APOD: MACS 1206: A Galaxy Cluster Lens... (2011 Oct 17)

Comments and questions about the APOD on the main view screen.
Post Reply
User avatar
APOD Robot
Otto Posterman
Posts: 5567
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 3:27 am
Contact:

APOD: MACS 1206: A Galaxy Cluster Lens... (2011 Oct 17)

Post by APOD Robot » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:06 am

Image MACS 1206: A Galaxy Cluster Gravitational Lens

Explanation: It is difficult to hide a galaxy behind a cluster of galaxies. The closer cluster's gravity will act like a huge lens, pulling images of the distant galaxy around the sides and greatly distorting them. This is just the case observed in the above recently released image from the CLASH survey with the Hubble Space Telescope. The cluster MACS J1206.2-0847 is composed of many galaxies and is lensing the image of a yellow-red background galaxy into the huge arc on the right. Careful inspection of the image will reveal at least several other lensed background galaxies -- many appearing as elongated wisps. The foreground cluster can only create such smooth arcs if most of its mass is smoothly distributed dark matter -- and therefore not concentrated in the cluster galaxies visible. Analyzing the positions of these gravitational arcs also gives astronomers a method to estimate the dark matter distribution in galaxy clusters, and infer from that when these huge conglomerations of galaxies began to form.

<< Previous APODDiscuss Any APOD Next APOD >>
[/b]

User avatar
bystander
Apathetic Retiree
Posts: 21590
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Re: APOD: MACS 1206: A Galaxy Cluster Lens... (2011 Oct 17)

Post by bystander » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:19 am

Know the quiet place within your heart and touch the rainbow of possibility; be
alive to the gentle breeze of communication, and please stop being such a jerk.
— Garrison Keillor

Boomer12k
:---[===] *
Posts: 2691
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 12:07 am

Re: APOD: MACS 1206: A Galaxy Cluster Lens... (2011 Oct 17)

Post by Boomer12k » Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:19 am

Anyone up for a "Slice o' Bacon"?



:------======= *

inertnet
Ensign
Posts: 54
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:42 pm

Re: APOD: MACS 1206: A Galaxy Cluster Lens... (2011 Oct 17)

Post by inertnet » Mon Oct 17, 2011 8:31 am

Minor detail: there's an 's' missing from the title "MACS 1206: A Galaxy Cluster Gravitational Len" on the APOD page.

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: APOD: MACS 1206: A Galaxy Cluster Lens... (2011 Oct 17)

Post by neufer » Mon Oct 17, 2011 9:37 am

Click to play embedded YouTube video.
Art Neuendorffer

User avatar
JohnD
Tea Time, Guv! Cheerio!
Posts: 1587
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 2:11 pm
Location: Lancaster, England

Re: APOD: MACS 1206: A Galaxy Cluster Lens... (2011 Oct 17)

Post by JohnD » Mon Oct 17, 2011 9:55 am

Please use the link in the caption to the YouTube video of a slow zoom into this view.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fNlS_tzBm4
It gives a better than most idea of the extraordinary perfomance of Hubble, as it zooms from an 'ordinary' view of the Corvus asterism; in, in, in, in, into this view.
Gives me vertigo!

John
(The one who wanted less "Gosh! Golly! Gee!" in Asterisk posts!)

User avatar
owlice
Guardian of the Codes
Posts: 8406
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 4:18 pm
Location: Washington, DC

Re: APOD: MACS 1206: A Galaxy Cluster Lens... (2011 Oct 17)

Post by owlice » Mon Oct 17, 2011 10:53 am

^5s John!

(Amazing image, astounding video. Thanks for pointing it out!)
A closed mouth gathers no foot.

GigaGerard
Asternaut
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 11:01 am
Location: The Hague, the Netherlands

Re: APOD: MACS 1206: A Galaxy Cluster Lens... (2011 Oct 17)

Post by GigaGerard » Mon Oct 17, 2011 11:16 am

My comment on:
The foreground cluster can only create such smooth arcs if most of its mass is smoothly distributed .... and therefore not concentrated ...

A possible alternative explanation for the smooth gravitational arcs:

1. We observe the light of the background galaxy after B billions of years, but for things travelling with the speed of light time is at a standstill.
2. The trajectory of the photon is bend by the cluster mass in between, but not as we believe right at the time it passes the cluster.
3. The mass that bends the background light should be calculated as an average of the positions of the in between galaxies during B billions of years.

User avatar
orin stepanek
Plutopian
Posts: 8200
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: Nebraska

Re: APOD: MACS 1206: A Galaxy Cluster Lens... (2011 Oct 17)

Post by orin stepanek » Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:30 pm

To me it seams that some of the background galaxies appear twice as their images bend around the foreground galaxies! either that or they have twins. :mrgreen:
Orin

Smile today; tomorrow's another day!

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18572
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: APOD: MACS 1206: A Galaxy Cluster Lens... (2011 Oct 17)

Post by Chris Peterson » Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:49 pm

GigaGerard wrote:A possible alternative explanation for the smooth gravitational arcs:

1. We observe the light of the background galaxy after B billions of years, but for things travelling with the speed of light time is at a standstill.
That's not consistent with our very good understanding of General Relativity. It doesn't matter whether a photon feels time in any meaningful sense. What matters is that it exists in the Universe, having a (generally) discrete position and any particular time. That is, from our frame of view, we see it having a trajectory. And we observe a smooth flow of time. It is when and where the photon is acted on in our frame of reference that matters, not the photon's.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

Wolf Kotenberg

Re: APOD: MACS 1206: A Galaxy Cluster Lens... (2011 Oct 17)

Post by Wolf Kotenberg » Mon Oct 17, 2011 2:42 pm

Magnificent ! Was this a " lucky shot " ?????

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18572
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: APOD: MACS 1206: A Galaxy Cluster Lens... (2011 Oct 17)

Post by Chris Peterson » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:07 pm

Wolf Kotenberg wrote:Magnificent ! Was this a " lucky shot " ?????
Nope. It was collected as part of a survey project targeting a specific list of known large galaxy clusters, with a well defined set of science goals.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: APOD: MACS 1206: A Galaxy Cluster Lens... (2011 Oct 17)

Post by neufer » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:09 pm

Chris Peterson wrote:
It doesn't matter whether a photon feels time in any meaningful sense.
What matters is that it exists in the Universe, having a (generally) discrete position and any particular time.
Hath not a photon eyes? hath not a photon hands, organs, dimensions, senses, affections, passions? fed with the same food, hurt with the same weapons, subject to the same diseases, healed by the same means, warmed and cooled by the same winter and summer, as an electron is? If you prick them, do they not bleed? if you tickle them, do they not laugh? if you poison them, do they not die? and if you wrong them, shall they not revenge? If they are like you in the rest frame, they will resemble you in motion. If a photon wrong a electron, what is his humility? Revenge. If a electron wrong a photon, what should his sufferance be by electron example? Why, revenge. The villany you teach them, they will execute, and it shall go hard but they will better the instruction.
Art Neuendorffer

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18572
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: APOD: MACS 1206: A Galaxy Cluster Lens... (2011 Oct 17)

Post by Chris Peterson » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:26 pm

neufer wrote:Hath not a photon eyes? hath not a photon hands, organs, dimensions, senses, affections, passions? fed with the same food, hurt with the same weapons, subject to the same diseases, healed by the same means, warmed and cooled by the same winter and summer, as an electron is? If you prick them, do they not bleed? ...
What wavelength does a photon require in order to collect a pound of it? By my calculation, it's 5e-42 m, giving it the energy equivalent of a 10 megaton explosion. You don't want to piss off that photon!
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

zbvhs
Science Officer
Posts: 161
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 11:57 am
Location: Frederick, MD

Re: APOD: MACS 1206: A Galaxy Cluster Lens... (2011 Oct 17)

Post by zbvhs » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:51 pm

I love it when smart people get in arguments.
Virgil H. Soule

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Venetian blind?

Post by neufer » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:58 pm

Chris Peterson wrote:
neufer wrote:
Hath not a photon eyes? hath not a photon hands, organs, dimensions, senses, affections, passions? fed with the same food, hurt with the same weapons, subject to the same diseases, healed by the same means, warmed and cooled by the same winter and summer, as an electron is? If you prick them, do they not bleed? ...
What wavelength does a photon require in order to collect a pound of it? By my calculation, it's 5e-42 m, giving it the energy equivalent of a 10 megaton explosion. You don't want to piss off that photon!
The pound of flash, which I demand of him,
Is dearly bought; 'tis mine and I will have it.
If you deny me, fie upon your laws of relativity!
There is no force in the decrees of Venice.
I stand for judgment: answer; shall I have it?
(Apologies to the Earl of Oxford.)
Last edited by neufer on Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Art Neuendorffer

User avatar
Beyond
500 Gigaderps
Posts: 6889
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:09 am
Location: BEYONDER LAND

Re: APOD: MACS 1206: A Galaxy Cluster Lens... (2011 Oct 17)

Post by Beyond » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:59 pm

Neufer, i think you already have it, but I'm not sure what (it) is. :mrgreen:
To find the Truth, you must go Beyond.

ddorn777
Ensign
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 4:06 pm

Re: APOD: MACS 1206: A Galaxy Cluster Lens... (2011 Oct 17)

Post by ddorn777 » Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:22 pm

Shakespeare truly does speak in (relatively) universal terms. :wink:

Gravitational lensing is one of the more interesting aspects of cosmology that I like to read about. Thanks!

User avatar
Ann
4725 Å
Posts: 13802
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am

Re: APOD: MACS 1206: A Galaxy Cluster Lens... (2011 Oct 17)

Post by Ann » Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:43 pm

Neufer wrote:

Hath not a photon eyes?
Image
It does!!!












Ann
Color Commentator

User avatar
hstarbuck
Ensign
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:59 pm
Location: Hawaii

Re: APOD: MACS 1206: A Galaxy Cluster Lens... (2011 Oct 17)

Post by hstarbuck » Tue Oct 18, 2011 12:14 am

Chris Peterson wrote:
neufer wrote:Hath not a photon eyes? hath not a photon hands, organs, dimensions, senses, affections, passions? fed with the same food, hurt with the same weapons, subject to the same diseases, healed by the same means, warmed and cooled by the same winter and summer, as an electron is? If you prick them, do they not bleed? ...
What wavelength does a photon require in order to collect a pound of it? By my calculation, it's 5e-42 m, giving it the energy equivalent of a 10 megaton explosion. You don't want to piss off that photon!
Unless the photon is on the moon, then it's wavelength for a pound would be 8e-43 m.

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: APOD: MACS 1206: A Galaxy Cluster Lens... (2011 Oct 17)

Post by neufer » Tue Oct 18, 2011 1:10 am

hstarbuck wrote:
Chris Peterson wrote:
What wavelength does a photon require in order to collect a pound of it? By my calculation, it's 5e-42 m, giving it the energy equivalent of a 10 megaton explosion. You don't want to piss off that photon!
Unless the photon is on the moon, then it's wavelength for a pound would be 8e-43 m.
I get 4.873e-42 m for the Compton wavelength...

but 7.756e-43 m for the “reduced” Compton wavelength.

<<The reduced Compton wavelength is a natural representation for mass on the quantum scale, and as such, it appears in many of the fundamental equations of quantum mechanics.>>

So you are both right (although this is all rather moot since a Planck length is 1.6162e−35 m).
Art Neuendorffer

Post Reply