Rochester: Nearby Double Star Fomalhaut Is Actually a Triple

Find out the latest thinking about our universe.
Post Reply
User avatar
bystander
Apathetic Retiree
Posts: 21577
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Rochester: Nearby Double Star Fomalhaut Is Actually a Triple

Post by bystander » Fri Oct 04, 2013 5:39 pm

Bright Nearby Double Star Fomalhaut Is Actually a Triple
University of Rochester | 2013 Oct 03
The nearby star system Fomalhaut – of special interest for its unusual exoplanet and dusty debris disk – has been discovered to be not just a double star, as astronomers had thought, but one of the widest triple stars known.

In a paper recently accepted for publication in the Astronomical Journal and posted today to the preprint server arXiv, researchers show that a previously known smaller star in its vicinity is also part of the Fomalhaut system.

Eric Mamajek, associate professor of physics and astronomy at the University of Rochester, and his collaborators found the triple nature of the star system through a bit of detective work. "I noticed this third star a couple of years ago when I was plotting the motions of stars in the vicinity of Fomalhaut for another study," Mamajek said. "However I needed to collect more data and gather a team of co-authors with different observations to test whether the star's properties are consistent with being a third member of the Fomalhaut system."

Serendipity also played a part. A chance meeting in Chile between Mamajek and Todd Henry, from Georgia State University and director of the Research Consortium On Nearby Stars (RECONS) team, revealed a clue that helped solve the mystery: the distance to the star. Henry recalls sitting in the kitchen of a motel in La Serena, Chile, with Mamajek, discussing nearby stars. "Eric was playing detective on this third star and I just happened to be sitting there with an observing list that contained the unpublished parallax," Henry said. Parallax is a type of measurement astronomers use to determine distances. "A student at the time, Jennifer Bartlett at the University of Virginia, was working with us on a sample of potentially nearby stars for her Ph.D. thesis, and LP876-10 was on it. Eric and I got to talking, and here we are with a cool discovery."

By carefully analyzing astrometric (precise movements) and spectroscopic measurements (that allow the temperature and radial velocity to be determined), the researchers were able to measure the distance and speed of the third star. They concluded that the star, until recently known as LP 876-10, is part of the Fomalhaut system, making it Fomalhaut C.

"Fomalhaut C looks quite far apart from the big, bright star that is Fomalhaut A when you look up at the sky from Earth," added Mamajek. There are roughly 5.5 degrees between the two stars, which is as if they were separated by roughly 11 full moons for an observer on Earth. Mamajek explained that they look this far apart, in part, because Fomalhaut is relatively close to Earth as stars go – approximately 25 light years. If these stars were far away from Earth, they would appear much closer together in the sky. That they appear so far apart could explain why the connection between LP 876-10 and Fomalhaut had been previously missed. Being able to obtain high quality astrometric and velocity data were the other keys.

The researchers also had to show that it would be feasible for these two stars to be bound, rather than moving independently. "Fomalhaut A is such a massive star, about twice the mass of our Sun, that it can exert sufficient gravitational pull to keep this tiny star bound to it – despite the star being 158,000 times farther away from Fomalhaut than the Earth is from the Sun," Mamajek said.

Mamajek worked with a large team of collaborators to piece together the story of this interesting tiny star. "Henry and the RECONS team have been doing an exhaustive survey of the "Solar Neighborhood," characterizing the stellar systems that are closest to our solar system and discovering new nearby stars," said Mamajek. "His team had already gathered several years of observations on this particular star – using the SMARTS 0.9-meter telescope at Cerro Tololo in Chile." The researchers also needed to know the radial velocity of the star, which Andreas Seifahrt from the University of Chicago measured, and which they pinpoint in the paper to be within about one kilometer per second of that of Fomalhaut A.

There are another 11 star systems closer to our Sun than Fomalhaut that consist of three or more stars, including the closest star system, Alpha Centauri. The new measurements in the paper also show that the Fomalhaut system is the most massive and widest among these nearby multiple systems.

Fomalhaut A is also the 18th brightest star visible in our night sky and one of the few stars with both a directly imaged exoplanet and a dusty debris disk. The famous star has been featured in science fiction novels by writers Isaac Asimov, Stanislaw Lem, Philip K. Dick, and Frank Herbert. Despite being a well-studied system, it was only recently confirmed that Fomalhaut was a binary star – two stars that orbit each other – although it had been first suggested in the 1890s.

One of Mamajek's colleagues at Rochester, Professor of Physics and Astronomy Alice C. Quillen, has worked for years to understand the way planets shape stellar dust disks like the one surrounding Fomalhaut. In 2006, she predicted the existence of a planet around Fomalhaut, as well as the shape of its orbit, by trying to understand why the debris ring was off-center and why it had a surprisingly sharp edge. The following year a new planet around Fomalhaut was imaged.

Many questions about Fomalhaut A's exoplanet and debris disk still remain unanswered. For example, astronomers are puzzled by why the exoplanet known as Fomalhaut "b" is on such an eccentric orbit and why the debris disk does not appear to be centered on the star Fomalhaut A. It is possible that Fomalhaut's wide companions B and C have gravitationally perturbed the Fomalhaut "b" exoplanet and debris belt orbiting Fomalhaut A, however the orbits of Fomalhaut's companion stars are not well-constrained. The orbits of Fomalhaut B and C around Fomalhaut A are predicted to take millions of years, so pinning down their orbits will be a challenge for future astronomers.

While Fomalhaut C is a red dwarf star – the most common type of star in the universe – Fomalhaut B is an orange dwarf star about three-fourths the mass of our Sun. From the vantage point of a hypothetical planet orbiting Fomalhaut C, Fomalhaut A would appear to be a brilliant white star nine times brighter than Sirius (the brightest star in our night sky) appears from Earth, similar to the typical brightness of the planet Venus. Fomalhaut B would appear to be an otherwise unremarkable bright orangish star similar in brightness to Polaris. The age of the trio is about 440 million years – roughly a 10th of the age of our solar system.

The Solar Neighborhood XXX: Fomalhaut C - Eric E. Mamajek et al
Double Star Fomalhaut May Actually Be A Triplet!
Universe Today | Elizabeth Howell | 2013 Oct 04
Know the quiet place within your heart and touch the rainbow of possibility; be
alive to the gentle breeze of communication, and please stop being such a jerk.
— Garrison Keillor

User avatar
Ann
4725 Å
Posts: 13433
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am

Re: Rochester: Nearby Double Star Fomalhaut Is Actually a Tr

Post by Ann » Sat Oct 05, 2013 7:36 pm

This is quite fascinating. Personally I find it remarkable that Fomalhaut is a triple system, while at the same time it could be mistaken for a single star. The three components are really far apart. The distance between Fomalhaut A and the newly discovered component C is, as pointed out, 5.5 degrees as seen from the distance of the Earth, corresponding to a whopping 185,000 AU. But Fomalhaut B is also really far away from component A, almost 2 degrees away from it. That corresponds to a distance between components A and B of more than 60,000 AU.

I find this "spread-out system" absolutely remarkable. Add into the mix the large planet, more than 400 AU from Fomalhaut A, and the Fomalhaut system becomes a veritable zoo!

Ann
Color Commentator

User avatar
Beyond
500 Gigaderps
Posts: 6889
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:09 am
Location: BEYONDER LAND

Re: Rochester: Nearby Double Star Fomalhaut Is Actually a Tr

Post by Beyond » Sat Oct 05, 2013 8:49 pm

It must be in a really BIG open area, to not be influenced by anything else.
To find the Truth, you must go Beyond.

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

The Castor Moving Group

Post by neufer » Sun Oct 06, 2013 12:08 am

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castor_Moving_Group wrote:
<<The Castor Moving Group is a moving group, that is, a set of stars with common velocities in space, thought to have a common origin. The stars that have been identified as part of the group include Castor, Fomalhaut, Vega, α Cephei and α Librae. They are all of similar age. The moving group was first proposed by J. P. Anosova, and V. V. Orlov in 1990. Anosova and Orlov originally proposed 15 members. The membership of the group has not been established and there is some controversy over whether the group is real or spurious.
Image
Proposed Castor Moving Group member stars:
  • ζ Leporis
    α Cephei
    α1 Librae
    α2 Librae
    Castor
    DX Cancri
    Fomalhaut
    HD 51825
    ψ Velorum
    Gliese 351A
    Gliese 426 AB
    GJ 408
    GJ 4247
    HD 117934
    HD 119124
    HD 162283
    HD 181321
    Gliese 842.2
    Gliese 896 AB
    TW Piscis Austrini
    κ Phoenicis
    Vega
Art Neuendorffer

BDanielMayfield
Don't bring me down
Posts: 2524
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2012 11:24 am
AKA: Bruce
Location: East Idaho

Re: Rochester: Nearby Double Star Fomalhaut Is Actually a Tr

Post by BDanielMayfield » Mon Oct 07, 2013 3:33 am

Fomalhaut is indeed a fascinating system.

I remember reading somewhere many years ago that in systems with more than one star an even number of stars is more common than odd numbers. Is this still believed to be true? It seems that common dim red dwarfs in either very wide or very close orbits could be escaping detection as members of systems, as Formalhaut C has until now.

Are there any up to date stats on the number of stars per system percentages?
Just as zero is not equal to infinity, everything coming from nothing is illogical.

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: Rochester: Nearby Double Star Fomalhaut Is Actually a Tr

Post by neufer » Mon Oct 07, 2013 1:28 pm

BDanielMayfield wrote:
I remember reading somewhere many years ago that in systems with more than one star an even number of stars is more common than odd numbers. Is this still believed to be true? It seems that common dim red dwarfs in either very wide or very close orbits could be escaping detection as members of systems, as Formalhaut C has until now.

Are there any up to date stats on the number of stars per system percentages?
HIPPARCOS found a slight deficit of:
  • 1) observed triple star systems (1,960) as compared to
    2) the geometric mean (2,476) of double and quadruple star systems.
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1992ASPC...32..435D wrote:
THE HIPPARCOS MISSION AND THE DOUBLE STARS
by J Dommanget - ‎1992

Code: Select all

11,434 are double
 1,960 are triple
   536 are quadruple 
   237 are multiple (more than four components) 
Note, however, that many well known binary stars (e.g., Fomalhaut) later turned out to be triple star systems:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polaris wrote:
<<Polaris Aa is a 4.5 solar mass F7 supergiant.

Polaris B was found by William Herschel in 1780 using one of the most powerful telescopes at the time: a reflecting telescope that he had made.

In 1929, it was discovered by examining the spectrum of Polaris A that it was a very close binary with the secondary being a dwarf, which had been theorized in earlier observations.

In January 2006, NASA released images from the Hubble telescope, directly showing all three members of the Polaris ternary system. The nearer dwarf star is in an orbit of only 18.5 AU (2.8 billion km, about the distance from our Sun to Uranus) from Polaris A, explaining why its light is swamped by its close and much brighter companion.>>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_Centauri wrote:
<<The binary nature of Alpha Centauri AB was first recognized in December 1689 by astronomer and Jesuit priest Jean Richaud. The finding was made incidentally while observing a passing comet from his station in Puducherry.

Scottish astronomer Robert Innes discovered Proxima Centauri in 1915 by blinking photographic plates taken at different times during a dedicated proper motion survey. This showed the large proper motion and parallax of the star was similar in both size and direction to those of Alpha Centauri AB, suggesting immediately it was part of the system and slightly closer to us than Alpha Centauri AB. Lying 4.22 light-years away, Proxima Centauri is the nearest star to the Sun.>>
Art Neuendorffer

BDanielMayfield
Don't bring me down
Posts: 2524
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2012 11:24 am
AKA: Bruce
Location: East Idaho

Re: Rochester: Nearby Double Star Fomalhaut Is Actually a Tr

Post by BDanielMayfield » Wed Oct 09, 2013 8:08 pm

Thanks for that reply, which was interesting as always Art.

So we can see a trend here: As our ablities to observe and measure the positions and motions of stars improve, we find that fewer stellar systems actually contain only one star. This reminds me of speculations I recall from years back that even our own system might contain another, distant stellar member. Has this possibility been completely ruled out?

In general then, as our census of all the stars in the sun’s vicinity improve, we’ll have a data set of the number of stars in all systems out to some radius. We’ll be able to say that, in this area of our galaxy at least, systems with N stars occur with the observed frequencies. We’d be able to plot a simple chart showing number of stars per system versus these percentages. Has this type of study already been done?

As the upcoming Gaia mission is projected to accurately chart the positions and motions of around a whopping one billion stars, it will go very far in defining this interesting parameter, the occurance rates for the various stellar multiples.
Just as zero is not equal to infinity, everything coming from nothing is illogical.

User avatar
Ann
4725 Å
Posts: 13433
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am

Re: Rochester: Nearby Double Star Fomalhaut Is Actually a Tr

Post by Ann » Thu Oct 10, 2013 12:31 am

BDanielMayfield wrote:
So we can see a trend here: As our ablities to observe and measure the positions and motions of stars improve, we find that fewer stellar systems actually contain only one star. This reminds me of speculations I recall from years back that even our own system might contain another, distant stellar member. Has this possibility been completely ruled out?
I believe that the idea of "Nemesis", a second but faint stellar object that is bound to the Sun and regularly upsets the bodies in the Oort Cloud, has been at least mostly ruled out. (But you'll have to ask someone else about how definite this rejection is.)

However, what about a star or even a brown dwarf that is as far from the Sun as Proxima Centauri is from Alpha Centauri A and B? According to Jim Kaler, Proxima is about 6,000 AU from the bright pair of Alpha Centauri. If a brown dwarf 6,000 AU away is loosely bound to the Sun, would we necessarily have detected it by now?

Ann
Color Commentator

User avatar
rstevenson
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Posts: 2705
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 1:24 pm
Location: Halifax, NS, Canada

Re: Rochester: Nearby Double Star Fomalhaut Is Actually a Tr

Post by rstevenson » Thu Oct 10, 2013 12:56 am

Given the number of extremely distant satellites we've thrown around the Solar System in the last few decades we would have noticed if any of them -- or more likely all of them -- were being pulled a little off course. But they're not; they are very accurately slotting in where we think they should be, to such an extent that we noticed the effect of a tiny bit of heat loss pushing one such space craft a tiny bit off course. (See Pioneer anomaly.)

However loosely bound a distant star might be, it would still gravitationally interact with everything in the Solar System, and I believe we are now able to make sufficiently accurate measurements that we would detect that. In fact, we could compare the effect on different craft travelling off in different directions, allowing us to triangulate the position of this possible companion star, thereby telling us where to point our telescopes.

Sorry, no Nemesis.

Rob

User avatar
Ann
4725 Å
Posts: 13433
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am

Re: Rochester: Nearby Double Star Fomalhaut Is Actually a Tr

Post by Ann » Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:35 am

rstevenson wrote:Given the number of extremely distant satellites we've thrown around the Solar System in the last few decades we would have noticed if any of them -- or more likely all of them -- were being pulled a little off course. But they're not; they are very accurately slotting in where we think they should be, to such an extent that we noticed the effect of a tiny bit of heat loss pushing one such space craft a tiny bit off course. (See Pioneer anomaly.)

However loosely bound a distant star might be, it would still gravitationally interact with everything in the Solar System, and I believe we are now able to make sufficiently accurate measurements that we would detect that. In fact, we could compare the effect on different craft travelling off in different directions, allowing us to triangulate the position of this possible companion star, thereby telling us where to point our telescopes.

Sorry, no Nemesis.

Rob
Thanks for your clarification, Rob!

Ann
Color Commentator

User avatar
Ann
4725 Å
Posts: 13433
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am

Fomalhaut: A crazy wide triple star

Post by Ann » Sat Oct 04, 2014 5:45 am

Fomalhaut: A Crazy-Wide Triple Star
Sky & Telescope | 2014 Oct 01
Image
Fomalhaut is 16 times as bright as the Sun and lies 25 light-years from Earth.
NASA/ESA/DSS2
Quick! Name the widest double star in the sky. If you chose Alpha Centauri and its faint, distant companion Proxima (separation 2.2°), you would have been correct ... prior to 2013. That year, Eric Mamajek (University of Rochester) and his colleagues announced the discovery of Fomalhaut C, a companion star located a whopping 5.7° northwest of Fomalhaut (Alpha Piscis Austrini) in a different constellation, Aquarius.

Fomalhaut (FO-mal-ought) stands out as the only 1st-magnitude star among the fall constellations. For observers at mid-northern latitudes, it crouches low in the southern sky in the dim constellation Piscis Austrinus, the Southern Fish, and stands due south around 11:00 p.m. local time in early October (10:00 p.m. at mid-month).

Though it may appear isolated in the barren October sky, Fomalhaut has company...
Ann
Last edited by bystander on Sat Oct 04, 2014 1:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: added <quote>, reference, and merged topic
Color Commentator

User avatar
MargaritaMc
Look to the Evenstar
Posts: 1836
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 10:14 pm
Location: 28°16'7"N 16°36'20"W

Re: Fomalhaut: A crazy wide triple star

Post by MargaritaMc » Sat Oct 04, 2014 11:11 am

"In those rare moments of total quiet with a dark sky, I again feel the awe that struck me as a child. The feeling is utterly overwhelming as my mind races out across the stars. I feel peaceful and serene."
&mdash; Dr Debra M. Elmegreen, Fellow of the AAAS

User avatar
Ann
4725 Å
Posts: 13433
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am

Re: Rochester: Nearby Double Star Fomalhaut Is Actually a Tr

Post by Ann » Sat Oct 04, 2014 3:53 pm

Right, it seemed familiar.

Thanks for putting my post in the right place, bystander!

Ann
Color Commentator

Post Reply