ahhh yes, with a few "assumptions" here and there, and "ignoring" some facts here and there, if I read the paper correctly. FOCLMAO on this one, thanky makc.
An interesting photo here, http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA02960 An interesting comparison of three of Jupiters moons. http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA01656 An interesting size comparrison, http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA01645 More craters, http://photojournal.jp...
Such as, OP = AFAIK = LCDM = IGM = And, by the way, I must have missed this, Several folk have made similar claims (not necessarily to do with craters). Some have been offered the floor, to make a scientific case, for their claims. As far as I know, none have seriously availed themselves of the offe...
Now IF Nereid would just follow the rules there would be no questions about what to do with multiple threads on the same topic. 5. If an official discussion thread is made, please keep all posts on the subject inside the appropriate threads. All other threads will be locked, so make sure you hit the...
Many, such as myself, are not from any of those "3 letter" institutions that use those abbreviations as you do. Most are not chat room addicts such as yourself, and those abbreviations are a bit confusing at times. We know ones such as FBI, CIA, NSA, DOD, NASA, USA, ect, but could you post...
Light speed is only a reference point based on the known speed of light. 186 million miles per hour (mmph) Why limit ourselves to just that speed? Why not try to go much faster? After all, that would be an OK speed to travel around our solar system, but not for inter star travel, and no way acceptab...