NASA/ASU/SI: Recent Geological Activity on the Moon

Find out the latest thinking about our universe.
Post Reply
User avatar
bystander
Apathetic Retiree
Posts: 21577
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Oklahoma

NASA/ASU/SI: Recent Geological Activity on the Moon

Post by bystander » Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:27 pm

Recent Geological Activity on the Moon: Lunar Crust Pulling Apart
NASA LRO | ASU | Smithsonian | 2012 Feb 20

New images from NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) spacecraft show the moon's crust is being stretched, forming minute valleys in a few small areas on the lunar surface. Scientists propose this geologic activity occurred less than 50 million years ago, which is considered recent compared to the moon's age of more than 4.5 billion years.

A team of researchers analyzing high-resolution images obtained by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) show small, narrow trenches typically much longer than they are wide. This indicates the lunar crust is being pulled apart at these locations. These linear valleys, known as graben, form when the moon's crust stretches, breaks and drops down along two bounding faults. A handful of these graben systems have been found across the lunar surface.

"We think the moon is in a general state of global contraction because of cooling of a still hot interior," said Thomas Watters of the Center for Earth and Planetary Studies at the Smithsonian's National Air and Space Museum in Washington, and lead author of a paper on this research appearing in the March issue of the journal Nature Geoscience. "The graben tell us forces acting to shrink the moon were overcome in places by forces acting to pull it apart. This means the contractional forces shrinking the moon cannot be large, or the small graben might never form."

The weak contraction suggests that the moon, unlike the terrestrial planets, did not completely melt in the very early stages of its evolution. Rather, observations support an alternative view that only the moon's exterior initially melted forming an ocean of molten rock.

In August 2010, the team used LROC images to identify physical signs of contraction on the lunar surface, in the form of lobe-shaped cliffs known as lobate scarps. The scarps are evidence the moon shrank globally in the geologically recent past and might still be shrinking today. The team saw these scarps widely distributed across the moon and concluded it was shrinking as the interior slowly cooled.

Based on the size of the scarps, it is estimated that the distance between the moon's center and its surface shank by approximately 300 feet. The graben were an unexpected discovery and the images provide contradictory evidence that the regions of the lunar crust are also being pulled apart.

"This pulling apart tells us the moon is still active," said Richard Vondrak, LRO Project Scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. "LRO gives us a detailed look at that process."

As the LRO mission progresses and coverage increases, scientists will have a better picture of how common these young graben are and what other types of tectonic features are nearby. The graben systems the team finds may help scientists refine the state of stress in the lunar crust.

"It was a big surprise when I spotted graben in the far side highlands," said co-author Mark Robinson of the School of Earth and Space Exploration at Arizona State University, principal investigator of LROC. "I immediately targeted the area for high-resolution stereo images so we could create a three-dimensional view of the graben. It's exciting when you discover something totally unexpected and only about half the lunar surface has been imaged in high resolution. There is much more of the moon to be explored."

The research was funded by the LRO mission, currently under NASA's Science Mission Directorate at NASA Headquarters in Washington. LRO is managed by NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md.
Click to play embedded YouTube video.

Recent extensional tectonics on the Moon revealed by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera - Thomas R. Watters et al
Recent Geologic Activity on the Moon?
Universe Today | Ray Sanders | 2012 Feb 20

It's Alive! There's Magma on the Moon
Discovery News | Charles Q. Choi, Space.com | 2012 Feb 21

Why is our shrinking moon also stretching?
New Scientist | Short Sharp Science | David Shiga | 2012 Feb 21

If the Moon Currently has Liquid Magma, Why isn’t it Erupting?
Universe Today | Irene Antonenko | 2012 Feb 22
Know the quiet place within your heart and touch the rainbow of possibility; be
alive to the gentle breeze of communication, and please stop being such a jerk.
— Garrison Keillor

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: NASA/ASU/SI: Recent Geological Activity on the Moon

Post by neufer » Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:34 pm

Art Neuendorffer

User avatar
geckzilla
Ocular Digitator
Posts: 9180
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: Modesto, CA
Contact:

Re: NASA/ASU/SI: Recent Geological Activity on the Moon

Post by geckzilla » Thu Feb 23, 2012 4:51 pm

Come on Art, stop posting that fake rock sliding animation. It looks real to the untrained. :P
Just call me "geck" because "zilla" is like a last name.

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: NASA/ASU/SI: Recent Geological Activity on the Moon

Post by neufer » Thu Feb 23, 2012 5:06 pm

geckzilla wrote:
Come on Art, stop posting that fake rock sliding animation. It looks real to the untrained. :P
Bystander did it first.

(You've been trained in these matters :?: )
Art Neuendorffer

User avatar
geckzilla
Ocular Digitator
Posts: 9180
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: Modesto, CA
Contact:

Re: NASA/ASU/SI: Recent Geological Activity on the Moon

Post by geckzilla » Thu Feb 23, 2012 6:46 pm

My eyes are definitely trained to spot fakery in digital images. I've been doing it for years. I also took an advanced Photoshop course in college, if that counts for anything.
Just call me "geck" because "zilla" is like a last name.

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: NASA/ASU/SI: Recent Geological Activity on the Moon

Post by neufer » Thu Feb 23, 2012 7:27 pm

geckzilla wrote:
My eyes are definitely trained to spot fakery in digital images.
I've been doing it for years. I also took an advanced Photoshop course in college, if that counts for anything.
So what gives it away?
Art Neuendorffer

User avatar
geckzilla
Ocular Digitator
Posts: 9180
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: Modesto, CA
Contact:

Re: NASA/ASU/SI: Recent Geological Activity on the Moon

Post by geckzilla » Thu Feb 23, 2012 7:33 pm

Well, besides the obvious sky not changing, when the animation starts, there are some places where the undisturbed texture of the ground has been borrowed to cover up the tracks in order to create a before state. I don't know, really, if you have to be "trained" to spot it. A lot of people don't pay enough attention to things. Anyone could stop and think about it for a moment and realize it but a lot of people don't.
Just call me "geck" because "zilla" is like a last name.

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: NASA/ASU/SI: Recent Geological Activity on the Moon

Post by neufer » Tue Feb 28, 2012 4:27 pm

http://www.universetoday.com/93824/face-to-face-with-some-shattered-lunar-boulders/#more-93824 wrote:
Face-to-Face With Some Shattered Lunar Boulders
by Jason Major on February 27, 2012 <<Breaking up may be hard to do, but these two lunar boulders seem to have succeeded extremely well! Imaged by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) in October of 2009, this crumbled couple was recently identified by Moon Zoo team member Dr. Anthony Cook and brought to the attention of the project’s forum moderator.

The tracks left in the regolith — lunar soil — behind the boulders tell of their past rolling journeys down the slope of the elongated Schiller crater, in which they reside. Rolling boulders have been spotted before on the Moon, but what made these two split apart? And…why does that one on the lower right look so much like half a face?

Several things can cause lunar boulders to come loose and take the nearest downhill course. Meteorite impacts can shake the ground locally, giving the rocks enough of a nudge to set them on a roll. And moonquakes — the lunar version of earthquakes, as the name implies (although not due to tectonic plate shifts but rather to more mysterious internal lunar forces) — can also dislodge large boulders.

The low gravity on the Moon can make large rocks take a bounding path, evidenced by the dotted-line appearance of some of the trails. Could all that bounding and bouncing have made the two boulders above shatter apart? Or was something else the cause of their crumbling? Dr. Cook suggested that the boulders could have fractured before they began rolling, and then the added stress of their trip down the crater’s slope (uphill is to the right) made them break apart at the end of their trip… possibly due to further weathering and the extreme temperature variations of lunar days and nights. Although a sound idea, Dr. Cook added, “I’m a bit puzzled though why the one on the top left has rock debris so far away from the centre. The boulder that looks like a skull rock on the bottom right has debris a lot closer to it, that could simply be explained by bits falling off as one would expect from the explanation above.”

Another idea is that the boulders were struck by meteorites, but it seems extremely improbable that two would have been hit right next to each other. Still, not impossible, especially given the geologic time spans in play.

And as far as the “skull rock” boulder is concerned… that’s a little something called pareidolia, the tendency for our brains to interpret random shapes as something particularly significant. In this case it’s a human face, one of the most popular forms of pareidolia (perhaps best known by the famous “Face on Mars”, which, as we all now know, has been since shown to be just another Martian mesa.)

It does look like a face though, and not a particularly happy one!>>
Art Neuendorffer

Post Reply