The object larger than Pluto (July 31)

Comments and questions about the APOD on the main view screen.
User avatar
orin stepanek
Plutopian
Posts: 8200
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: Nebraska

Post by orin stepanek » Fri Sep 02, 2005 1:38 pm

If you were in a car going 60 miles an hour; and compared that to the speed of light. That would make Earth 8 1/2 miles back. How far can you drive in over four years non stop? So my wayward planet would be lost is space for a long time. Still I believe in the possibility.
Orin

Empeda
Ensign
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Dorset, England
Contact:

Post by Empeda » Fri Sep 02, 2005 3:39 pm

I think it's certainly possible - anything is.....but an object that far away would be incredibly unlikely to be orbiting a star, or be stuck in the middle of two. The proper motions of the two stars would have to be pretty close I would have thought, and the tiny gravitational force at that kind of distance would be open to many weak fluctuations.

Still, never write anything off..... :shock:
I'm an Astrophysics Graduate from Keele University, England - doesn't mean I know anything but I might be able to help!

Aqua
Ensign
Posts: 56
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:19 pm
Location: Cazadero, CA, USA

Post by Aqua » Tue Oct 04, 2005 1:07 am

2003 UB313's peculiar orbit and other KBO's with similarly odd orbits may prove them to be 'captured' interstellar objects? Close encounter(s) with another star, or brown dwarf, where the lesser body's gravity looses influence over its orbitals. Cassini is showing us frozen water worlds and evidence of ongoing 'brown dwarf'-like neucleosynthesis within Saturn. Could Saturn be a captured 'brown dwarf'? That would go a long way into explaining what happened to Uranus? Where Jupiter got its water moons, and how Venus was resurfaced? Or even why Phobos appears to be part of MUCH larger body? There are more answers than questions.. right?

Empeda
Ensign
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Dorset, England
Contact:

Post by Empeda » Tue Oct 04, 2005 11:14 am

Åqua wrote:Could Saturn be a captured 'brown dwarf'? T
Yep - the more we discover the less we know... :x

Saturn isn't likely to be captured as it orbits along the same plane as the rest of the planets, suggesting that it was formed in an accretion process.
I'm an Astrophysics Graduate from Keele University, England - doesn't mean I know anything but I might be able to help!

Aqua
Ensign
Posts: 56
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:19 pm
Location: Cazadero, CA, USA

Post by Aqua » Wed Oct 05, 2005 9:10 pm

Saturn's rings and equator are inclined by 27° while its Inclination to the Solar Ecliptic is 2°29'17". Only Mercury, Venus and Pluto have higher inclinations to the solar ecliptic. Add 27° with 2°29'17" and you get an even higher angular inclination of almost 30°! Uranus' equator is inclined a whopping 97.86°, while Venus' inclination of Equator to Orbit is 177.3°! Tell me again how these orbital eccentricities originated.... why not speculate?

Zaha
Asternaut
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:42 pm

Re: Illusional Illustrations

Post by Zaha » Thu Oct 06, 2005 5:06 pm

papiamento wrote:No it's not just you (well... maybe, it could be).

Actually, I think APOD sometimes does a disservice with illustrations.

Objects that distant (100 AU) are just not going to be that well lit.
In fact, I think they would. At 100AU from Sun, the planet receives 1/10000 of the sunlight intensity Earth does. By comparison, the Sun's apparent magnitude on Earth is -26.7 and full Moon's -12.6, therefore we have by the definition of magnitude that Sun is 100^(26.7-12.6)/5) = 437000 times as bright as the full Moon. So an object at 100AU is 43.7 times brighter than Earth in full Moon's light, and as humans can see quite well (even colors) in good direct moonlight they would see the object fairly well lit with eyes adapted to dark.

With long enough exposures, it might even be possible to photograph the dark side in just starlight (even better if the object is illuminated by its own moon too) - though not in the same picture with the sunlit side.

makc
Commodore
Posts: 2019
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 5:25 pm

Post by makc » Thu Oct 06, 2005 6:57 pm

Thank you, Zaha, I've almost forgot what this thread originally was about.

Post Reply