APOD: Equinox Earth (2013 Sep 28)

Comments and questions about the APOD on the main view screen.
User avatar
alter-ego
Serendipitous Sleuthhound
Posts: 1119
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:51 am
Location: Redmond, WA

Re: APOD: Equinox Earth (2013 Sep 28)

Post by alter-ego » Sat Sep 28, 2013 7:09 pm

neufer wrote:
BDanielMayfield wrote:
The Sun illuminated both poles on the date the APOD was taken, but the view doesn’t extend clear to both poles because the satellite isn’t high enough. Since the Earth’s radius is 6,378 and the satellite (and all others in geostationary orbits) is 42,164 km from the Earth’s center the maximum latitude visible would be ~ 90 - arctan (6378/42164) = 81.4 deg.
  • How about 90 - arcsin(6378/42164) = 81.3 deg
BDanielMayfield wrote:
Extra point question: How high would the satellite need to be to actually see both poles?
The same height the geostationary satellite need to be to see either pole.
To see both poles simultaneously, the satellite must be on Earth's equatorial plane (Elektro-L does oscillates about this plane a little bit).
The simple no-atmosphere answer is infinity. The tangent planes at both poles would be parallel assuming a perfect sphere and they would only intersect at infinity. However, with the atmosphere, refraction allows for a finite distance away to see both poles.

Assuming a nominal refraction model, stars that are just visible on the horizon are actually ≈0.7° below. Using 0.7°, then the minimum distance to where both poles just become visible = 6378km/tan(0.7°) = 522,020 km, or ~1.36 x the moons orbital radius.

So it is also the case that during several days about an equinox, the sun is visible from both poles - only about 1/2° above the horizon (on a clear day of course).
A pessimist is nothing more than an experienced optimist

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: APOD: Equinox Earth (2013 Sep 28)

Post by neufer » Sat Sep 28, 2013 7:35 pm

alter-ego wrote:
To see both poles simultaneously, the satellite must be on Earth's equatorial plane (Elektro-L does oscillates about this plane a little bit).
The simple no-atmosphere answer is infinity. The tangent planes at both poles would be parallel assuming a perfect sphere and they would only intersect at infinity. However, with the atmosphere, refraction allows for a finite distance away to see both poles.

Assuming a nominal refraction model, stars that are just visible on the horizon are actually ≈0.7° below. Using 0.7°, then the minimum distance to where both poles just become visible = 6378km/tan(0.7°) = 522,020 km, or ~1.36 x the moons orbital radius.

So it is also the case that during several days about an equinox, the sun is visible from both poles - only about 1/2° above the horizon (on a clear day of course).
  • Polar temperature inversions near the surface might significantly enhance the refraction effect.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fata_Morgana_%28mirage%29 wrote: <<A Fata Morgana is an unusual and complex form of superior mirage that is seen in a narrow band right above the horizon. It is an Italian phrase derived from the vulgar Latin for "fairy" and the Arthurian sorceress Morgan le Fay, from a belief that these mirages, often seen in the Strait of Messina, were fairy castles in the air or false land created by her witchcraft to lure sailors to their death. A Fata Morgana can be seen on land or at sea, in polar regions or in deserts. This optical phenomenon occurs because rays of light are bent when they pass through air layers of different temperatures in a steep thermal inversion where an atmospheric duct has formed.

In the early 19th century, Fata Morgana mirages appear to have been responsible for two unrelated discoveries of non-existent arctic land masses which were given the names "Crocker Mountains" and "Crocker Land".>>
Art Neuendorffer

User avatar
alter-ego
Serendipitous Sleuthhound
Posts: 1119
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:51 am
Location: Redmond, WA

Re: APOD: Equinox Earth (2013 Sep 28)

Post by alter-ego » Sat Sep 28, 2013 8:02 pm

neufer wrote:Polar temperature inversions near the surface might significantly enhance the refraction effect.
That's certainly true.
I estimated a more realistic polar refraction factor by using a sub-freezing temperature (-15C). The lower temperature increases the refraction magnitude, and likely similar for both poles. As far as anomalous mirage effects, these would tend to be transient and most likely not simultaneous at both poles. Whereas the estimate I wanted was the nominal average refraction.
A pessimist is nothing more than an experienced optimist

saturno2
Commander
Posts: 755
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:05 pm

Re: APOD: Equinox Earth (2013 Sep 28)

Post by saturno2 » Sat Sep 28, 2013 9:45 pm

Beautiful image
Elektro-L has a design interesting

dbooksta
Ensign
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 2:07 pm

Re: APOD: Equinox Earth (2013 Sep 28)

Post by dbooksta » Sun Sep 29, 2013 1:17 am

So what is that streak across the equator about 4 frames in?

User avatar
geckzilla
Ocular Digitator
Posts: 9180
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: Modesto, CA
Contact:

Re: APOD: Equinox Earth (2013 Sep 28)

Post by geckzilla » Sun Sep 29, 2013 2:16 am

dbooksta wrote:So what is that streak across the equator about 4 frames in?
earthframe.gif
6th frame. Some anomaly related to the bright reflection of the sun on the water, there.
Just call me "geck" because "zilla" is like a last name.

BDanielMayfield
Don't bring me down
Posts: 2524
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2012 11:24 am
AKA: Bruce
Location: East Idaho

Re: APOD: Equinox Earth (2013 Sep 28)

Post by BDanielMayfield » Sun Sep 29, 2013 2:17 am

alter-ego wrote:
neufer wrote:
BDanielMayfield wrote:
The Sun illuminated both poles on the date the APOD was taken, but the view doesn’t extend clear to both poles because the satellite isn’t high enough. Since the Earth’s radius is 6,378 and the satellite (and all others in geostationary orbits) is 42,164 km from the Earth’s center the maximum latitude visible would be ~ 90 - arctan (6378/42164) = 81.4 deg.
  • How about 90 - arcsin(6378/42164) = 81.3 deg
BDanielMayfield wrote:
Extra point question: How high would the satellite need to be to actually see both poles?
The same height the geostationary satellite need to be to see either pole.
To see both poles simultaneously, the satellite must be on Earth's equatorial plane (Elektro-L does oscillates about this plane a little bit).
The simple no-atmosphere answer is infinity. The tangent planes at both poles would be parallel assuming a perfect sphere and they would only intersect at infinity. However, with the atmosphere, refraction allows for a finite distance away to see both poles.

Assuming a nominal refraction model, stars that are just visible on the horizon are actually ≈0.7° below. Using 0.7°, then the minimum distance to where both poles just become visible = 6378km/tan(0.7°) = 522,020 km, or ~1.36 x the moons orbital radius.

So it is also the case that during several days about an equinox, the sun is visible from both poles - only about 1/2° above the horizon (on a clear day of course).
Yes Art, after sketching it out on the back of an envelope (literally) arcsine is the correct function. But of course I was referring to seeing both poles simultaneously …

… As noted by alter-ego. Well done.
Just as zero is not equal to infinity, everything coming from nothing is illogical.

User avatar
MarkBour
Subtle Signal
Posts: 1377
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2013 2:44 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: APOD: Equinox Earth (2013 Sep 28)

Post by MarkBour » Sun Sep 29, 2013 2:31 am

neufer wrote:
zbvhs wrote:
And somewhere down there, if you knew exactly where to look, you would see the satellite's shadow.
  • By "shadow" do you mean the penumbra or the antumbra, exactly :?:
So, we need the radius of the Sun, the distance to the Sun, radius of the satellite and distance to the satellite. But I'm pretty certain that those numbers would quickly show that the only kind of shadow such a satellite could ever cast on the Earth would be an antumbral shadow. And its transit of the Sun would be very hard to detect, either by looking up from the Earth toward the Sun behind it (like the Kepler observatory does to stars), or by looking down on the earth for a region that is not as brightly lit. And then there's scattering in the clouds and atmosphere, which, I'm also willing to bet is plenty to completely wash out that hint of darkness, no matter how fine the detector was.

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

A Tumbrel shadow

Post by neufer » Sun Sep 29, 2013 1:02 pm

MarkBour wrote:
neufer wrote:
zbvhs wrote:
And somewhere down there, if you knew exactly where to look, you would see the satellite's shadow.
  • By "shadow" do you mean the penumbra
    or the antumbra, exactly :?:
I'm pretty certain that those numbers would quickly show that the only kind of shadow such a satellite could ever cast on the Earth would be an antumbral shadow. And its transit of the Sun would be very hard to detect, either by looking up from the Earth toward the Sun behind it (like the Kepler observatory does to stars), or by looking down on the earth for a region that is not as brightly lit. And then there's scattering in the clouds and atmosphere, which, I'm also willing to bet is plenty to completely wash out that hint of darkness, no matter how fine the detector was.
Art Neuendorffer

tomatoherd

Re: APOD: Equinox Earth (2013 Sep 28)

Post by tomatoherd » Sun Sep 29, 2013 2:08 pm

retrogalax wrote:If i was an Extra-Terrestrial i would love to own this planet. Nice educational picture. :)
One group of aliens were interested once. But when they discovered the presence of septoria leaf spot, they deemed it uninhabitable.

User avatar
geckzilla
Ocular Digitator
Posts: 9180
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: Modesto, CA
Contact:

Re: APOD: Equinox Earth (2013 Sep 28)

Post by geckzilla » Sun Sep 29, 2013 2:16 pm

tomatoherd wrote:
retrogalax wrote:If i was an Extra-Terrestrial i would love to own this planet. Nice educational picture. :)
One group of aliens were interested once. But when they discovered the presence of septoria leaf spot, they deemed it uninhabitable.
Tomatomorphic aliens might also need to watch out for tomato hornworms. Viruses and fungi are bad enough, but nothing strikes terror into the heart of a tomato plant quite like the hornworm.
Just call me "geck" because "zilla" is like a last name.

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: APOD: Equinox Earth (2013 Sep 28)

Post by neufer » Sun Sep 29, 2013 2:22 pm

Click to play embedded YouTube video.
geckzilla wrote:
tomatoherd wrote:
retrogalax wrote:
If i was an Extra-Terrestrial i would love to own this planet. Nice educational picture. :)
One group of aliens were interested once. But when they discovered the presence of septoria leaf spot, they deemed it uninhabitable.
Tomatomorphic aliens might also need to watch out for tomato hornworms. Viruses and fungi are bad enough, but nothing strikes terror into the heart of a tomato plant quite like the hornworm.
Art Neuendorffer

User avatar
Nitpicker
Inverse Square
Posts: 2692
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2013 2:39 am
Location: S27 E153

Re: Infernal Equinox

Post by Nitpicker » Mon Sep 30, 2013 3:47 am

neufer wrote:
Gary Loeb wrote:
I just realized my minor mistake... It IS the northern hemisphere's autumnal equinox,
as well as the southern hemisphere's vernal equinox. It's the Whole Earth's equinox. :oops:
You would think that they would have come up with better names by now.
These are the preferred terms for we upside-down people, who are easily confused:

The Northward Equinox (in March), as the Sun begins to move into the Northern Hemisphere.

The Southward Equinox (in September), as the Sun begins to move into the Southern Hemisphere.

User avatar
Anthony Barreiro
Turtles all the way down
Posts: 793
Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 7:09 pm
Location: San Francisco, California, Turtle Island

Re: Infernal Equinox

Post by Anthony Barreiro » Mon Sep 30, 2013 3:58 am

Nitpicker wrote:
neufer wrote:
Gary Loeb wrote:
I just realized my minor mistake... It IS the northern hemisphere's autumnal equinox,
as well as the southern hemisphere's vernal equinox. It's the Whole Earth's equinox. :oops:
You would think that they would have come up with better names by now.
These are the preferred terms for we upside-down people, who are easily confused:

The Northward Equinox (in March), as the Sun begins to move into the Northern Hemisphere.

The Southward Equinox (in September), as the Sun begins to move into the Southern Hemisphere.
March Equinox, June Solstice, September Equinox, December Solstice. Unambiguous and requires no knowledge of which direction the Sun appears to be moving or where the Sun appears to be standing still.
May all beings be happy, peaceful, and free.

User avatar
Nitpicker
Inverse Square
Posts: 2692
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2013 2:39 am
Location: S27 E153

Re: APOD: Equinox Earth (2013 Sep 28)

Post by Nitpicker » Mon Sep 30, 2013 4:06 am

Anthony Barreiro wrote:March Equinox, June Solstice, September Equinox, December Solstice. Unambiguous and requires no knowledge of which direction the Sun appears to be moving or where the Sun appears to be standing still.
Indeed they require no knowledge of the Sun. Nor do they add any.

I also prefer Northern and Southern Solstice (in June and December respectively).

User avatar
Anthony Barreiro
Turtles all the way down
Posts: 793
Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 7:09 pm
Location: San Francisco, California, Turtle Island

Re: APOD: Equinox Earth (2013 Sep 28)

Post by Anthony Barreiro » Mon Sep 30, 2013 4:27 am

Nitpicker wrote:
Anthony Barreiro wrote:March Equinox, June Solstice, September Equinox, December Solstice. Unambiguous and requires no knowledge of which direction the Sun appears to be moving or where the Sun appears to be standing still.
Indeed they require no knowledge of the Sun. Nor do they add any.

I also prefer Northern and Southern Solstice (in June and December respectively).
Northward, Northern, Southward, and Southern are fine for those who already understand what you mean by them, but are likely to befuddle those who don't, and would be ambiguous for those who aren't sure if you're talking about the movement of the Earth's noontime equator relative to the ecliptic or the apparent motion of the Sun in Earth's sky.
May all beings be happy, peaceful, and free.

User avatar
Nitpicker
Inverse Square
Posts: 2692
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2013 2:39 am
Location: S27 E153

Re: APOD: Equinox Earth (2013 Sep 28)

Post by Nitpicker » Mon Sep 30, 2013 5:09 am

Anthony Barreiro wrote:Northward, Northern, Southward, and Southern are fine for those who already understand what you mean by them, but are likely to befuddle those who don't, and would be ambiguous for those who aren't sure if you're talking about the movement of the Earth's noontime equator relative to the ecliptic or the apparent motion of the Sun in Earth's sky.
Most people know the difference between North and South. For those that don't, it is easy: to find North, face South, then turn around. :) If that doesn't help in the slightest, not even to raise a smile, then there's not much to be done I'm afraid. Enjoy the sunshine.

I don't see the ambiguity though. Whether you think of the position of the Sun relative to the Ecliptic [Edit: sorry, relative to the Celestial Equator], or just its position in the sky for that time of year, the North/South descriptors still hold true, for everyone on the planet.

User avatar
Anthony Barreiro
Turtles all the way down
Posts: 793
Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 7:09 pm
Location: San Francisco, California, Turtle Island

Re: APOD: Equinox Earth (2013 Sep 28)

Post by Anthony Barreiro » Mon Sep 30, 2013 5:55 pm

Nitpicker wrote:
Anthony Barreiro wrote:Northward, Northern, Southward, and Southern are fine for those who already understand what you mean by them, but are likely to befuddle those who don't, and would be ambiguous for those who aren't sure if you're talking about the movement of the Earth's noontime equator relative to the ecliptic or the apparent motion of the Sun in Earth's sky.
Most people know the difference between North and South. For those that don't, it is easy: to find North, face South, then turn around. :) If that doesn't help in the slightest, not even to raise a smile, then there's not much to be done I'm afraid. Enjoy the sunshine.

I don't see the ambiguity though. Whether you think of the position of the Sun relative to the Ecliptic [Edit: sorry, relative to the Celestial Equator], or just its position in the sky for that time of year, the North/South descriptors still hold true, for everyone on the planet.
The ambiguity arises because the Earth's noontime equator is moving in the opposite direction of the Sun's apparent movement in the sky. The Sun is moving south in the sky because the equator on the daytime side of the Earth is moving north of the ecliptic, and vice versa.
May all beings be happy, peaceful, and free.

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18111
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: APOD: Equinox Earth (2013 Sep 28)

Post by Chris Peterson » Mon Sep 30, 2013 6:35 pm

Nitpicker wrote:Indeed they require no knowledge of the Sun. Nor do they add any.

I also prefer Northern and Southern Solstice (in June and December respectively).
For the general astronomical case, northern and southern are the best choices for solstices, and northward and southward are the best choices for equinoxes.

For discussing these events on the Earth, however, I don't think you can usually do better than qualifying them with the month. It's both geographically unbiased and clear to the maximum number of people. It's also the most common usage these days, outside the still common use of season names (which is geographically biased, of course).
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

User avatar
Anthony Barreiro
Turtles all the way down
Posts: 793
Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 7:09 pm
Location: San Francisco, California, Turtle Island

Re: APOD: Equinox Earth (2013 Sep 28)

Post by Anthony Barreiro » Mon Sep 30, 2013 6:49 pm

Anthony Barreiro wrote:Lovely image of my favorite planet! ...
Psnarf wrote:You can see that rip-snorting typhoon Usagi between Taiwan and Hong Kong, as well as Pabuk following it at the edge of the disc. (It wasn't covered on the Weather Channel because they couldn't afford to send a L.L.Bean model over there to try and remain upright in 120mph winds. I imagine a drop of rain would be painful at 120mph.) On 22Sep it made landfall at Shanwei, Guangdong, China. Before weakening over Taiwan, Usagi reached category 5 @125mph. It was only 100mph when it made lanfall in China. Pabuk reached category 2, but it headed northwest and dissipated without destroying anything on land. The combined high-level moisture from those two storms crossed the northern Pacific and made folks in Seattle somewhat uncomfortable.
http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/twc/satellite/28km_wv_Pac.php (click on the image for animation)
You're right, of course. The more I look at the picture, the more my eye gravitates toward the typhoon. From above it looks quite lovely. But I wouldn't want to be underneath it, or in the middle of it.
May all beings be happy, peaceful, and free.

tirsky
Asternaut
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:27 pm

Re: APOD: Equinox Earth (2013 Sep 28)

Post by tirsky » Mon Sep 30, 2013 8:27 pm

Eric wrote:Great pic. Has anyone been able to follow the link to the full-res image? I'm getting a "not found" when I try.
--Eric
https://vk.com/doc14035574_222714865 try it;) this is 5000 x 5000 pix picture!

User avatar
Beyond
500 Gigaderps
Posts: 6889
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:09 am
Location: BEYONDER LAND

Re: APOD: Equinox Earth (2013 Sep 28)

Post by Beyond » Mon Sep 30, 2013 9:01 pm

Wow! It took a while to load, but that 5000 x 5000 picture of earth fills up the width of my 24 inch screen and i have to scroll up and down to see it all. NICE!
To find the Truth, you must go Beyond.

User avatar
Nitpicker
Inverse Square
Posts: 2692
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2013 2:39 am
Location: S27 E153

Re: APOD: Equinox Earth (2013 Sep 28)

Post by Nitpicker » Mon Sep 30, 2013 10:37 pm

Anthony Barreiro wrote:
The ambiguity arises because the Earth's noontime equator is moving in the opposite direction of the Sun's apparent movement in the sky. The Sun is moving south in the sky because the equator on the daytime side of the Earth is moving north of the ecliptic, and vice versa.
Never heard the term "the Earth's noontime equator" before, but I think I understand what you mean.

As with most descriptors of the Sun-Earth system, they should be applied to the Sun and not the Earth. For example, at the current time of Northward/March Equinox, the Sun has a Right Ascension of zero hours and is in Pisces, not the Earth. This caught me out when I first sketched a diagram of the Ecliptic, and I was thinking heliocentrically, like a good little Copernican. Silly me.

From now on, I shall happily include the month, as well as the North/South descriptors for these events.

User avatar
Anthony Barreiro
Turtles all the way down
Posts: 793
Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 7:09 pm
Location: San Francisco, California, Turtle Island

Re: APOD: Equinox Earth (2013 Sep 28)

Post by Anthony Barreiro » Mon Sep 30, 2013 11:05 pm

Nitpicker wrote:From now on, I shall happily include the month, as well as the North/South descriptors for these events.
No nits on you! :ssmile:
May all beings be happy, peaceful, and free.

User avatar
Nitpicker
Inverse Square
Posts: 2692
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2013 2:39 am
Location: S27 E153

Re: APOD: Equinox Earth (2013 Sep 28)

Post by Nitpicker » Mon Sep 30, 2013 11:20 pm

Incidentally, I chose the name "Nitpicker" because:

a) my first ever post to this forum was particularly nitpicky,

b) it is a reminder to me not to nitpick too much,

c) it is an open invitation to others to correct me, should I write something iffy (I'm fairly thick-skinned),

d) in most of my own rather ordinary looking astrophotographs, the identification of stars reminds me of nitpicking.

Post Reply