University of Texas | McDonald Observatory | 2012 Oct 09
Dust is an annoyance in everyday life, but an important building block of stars and planets. As such, astronomers need to understand how cosmic dust forms over time — it's an integral step in figuring out the evolution of galaxies, and the stars and planets within them.
To better understand cosmic dust, University of Texas at Austin assistant professor Steven Finkelstein and colleagues are pursuing one of the largest Hubble Space Telescope projects to date, studying dust in thousands of galaxies over a wide range of cosmic time. They published some early results in a paper lead by Finkelstein in a recent issue of The Astrophysical Journal.
"We don't yet understand how galaxies build up their dust reservoirs," Finkelstein said. "We know that dust builds up through time, but exactly when the formation of dust begins is unknown."
Finkelstein is part of a large team of astronomers working to rectify that knowledge gap. They are studying nearly 3,000 galaxies seen 500 million to 1,500 million years after the Big Bang — only a moment after the initial event, when compared to the 13.7-billion-year age of the universe. The project is called CANDELS: the Cosmic Assembly Near-infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey.
Some of the galaxies came from the team's own ongoing Hubble observations: more than 900 orbits studying distant galaxies with the Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3). They also include data from several other large Hubble galaxy surveys (including Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey (GOODS) and the Hubble Ultra-Deep Field survey).
Finkelstein said that previous studies with smaller surveys, including some of his own, appeared to indicate that ancient galaxies were dust free. But CANDELS has found that even at a very early epoch, massive galaxies already contain a lot of dust, in the form of grains of carbon and silicon (in astronomical jargon, "heavy metals").
"We found something we wouldn't expect," Finkelstein said. "Although dust can form quickly, I don't think many people expected galaxies at only 800 million years after the Big Bang to have a lot of dust. These observations caused us to change our thinking."
Studying such ancient, and thus faint, galaxies is tricky even for Hubble. Only a miniscule amount of information comes through in the tiny stream of photons they send our way, but their color can be determined. This was the team's quarry. Galaxy colors are a clue to the amount of dust a galaxy contains: The redder a galaxy appears, the more dust it contains. The bluer it appears, the less dust it contains.
And finding a significant amount of "heavy metal" dust in these early massive galaxies means they must have been forming stars for a while, Finkelstein said. That's because heavy elements were not created in the Big Bang itself. They are built up over time inside stars, as they fuse lighter elements into heavier ones through nuclear fusion at their cores. When a massive star runs through all of this nuclear fuel, it explodes as a spectacular supernova, spewing these heavy elements into the galaxy. These heavy elements are the building blocks for the dust for which CANDELS was looking.
"These results are very interesting because they tell us that dust does form at early times," he said. "This is important because the same elements that compose the dust grains are necessary for the formation of planets. Also, we think that dust is a key component in allowing hydrogen gas to form molecules, which is necessary for star formation."
Additionally, the team found that in between 800 million and 1.5 billion years after the Big Bang, "all galaxies — not just massive ones — get dusty," Finkelstein said.
This work has him excited about the future, Finkelstein said. "The presence of dust means that a previous generation of stars has lived and died. So, when we can peer back to even farther later this decade with JWST [James Webb Space Telescope], there should be a lot for us to see!"
CANDELS: The Contribution of the Observed Galaxy Population to Cosmic Reionization - Steven L. Finkelstein et al
- Astrophysical Journal 758(2) 93 (2012 Oct 20) DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/758/2/93
arXiv.org > astro-ph > arXiv:1206.0735 > 04 Jun 2012 (v1), 06 Jun 2012 (v2)
- Astrophysical Journal 756(2) 164 (2012 Sep 10) DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/756/2/164
arXiv.org > astro-ph > arXiv:1110.3785 > 17 Oct 2011 (v1), 08 Aug 2012 (v2)
