APOD: Simeis 147: Supernova Remnant (2012 Oct 09)

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :ssmile: :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol2: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: APOD: Simeis 147: Supernova Remnant (2012 Oct 09)

Re: APOD: Simeis 147: Supernova Remnant (2012 Oct 09)

by neufer » Tue Jul 23, 2013 2:43 am

Guest wrote:
The explanation of the distance of Simeis 147 is faulty. The supernova remnant is 40,000 light years away. This does not mean that the light from that supernova remnant first reached earth 40,000 years ago. Rather, the light we now see from that supernova remnant left 40,000 years ago.
There seems to be some uncertainty about when the light from the supernova remnant first reached earth but there is little doubt about the distance. (And if it were 40,000 light years away it would be 1800 light years wide :!: )
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simeis_147 wrote:
Simeis 147 (also known as Sharpless 2-240 and the Spaghetti Nebula) is a supernova remnant in the constellations of Taurus and Auriga.

The nebulous area is fairly large, with an apparent size covering around 3 degrees, and is approximately 3000(±350) light years away, and covers an area of around 41.9 parsecs (137 ly(±25)), and is approximately 40 000 years old.>>
http://www.universetoday.com/15086/simeis-147-by-davide-de-martin/ wrote:
Simeis 147 by Davide De Martin
by Tammy Plotner, Universe Today, June 16, 2008

<<If you think we’re looking straight down the maul of the “Doomsday Machine”, you’d be pretty much correct. While the fictionalized Star Trek account had the planet killer slowly destroying a distant solar system, this particular “star eater” is very real and still exists along the Auriga-Taurus border…

Named Simeis 147, this ancient supernova remnant has expanded so much that it’s barely visible to larger telescopes. Why? Mostly because the diameter of the nebula is about 3-1/2 degrees, or about 7 times the size of the Moon – and the fact it’s one of the faintest objects in the night sky. Like many nebulous “sky scraps”, it is simply too large to be seen in its entirety – or beauty – except through the magic of astrophotograhy.

In this week’s image by Davide De Martin, we take an up close and personal look at Simeis 147. The intricate filaments of this faint supernova remnant spans over 160 light years of interstellar space and is around 3900 light years away. With an apparent age of about 100,000 years, this awesome explosion occurred around the time of Peking Man, and like our distant ancestor left more than one artifact behind. In this case, the expanding remnant is not all. Deep within the folds and rifts lay a spinning neutron star. This pulsar is all that’s left of the original star’s core.

Unlike many things unexplored, more study was indicated and newer estimated gauge Semeis 147′s age at about 30,000 years. The pulsar itself has recently been detected and has been cataloged as PSR J0538+2817. Imagine something that rotates completely on its axis seven times per second! And think about what happened… The outer layers of this exploding star initially carried outward at speeds of 10,000-20,000 km/s–a tremendous amount of energy released in a blast wave.

Supernovae are divided into classes based upon the appearance of their spectra: hydrogen lines are prominent in Type II supernovae; while hydrogen lines are absent in Type Ia supernovae. Put simply, this means the progenitor stars either had hydrogen in their outer envelopes or did not have hydrogen in their outer envelopes. Type II supernovae are the territory of massive stars while Type Ia supernovae more than likely originated with white dwarf binary star systems – a place where the accreting white dwarf is driven above the Chandrasekhar Mass Limit, collapses and explodes.

So how often do events like the Simeis 147 type happen? According to Rudolph Minkowski; “As regards the supernovae frequency, there are two types of supernovae. The Supernovae I seem to occur about every 400 or 500 years per galaxy and the Supernovae II about every 50 years per galaxy, with considerable leeway. But, the Supernovae II are certainly much more frequent than Supernova I.” In recent studies done the 610.5 MHz Contour Maps of the Supernova Simeis 147, by Dickel and McKinley, the integrated flux densities show that the radiation is probably non-thermal and incredibly old.

As old as the Star Trek “Doomsday Machine”? Its origins were also unknown and it produced mass destruction. Maybe Simeis 147 isn’t quite the same as the neutronium hulled, antiproton beam firing planet killer of Gene Roddenberry’s fictionalized story… But it is definitely as intriguing to the imagination!>>

Re: APOD: Simeis 147: Supernova Remnant (2012 Oct 09)

by Chris Peterson » Tue Jul 23, 2013 2:39 am

Guest wrote:The explanation of the distance of Simeis 147 is faulty. The supernova remnant is 40,000 light years away. This does not mean that the light from that supernova remnant first reached earth 40,000 years ago. Rather, the light we now see from that supernova remnant left 40,000 years ago.
The caption is correct. The remnant is 3000 ly away. The light from the supernova reached the Earth 40,000 years ago, so we are now seeing a 40,000 year old remnant. The actual distance to the object is irrelevant.

Re: APOD: Simeis 147: Supernova Remnant (2012 Oct 09)

by Guest » Tue Jul 23, 2013 2:16 am

The explanation of the distance of Simeis 147 is faulty. The supernova remnant is 40,000 light years away. This does not mean that the light from that supernova remnant first reached earth 40,000 years ago. Rather, the light we now see from that supernova remnant left 40,000 years ago.

Re: APOD: Simeis 147: Supernova Remnant (2012 Oct 09)

by tetrodehead » Thu Oct 11, 2012 9:02 am

Great picture!
In the max definition picture, near the bottom right corner at 4 o'clock from the nebula, is a ray starting near a blue star and running to the picture edge. Is the ray cosmic or a 'scratch'?

Re: APOD: Simeis 147: Supernova Remnant (2012 Oct 09)

by neufer » Thu Oct 11, 2012 3:29 am

Chris Peterson wrote:
For me, not fully understanding something diminishes its wonder.
Doesn't science itself require that we don't fully understanding something :?:

Re: APOD: Simeis 147: Supernova Remnant (2012 Oct 09)

by Chris Peterson » Thu Oct 11, 2012 1:23 am

Anthony Barreiro wrote:A big part of my interest in skywatching and astronomy comes from the sense of wonder and awe I experience contemplating vast spaces and cosmic timelines, and trying to to relate them to what I see through the eyepiece of a small telescope. Speaking humbly and only for myself, I hope I never get to the point where I have no problem at all visualizing 150 light years. It would take some of the fun out of it for me and I might need to find a new hobby.
I find that the deeper my understanding of anything, the more I appreciate it, and the greater my sense of wonder. For me, not fully understanding something diminishes its wonder.

Re: APOD: Simeis 147: Supernova Remnant (2012 Oct 09)

by Ann » Thu Oct 11, 2012 12:51 am

I once built a very simple model of the inner solar system, using a round table cloth with a diameter of 2 meters as the Sun, and putting Mars, which I unfortunately had to make too big (0.02 meters, the same as the Earth) at a distance of 300 meters. When I had placed pea-sized Mercury, 0.02 meter Venus, 0.02 meter Earth (with pea-sized Moon) and Mars at the proper distances from the table-cloth Sun, I was struck by the unbelievable tininess of the planets and the incredible distances between them. The planets were "swallowed by the darkness" as it were. Our solar system seemed so empty to me, even though it is really quite crowded compared with the average density of our part of the galaxy. I tried to "blow my model up" to the real size of the inner solar system, and realized that I couldn't picture it in my mind at all.

For all of that, I can certainly picture a model of nearby space with a diameter of 150 light-years. I would put the Sun in the middle (simply because we ourselves are in the middle of such a sphere), and Alpha Centauri at four light-years away from us. I most certainly can't picture the actual distance of four light-years, but I can easily picture that a star 150 light-years away from us is 37.5 times as far away from us as Alpha Centauri. I could make a drawing of it and picture it easily.

The actual distance itself is unimaginable to me, but the "relative distance" is easy to picture. I think it has to be that way for beings whose average size as adults is on the order of about two meters.

Ann

Re: APOD: Simeis 147: Supernova Remnant (2012 Oct 09)

by Anthony Barreiro » Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:45 pm

Chris Peterson wrote:
PhilT wrote:Never ceases to amaze me, we all loosely throw out numbers like "150 light years across"..... but I wonder if we really get how enormously big that is compared to little old us.
Personally, I have no problem at all visualizing 150 light years. These are the sort of units I work with all the time, and consequently they seem very natural to me. I don't think that people have any inherent difficulty dealing with scales outside our daily experience, it's just a question of familiarity.
A big part of my interest in skywatching and astronomy comes from the sense of wonder and awe I experience contemplating vast spaces and cosmic timelines, and trying to to relate them to what I see through the eyepiece of a small telescope. Speaking humbly and only for myself, I hope I never get to the point where I have no problem at all visualizing 150 light years. It would take some of the fun out of it for me and I might need to find a new hobby.

Re: APOD: Simeis 147: Supernova Remnant (2012 Oct 09)

by BMAONE23 » Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:09 pm

Our closest neighbor is 4.2LY away. If you use this as an average density for our neighborhood then a Bubble that is 150LY diameter would encompass enopugh space to affect over 6000 stars.

Re: APOD: Simeis 147: Supernova Remnant (2012 Oct 09)

by neufer » Wed Oct 10, 2012 3:56 pm

starsurfer wrote:
neufer wrote:
starsurfer wrote:
Spectacular image of what is surely a very faint supernova remnant! :D As well as Ha,
it also contains a lot of OIII emission and there are very few images that include exposures in this waveband. :(
OIII emission is generally the result of ultraviolet irradiation from a white dwarf CS.
You're wrong when you say that OIII is only the result of the effects of a white dwarf.
Did I say that :?:

Re: APOD: Simeis 147: Supernova Remnant (2012 Oct 09)

by Chris Peterson » Wed Oct 10, 2012 3:07 pm

PhilT wrote:Never ceases to amaze me, we all loosely throw out numbers like "150 light years across"..... but I wonder if we really get how enormously big that is compared to little old us.
Personally, I have no problem at all visualizing 150 light years. These are the sort of units I work with all the time, and consequently they seem very natural to me. I don't think that people have any inherent difficulty dealing with scales outside our daily experience, it's just a question of familiarity.

Re: APOD: Simeis 147: Supernova Remnant (2012 Oct 09)

by starsurfer » Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:42 pm

neufer wrote:
starsurfer wrote:
Spectacular image of what is surely a very faint supernova remnant! :D As well as Ha, it also contains a lot of OIII emission and there are very few images that include exposures in this waveband. :(
OIII emission is generally the result of ultraviolet irradiation from a white dwarf CS.

This has just a neutron CS :!:

The only narrowband data was H-Alpha:
http://blog.deepskycolors.com/archive/2011/12/08/simeis-147-and-surroundings.html wrote:
<<Successfully combining narrowband data (H-Alpha in this case) and (L)RGB data can be tricky. One of the usual results is that, since H-Alpha data tends to produce very small stars, when combined with broadband data, the resulting image often presents a rather severe ringing around the stars. Also, some conventional techniques rely on mixing H-Alpha with the red (R) and blue (B) data, but in this case, my RGB data was rather poor so I couldn't rely on just this technique. Therefore, for this particular image I followed a number of conventional as well as non-conventional methods that proved to be rather successful in producing an image that visually documents this area of the sky. Also, as usual in many of my recent images, a multi-scale approach dominated post-processing, in particular to bring out the fainter details that hide behind the swarm of stars.>>
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap050324.html wrote:
<<It's easy to get lost following the intricate filaments in this detailed image of faint supernova remnant Simeis 147. Seen towards the constellation Taurus it covers nearly 3 degrees (6 full moons) on the sky corresponding to a width of 150 light-years at the stellar debris cloud's estimated distance of 3,000 light-years. The color composite image includes eight hours of exposure time with an H-alpha filter, transmiting only the light from recombining hydrogen atoms in the expanding nebulosity and tracing the regions of shocked, glowing gas. This supernova remnant has an apparent age of about 100,000 years - meaning light from the massive stellar explosion first reached Earth 100,000 years ago - but this expanding remnant is not the only aftermath. The cosmic catastrophe also left behind a spinning neutron star or pulsar, all that remains of the original star's core.>>
I didn't say that the image included OIII exposures, I was merely stating that this particular remnant also includes OIII, which is rarely seen as nearly all images are Ha only. You're wrong when you say that OIII is only the result of the effects of a white dwarf. Many supernova remnants and Wolf Rayet nebulae, which don't feature a white dwarf exhibit bright OIII emission. Visual OIII emission can arise from oxygen gas receiving enough energy to be ionized, which usually requires more energy to be ionized than hydrogen. The OIII in supernova remnants is usually due to the intense high energies created by the shockwave of the gas colliding with the ISM. Another interesting thing is that OIII emission is more susceptible to dust extinction than hydrogen-alpha.
You can see a comparison of Ha and OIII in Simeis 147 in this image by Stephane Zoll: http://www.astrosurf.com/zoll/images/SH2_240_HvsO.jpg

Re: APOD: Simeis 147: Supernova Remnant (2012 Oct 09)

by BMAONE23 » Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:56 pm

bystander wrote:
BMAONE23 wrote:The larger/brighter of the two to the left is LBN 827 (Lynds Bright Nebula)

Looking at Google Sky, it appears at RA 5H51M54.89S DEC 27d01'28.96"
I've seen the larger labeled as LBN 826 and the smaller as LBN 827.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/hiroc/6930595750/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/hiroc/6930606968/
This is interesting...The LBN database lists LBN 827 as visually larger than LBN 826 http://www.atscope.com.au/database/lbn.txt

The catalog lists LBN 826 with a dimension of 7 x 7 arcmin with an area of 0.011(degree^2)
It also lists LBN 827 with a dimension of 10 x 10 arcmin with an area of 0.014 (degree^2)

Re: APOD: Simeis 147: Supernova Remnant (2012 Oct 09)

by neufer » Wed Oct 10, 2012 12:04 pm

PhilT wrote:
Never ceases to amaze me, we all loosely throw out numbers like "150 light years across"..... but I wonder if we really get how enormously big that is compared to little old us.
http://asterisk.apod.com/viewtopic.php? ... 62#p185242

Re: APOD: Simeis 147: Supernova Remnant (2012 Oct 09)

by PhilT » Wed Oct 10, 2012 11:07 am

Never ceases to amaze me, we all loosely throw out numbers like "150 light years across"..... but I wonder if we really get how enormously big that is compared to little old us.

The biggest thing we can get our heads around is probably the Solar system - which is about 1/700th of a light year across. Therefore taking ~1/2 day for light to travel from one side to the other.

Put in another perspective, one could fit 105,000 (150x700) Solar systems end to end from one side of this Supernova remnant to the other.

Re: APOD: Simeis 147: Supernova Remnant (2012 Oct 09)

by saturno2 » Tue Oct 09, 2012 11:18 pm

Beautiful image
Supernova
The beautiful visible Universe

Re: APOD: Simeis 147: Supernova Remnant (2012 Oct 09)

by bystander » Tue Oct 09, 2012 11:02 pm

BMAONE23 wrote:The larger/brighter of the two to the left is LBN 827 (Lynds Bright Nebula)

Looking at Google Sky, it appears at RA 5H51M54.89S DEC 27d01'28.96"
I've seen the larger labeled as LBN 826 and the smaller as LBN 827.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/hiroc/6930595750/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/hiroc/6930606968/

Re: APOD: Simeis 147: Supernova Remnant (2012 Oct 09)

by BMAONE23 » Tue Oct 09, 2012 9:24 pm

Dave1234 wrote:What is the small nebula just to the left of Simeis 147? And do I see an even smaller red nebula to its left? Perhaps it should be called Siphonaptera. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Siphonaptera
The larger/brighter of the two to the left is LBN 827 (Lynds Bright Nebula)

Looking at Google Sky, it appears at RA 5H51M54.89S DEC 27d01'28.96"

Re: APOD: Simeis 147: Supernova Remnant (2012 Oct 09)

by Boomer12k » Tue Oct 09, 2012 9:10 pm

casus b wrote:If it doesn't have a name yet, I nominate the "Rose".
Unfortunately, it has a name....The Spaghetti Nebula. YUMMY!!! :D

If you want to see other interesting shots you find on Apod. In you search engine websearch......Images of (Blank), and fill in the blank. Lots of other interesting shots of this nebula.

:---[===] *

Re: APOD: Simeis 147: Supernova Remnant (2012 Oct 09)

by Dave1234 » Tue Oct 09, 2012 8:29 pm

What is the small nebula just to the left of Simeis 147? And do I see an even smaller red nebula to its left? Perhaps it should be called Siphonaptera. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Siphonaptera

Re: APOD: Simeis 147: Supernova Remnant (2012 Oct 09)

by Chris Peterson » Tue Oct 09, 2012 6:35 pm

KimM wrote:"The supernova remnant has an estimated age of about 40,000 years, meaning light from the massive stellar explosion first reached Earth 40,000 years ago." --APOD

Incorrect. If the supernova remnant was created approximately 40,000 years ago and it is 3,000 light years away, then what we are observing today is 37, 000 years old. Be careful with the units. :)
Incorrect. It doesn't matter how far away the object is. In most cases (including this one) astronomers and physicists are only interested in when the observation is made. When it "really" happened doesn't matter in the slightest. The caption is correct as written.

Re: APOD: Simeis 147: Supernova Remnant (2012 Oct 09)

by KimM » Tue Oct 09, 2012 5:57 pm

"The supernova remnant has an estimated age of about 40,000 years, meaning light from the massive stellar explosion first reached Earth 40,000 years ago." --APOD

Incorrect. If the supernova remnant was created approximately 40,000 years ago and it is 3,000 light years away, then what we are observing today is 37, 000 years old. Be careful with the units. :)

Re: APOD: Simeis 147: Supernova Remnant (2012 Oct 09)

by Anthony Barreiro » Tue Oct 09, 2012 5:16 pm

This is a beautiful picture! I love how the supernova remnant appears to hang in space, very three dimensional. It makes me imagine being on the bridge of a starship exploring the galactic neighborhood.

I've never observed this object myself, although being so close to Beta Tauri it's pretty easy to find! A quick internet search led to this interesting report and drawing from Rich Jakiel. If you mouse over the drawing, you'll see a corresponding ccd photo. Rich used a high-quality 20-inch f-3.9 telescope and, interestingly, an O-III filter, and reports a limiting visual magnitude of 6.5. So I'm probably not going to see this one from the back yard with my 5-inch schmidt cassegrain.

Re: APOD: Simeis 147: Supernova Remnant (2012 Oct 09)

by NGC3314 » Tue Oct 09, 2012 1:14 pm

Like may supernova remnants in its age range, Simeis 147 does have reasonably strong [O III] emission (I found a paper in a Soviet journal from the 1970s quoting ratios of 2.0-4.6 relative to the strength of H-beta). As well as by reprocessing deep UV, these transitions can also be powered by rapid shocks in the interstellar medium, which supernova remnants can do for a long time. Multifilter images of such SNRs as the Cygnus Loop show how the ionization state can change on very fine scales as shocks encounter denser clouds and are redirected (sometimes wrapping around them).

Re: APOD: Simeis 147: Supernova Remnant (2012 Oct 09)

by casus b » Tue Oct 09, 2012 1:07 pm

If it doesn't have a name yet, I nominate the "Rose".

Top