Lancaster: Why Galaxies Stop Creating Stars - Nature vs. Nurture

Find out the latest thinking about our universe.
Post Reply
User avatar
bystander
Apathetic Retiree
Posts: 21577
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Lancaster: Why Galaxies Stop Creating Stars - Nature vs. Nurture

Post by bystander » Wed Jul 13, 2016 3:48 pm

Why Galaxies Stop Creating Stars: Nature vs. Nurture
Lancaster University, UK | 2016 July 12

Astronomers have studied 70,000 galaxies across cosmic time to find out why some cease generating stars.
[img3="Hubble Chandra Composite - ESO 137-001
Credit: NASA, ESA, Hubble Heritage (STScI/AURA), CXC, UAH
"]http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/1403/heic1404b1024.jpg[/img3][hr][/hr]
The processes that cause galaxies to “quench,” (cease star formation) are not well understood and constitute an outstanding problem in the study of the evolution of galaxies. ...

By exploring the unique COSMOS UltraVISTA survey, astronomers were able to study the role of “nature” (internal processes) and “nurture” (external processes) in the evolution of galaxies over the past 11 billion years with unprecedented detail.

Dr David Sobral said: “Just like humans, galaxies are affected by both the environment in which they form and evolve, but also by their ‘nature’ and internal processes; both can have dramatic effects.”

“Surprisingly, we find that the external processes are only really relevant in shutting down the production of stars in galaxies over the last eight billion years. At earlier times in the Universe, internal processes are the main mechanism for shutting down star formation. In other words: back then, it was all about nature, not nurture, but later on the environment starts to play a major role”. ...

Effects of Local Environment and Stellar Mass on Galaxy Quenching out to z~3 - Behnam Darvish et al
Know the quiet place within your heart and touch the rainbow of possibility; be
alive to the gentle breeze of communication, and please stop being such a jerk.
— Garrison Keillor

User avatar
Ann
4725 Å
Posts: 13431
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am

Re: Lancaster: Why Galaxies Stop Creating Stars - Nature vs. Nurture

Post by Ann » Wed Jul 13, 2016 4:52 pm

Hydrogen gas (red) is seen trailing behind white-looking NGC 4569, M90.
Photo: CFHT/Coelum.
Large Virgo Cluster spiral M90 (NGC 4569) is being robbed of most of its gas by falling through the Virgo Cluster at high speed.

The colors of M90 demonstrate clearly that it has stopped forming stars relatively recently. The B-V index of M90 is 0.720, which is very normal for a large spiral galaxy. But its U-B index is 0.425, which indicates that M90 contains few very hot, brightly ultraviolet stars.

M100. Photo: Isaac Newton Group of Telescopes
and Nik Szymanek.











Compare M90, which is losing a lot of gas, with M100, which has a truncated disk due to interactions with the hot intracluster gas of Virgo, but is still forming a lot of new stars near its center. The B-V index of M100 is 0.70, basically the same as the B-V index of M90. But the U-B index of M100 is -0.10, very different to the U-B of 0.425 of M90. M100 is forming a lot of hot new stars, but M90 isn't.

M90. Photo: Paul and Daniel Koblas/Adam Block/NOAO/AURA/NSF







Because of all the gas it is losing, the spiral arms of M90 are fuzzy and soft.

Ann
Color Commentator

starsurfer
Stellar Cartographer
Posts: 5335
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 7:25 pm

Re: Lancaster: Why Galaxies Stop Creating Stars - Nature vs. Nurture

Post by starsurfer » Wed Jul 13, 2016 5:44 pm

Ann wrote:
Hydrogen gas (red) is seen trailing behind white-looking NGC 4569, M90.
Photo: CFHT/Coelum.
Large Virgo Cluster spiral M90 (NGC 4569) is being robbed of most of its gas by falling through the Virgo Cluster at high speed.

The colors of M90 demonstrate clearly that it has stopped forming stars relatively recently. The B-V index of M90 is 0.720, which is very normal for a large spiral galaxy. But its U-B index is 0.425, which indicates that M90 contains few very hot, brightly ultraviolet stars.

M100. Photo: Isaac Newton Group of Telescopes
and Nik Szymanek.










Compare M90, which is losing a lot of gas, with M100, which has a truncated disk due to interactions with the hot intracluster gas of Virgo, but is still forming a lot of new stars near its center. The B-V index of M100 is 0.70, basically the same as the B-V index of M90. But the U-B index of M100 is -0.10, very different to the U-B of 0.425 of M90. M100 is forming a lot of hot new stars, but M90 isn't.

M90. Photo: Paul and Daniel Koblas/Adam Block/NOAO/AURA/NSF







Because of all the gas it is losing, the spiral arms of M90 are fuzzy and soft.

Ann
I have never seen that image of M90 before! I didn't know it had hydrogen streamers!

Post Reply