MARS at High resolution

Comments and questions about the APOD on the main view screen.
Post Reply
ta152h0
Schooled
Posts: 1399
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 12:46 am
Location: Auburn, Washington, USA

MARS at High resolution

Post by ta152h0 » Mon Apr 10, 2006 5:36 am

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap060410.html

Sure looks like coastal land. I remember a sci-fi movie where astronauts got stranded on Mars and these " fish like " things swimming in the sand . I would guess sand has a liquid quality ove time. :)
Wolf Kotenberg

makc
Commodore
Posts: 2019
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 5:25 pm

Post by makc » Mon Apr 10, 2006 6:17 am

check out this thread for more images.

harry
G'day G'day G'day G'day
Posts: 2881
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 8:04 am
Location: Sydney Australia

Post by harry » Mon Apr 10, 2006 9:15 am

It is a nice image,,,,,,,,,,thank you

Imagine this was just a dream a few decades ago.

And

Few decades more and we maybe living on mars.
Harry : Smile and live another day.

User avatar
orin stepanek
Plutopian
Posts: 8200
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: Nebraska

Post by orin stepanek » Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:02 pm

The view is awesome. I can't wait 'til the orbit is circularised and still closer views are photographed.
Orin

Sowndbyte
Ensign
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 5:06 pm
Location: Oregon

overexposure

Post by Sowndbyte » Tue Apr 11, 2006 6:01 pm

The photo appears over exposed to me. creating a false sheen on the surface.
notice on left sides of craters where sun is hitting surface straight on there is no texture only glare. this is the first photo and very tempting in detail (2.5 M per pixel) and I look forward to the final evolution cycle photos. but this lacks the pure power that the first Mars photo the rover Spirit took http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/ ... 0106c.html

User avatar
BMAONE23
Commentator Model 1.23
Posts: 4076
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 6:55 pm
Location: California

Re: overexposure

Post by BMAONE23 » Tue Apr 11, 2006 7:34 pm

Sowndbyte wrote:The photo appears over exposed to me. creating a false sheen on the surface.
notice on left sides of craters where sun is hitting surface straight on there is no texture only glare. this is the first photo and very tempting in detail (2.5 M per pixel) and I look forward to the final evolution cycle photos. but this lacks the pure power that the first Mars photo the rover Spirit took http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/ ... 0106c.html
Keep in mind, these images were taken from a much higher altitude than what will be final orbiting altitude. I believe the image was taken from an altitude 1549 miles, 6 times higher than the operating altitude and still only 2.49 meters per pixel.
Last edited by BMAONE23 on Tue Apr 11, 2006 9:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

ta152h0
Schooled
Posts: 1399
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 12:46 am
Location: Auburn, Washington, USA

hi-res

Post by ta152h0 » Tue Apr 11, 2006 8:11 pm

quit being so critical at something that was presented as a test shot. Somebody at JPL might decide to be offended at such wording and not share so freely nest time.
Wolf Kotenberg

Post Reply