H0LiCOW: Universe Expanding Faster Than Expected

Find out the latest thinking about our universe.
Post Reply
User avatar
bystander
Apathetic Retiree
Posts: 21577
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Oklahoma

H0LiCOW: Universe Expanding Faster Than Expected

Post by bystander » Thu Jan 26, 2017 10:08 pm

Cosmic Lenses Support Finding on Faster Than Expected Expansion of the Universe
ESA Hubble Science Release | 2017 Jan 26
By using galaxies as giant gravitational lenses, an international group of astronomers using the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope have made an independent measurement of how fast the Universe is expanding. The newly measured expansion rate for the local Universe is consistent with earlier findings. These are, however, in intriguing disagreement with measurements of the early Universe. This hints at a fundamental problem at the very heart of our understanding of the cosmos.

The Hubble constant — the rate at which the Universe is expanding — is one of the fundamental quantities describing our Universe. A group of astronomers from the H0LiCOW collaboration, led by Sherry Suyu (associated with the Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics in Germany, the ASIAA in Taiwan and the Technical University of Munich), used the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope and other telescopes in space and on the ground to observe five galaxies in order to arrive at an independent measurement of the Hubble constant.

The new measurement is completely independent of — but in excellent agreement with — other measurements of the Hubble constant in the local Universe that used Cepheid variable stars and supernovae as points of reference [heic1611].

However, the value measured by Suyu and her team, as well as those measured using Cepheids and supernovae, are different from the measurement made by the ESA Planck satellite. But there is an important distinction — Planck measured the Hubble constant for the early Universe by observing the cosmic microwave background.

While the value for the Hubble constant determined by Planck fits with our current understanding of the cosmos, the values obtained by the different groups of astronomers for the local Universe are in disagreement with our accepted theoretical model of the Universe. “The expansion rate of the Universe is now starting to be measured in different ways with such high precision that actual discrepancies may possibly point towards new physics beyond our current knowledge of the Universe,” elaborates Suyu. ...

Cosmic Lenses Bring the Universe's Expansion into Sharper Focus
Subaru Telescope | National Astronomical Observatory of Japan | 2017 Jan 26

Cosmic lenses support finding on faster than expected expansion of the Universe
Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics | 2016 Jan 26

H0LiCOW I. H0 Lenses in COSMOGRAIL's Wellspring: Program Overview - Sherry H. Suyu et al H0LiCOW II. Spectroscopic survey and galaxy-group identification
of the strong gravitational lens system HE0435-1223
- Dominique Sluse et al H0LiCOW III. Quantifying the effect of mass along the line of sight to the
gravitational lens HE 0435-1223 through weighted galaxy counts
- Cristian E. Rusu et al H0LiCOW IV. Lens mass model of HE 0435-1223 and blind measurement
of its time-delay distance for cosmology
- Kenneth C. Wong et al
  • arXiv.org > astro-ph > 1607.01403 > 05 Jul 2016 (v1), 19 Dec 2016 (v2)
H0LiCOW V. New COSMOGRAIL time delays of HE0435-1223: H0 to 3.8%
precision from strong lensing in a flat ΛCDM model
- Vivien Bonvin et al H0LiCOW VI. Testing the fidelity of lensed quasar host galaxy reconstruction - Kenneth C. Wong et al
Know the quiet place within your heart and touch the rainbow of possibility; be
alive to the gentle breeze of communication, and please stop being such a jerk.
— Garrison Keillor

User avatar
Ann
4725 Å
Posts: 13433
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am

Re: H0LiCOW: Universe Expanding Faster Than Expected

Post by Ann » Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:37 am

The Hubble constant as measured (with error bars)
by Planck, WMAP, strong lenses, Cepheids and Cepheids + SNe.
Source: shsuyu.github.io
I find this graph interesting. It would seem that Planck's measurement of the Hubble constant, based on the cosmic microwave background, is incompatible with the values arrived at by all the other methods. WMAP is incompatible with the measurements of Cepheids and supernovas. Strong lenses, with their relatively large error bars, are in agreement with all the other values except Planck.

And by the way... H0LiCOW is a cute name.

Ann
Color Commentator

Post Reply