Nitpicker wrote:Seems to me like there is little evidence to support one kind of structure over the other (diapir or a "sandwiched ocean"). There is evidence of southern geysers forming the E-ring, but that doesn't really tell us anything about the geological structure creating the geysers. I might have been less likely to recoil from the "sandwiched ocean" idea, if the image was not described as a cartoon, and south was not drawn at the bottom, making it look like a low point for water to drain.
I think there IS evidence for the “sandwiched ocean” notion Nitpicker.
And from the S&T article I referenced here's and explanation of that evidence:
So how do astronomers map the interior of a moon using only an orbiting spacecraft?
It all comes down to the subtle effect of gravity. We tend to think of the force of gravity on any planet as a constant. But in reality it varies depending on your global location and the composition of the planet under your feet. For example, Earth’s gravity measured at our equator is 9.788 m/sec2, whereas at one of the poles it may be as high as 9.838 m/sec2 (a difference of 0.5%).
“Gravity allows us to open a window into the interior of the moon,” said Iess. During three close flybys of Enceladus, Cassini measured variations in how the moon’s gravity pulled on the spacecraft. These variations revealed the large-scale characteristics of the moon’s surface and interior, including any mass anomalies — spots where there is an excess or lack of mass — typically due to a bulge or a basin, or even just a change in density.
While flying past Enceladus’s south pole, Cassini spotted a negative mass anomaly, likely due to a depression in the icy surface.
“When you look at the actual surface you see that, although there is indeed a depression, it is much larger than that needed to explain the gravity,” said coauthor David Stevenson (Caltech). In other words, there simply isn’t enough mass at the surface of the south pole to account for the gravitational field present there. So there has to be something more massive underneath the surface. “A natural way to do this is to have a layer of water, because water is more dense than ice.”
Thus this subsurface ocean idea does have some real evidence to back it up. So don't be so quick to flush it down the drain.
Just as zero is not equal to infinity, everything coming from nothing is illogical.