Comments and questions about the
APOD on the main view screen.
-
APOD Robot
- Otto Posterman
- Posts: 5549
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 3:27 am
Post
by APOD Robot » Wed Sep 06, 2017 4:06 am
The Climber and the Eclipse
Explanation: What should you do if your rock climbing picture is photobombed by a total eclipse of the Sun? Rejoice -- because your
planning paid off. After
months of considering different venues, and a week of scouting different locations in
Oregon's
Smith Rock State Park, a group of
photographers and rock climbers led by
Ted Hesser, Martina Tibell, and Michael Shainblum settled on picturesque 100-meter tall
Monkey Face tower as the dramatic foreground for their images of the pending
total solar eclipse. Tension mounted as the
eclipse time approached, planned juxtapositions were scrutinized, and the placement of rock climber
Tommy Smith was adjusted. Right on schedule, though, the
Moon moved in front of the Sun, and Smith moved in front of the Moon, just as planned. The solar eclipse
image displayed here actually shows a
diamond ring, an eclipse phase when a bit of the distant Sun is still visible beyond the
Moon's surface.
[/b]
-
Bob m
Post
by Bob m » Wed Sep 06, 2017 4:31 am
why can I see stars in the moon?
-
geckzilla
- Ocular Digitator
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:42 pm
- Location: Modesto, CA
Post
by geckzilla » Wed Sep 06, 2017 5:04 am
Bob m wrote:why can I see stars in the moon?
Could be hot pixels, dust, bugs, or pretty much anything but stars.
Just call me "geck" because "zilla" is like a last name.
-
Boomer12k
- :---[===] *
- Posts: 2691
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 12:07 am
Post
by Boomer12k » Wed Sep 06, 2017 5:29 am
Why is the eclipse so big in the picture, but when I saw it... here in Oregon...it was not so big...is it just perspective?
We had trees, etc, around... but even then, not this dynamic... the only thing I can think of is distance from the camera to person. If up closer it would look smaller...I wonder how far way that was taken.
Other than that, it is a great shot, and image...
:---[===] *
-
Knight of Clear Skies
- Ensign
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 9:02 am
Post
by Knight of Clear Skies » Wed Sep 06, 2017 7:11 am
geckzilla wrote:Bob m wrote:why can I see stars in the moon?
Could be hot pixels, dust, bugs, or pretty much anything but stars.
I wondered that, but zooming in they appear to show the same trailing as the stars to the right of the climber. Would be interested to hear what they are.
-
Confused
- Science Officer
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 6:50 pm
- Location: California, USA
Post
by Confused » Wed Sep 06, 2017 7:21 am
It is not a photobomb if it is the intended subject of the photo.
Was this the only attempt? I assume not. Otherwise, they deserve credit for the plan and successful execution. Most things don't always work the first time and every time.
-
Confused
- Science Officer
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 6:50 pm
- Location: California, USA
Post
by Confused » Wed Sep 06, 2017 7:24 am
Knight of Clear Skies wrote:geckzilla wrote:Bob m wrote:why can I see stars in the moon?
Could be hot pixels, dust, bugs, or pretty much anything but stars.
I wondered that, but zooming in they appear to show the same trailing as the stars to the right of the climber. Would be interested to hear what they are.
Can we
assume they are stars on the right? If not then you will need other evidence.
-
neufer
- Vacationer at Tralfamadore
- Posts: 18805
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
- Location: Alexandria, Virginia
Post
by neufer » Wed Sep 06, 2017 7:44 am
Boomer12k wrote:
Why is the eclipse so big in the picture, but when I saw it... here in Oregon...it was not so big...is it just perspective?
We had trees, etc, around... but even then, not this dynamic... the only thing I can think of is distance from the camera to person. If up closer it would look smaller...I wonder how far way that was taken.
Both the Sun & Moon are ~110 times as far away as they are across.
Both look only about ~10 feet across relative to the climber.
Hence, the climber was about ~1100 feet away from the telephoto lens.
Art Neuendorffer
-
neufer
- Vacationer at Tralfamadore
- Posts: 18805
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
- Location: Alexandria, Virginia
Post
by neufer » Wed Sep 06, 2017 7:52 am
Confused wrote:Knight of Clear Skies wrote:geckzilla wrote:
Could be hot pixels, dust, bugs, or pretty much anything but stars.
I wondered that, but zooming in they appear to show the same trailing as the stars to the right of the climber. Would be interested to hear what they are.
Can we
assume they are stars on the right? If not then you will need other evidence.
Five very bright stars within 20 arcminutes of each other
(The Pleiades are ~110 arcminutes wide.)
Art Neuendorffer
-
Knight of Clear Skies
- Ensign
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 9:02 am
Post
by Knight of Clear Skies » Wed Sep 06, 2017 8:23 am
neufer wrote:Five very bright stars within 20 arcminutes of each other
(The Pleiades are ~110 arcminutes wide.)
I was wondering if the camera had been left in position until nightfall and they had been composited in later (using a longer exposure), but that seems unlikely. Perhaps the 'trailing' is caused by the action of the shutter moving the camera slightly, the outline around the rock and climber is a similar width. The small streaks could well be insects or dust spots on the lens.
-
bobFranke
- Asternaut
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 4:00 am
Post
by bobFranke » Wed Sep 06, 2017 8:29 am
That's a beautiful shot. But good grief, man!
With all the involved planning, why not take the extra five or 10 minutes to touch up the dust bunnies that are sooo distracting.
-
BobStein-VisiBone
- Ensign
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:34 am
- Location: Brushton, NY, US
Post
by BobStein-VisiBone » Wed Sep 06, 2017 9:32 am
One letter is wrong in the video link, it should be:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgAksIb1NGo
-
Knight of Clear Skies
- Ensign
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 9:02 am
Post
by Knight of Clear Skies » Wed Sep 06, 2017 10:39 am
Mystery solved. There is a
short video here which shows lots of insects flying through the shot, and a fine selection of images before and after totality.
-
Indigo_Sunrise
- Science Officer
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 1:40 pm
- Location: Md
Post
by Indigo_Sunrise » Wed Sep 06, 2017 11:19 am
Wow, what a way to experience the eclipse! Excellent image!
Forget the box, just get outside.
-
Greg Parker
Post
by Greg Parker » Wed Sep 06, 2017 12:18 pm
He could have left the bug bright spots in deliberately in an attempt to short-circuit "fake" or "Photoshopped" comments which seem to abound when someone produces a beautiful image well beyond the average person's capabilties. Superb image!!!
-
Chris Peterson
- Abominable Snowman
- Posts: 18534
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Post
by Chris Peterson » Wed Sep 06, 2017 1:09 pm
Greg Parker wrote:He could have left the bug bright spots in deliberately in an attempt to short-circuit "fake" or "Photoshopped" comments which seem to abound when someone produces a beautiful image well beyond the average person's capabilties. Superb image!!!
I like the spots. I immediately recognized them as bugs or floating seeds, as I saw the same thing visually from Wyoming and caught some in my photos, as well. I think they add another layer of depth.
-
RJN
- Baffled Boffin
- Posts: 1673
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 1:58 pm
- Location: Michigan Tech
Post
by RJN » Wed Sep 06, 2017 1:41 pm
Thanks for pointing this out. Which letter is wrong? I just tried to fix this by cursor-copying the YouTube string -- but the same error results. Any ideas why?
-
Tszabeau
Post
by Tszabeau » Wed Sep 06, 2017 1:44 pm
So... it's the bugs doing the photo-bombing.
-
Chris Peterson
- Abominable Snowman
- Posts: 18534
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Post
by Chris Peterson » Wed Sep 06, 2017 1:47 pm
RJN wrote:
Thanks for pointing this out. Which letter is wrong? I just tried to fix this by cursor-copying the YouTube string -- but the same error results. Any ideas why?
Not sure what's going wrong with your copy/paste, but the difference is that the second from last character needs to be a capital "G", not the lower case "g" you have in the caption link.
-
DonTaylor
- Asternaut
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:28 pm
Post
by DonTaylor » Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:37 pm
I call BS on this one. I plugged in his location at Monkey Face Rock, north of Redmond. He would have had to be standing north of the the rock tower facing south east. The diamond ring would have appeared at roughly 2 and 7 o’clock, not 5 o’clock like in the picture. The little trapezoid pattern of stars to the right don’t show up in any of my planetarium apps. I’ve yet to see a diamond ring image with the much corona visible, except this one. I guess the "stars" on the disk of the moon are either "the ones the astronauts had to navigate around when the went to the moon" or the moon really is "made of swiss cheese" and that's sunlight shining through. And of course, the eclipse is out of focus, which hides a lot of photoshop flaws, while the rock and climber are in focus. Who shots an eclipse and focuses on the foreground? A BS shot all the way around. Reasonably good photoshop work, but it does an injustice to those of us who do real astro imaging.
-
Chris Peterson
- Abominable Snowman
- Posts: 18534
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Post
by Chris Peterson » Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:44 pm
DonTaylor wrote:I call BS on this one.
I call BS on you. Maybe you should read the other comments before adding your own. Maybe you should follow the links and read about how this image was made, how many people were there when it was made, and watch the related video.
-
RJN
- Baffled Boffin
- Posts: 1673
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 1:58 pm
- Location: Michigan Tech
Post
by RJN » Wed Sep 06, 2017 4:04 pm
In the NASA APOD's text, I have now added the astrophotographers name to the front of the list of people leading this great photographic effort.
- RJN
-
ta152h0
- Schooled
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 12:46 am
- Location: Auburn, Washington, USA
Post
by ta152h0 » Wed Sep 06, 2017 4:23 pm
Who said there is no i9ntelligent life here ? and very artistic ) Maybe in Wash DC but here ? Vast amounts populate thisplace. I watche NASA tv yedsterday and it was a tribute to the Voyager space program and there was a lady on the end of the panel, whose name was " Anna " . Very passionate. Who is she ? And the others not only passionate, also PHD's in science. Very happy to see the other side of cable tv. My father always told me not to watch just one channel Macular degeneration makes it a bit more challenging.
Wolf Kotenberg
-
Visual_Astronomer
Post
by Visual_Astronomer » Wed Sep 06, 2017 4:27 pm
Having been to Smith Rock a number of times, I immediately recognised these as bugs.
Smith Rock is an extraordinary place under ordinary circumstances, it must have been amazing during the eclipse!
-
RJN
- Baffled Boffin
- Posts: 1673
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 1:58 pm
- Location: Michigan Tech
Post
by RJN » Wed Sep 06, 2017 5:10 pm
Chris Peterson wrote:the difference is that the second from last character needs to be a capital "G", not the lower case "g" you have in the caption link.
Thanks (again). That fixed it.