NIST: The Constants They Are A Changin'

Find out the latest thinking about our universe.
Post Reply
User avatar
bystander
Apathetic Retiree
Posts: 21577
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Oklahoma

NIST: The Constants They Are A Changin'

Post by bystander » Sat Jul 23, 2011 1:41 am

NIST Posts Latest Adjustments to Fundamental Figures
National Institute of Standards and Technology | 2011 July 19
[c][attachment=0]NIST-SP-959.jpg[/attachment][/i][/c]
The electromagnetic force has gotten a little stronger, gravity a little weaker, and the size of the smallest "quantum" of energy is now known a little better. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has posted the latest internationally recommended values of the fundamental constants of nature.

The constants, which range from relatively famous (the speed of light) to the fairly obscure (Wien frequency displacement law constant) are adjusted every four years in response to the latest scientific measurements and advances. These latest values arrive on the verge of a worldwide vote this fall on a plan to redefine the most basic units in the International System of Units (SI), such as the kilogram and ampere, exclusively in terms of the fundamental constants.

The values are determined by the Committee on Data for Science and Technology (CODATA) Task Group on Fundamental Constants, an international group that includes NIST members. The adjusted values reflect some significant scientific developments over the last four years.

Often the biggest news in a fundamental constant value is a reduced uncertainty—scientists know the value better. The uncertainty in the value of the fine-structure constant alpha (α = 7.297 352 5698 x 10-3), which dictates the strength of the electromagnetic force, has been slashed in half to 0.3 parts per billion (ppb). Since α can be measured in a uniquely broad range of phenomena from the recoil of atoms to the magnetic properties of electrons, the consistency of the measurements acts as a barometer of scientists' general understanding of physics. α will also be a critical constant after a redefinition of the SI: it will remain an experimentally determined constant, while quite a few others' values will be fixed to define the basic measurement units.

Also improved is the Planck constant h, which defines the size of the smallest possible "quantum" (packet) of energy, and is central to efforts to redefine the SI unit of mass. The latest value of h (6.626 069 57 x 10-34 joule seconds) takes into account a measurement of the number of atoms in a highly enriched silicon sphere. That value currently disagrees with the other fundamental method for determining h, known as the watt-balance. Even so, when all the values are combined, the overall uncertainty of h (44 ppb) is smaller than in 2006, and the values from the two techniques are getting closer to each other.

The 2010 CODATA values incorporate two new experimental measurements of G, the Newtonian constant of gravitation, which dictates the strength of gravity. The latest value of G (6.673 84 x 10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2) is about 66 parts per million smaller than the 2006 value. Other adjustments have been seen in the constants such as the radius of the proton and other constants related to atoms and gases such as the Rydberg and molar gas constants.

The CODATA task group is preparing a full report on the 2010 adjustments (for now, there is a brief overview), and the report will include recommendations for future measurements. A plan to adopt a fully constant-based SI, being voted upon this October by the General Conference on Weights and Measures, is contingent upon the values of the fundamental constants such as h reaching certain levels of precision and accuracy that will require further measurement advances in the coming years.
Newsflash: Gravity is Now a Little Weaker; Mass of Proton a Bit Smaller
Discover Blogs | 80beats | 2011 July 22
Attachments
Credit: Mohr,Talbott/NIST
Credit: Mohr,Talbott/NIST
Know the quiet place within your heart and touch the rainbow of possibility; be
alive to the gentle breeze of communication, and please stop being such a jerk.
— Garrison Keillor

User avatar
bystander
Apathetic Retiree
Posts: 21577
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Nature: Physicists count on updated constants

Post by bystander » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:17 pm

Physicists count on updated constants
Nature News | Eugenie Samuel Reich | 2011 July 26
The latest revision of fundamental quantities bodes well for the proposed overhaul of the international system of units.

As cheat sheets go, it is a long one. Every four years, a task force of the Committee on Data for Science and Technology (CODATA), headquartered in Paris, releases a short-hand description of the physical world: the latest, painstaking determination of the values and uncertainties of more than 300 physical constants, from the familiar speed of light, c, to the more obscure mass of the tau lepton, τ.

The most recent figures, from 2010, were first placed online in June and announced on 19 July by the US National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) in Gaithersburg, Maryland. The numbers include reduced uncertainties for several key constants, which physicists say is encouraging because these will allow for better tests of theory. The more precise figures will also aid plans to redefine familiar units of measure­ment, such as the kelvin and the kilogram, in terms of unchanging fundamental constants rather than relying on a material object that might not be stable (as for the kilogram standard).

"There's progress in the right direction," says Peter Mohr, a member of the CODATA task force at NIST. "It gives you more confidence doing science."

The task force revised the numbers that it had released in 2006 by reviewing the latest experiments and theory constraining fundamental quantities. Uncertainties decreased for the fine-structure constant, α, which is used in atomic physics; Planck's constant, h, which defines the size of energy quanta; Avogadro's constant, NA, the number of atoms in a sample of an element, the mass of which in grams equals its atomic mass; and Boltzmann's constant, k, which relates energy and temperature.

Much of the progress arises from advances in measurement science. For example, a 2010 measurement of Avogadro's constant made by counting the atoms in a lattice of highly enriched silicon produced a revised number. This brought the figure closer to another value obtained using Planck's constant (which is related to Avogadro's constant) by measuring the electric current needed to support a kilogram test mass suspended in a magnetic field against the force of gravity. Combining the two methods reduced the relative uncertainty in CODATA's Avogadro's constant from ±5.0 × 10−8 to ±4.4 × 10−8. For Boltzmann's constant, five new measurements lowered its relative uncertainty to ±9.1 × 10−7 from ±1.7 × 10−6 in 2006, when it was based on just two measurements. "That's a piece of good news," says Mohr.

The improved precision, particularly in the values of Avogadro's constant and Boltzmann's constant, is a boost for a proposal to rationalize the international system of standard units (known as SI, Système International d'Unités) by linking four of them — the ampere, mole, kilogram and kelvin — to physical constants, says Terry Quinn, emeritus director of the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) in Sèvres, France. The proposal is due to be voted on at the General Conference on Weights and Measures in Paris in October, and would put the SI on a path to be revamped by 2015.

Plans for the ampere's revision have long been in good shape because measurements of the electron's charge are very precise. Using the latest values for Boltzmann's constant, the kelvin could also be redefined with ease, says Mohr. The sticking point has been the kilogram, which is currently defined by a prototype mass held at the BIPM that many physicists consider an embarrassment because it is thought to vary over time. The new proposal would define the kilogram in terms of Planck's constant, which has units of kilogram metres squared per second. Before that can happen, some experts would like to see the uncertainty in that constant's value decrease to ±2 × 10–8.

Quinn says that given recent progress, he expects that to be achieved before 2015. But Ian Mills, a chemist and physicist at the University of Reading, UK, who is president of the BIPM's consultative committee on units, says that the uncertainty of Planck's constant is already low enough to redefine the kilogram reliably. "We could go ahead and make the change to SI today, but everyone is very anxious that we get everything tickety-boo."
Know the quiet place within your heart and touch the rainbow of possibility; be
alive to the gentle breeze of communication, and please stop being such a jerk.
— Garrison Keillor

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: Nature: Physicists count on updated constants

Post by neufer » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:25 pm

Click to play embedded YouTube video.
bystander wrote:Physicists count on updated constants
Nature News | Eugenie Samuel Reich | 2011 July 26
The latest revision of fundamental quantities bodes well for the proposed overhaul of the international system of units.

Quinn says that given recent progress, he expects that to be achieved before 2015. But Ian Mills, a chemist and physicist at the University of Reading, UK, who is president of the BIPM's consultative committee on units, says that the uncertainty of Planck's constant is already low enough to redefine the kilogram reliably. "We could go ahead and make the change to SI today, but everyone is very anxious that we get everything tickety-boo."
Art Neuendorffer

User avatar
bystander
Apathetic Retiree
Posts: 21577
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Re: NIST: The Constants They Are A Changin'

Post by bystander » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:41 pm

Click to play embedded YouTube video.
Know the quiet place within your heart and touch the rainbow of possibility; be
alive to the gentle breeze of communication, and please stop being such a jerk.
— Garrison Keillor

User avatar
Beyond
500 Gigaderps
Posts: 6889
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:09 am
Location: BEYONDER LAND

Re: NIST: The Constants They Are A Changin'

Post by Beyond » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:45 pm

Gee, neufer, you just posted the embedded video from You-Tube 15 minutes ago, and already it says "embedding disabled by request". What the heck :!: Do they have You-Tube Police patrolling, or something :?: :?:
To find the Truth, you must go Beyond.

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: NIST: The Constants They Are A Changin'

Post by neufer » Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:59 am

Beyond wrote:
Gee, neufer, you just posted the embedded video from You-Tube 15 minutes ago, and already it says "embedding disabled by request". What the heck :!: Do they have You-Tube Police patrolling, or something :?: :?:
A lot of You-Tube videos (of copyrighted material?) are tagged so that simply won't allow embedding.

The requesting took place long before I posted it (and I am sure that it is nothing personal).
Art Neuendorffer

User avatar
Beyond
500 Gigaderps
Posts: 6889
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:09 am
Location: BEYONDER LAND

Re: NIST: The Constants They Are A Changin'

Post by Beyond » Wed Jul 27, 2011 3:46 am

neufer wrote:
Beyond wrote:
Gee, neufer, you just posted the embedded video from You-Tube 15 minutes ago, and already it says "embedding disabled by request". What the heck :!: Do they have You-Tube Police patrolling, or something :?: :?:
A lot of You-Tube videos (of copyrighted material?) are tagged so that simply won't allow embedding.

The requesting took place long before I posted it (and I am sure that it is nothing personal).
Okie-dokie. Wouldn't it be better then, to just link it, so all we have to do is click the link??
To find the Truth, you must go Beyond.

User avatar
bystander
Apathetic Retiree
Posts: 21577
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Re: NIST: The Constants They Are A Changin'

Post by bystander » Wed Jul 27, 2011 3:59 am

Beyond wrote:Okie-dokie. Wouldn't it be better then, to just link it, so all we have to do is click the link??
Just click the youtube twice, it will take you there.
Know the quiet place within your heart and touch the rainbow of possibility; be
alive to the gentle breeze of communication, and please stop being such a jerk.
— Garrison Keillor

User avatar
Beyond
500 Gigaderps
Posts: 6889
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:09 am
Location: BEYONDER LAND

Re: NIST: The Constants They Are A Changin'

Post by Beyond » Wed Jul 27, 2011 4:21 am

bystander wrote:
Beyond wrote:Okie-dokie. Wouldn't it be better then, to just link it, so all we have to do is click the link??
Just click the youtube twice, it will take you there.
Oh, didn't know that. Thanks :!: :!:
To find the Truth, you must go Beyond.

User avatar
Beyond
500 Gigaderps
Posts: 6889
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:09 am
Location: BEYONDER LAND

Re: NIST: The Constants They Are A Changin'

Post by Beyond » Wed Jul 27, 2011 4:25 am

bystander wrote:
Beyond wrote:Okie-dokie. Wouldn't it be better then, to just link it, so all we have to do is click the link??
Just click the youtube twice, it will take you there.
That didn't work! I found that i have to put my cursor over where it says "You Tube" and click once. Then i'm there and it starts playing.
To find the Truth, you must go Beyond.

User avatar
Ann
4725 Å
Posts: 13440
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am

Re: NIST: The Constants They Are A Changin'

Post by Ann » Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:04 pm

The 2010 CODATA values incorporate two new experimental measurements of G, the Newtonian constant of gravitation, which dictates the strength of gravity. The latest value of G (6.673 84 x 10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2) is about 66 parts per million smaller than the 2006 value.
How come I don't feel lighter already?

Ann
Color Commentator

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: NIST: The Constants They Are A Changin'

Post by neufer » Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:11 pm

Ann wrote:
The 2010 CODATA values incorporate two new experimental measurements of G, the Newtonian constant of gravitation, which dictates the strength of gravity. The latest value of G (6.673 84 x 10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2) is about 66 parts per million smaller than the 2006 value.
How come I don't feel lighter already?
You didn't get lighter but Mother Earth just got heavier (by about 66 parts per million ).

You are, however, a little less attractive (by about 66 parts per million ).
Art Neuendorffer

User avatar
Ann
4725 Å
Posts: 13440
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am

Re: NIST: The Constants They Are A Changin'

Post by Ann » Wed Jul 27, 2011 3:07 pm

neufer wrote:
Ann wrote:
The 2010 CODATA values incorporate two new experimental measurements of G, the Newtonian constant of gravitation, which dictates the strength of gravity. The latest value of G (6.673 84 x 10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2) is about 66 parts per million smaller than the 2006 value.
How come I don't feel lighter already?
You didn't get lighter but Mother Earth just got heavier (by about 66 parts per million ).

You are, however, a little less attractive (by about 66 parts per million ).
:( :( :(

Ann
Color Commentator

User avatar
bystander
Apathetic Retiree
Posts: 21577
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Re: NIST: The Constants They Are A Changin'

Post by bystander » Wed Jul 27, 2011 3:16 pm

neufer wrote:You didn't get lighter but Mother Earth just got heavier (by about 66 parts per million ).

You are, however, a little less attractive (by about 66 parts per million ).
It's a good thing you are already married, your pickup lines need a lot of work. :mrgreen:
Know the quiet place within your heart and touch the rainbow of possibility; be
alive to the gentle breeze of communication, and please stop being such a jerk.
— Garrison Keillor

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: NIST: The Constants They Are A Changin'

Post by neufer » Wed Jul 27, 2011 4:53 pm

bystander wrote:
neufer wrote:
You didn't get lighter but Mother Earth just got heavier (by about 66 parts per million ).

You are, however, a little less attractive (by about 66 parts per million ).
It's a good thing you are already married, your pickup lines need a lot of work. :mrgreen:
At least they have remained constant over time.
Art Neuendorffer

Post Reply