, monarch, and universe in one) perceives any attempt at communicating with him as simply being a thought originating in his own mind (cf. Solipsism):
  • 'You see,' said my Teacher, 'how little your words have done. So far as the Monarch understand them at all, he accepts them as his own – for he cannot conceive of any other except himself – and plumes himself upon the variety of Its Thought as an instance of creative Power. Let us leave this God of Pointland to the ignorant fruition of his omnipresence and omniscience: nothing that you or I can do can rescue him from his self-satisfaction.' — the Sphere
The Square recognizes the connection between the ignorance of the monarchs of Pointland and Lineland with his own (and the Sphere's) previous ignorance of the existence of other, higher dimensions. Once returned to Flatland, the Square finds it difficult to convince anyone of Spaceland's existence, especially after official decrees are announced – anyone preaching the lies of three dimensions will be imprisoned (or executed, depending on caste). Eventually the Square himself is imprisoned for just this reason, where he spends the rest of his days attempting to explain the third dimension to his brother.>>
Art Neuendorffer

User avatar
Ann
4725 Å
Posts: 13427
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am

Re: UBuffalo: Did the Early Universe Have One Dimension?

Post by Ann » Tue Apr 26, 2011 3:22 pm

Women are simple line-segments, while men are regular polygons with various numbers of sides.
Pre-women's lib. You got that right.

Ann
Color Commentator

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Edwin AbBOTT AbBOTT in 'DRAG'?

Post by neufer » Wed Nov 23, 2011 4:56 am

neufer wrote:
owlice wrote: Vanishing dimensions? Propogating or increasing dimensions
strikes me as a better name for the theory.
Vanishing dimensions as the Large Hadron Collider investigates higher energies
or as various astronomical instruments peer back in time (e.g., to pre-woman's lib).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatland wrote:
<<Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions is an 1884 satirical novella by the English schoolmaster Edwin AbBOTT AbBOTT. Writing pseudonymously as "A Square", Abbott used the fictional two-dimensional world of Flatland to offer pointed observations on the social hierarchy of Victorian culture.>>
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Abbott.html wrote: .
<<Edwin AbBOTT AbBOTT's parents were Jane AbBOTT Edwin AbBOTT.
(His mother Jane was a first cousin of his father, so both had the name of AbBOTT.)

Edwin AbBOTT AbBOTT was the writer of the PREFACE to Constance M. POTT's _The Promus of formularies & elegancies_

He wrote several theological works and a biography (1885) of Francis Bacon,
but he is best known for his standard: _A Shakespearean Grammar_ by E. A. A. 30th May, 1870.
and the pseudonymously written Flatland (by A Square, 1884).>>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Constance M. POTT was born on Wednesday, January 22, 1862
Francis Bacon was born on Wednesday, January 22, 1561
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sirbacon.org/links/pott.html wrote:
Constance M. POTT (January 22, 1862 - 1957 :!: ) started the Francis Bacon Society with it's first meeting in December of 1885. Mrs. Pott is author of Francis Bacon (January 22, 1561-1626)and His Secret Society and arranged the publication of Francis Bacon's private notebook The Promus of Formularies and Elegancies; Private Notes, circa. 1594-6.
http://shakespeareauthorship.com/ox5.html wrote:
<<One of the sheets of The Promus contains so many parallels to ROMEO & JULIET, including a single speech of Friar Laurence's, that even the Shakespearean scholar Edwin AbBOTT AbBOTT (in his PREFACE to POTT's edition) was hard put to call it a coincidence. >>
- (Stratfordian) David Kathman
      • _Love Labour's Lost_ & *_ROMEO & JULIET_* were both registered on January 22, 1607
        ------------------------------­---------------------------
        Ben Jonson's First Folio Eulogy to Shakespeare:

        * [P]assions of *JULIET, and her ROMEO* ;
        * [O]r till I heare a Scene more nobly take,
        * [T]hen when thy half-Sword parlying Romans spake.
        * [T]ill these, till any of thy Volumes rest
        ------------------------------­--------------------------
Constance M. POTT (January 22, 1862 - 1957) could have been interviewed on TV by Jack Parr in 1957 :!:
Art Neuendorffer

User avatar
Ann
4725 Å
Posts: 13427
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am

Re: Edwin AbBOTT AbBOTT in 'DRAG'?

Post by Ann » Wed Nov 23, 2011 6:44 am

Image
Södra Sallerups kyrka (pre-woman's lib)
This is Södra Sallerups Kyrka, the Church of Södra Sallerup, whose oldest parts date back to the 12th century. You can see the main entrance far to the right in this image. Or maybe I should say that it wasn't just the main entrance, it was also the men's entrance?

So where did the women enter the church? Well, first of all you need to understand that this picture was taken in the afternoon, and the church is lit by the Sun from the west, and the main entrance is to the west. But the women had to enter through a door that was located below the tower, behind a tree in this picture. That door was to the north, an evil cardinal point in cold Scandinavia. So of course the women had to enter the church from the north!

Pre-woman's lib, indeed! :evil:

Ann
Color Commentator

User avatar
Ann
4725 Å
Posts: 13427
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am

Re: UBuffalo: Did the Early Universe Have One Dimension?

Post by Ann » Wed Nov 23, 2011 6:46 am

This thread has strayed horribly off topic, not least because of my own contributions. But I must say, bystander, that the idea of the universe expanding from zero dimensions to one to two to three to, perhaps, four spatial dimensions, is a very interesting one.

Ann
Color Commentator

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: UBuffalo: Did the Early Universe Have One Dimension?

Post by neufer » Wed Nov 23, 2011 1:48 pm

Click to play embedded YouTube video.
Click to play embedded YouTube video.
Art Neuendorffer

Post Reply