APOD: The Coldest Place on Earth (2013 Dec 11)

Comments and questions about the APOD on the main view screen.
User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18185
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: APOD: The Coldest Place on Earth (2013 Dec 11)

Post by Chris Peterson » Thu Dec 12, 2013 6:22 pm

Remo wrote:Point taken. You are absolutely correct that the sky temperature we "see" on a cold clear night, is not the temperature of the cosmic background radiation but some mix of the CMBR plus IR radiation coming from the atmosphere.
I'm not sure what you mean by that. The CMBR is so cold it radiates in the microwave part of the spectrum. Energy doesn't flow from cold to warm; the CMBR isn't contributing significantly to the temperature of the sky. The temperature of the sky- that is, the radiative surface above us, is determined by the temperature that the various gases equilibrate at, which is a factor of the radiation they receive from around and below them (at night, or the energy they store during the day), and the amount they radiate out towards the coldness of space.
To clarify my point (I know I got a little technical; now I, guess I get even more technical), the atmosphere is "optically thin" because you can see through it in both the optical and the IR spectrums.
Absolutely, the sky is quite transparent in the visual spectrum. However, it is nearly opaque across large parts of the IR spectrum. That's why IR astronomy from the ground is extremely limited.
If, as you said, you got a -70C sky reading (impressive!)...
I'm nearly at 3000m height here.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: APOD: The Coldest Place on Earth (2013 Dec 11)

Post by neufer » Thu Dec 12, 2013 6:39 pm

Anthony Barreiro wrote:
the prime meridian, established by international treaty in 1884, just happens to run through the capital city of the biggest global empire of the nineteenth century. This is probably not a coincidence. (Moderators -- when does "politics" become "history"? :lol2: )
When Greenwich was adopted as the universal zero longitude, it had at least ten rivals: Paris, Berlin, Cadiz, Copenhagen, Lisbon, Rio, Rome, Saint Petersburg, Stockholm, and Tokyo.

However, Antarctica is divided essentially along Ptolemy's original "Fortunate Isles" prime meridian:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_meridian wrote: <<The notion of longitude was developed by the Greek Eratosthenes (c. 276 BC – c. 195 BC) in Alexandria and Hipparchus (c. 190 BC – c. 120 BC) in Rhodes and applied to a large number of cities by the geographer Strabo (c. 63 BC – c. 24 AD). But it was Ptolemy (c. AD 90 – c. AD 168) who first used a consistent meridian for a world map in his Geographia.

Ptolemy used as his basis the "Fortunate Isles", a group of islands in the Atlantic which are usually associated with the Canary Islands (13° to 18°W), although his maps correspond more closely to the Cape Verde islands (22° to 25° W). The main point is to be comfortably west of the western tip of Africa (17.5° W) as negative numbers were not yet in use. The chief method of determining longitude at this time was by using the reported times of lunar eclipses in different countries.

Ptolemy’s Geographia was first printed with maps at Bologna in 1477 and many early globes in the 16th century followed his lead. But there was still a hope that a "natural" basis for a prime meridian existed. Christopher Columbus reported (1493) that the compass pointed due north somewhere in mid-Atlantic and this fact was used in the important Tordesillas Treaty of 1494 which settled the territorial dispute between Spain and Portugal over newly discovered lands. The Tordesillas line was eventually settled at 370 leagues west of Cape Verde. This is shown in Diogo Ribeiro's 1529 map. São Miguel Island (25.5°W) in the Azores was still used for the same reason as late as 1594 by Christopher Saxton, although by this time it had been shown that the zero deviation line did not follow a line of longitude.

In 1541, Mercator produced his famous forty-one centimetre terrestrial globe and drew his prime meridian precisely through Fuertaventura (14°1'W) in the Canaries. His later maps used the Azores, following the magnetic hypothesis. But by the time that Ortelius produced the first modern atlas in 1570, other islands such as Cape Verde were coming into use. In his atlas longitudes were counted from 0° to 360°, not 180°W to 180°E as is common today. This practice was followed by navigators well into the eighteenth century. In 1634, Cardinal Richelieu used the westernmost island of the Canaries, Ferro, 19° 55' west of Paris, as the choice of meridian. Unfortunately, the geographer Delisle decided to round this off to 20°, so that it simply became the meridian of Paris disguised.

In the early eighteenth century the battle was on to improve the determination of longitude at sea, leading to the development of the chronometer by John Harrison. But it was the development of accurate star charts principally by the first British Astronomer Royal, John Flamsteed between 1680 and 1719 and disseminated by his successor, Edmund Halley that enabled navigators to use the lunar method of determining longitude more accurately using the octant developed by Thomas Godfrey and John Hadley. Between 1765 and 1811, Nevil Maskelyne published 49 issues of the Nautical Almanac based on the meridian of the Royal Observatory, Greenwich. "Maskelyne's tables not only made the lunar method practicable, they also made the Greenwich meridian the universal reference point. Even the French translations of the Nautical Almanac retained Maskelyne's calculations from Greenwich—in spite of the fact that every other table in the Connaissance des Temps considered the Paris meridian as the prime." In 1884, at the International Meridian Conference held in Washington, D.C., 22 countries voted to adopt the Greenwich meridian as the prime meridian of the world. The French argued for a neutral line, mentioning the Azores and the Bering Strait but eventually abstained and continued to use the Paris meridian until 1911.>>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rose_Line wrote: <<Rose Line is a fictional name given to the Paris Meridian and to the sunlight line defining the exact time of Easter on the Gnomon of Saint-Sulpice, marked by a brass strip on the floor of the church in the Priory of Sion mythology, where the two are conflated. The fictional name Rose Line was also popularized by Dan Brown in his 2003 novel, The Da Vinci Code. Chapter XIII of Circuit is devoted to the Zero Meridian, with de Chérisey claiming it was established by Till Eulenspiegel.

Brown's novel also conflates the Paris Meridian with a gnomon in the Parisian church of Saint-Sulpice marked in the floor with a brass line. The Paris Meridian actually passes about 100 metres east of the gnomon, which according to author Sharan Newman and a sign in the church was "never called a Rose-Line". "Rosslyn Chapel's entrance was more modest than Langdon expected. The small wooden door had two iron hinges and a simple oak sign, Roslin. This ancient spelling, Langdon explained to Sophie, derived from the Rose Line meridian on which the chapel sat; or, as Grail academics preferred to believe, from the 'Line of the Rose' — the ancestral lineage of Mary Magdalene..."

The Da Vinci Code protagonist follows the line of Arago medallions to the Louvre museum, where (according to the book) the Paris Meridian passes beneath the so-called Inverted Pyramid in an underground mall in front of the museum. The novel hints that this is the final resting place of the Holy Grail. The fact that the meridian passes near the Inverted Pyramid is also noted in the book Le guide du Paris maçonnique by Raphäel Aurillac, who likewise ascribes some deeper, esoteric significance to this.>>
Art Neuendorffer

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: APOD: The Coldest Place on Earth (2013 Dec 11)

Post by neufer » Thu Dec 12, 2013 6:41 pm

Chris Peterson wrote:
I'm nearly at 3000m height here.
Is that with or without the snow :?:
Art Neuendorffer

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18185
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: APOD: The Coldest Place on Earth (2013 Dec 11)

Post by Chris Peterson » Thu Dec 12, 2013 6:47 pm

neufer wrote:
Chris Peterson wrote: I'm nearly at 3000m height here.
Is that with or without the snow :?:
We're a bit like the Antarctic. We get cold, but not much snow.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: APOD: The Coldest Place on Earth (2013 Dec 11)

Post by neufer » Thu Dec 12, 2013 7:13 pm

Chris Peterson wrote:
We're a bit like the Antarctic. We get cold, but not much snow.
So...you're basically just an Abominable man then.
Art Neuendorffer

User avatar
rstevenson
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Posts: 2705
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 1:24 pm
Location: Halifax, NS, Canada

Re: APOD: The Coldest Place on Earth (2013 Dec 11)

Post by rstevenson » Thu Dec 12, 2013 7:25 pm

geckzilla wrote:The politics rule is somehow the most difficult one to enforce here. :doh:
Are you suggesting that a question and answer about global warming is a political, rather than a scientific, discussion?

Rob

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18185
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: APOD: The Coldest Place on Earth (2013 Dec 11)

Post by Chris Peterson » Thu Dec 12, 2013 7:30 pm

rstevenson wrote:
geckzilla wrote:The politics rule is somehow the most difficult one to enforce here. :doh:
Are you suggesting that a question and answer about global warming is a political, rather than a scientific, discussion?
I think we know how quickly a scientific discussion can degrade into a political or pseudoscientific one with such a politicized topic. That's the line the moderators have to walk.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

yo.quimet@gmail.com

Re: APOD: The Coldest Place on Earth (2013 Dec 11)

Post by yo.quimet@gmail.com » Thu Dec 12, 2013 7:33 pm

Any way to estimete the "real feel" or feels like?

User avatar
geckzilla
Ocular Digitator
Posts: 9180
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: Modesto, CA
Contact:

Re: APOD: The Coldest Place on Earth (2013 Dec 11)

Post by geckzilla » Thu Dec 12, 2013 8:54 pm

yo.quimet@gmail.com wrote:Any way to estimete the "real feel" or feels like?
Yesterday I somehow ended up reading this article which describes one aspect of how researchers deal with the cold.
He said he does not personally know how that kind of cold feels, but that he knows researchers to expose themselves to it. To be able to breathe without feeling pain, researchers have to breathe through a snorkel that travels through the arm of their coat. This warms the air and ensures the person does not accidentally inhale the cold air.
In other words, you will damage your tissues on the inside simply breathing in such a place and that's not even in the areas which were measured. You probably wouldn't even want a tiny portion of skin exposed to get that feel.
Just call me "geck" because "zilla" is like a last name.

Post Reply