HEAPOW: The Anomalous Universe? (2014 Feb 17)

Find out the latest thinking about our universe.
Post Reply
User avatar
bystander
Apathetic Retiree
Posts: 21571
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Oklahoma

HEAPOW: The Anomalous Universe? (2014 Feb 17)

Post by bystander » Mon Feb 17, 2014 4:41 pm

Image HEAPOW: The Anomalous Universe? (2014 Feb 17)

A firm belief underpinning modern cosmology is that the Universe is uniform, and the same in all directions. This "cosmological principle" fails on small scales (the local Universe is much hotter in the direction of the sun than in the opposite direction), but it is believed to hold if you look at big enough sections. Maps of the relic radiation over the entire sky obtained by the Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE), the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP), and now the Planck spacecraft mostly support this view, and have confirmed the standard ideas of the geometry and makeup of the Universe. Mostly confirmed, that is. There were interesting hints from WMAP that something was not quite right with this picture; that the small fluctuations in the temperature of the Universe, the small fluctuations that give rise to all the structure we see anround us, were not uniformly distributed. More precise observations with the Planck satellite confirmed and refined the WMAP results, but also (somewhat astonishingly) confirmed the presence of spatial asymmetries in the cosmic microwave background. Planck found that one of the two hemispheres of the Universe appears to have a significantly stronger signal on average than the other hemisphere. Planck also confirmed the presence of a peculiar 'cold spot' seen by WMAP, a surprisingly large, low-temperature region in the cosmic radiation. The image above shows Planck's all sky map with the hemispheric asymmetry enhanced, and with the "cold spot" encircled. These odd features may have a prosaic explanation; or they could indicate that the fundamental assumption of the cosmological principle is a poor one. That would seem to indicate the Universe has a preferred direction. If so, what preferred it?

ESA: Simple but challenging: The Universe according to Planck
ESA: Planck Science Team Home Page

http://asterisk.apod.com/viewtopic.php?t=31015
http://asterisk.apod.com/viewtopic.php?t=30986
http://asterisk.apod.com/viewtopic.php?t=20105
<< Previous HEAPOW High Energy Astrophysics Picture of the Week Next HEAPOW >>
Know the quiet place within your heart and touch the rainbow of possibility; be
alive to the gentle breeze of communication, and please stop being such a jerk.
— Garrison Keillor

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18113
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: HEAPOW: The Anomalous Universe? (2014 Feb 17)

Post by Chris Peterson » Mon Feb 17, 2014 5:03 pm

I've never been particularly overwhelmed by this discovery, since I can't think of any reason why "local" can't be extended to the entire observable Universe. Given that what we can see almost certainly represents only a tiny fraction of the entire Universe, why should we necessarily expect absolute uniformity at this scale?
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

BDanielMayfield
Don't bring me down
Posts: 2524
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2012 11:24 am
AKA: Bruce
Location: East Idaho

Re: HEAPOW: The Anomalous Universe? (2014 Feb 17)

Post by BDanielMayfield » Tue Feb 18, 2014 4:48 am

Chris Peterson wrote:I've never been particularly overwhelmed by this discovery, since I can't think of any reason why "local" can't be extended to the entire observable Universe. Given that what we can see almost certainly represents only a tiny fraction of the entire Universe, why should we necessarily expect absolute uniformity at this scale?
How can you be so certain, or what causes you to believe that the entire Universe is so much larger than the fraction we can observe?
Just as zero is not equal to infinity, everything coming from nothing is illogical.

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18113
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: HEAPOW: The Anomalous Universe? (2014 Feb 17)

Post by Chris Peterson » Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:43 am

BDanielMayfield wrote:How can you be so certain, or what causes you to believe that the entire Universe is so much larger than the fraction we can observe?
Well, it would be extraordinarily coincidental for the observable universe to be the same size as all the Universe. There's certainly no theoretical reason to expect that. If the Universe is flat, it is also infinite. We can't say if it's flat, but it's very, very close to it. My understanding is that this puts a lower bound on the minimum size that is many orders of magnitude larger than the observable universe.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

User avatar
geckzilla
Ocular Digitator
Posts: 9180
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: Modesto, CA
Contact:

Re: HEAPOW: The Anomalous Universe? (2014 Feb 17)

Post by geckzilla » Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:56 am

It's counterintuitive the way we always see news about "the earliest galaxies" or "the faint microwave background leftover from the Big Bag" or other things of this nature. Makes it sound like we're looking at the edge. Also, age since the Big Bang? Makes it seem like there is a definite edge even if we can't see quite that far...
Just call me "geck" because "zilla" is like a last name.

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18113
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: HEAPOW: The Anomalous Universe? (2014 Feb 17)

Post by Chris Peterson » Tue Feb 18, 2014 6:05 am

geckzilla wrote:It's counterintuitive the way we always see news about "the earliest galaxies" or "the faint microwave background leftover from the Big Bag" or other things of this nature. Makes it sound like we're looking at the edge. Also, age since the Big Bang? Makes it seem like there is a definite edge even if we can't see quite that far...
There is an edge. But it's an edge in time, not space. That's what it really means to live in a 4D universe, with three spatial dimensions expanding in the time dimension.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

Post Reply