by BDanielMayfield » Fri Aug 28, 2020 3:33 pm
Yes this is a nice video. I don't want to come off sounding like a hater here, but there are a few issues that keep me from liking it completely. I like the zoom in beginning, but then there seem to be a bit too many hard and flat boundaries between cloud and empty space. Straight edges to clouds appear unnatural.
And then there's the way the stars are depicted. This flaw is mainly due to the limitations of our display devices in showcasing brightness differences, but might there be a way to make stars appear brighter as approaching them is simulated? As no attempt at all is made to brighten them the brilliance of the Trapezium stars are lost as the cluster is approached and flown though. Star colors are also uniformly white.
And, as to the Trapezium, some of them are known to be binary, but no attempt was made to depict this. Then too, their tight grouping is shown from the sideways approach to not be very close at all. Is this idea based on science, or merely imagination?
Yes this is a nice video. I don't want to come off sounding like a hater here, but there are a few issues that keep me from liking it completely. I like the zoom in beginning, but then there seem to be a bit too many hard and flat boundaries between cloud and empty space. Straight edges to clouds appear unnatural.
And then there's the way the stars are depicted. This flaw is mainly due to the limitations of our display devices in showcasing brightness differences, but might there be a way to make stars appear brighter as approaching them is simulated? As no attempt at all is made to brighten them the brilliance of the Trapezium stars are lost as the cluster is approached and flown though. Star colors are also uniformly white.
And, as to the Trapezium, some of them are known to be binary, but no attempt was made to depict this. Then too, their tight grouping is shown from the sideways approach to not be very close at all. Is this idea based on science, or merely imagination?