NGC 6334: a left handed angel (APOD 04 Mar 2008)

Comments and questions about the APOD on the main view screen.
Post Reply
User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

NGC 6334: a left handed angel (APOD 04 Mar 2008)

Post by neufer » Wed Mar 05, 2008 6:12 am

-----------------------------------------------
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap080304.html
.......................................................
NGC 6334, SPIREX/MSX composite:
Image
Red = 21um,
Green = 8um,
Blue = PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons),
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap050409.html
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap060414.html
-----------------------------------------------
Distant Wanderers: The Search for Planets Beyond the Solar System
- Page 166 by Bruce Dorminey
.
<<Astronomers at the Anglo-Australian Observatory have observed circular polarization of infrared light spanning distances of 1,000 AU in the star-forming complex of NGC 6334. circular polarization can occur naturally through the scattering of light as it travels through interstellar dust grains. Because the dust grains themselves may have already been aligned by magnetization, light passing through such magnetized grains may cause molecules that form in the local vicinity to form with a chiral preference. Laboratory studies have confirmed that circular polarization radiation can select (or destroy) one biomolecular hand in preference to another. As ultraviolet radiation from a nearby supernova passes through a magnetic alignment of dust grains, some of the amino acids embedded in such grains (alanine, for instance) would also be destroyed, thus triggering the selection (or preference) of one biomolecular hand over another. A similar process may have happened in the star-forming region that spawned our own solar system, since supernovae are thought to trigger the collapse of molecular clouds that form planetary systems. Thus radiation from the supernova which may have triggered the collapse of the molecular cloud that formed our own protostellar disk might also have had a local selection effect on amino acids, which eventually influenced the chiral preference of life on our own planet.>>

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/2000ASPC..213..355M
-----------------------------------------------
Extraterrestrial Enigma: Missing Amino Acids In Meteorites
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/life-03zzo.html
Seattle - Nov 04, 2003

<<Amino acids have been found in interstellar clouds and in meteorites - but with some enigmatic omissions and tantalizing similarities to life on Earth. Just why some amino acids are present in meteorites and others are absent, and why they seem to prefer the same "left-handed" molecular structure as Earth's living amino acids are questions that could unravel one of the most fundamental questions of science: Where and how did life begin? "The bottom line is that you have these materials that come from space," says Steve Macko, professor of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville. Macko refers specifically to eight of the amino acids found in a certain kind of meteorite - a carbonaceous chondrite. All eight amino acids are identical to those used by life on Earth. That could seem to point to a cosmic origin of these basic biological building blocks, says Macko. The case is bolstered by the fact that early Earth was bombarded with meteorites and the amino acid glycine has been detected on interstellar molecular clouds.

Making the case for cosmic origins of Earth's amino acids even more compelling is the fact that all of the meteorite amino acids, except glycine, favor the "left-handed" molecular structure, or chirality, that is also favored by life on Earth. The preference for left-handed amino acids was a necessary precondition for life, but just why life chose left (L-amino acids) over right (D-amino acids) is a mystery. "Essentially all of your protein is made of L-amino acids," said Macko. "Why is that? We don't know. The curious thing is that if you go to a meteorite you find a predominance of the same thing."

Another unanswered question: Why have only eight of life's 20 amino acids been found in meteorites? Perhaps all the amino acids were there, but something about the history of the meteorites or the analytical processes used limited their presence or their detection, Macko speculates. Only in recent years has the idea of amino acids from space affecting the start of life on Earth become a plausible hypothesis, explains Macko. Initially, amino acids were thought to have been created in the primordial atmosphere of early Earth.

In a now famous experiment more than a half-century ago, Stanley Miller and Harold Urey showed that amino acids were synthesized by simply creating lightning-like electrical discharges through a fog of water, methane and ammonia - all of which were thought to be readily available in Earth's early years. The experiment was proof that amino acids, out of which all life's proteins are made, can be created by strictly physical-chemical processes, without the help of living organisms.

Perhaps the most famous carbonaceous chondrite was the Murchison meteorite, which fragmented and fell in 1969 in and around the small town of Murchison, Victoria, about 70 miles north of Melbourne, Australia. Amino acids and other organic molecules were found in the Murchison meteorite. The mix of amino acids found in the Murchison Meteorite was similar to those produced in Miller-Urey type experiments. A chief difference, however, was seen by Mike Engel in his PhD research: Unlike the Miller-Urey experiment which produced equal amounts of the D and L- amino acids, Murchison tended to have L-amino acids predominate. The fact that the meteorite was seen falling and fragments were collected quickly minimized the chances that they were contaminated by Earth amino acids. The Miller-Urey experiment, combined with the discovery of amino acids in carbonaceous chondrites and the detection of glycine in molecular clouds, raise compelling issues about the origin of life on Earth, and its possible existence elsewhere in the solar system and beyond.>>
----------------------------------
Art Neuendorffer

henk21cm
Science Officer
Posts: 225
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 9:47 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Left or right handed?

Post by henk21cm » Wed Mar 05, 2008 10:26 am

Like Art Neufer brought to our attention, the Miller-Urey experiment produced roughly equally distributed amounts of L and D amino acids. On earth and in meteorites predominantly L amino acids are present. Refering to the circular polarisation of the IR light as a source for a preference for L or D and the consequences for a random distribution, the simple explanation is that most meteorites have an origin in our solar system, where amino acids are formed under the same (magnetic) circumstances.

What really interesting would be is to see whether the extrasolar meteorites have an equally distributed population of D and L amino acids, like found in the Miller-Urey experiment. I expect a random distribution of L and D amino acids in extrasolar meteorites, since there is no preference for left or right circular polarisation. The experiment will show whether my expectation/prediction is wrong.

The main problem will be "how to detect the origin of meteorites, independently of the sinisterity or dexterity of its amino acids".

Henk

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: Left or right handed?

Post by neufer » Wed Mar 05, 2008 1:21 pm

henk21cm wrote:Like Art Neufer brought to our attention, the Miller-Urey experiment produced roughly equally distributed amounts of L and D amino acids. On earth and in meteorites predominantly L amino acids are present. Refering to the circular polarisation of the IR light as a source for a preference for L or D and the consequences for a random distribution, the simple explanation is that most meteorites have an origin in our solar system, where amino acids are formed under the same (magnetic) circumstances.

What really interesting would be is to see whether the extrasolar meteorites have an equally distributed population of D and L amino acids, like found in the Miller-Urey experiment. I expect a random distribution of L and D amino acids in extrasolar meteorites, since there is no preference for left or right circular polarisation. The experiment will show whether my expectation/prediction is wrong.

The main problem will be "how to detect the origin of meteorites, independently of the sinisterity or dexterity of its amino acids".
The main problem will be "the impossibly low odds of our ever encountering an extrasolar meteorite."

Barring a theory that directly connects L amino acids with left handed neutrinos one would have to assume that your hypothesis is correct.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hb ... rino3.html
Art Neuendorffer

Post Reply