MIT: A far-off solar system

Find out the latest thinking about our universe.

MIT: A far-off solar system

Postby bystander » Thu Jul 26, 2012 9:03 pm

A far-off solar system
MIT | Jennifer Chu | 2012 July 25
Researchers measure the orientation of a multiplanet system and find it very similar to our own solar system

Our solar system exhibits a remarkably orderly configuration: The eight planets orbit the sun much like runners on a track, circling in their respective lanes and always keeping within the same sprawling plane. In contrast, most exoplanets discovered in recent years — particularly the giants known as “hot Jupiters” — inhabit far more eccentric orbits.

Now researchers at MIT, the University of California at Santa Cruz and other institutions have detected the first exoplanetary system, 10,000 light-years away, with regularly aligned orbits similar to those in our solar system. At the center of this faraway system is Kepler-30, a star as bright and massive as the sun. After analyzing data from NASA’s Kepler space telescope, the MIT scientists and their colleagues discovered that the star — much like the sun — rotates around a vertical axis and its three planets have orbits that are all in the same plane.

“In our solar system, the trajectory of the planets is parallel to the rotation of the sun, which shows they probably formed from a spinning disc,” says Roberto Sanchis-Ojeda, a physics graduate student at MIT who led the research effort. “In this system, we show that the same thing happens.”

Their findings, published today in the journal Nature, may help explain the origins of certain far-flung systems while shedding light on our own planetary neighborhood.

“It’s telling me that the solar system isn’t some fluke,” says Josh Winn, an associate professor of physics at MIT and a co-author on the paper. “The fact that the sun’s rotation is lined up with the planets’ orbits, that’s probably not some freak coincidence.”

Setting the record straight on orbital tilts

Winn says the team’s discovery may back a recent theory of how hot Jupiters form. These giant bodies are named for their extremely close proximity to their white-hot stars, completing an orbit in mere hours or days. Hot Jupiters’ orbits are typically off-kilter, and scientists have thought that such misalignments might be a clue to their origins: Their orbits may have been knocked askew in the very early, volatile period of a planetary system’s formation, when several giant planets may have come close enough to scatter some planets out of the system while bringing others closer to their stars.

Recently, scientists have identified a number of hot Jupiter systems, all of which have tilted orbits. But to really prove this “planetary scattering” theory, Winn says researchers have to identify a non-hot Jupiter system, one with planets circling farther from their star. If the system were aligned like our solar system, with no orbital tilt, it would provide evidence that only hot Jupiter systems are misaligned, formed as a result of planetary scattering.

Spotting sunspots in a far-off sun

In order to resolve the puzzle, Sanchis-Ojeda looked through data from the Kepler space telescope, an instrument that monitors 150,000 stars for signs of distant planets. He narrowed in on Kepler-30, a non-hot Jupiter system with three planets, all with much longer orbits than a typical hot Jupiter. To measure the alignment of the star, Sanchis-Ojeda tracked its sunspots, dark splotches on the surface of bright stars like the sun.

“These little black blotches march across the star as it rotates,” Winn says. “If we could make an image, that’d be great, because you’d see exactly how the star is oriented just by tracking these spots.”

But stars like Kepler-30 are extremely far away, so capturing an image of them is almost impossible: The only way to document such stars is by measuring the small amount of light they give off. So the team looked for ways to track sunspots using the light of these stars. Each time a planet transits — or crosses in front of — such a star, it blocks a bit of starlight, which astronomers see as a dip in light intensity. If a planet crosses a dark sunspot, the amount of light blocked decreases, creating a blip in the data dip.

“If you get a blip of a sunspot, then the next time the planet comes around, the same spot might have moved over here, and you’d see the blip not here but there,” Winn says. “So the timing of these blips is what we use to determine the alignment of the star.”

From the data blips, Sanchis-Ojeda concluded that Kepler-30 rotates along an axis perpendicular to the orbital plane of its largest planet. The researchers then determined the alignment of the planets’ orbits by studying the gravitational effects of one planet on another. By measuring the timing variations of planets as they transit the star, the team derived their respective orbital configurations, and found that all three planets are aligned along the same plane. The overall planetary structure, Sanchis-Ojeda found, looks much like our solar system.

James Lloyd, an assistant professor of astronomy at Cornell University who was not involved in this research, says that studying planetary orbits may shed light on how life evolved in the universe — since in order to have a stable climate suitable for life, a planet needs to be in a stable orbit. “In order to understand how common life is in the universe, ultimately we will need to understand how common stable planetary systems are,” Lloyd says. “We may find clues in extrasolar planetary systems to help understand the puzzles of the solar system, and vice versa.”

The findings from this first study of the alignment of a non-hot Jupiter system suggest that hot Jupiter systems may indeed form via planetary scattering. To know for sure, Winn says he and his colleagues plan to measure the orbits of other far-off solar systems.

“We’ve been hungry for one like this, where it’s not exactly like the solar system, but at least it’s more normal, where the planets and the star are aligned with each other,” Winn says. “It’s the first case where we can say that, besides the solar system.”

On the Same Plane
Science NOW | Sid Perkins | 2012 July 25

Kepler Spots 'Perfectly Aligned' Alien Worlds
Discovery News | Irene Klotz | 2012 July 25

Alignment of the stellar spin with the orbits of a three-planet system - Roberto Sanchis-Ojeda et al
It's much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers which might be wrong. — Richard Feynman
User avatar
bystander
Apathetic Retiree
 
Posts: 11267
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Re: MIT: A far-off solar system

Postby Ann » Fri Jul 27, 2012 5:34 am

“We’ve been hungry for one like this, where it’s not exactly like the solar system, but at least it’s more normal, where the planets and the star are aligned with each other,” Winn says. “It’s the first case where we can say that, besides the solar system.”


1) It's like us +

2) It's the only one we've found (besides ourselves) =

It's normal.

Ann
User avatar
Ann
Commodore
 
Posts: 4470
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am

Re: MIT: A far-off solar system

Postby Beyond » Fri Jul 27, 2012 3:09 pm

On the other hand, seeing as how it's the only system like our's that's been found so far, it could be just as abnormal as our's is. A lined up freak, hidden in the chaos of the universe. :lol2:
To find the Truth, you must go Beyond
User avatar
Beyond
Milliways Pundit
 
Posts: 4478
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:09 am
Location: BEYONDER LAND

Re: MIT: A far-off solar system

Postby neufer » Fri Jul 27, 2012 5:00 pm

Beyond wrote:
On the other hand, seeing as how it's the only system like our's that's been found so far, it could be just as abnormal as our's is. A lined up freak, hidden in the chaos of the universe. :lol2:

It's in accord with what we know:

Normal, a. [L. normalis, fr. norma rule, pattern, carpenter's square; prob. akin to noscere to know; cf. Gr. well known, gnomon, also, carpenter's square.] According to an established norm, rule, or principle; conformed to a type, standard, or regular form; performing the proper functions; not abnormal; regular; natural; analogical.
Art Neuendorffer
User avatar
neufer
Abstruse Allusion Artificer
 
Posts: 9534
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: MIT: A far-off solar system

Postby Chris Peterson » Fri Jul 27, 2012 5:33 pm

Ann wrote:"It’s the first case where we can say that, besides the solar system.”
1) It's like us +
2) It's the only one we've found (besides ourselves) =
It's normal.

Yeah, that's sort of funny. Of course, mainly it just goes to show that "normal" means different things... one of which is seeming ordinary by the standards of what we are surrounded by.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
 
Posts: 7127
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Colorado, USA

Re: MIT: A far-off solar system

Postby Ann » Fri Jul 27, 2012 7:57 pm

Chris Peterson wrote:
Ann wrote:"It’s the first case where we can say that, besides the solar system.”
1) It's like us +
2) It's the only one we've found (besides ourselves) =
It's normal.

Yeah, that's sort of funny. Of course, mainly it just goes to show that "normal" means different things... one of which is seeming ordinary by the standards of what we are surrounded by.


Of course it may turn out that our Solar system is a lot more "normal" (that is, less atypical) than it appears to right now. Surely it takes longer to detect solar systems like our own than those where the planets orbit their stars very closely.

Ann
Last edited by Ann on Sat Jul 28, 2012 11:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Ann
Commodore
 
Posts: 4470
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am

Re: MIT: A far-off solar system

Postby Chris Peterson » Fri Jul 27, 2012 8:05 pm

Ann wrote:Of course it may turn out that our Solar system is a lot more "normal" (that is, non-atypical) than it appears to right now. Surely it takes longer to detect solar systems like our own than those where the planets orbit their stars very closely.

Very true.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
 
Posts: 7127
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Colorado, USA

Re: MIT: A far-off solar system

Postby neufer » Mon Apr 22, 2013 6:38 pm

http://blog.planethunters.org/2013/02/1 ... -transits/ wrote:
Jean Tate asked:

Question: In the image of Venus transiting the Sun, there are sunspots. How common are sunspots on the Sun-like stars in the Kepler field? How do sunspots change the transit light curve? How are sunspots modeled?

A: http://blog.planethunters.org/2013/02/1 ... -transits/
Art Neuendorffer
User avatar
neufer
Abstruse Allusion Artificer
 
Posts: 9534
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia


Return to The Communications Center: Breaking Science News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CommonCrawl [Bot] and 4 guests