IA-Porto: Half of Kepler's Giant Exoplanet Candidates Are False Positives

Find out the latest thinking about our universe.
Post Reply
User avatar
bystander
Apathetic Retiree
Posts: 21577
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Oklahoma

IA-Porto: Half of Kepler's Giant Exoplanet Candidates Are False Positives

Post by bystander » Sun Dec 06, 2015 4:36 pm

Half of Kepler's Giant Exoplanet Candidates Are False Positives
Institute for Astrophysics and Space Sciences | University of Porto | 2015 Dec 02
[img3="This artist’s view shows the hot Jupiter exoplanet 51 Pegasi b, orbits a star about 50 light-years from Earth in the constellation of Pegasus (The Winged Horse). This was the first exoplanet around a normal star to be found in 1995. Twenty years later this object was also the first exoplanet to be be directly detected spectroscopically in visible light. (Credit: ESO/M. Kornmesser/Nick Risinger (skysurvey.org))"]http://www.iastro.pt/img/news/2015Dez02_1.jpg[/img3][hr][/hr]
An international team led by Alexandre Santerne from Instituto de Astrofísica e Ciências do Espaço (IA) made a 5-year radial velocity campaign of Kepler’s giant exoplanet candidates, using the SOPHIE spectrograph (Observatory of Haute-Provence, France), and found that 52.3% were actually eclipsing binaries, while 2.3% were brown dwarfs [6].

Santerne (IA & University of Porto), first author of this paper, commented: “It was thought that the reliability of the Kepler exoplanets detection was very good -- between 10 and 20% of them were not planets. Our extensive spectroscopic survey, of the largest exoplanets discovered by Kepler, shows that this percentage is much higher, even above 50%. This has strong implications in our understanding of the exoplanet population in the Kepler field.”

One of the team members, Vardan Adibekyan (IA & University of Porto), added: “Detecting and characterizing planets is usually a very subtle and difficult task. In this work, we showed that even big, easy to detect planets are also difficult to deal with. In particular, it was shown that less than half of the detected big transiting planet candidates are actually there. The rest are false positives, due to different kind of astrophysical sources of light or noise.”

Giant transiting exoplanets are easily mimicked by false positives, so spectroscopic follow-up observations are needed to establish the planetary nature of the transit detections, and easily reveal blended multiple stellar systems. ...

The research, which ran between July 2010 and July 2015, started with all 8826 objects on the list of Kepler objects of interest (KOI). The sample number was progressively reduced to 129 KOIs on 125 target stars, by removing already known false positives, stars too faint to be observed by SOPHIE, and candidates with orbits of more than 400 days, to insure that at least 3 transits could be observed. ...

SOPHIE velocimetry of Kepler transit candidates XVII. The physical
properties of giant exoplanets within 400 days of period
- A. Santerne et al
Know the quiet place within your heart and touch the rainbow of possibility; be
alive to the gentle breeze of communication, and please stop being such a jerk.
— Garrison Keillor

User avatar
Ann
4725 Å
Posts: 13420
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am

Re: IA-Porto: Half of Kepler's Giant Exoplanet Candidates Are False Positives

Post by Ann » Sun Dec 06, 2015 6:41 pm

Interesting. There are two possibilities. Either there are fewer giant exoplanets than predicted, or, more likely, the task of finding them is more formidable than had been anticipated.

Ann
Color Commentator

saturno2
Commander
Posts: 758
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:05 pm

Re: IA-Porto: Half of Kepler's Giant Exoplanet Candidates Are False Positives

Post by saturno2 » Wed Dec 09, 2015 12:42 am

The study of exoplanets is difficult, but it
they are detected planets that may have
Earth conditions ( living area )
It´s a whole universe to explore.

Alohascope

Re: IA-Porto: Half of Kepler's Giant Exoplanet Candidates Are False Positives

Post by Alohascope » Thu Dec 10, 2015 3:06 am

saturno2 wrote:The study of exoplanets is difficult, but it
they are detected planets that may have
Earth conditions ( living area )
It´s a whole universe to explore.
And we sure aren't going to know all the answers today.

Post Reply