Sorry! Reality has a nasty habit of crashing dreams...emc wrote: I very much like the way you wrote about star travel so matter-of-factly... very encouraging! ...Where's my galaxy cruiser "after-light" switch???...maybe it should be called "after-gravity" switch!
...what a load that would be off my mind!
But...let's just hope that we will find a way to control gravity, invent a FTL propulsion, and find an infinite source of energy to power both.They are going to discover that quarks don't exist; that what they thought was a single "quark" is really a soup of many, many newly discovered smaller particles. This will lead the scientists to understand that "dark matter" is really "very, very tiny matter".bystander wrote:It will be interesting to see what new answers the LHC will provide. Evidence of WIMPs, Higgs bosons, supersymmetry, gravitons????? Even more interesting, what new questions will be asked?
starnut wrote:Sorry! Reality has a nasty habit of crashing dreams...emc wrote: I very much like the way you wrote about star travel so matter-of-factly... very encouraging! ...Where's my galaxy cruiser "after-light" switch???
http://www.vibrationalrelativity.org/overview.htmThe most important new questions will be related to their discovery of the nature of different realities of vibrational frequencies. Scientists will prove that the vibrational reality in which humans reside, emanates from a higher vibrational reality. I understand many of you do not understand this yet.
I guess molecules don't exist because they are just a combination of atoms. Oh, wait! Atoms don't exist because they are made of protons, neutrons and electrons. But those particles don't exist either. As a matter of fact, the universe doesn't exist at all and you aren't reading this.the pretender wrote:They are going to discover that quarks don't exist; that what they thought was a single "quark" is really a soup of many, many newly discovered smaller particles. This will lead the scientists to understand that "dark matter" is really "very, very tiny matter". ...
BMAONE23, THANKS a lot for these phantastic links! Now it is clear: the huge galaxy in todays foto must be Andromeda. Really great!BMAONE23 wrote:It sits with Andromeda
Oriented just below it in these APOD's http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap080124.html
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070721.html
and below left in this spectacular comparative image
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap061228.html
Geeze...for something as important as this you can't trust the media. Go to an authoratative source:emc wrote:"The world breathed a sigh of relief as our predicted demise - at 5pm - came and went with not even a whimper, let alone a bang."
So according to the IEDAB we are all dead... interesting... I had much higher hopes for after-life... I'm still at work.iamlucky13 wrote:Geeze...for something as important as this you can't trust the media. Go to an authoratative source:emc wrote:"The world breathed a sigh of relief as our predicted demise - at 5pm - came and went with not even a whimper, let alone a bang."
http://qntm.org/?board
Or better yet, recognize it with your own eyes:
http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html
Billions of people around the world are still in denial because of the mainstream media, saying things like "but they haven't even started colliding particles yet." Oh yeah smarty-pants? Then how come the IEDAB is reporting the world has been destroyed?
Mass-energy equivalence and the fact that matter can "condense" out of high energy environments. The collisions occur at 14 TeV. This is equivalent to about 15000 times the mass of a proton.bystander wrote:The God Particle (higgs boson)
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2008/ ... nteractive
How can you create a particle with 100 to 200 times the mass of a proton by smashing two protons together?
No probiamlucky13 wrote:Sorry about the misquote EMC. Interestingly, the IEDAB didn't actually say we're all dead. It just said the earth had been destroyed. Draw you own conclusions.
Actually gravity is not what is preventing long term space travel. It's not a huge problem to go into space.starnut wrote:One thing I hope that discoveries from the LHC and other future particle colliders will lead is better understanding how the gravitational force is created. Until we learn if this fundamental force can be controlled by some artificial means, long-term space travel will remain very difficult to attain. We need to find a way to neutralize the gravitational force around a spacecraft on a planet or moon so it can lift off the surface without so much energy and to create artificial gravity inside the spacecraft for people on long space travels. Otherwise, long space voyages will remain just a pipe dream.
That doesn't really change the existence of quarks. It just changes the definition of a quark or actually just explains what a quark exactly is.GOD wrote:They are going to discover that quarks don't exist; that what they thought was a single "quark" is really a soup of many, many newly discovered smaller particles. This will lead the scientists to understand that "dark matter" is really "very, very tiny matter".bystander wrote:It will be interesting to see what new answers the LHC will provide. Evidence of WIMPs, Higgs bosons, supersymmetry, gravitons????? Even more interesting, what new questions will be asked?
The most important new questions will be related to their discovery of the nature of different realities of vibrational frequencies. Scientists will prove that the vibrational reality in which humans reside, emanates from a higher vibrational reality. I understand many of you do not understand this yet.
Remember what happened to the space shuttles Challenger and Columbia? Using chemical rockets to leave the Earth and atmospheric braking to return is too dangerous and inefficient. It also takes far too long to get the shuttle ready for the next flight. Better to be able to control gravity to take off and land gently. We can also use gravity control for air travels.soupphysics wrote:
Actually gravity is not what is preventing long term space travel. It's not a huge problem to go into space.
It's the unimaginable huge distances that prevent it the long trips and the energy needed to accelerate to close to light speed, and even at that speed, it is some very long trips.
Artificial gravity on a space ship is not a problem either. It can be created by rotation (centripetal force).
