APOD: Perseid Below (2012 Aug 10)

Comments and questions about the APOD on the main view screen.
User avatar
APOD Robot
Otto Posterman
Posts: 3356
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 3:27 am

APOD: Perseid Below (2012 Aug 10)

Post by APOD Robot » Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:06 am

Image Perseid Below

Explanation: Denizens of planet Earth watched last year's Perseid meteor shower by looking up into the bright moonlit night sky. But this remarkable view captured on August 13, 2011 by astronaut Ron Garan looks down on a Perseid meteor. From Garan's perspective onboard the International Space Station orbiting at an altitude of about 380 kilometers, the Perseid meteors streak below, swept up dust left from comet Swift-Tuttle heated to incandescence. The glowing comet dust grains are traveling at about 60 kilometers per second through the denser atmosphere around 100 kilometers above Earth's surface. In this case, the foreshortened meteor flash is right of frame center, below the curving limb of the Earth and a layer of greenish airglow, just below bright star Arcturus. Want to look up at this year's Perseid meteor shower? You're in luck. This weekend the shower should be near its peak, with less interference from a waning crescent Moon rising a few hours before the Sun.

<< Previous APOD This Day in APOD Next APOD >>
[/b]

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 15396
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: APOD: Perseid Below (2012 Aug 10)

Post by neufer » Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:15 am

Click to play embedded YouTube video.
Art Neuendorffer

Joe Horton

Re: APOD: Perseid Below (2012 Aug 10)

Post by Joe Horton » Fri Aug 10, 2012 12:24 pm

By my calculation, a 1 gram meteorite at 60 km/sec has about 25 times the kinetic energy of a 55 grain .223 round--an appreciable amount. As far as we known, has anything this size ever hit one of earth's artificial orbiters?

JH

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 15396
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: APOD: Perseid Below (2012 Aug 10)

Post by neufer » Fri Aug 10, 2012 12:57 pm

Joe Horton wrote:
By my calculation, a 1 gram meteorite at 60 km/sec has about 25 times the kinetic energy of a 55 grain .223 round--an appreciable amount. As far as we known, has anything this size ever hit one of earth's artificial orbiters?
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/columnist/vergano/story/2011-09-25/meteors-satellites/50531542/1 wrote:
Meteoroid impacts may explain some satellite mysteries
By Dan Vergano, USA TODAY, 9/26/2011

<<With one of NASA's defunct satellites crashing down to Earth this weekend, forgetting our more commonplace visitors from space, meteors, might be easy. But bear in mind that roughly 100 tons of space dust and rubble, or meteoroids, rain down on Earth every day. And that before the space agency's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (UARS) was allowed to take a final plunge to keep it from cluttering space, something smacked into the spacecraft four years ago, hard enough to dislodge four pieces from its frame. "We create space junk, so we're obligated to get rid of it. But we're a little bit oblivious to meteoroids," says aerospace engineer Sigrid Close of Stanford University. "And we can't go out and kill the comets that cause meteoroids."

Meteor showers look pretty in the nighttime sky, caused by space rocks as big as 30 feet across streaking across the heavens. But Close and colleagues have diagnosed a previously unsuspected way that even the humblest bit of space dust — as small as four-thousandths of an inch across — may end up zapping satellite electronics. These bits of comets and asteroids routinely swoop down on Earth at speeds ranging from 24,600 to 160,000 miles-per-hour, much faster than the orbital zip of most satellites.

For fans of categorizing stuff, I should probably mention that meteoroids are what space rocks are called when they are flying through space, meteors are what they are called when they are burning through the sky, and meteorites are what they are called after they land. Any meteoroid much bigger than 30 feet across is generally dubbed by astronomers as an asteroid, or else a comet.

"Most of the time we think of a bullet hole left behind in the spacecraft (from meteoroids)," Close says, and impacts do abrade satellite surfaces and make holes. "But these things are traveling so fast that they leave a little [plasma] cloud behind when they hit," she adds. "We're trying to figure out what that can do."

Some evidence that meteoroid strikes cause bad things to happen comes from the August Perseids meteor shower. The Perseids seem to have discombobulated the European Space Agency's Olympus satellite in 1993 and may have done the same to Landsat V in 2009. Two Japanese satellites, ADEOS II and the ALOS spacecraft, have lost power amid other meteor showers. And the Jason-I satellite was knocked 11 inches sideways by something in 2002 that boosted the current in its solar power cells for its next three orbits.


As Close and colleagues reported in a Journal of Geophysical Researchstudy last year, spacecraft designers have suspected since 1963 that high-speed meteoroid impacts with spacecraft created little clouds of electrified gas, or "plasma." Exactly how this screws up satellites isn't clear, but the team proposed a mechanism in the paper, a so-called electromagnetic pulse, a sudden oversized outburst of electrical activity.

In doomsday thrillers, nuclear bombs create hefty electromagnetic pulses that overload the nation's power grid. In the study, and in experiments presented this summer by Close's student, Nicolas Lee, at an American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics meeting in Honolulu, the engineers looked at whether meteoroids would generate small electromagnetic pulses on satellites they hit.
Even before Sputnik ascended into orbit in 1957, engineers had worried about impacts from meteoroids, leading to the development of so-called Whipple shields (invented by Harvard astronomer Fred Whipple in 1947), layers of aluminum strips that catch particles before they penetrate satellites. "We often think of satellites as shielded, even from electric effects," Close says. "But if there is anything electronic reaching into the spacecraft, even a transmitter, it isn't." So, in the experiments, the team accelerated tiny iron particles to meteoroid speeds and shot them at metal targets that simulated satellite surfaces. On some tungsten and aluminum used in satellites, they found plasmas triggering 3-microsecond electrical outbursts after an impact. "But it really depends on the materials," Close says. Unfortunately, the plasmas seem to have a sweet tooth for solar cells and for materials found in the stabilizing gyroscopes of spacecraft, she says, "but we are still figuring this out." On the plus side, she adds, simply knowing the electronic effect is happening might point the way to better shields.

"The current space environment is growing increasingly hazardous to spacecraft and astronauts," said Donald Kessler, retired head of NASA's Orbital Debris Program Office, in a statement on a recent National Research Council panel report he headed. The report called for NASA to start studying direct removal of old rocket boosters and derelict spacecraft from orbit, and keeping better track of electrical anomalies in orbit.

The threat to satellite computers comes not just from old bits of spacecraft, but also from atomic particles moving at nearly light-speed called cosmic rays, and from electric fields in the Earth's upper atmosphere energized by solar storms. Above "Low Earth" orbits roughly 100 to 1,200 miles high, "meteoroids really take over as the threat," says Close, who was on the NRC report panel.

The best way to get a handle on electromagnetic pulses from meteoroids frying satellites might be sending up a sacrificial victim, a small "CubeSat" equipped with a metal meteoroid screen and the same detectors used in the experiments. Until then, satellite operators will have to content themselves with turning their spacecraft sideways during meteor showers, she says. "The most dangerous place for a satellite is out in front of the Earth as it orbits the sun, plowing into whatever is out there," she says. "We really have a lot to learn about meteoroids."
Art Neuendorffer

Marclacy

Re: APOD: Perseid Below (2012 Aug 10)

Post by Marclacy » Fri Aug 10, 2012 2:21 pm

Is the thin greenish line in the photograph an aurora?

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 15396
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: APOD: Perseid Below (2012 Aug 10)

Post by neufer » Fri Aug 10, 2012 2:34 pm

Marclacy wrote:
Is the thin greenish line in the photograph an aurora?
Art Neuendorffer

saturno2
Commander
Posts: 619
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:05 pm

Re: APOD: Perseid Below (2012 Aug 10)

Post by saturno2 » Sat Aug 11, 2012 12:44 am

Perseid meteor is interesting when it see from I S S.

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 14003
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA

Re: APOD: Perseid Below (2012 Aug 10)

Post by Chris Peterson » Sat Aug 11, 2012 1:04 am

2012-Perseids-(filtered_0801-0809).jpg
The Perseids are getting pretty good from below, as well. Here we have 155 of them (other shower members have been removed) from a single location (central Colorado) since August 1 - despite interference from moonlight and less than transparent skies. All the meteors in the composite are brighter than about magnitude 1- a visual observer would see many more. Things should really pick up over the next few days.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com