Starship Asterisk*

He's probably right.
I wanted to hear about the dog that didn't bark, because it sounded a bit Sherlockian. It's right in the middle, just laying there quietly.

This is one of those irritating pics where one simply cannot force one's eyes to see craters, no matter how one orientates one's head or the image. Like previous entry, all I see are pellets strewn over the surface! Oddly enough, if I go to one of the links http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpegMod/...

Pits?? I only see bumps.

http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ZuBhtB8YISM/hqdefault.jpg I wonder if anyone, like me, zoomed in hoping to get lost in it only to find the detail ran out too soon? Truly awesome; inspirational, even. :arrow: I was able to see this guy. That's nothing new for you, neufer, you're a wiz at finding such things. ...

It shows up rather vividly on the Windows 10 i got yesterday.

Ok, got it. Thanks Chris.

So, neufer, the detector doesn't work in air and couldn't be used on earth to find anything? What, it's too sensitive?

neufer wrote:

Beyond wrote:
Wouldn't that detector work just as well on earth?

Where are you going to find an asteroid on earth?

Isn't that what the detector is for?

Wouldn't that detector work just as well on earth?

Chris Peterson wrote:

neufer wrote:You must live in the Southern Taurid Zone.

A snowman in a Taurid zone?

Not for long!

Oh, ok.

I thought the ozone hole was supposed to be getting smaller. It doesn't look like it from those two charts.

Gee, the things one misses when one stays away from the Asterisk* for a few hours. At least i caught a post in the 'Library' before it gets deleted.

Who is LISA?

BOO!! to you all.

Even though the Beach Boys sang of good vibrations, there's no such thing when it comes to Hubble imaging. IF it's attached to anything, especially the ISS, it's going to be producing a lot of blurry pictures.

Ann wrote: ...GR has been incredibly successful.

Especially for dogs. But then dogs use a fuller version of GR. GRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

Cheerios, to the 'humorous pose' link. As for the conjunction, the usual clouds, trees or whatever, gets in the way of that.

Oh, he's a hockey player! No wonder I had no freakin' idea what Pucknut was talking about. Mark Messier now becomes the 4th hockey player whose name I have ever learned. Ever. And there's no guarantee that I'll remember his first name tomorrow. 4 ?? You're one ahead of me. Besides Mark, i only reme...

https://badgerinabathtub.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/41113.jpg "Pasta"-cles after washing up on the shores of Pentapolis being fed by a group of poor Libyan fishermen of Asian descent? It's just a beard-bowl, Ron. When my cousin saw it, he said he wanted to barf. I asked him what he would...

BMAONE23 wrote:

Beyond wrote:

neufer wrote:

• 1) an elephant
  2) a resting cat
  3) Mickey Mouse
  4) ...

I like #4.

There is also a "#4" on Pluto, preceding the Whale
Of course it could be a Number 6 too

I'd have to see morse of it to be able to tell.

neufer wrote:

• 1) an elephant
  2) a resting cat
  3) Mickey Mouse
  4) ...

I like #4.

Ann wrote:Giraffes aside, this is a gorgeous image.

Ann

Ann, Giraffes are big animals. They have to be 'aside',( or upside down, as in your earlier post) or they'd block most of your view of the image.

In [the core of] the Sun, the helium-3 produced in these reactions exists for only about 400 years before it is converted into helium-4.>> Now just how would anyone be able to know that?? Well, after looking up Helium-3 stuff, it would seem that depending on what is involved in making it (there are...