by harry » Tue Mar 13, 2007 1:20 pm
Hello Dr Skeptic
Six days,,,,,,,,,,,,,where on earth did you get six days from.
The universe is infinite in age and size.
The agenda,,,,,,,,,,,,,,be scientific about it.
I'm not emotional over any theory. Just do not want to see History repeat itself by having scientists ruled by the mob and money.
People have options. Read more and more. Go into depth and try to see the evidence and observations and conclusions and so on.
Do not take my word for it. My opinion could be wrong, but it does not mean that others are right.
Imagine for one sec I agreed with the Big Bang, just because some person said so.
Regardless,,,,,,,,,read this link,,,,,,,hundreds of scientists cannot be wrong
and the list is growing.
An Open Letter to the Scientific Community
cosmologystatement.org
(Published in New Scientist, May 22, 2004)
http://www.cosmologystatement.org/
The big bang today relies on a growing number of hypothetical entities, things that we have never observed-- inflation, dark matter and dark energy are the most prominent examples. Without them, there would be a fatal contradiction between the observations made by astronomers and the predictions of the big bang theory. In no other field of physics would this continual recourse to new hypothetical objects be accepted as a way of bridging the gap between theory and observation. It would, at the least, raise serious questions about the validity of the underlying theory.
But the big bang theory can't survive without these fudge factors. Without the hypothetical inflation field, the big bang does not predict the smooth, isotropic cosmic background radiation that is observed, because there would be no way for parts of the universe that are now more than a few degrees away in the sky to come to the same temperature and thus emit the same amount of microwave radiation.
Hello Dr Skeptic
Six days,,,,,,,,,,,,,where on earth did you get six days from.
The universe is infinite in age and size.
The agenda,,,,,,,,,,,,,,be scientific about it.
I'm not emotional over any theory. Just do not want to see History repeat itself by having scientists ruled by the mob and money.
People have options. Read more and more. Go into depth and try to see the evidence and observations and conclusions and so on.
Do not take my word for it. My opinion could be wrong, but it does not mean that others are right.
Imagine for one sec I agreed with the Big Bang, just because some person said so.
Regardless,,,,,,,,,read this link,,,,,,,hundreds of scientists cannot be wrong
and the list is growing.
An Open Letter to the Scientific Community
cosmologystatement.org
(Published in New Scientist, May 22, 2004)
http://www.cosmologystatement.org/
[quote]The big bang today relies on a growing number of hypothetical entities, things that we have never observed-- inflation, dark matter and dark energy are the most prominent examples. Without them, there would be a fatal contradiction between the observations made by astronomers and the predictions of the big bang theory. In no other field of physics would this continual recourse to new hypothetical objects be accepted as a way of bridging the gap between theory and observation. It would, at the least, raise serious questions about the validity of the underlying theory.
But the big bang theory can't survive without these fudge factors. Without the hypothetical inflation field, the big bang does not predict the smooth, isotropic cosmic background radiation that is observed, because there would be no way for parts of the universe that are now more than a few degrees away in the sky to come to the same temperature and thus emit the same amount of microwave radiation. [/quote]