with Einstein’s Full Theory of General Relativity
Case Western Reserve University | 2016 June 22
[c][attachment=0]cwru-universe-simulation.jpg[/attachment][/c][hr][/hr]Research teams on both sides of the Atlantic have shown that precise modeling of the universe and its contents will change the detailed understanding of the evolution of the universe and the growth of structure in it.
One hundred years after Einstein introduced general relativity, it remains the best theory of gravity, the researchers say, consistently passing high-precision tests in the solar system and successfully predicting new phenomena such as gravitational waves, which were recently discovered by the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory.
The equations of general relativity, unfortunately, are notoriously difficult to solve. For the past century, physicists have used a variety of assumptions and simplifications in order to apply Einstein’s theory to the universe. ...
Research teams on both sides of the Atlantic have shown that precise modeling of the universe and its contents will change the detailed understanding of the evolution of the universe and the growth of structure in it.
One hundred years after Einstein introduced general relativity, it remains the best theory of gravity, the researchers say, consistently passing high-precision tests in the solar system and successfully predicting new phenomena such as gravitational waves, which were recently discovered by the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory.
The equations of general relativity, unfortunately, are notoriously difficult to solve. For the past century, physicists have used a variety of assumptions and simplifications in order to apply Einstein’s theory to the universe. ...
Scientists’ Breakthrough in Modeling Universe
University of Portsmouth | 2016 June 24
Departures from the FLRW Cosmological Model in an Inhomogeneous Universe:
A Numerical Examination - John T. Giblin Jr, James B. Mertens, Glenn D. Starkman
- Physical Review Letters 116(25):1301 (24 June 2016) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.251301
arXiv.org > gr-qc > arXiv:1511.01105 > 03 Nov 2015 (v1), 16 Nov 2015 (v2)
- Physical Review Letters 93(12):4059 (15 June 2016) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.124059
arXiv.org > gr-qc > arXiv:1511.01106 > 03 Nov 2015 (v1), 16 Nov 2015 (v2)
- Physical Review Letters 116(25):1302 (24 June 2016) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.251302
arXiv.org > gr-qc > arXiv:1511.05124 > 16 Nov 2015 (v1), 12 Dec 2015 (v2)