Romulus and Remus (APOD 2005/8/18)

Comments and questions about the APOD on the main view screen.
Post Reply
Axel
Ensign
Posts: 92
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 12:41 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec

Romulus and Remus (APOD 2005/8/18)

Post by Axel » Thu Aug 18, 2005 2:04 pm

Don't tell me they're giving names to satellites of asteroids! Yikes!!!

It's bad enough they must find names for the new (and ever more easily discovered) asteroids besides the 12,000 or so already baptized. And while I'm on the topic, I find it strange that with all the classical names apparently used up - so they are scraping the bottom of the barrel with handles like ASCII, GNU, and Albertacentenary - no-one has thought of Narcissus.

I want an asteroid named Narcissus so I can make my fortune writing the great drugstore astrology book: "Narcissus: Your Key to Self-Understanding".

OKozmicBeast
Asternaut
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 1:26 am

Romulus and Remus (APOD 2005/8/18)

Post by OKozmicBeast » Fri Aug 19, 2005 1:33 am

The most interesting aspect of this to me is the fact that the orbits are all coplanar. I wonder how long that took... or were they always coplanar?

Hmmm...

User avatar
orin stepanek
Plutopian
Posts: 8200
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: Nebraska

Post by orin stepanek » Fri Aug 19, 2005 1:38 am

Might as well give them names. Othgerwise they would have to be given a number. Who knows; some day Remus may be a hot property for a future prospector!!!???
Orin

Empeda
Ensign
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Dorset, England
Contact:

Post by Empeda » Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:08 pm

I don't think that they're going to be naming all satelites of asteroids - it's just it seemed quite apt in this case as the asteriod was called Sylvia, mythical mother of the founders of Rome - Romulus and Remus, who despite being raised by a she-wolf, did quite a good job of it........ :wink:
I'm an Astrophysics Graduate from Keele University, England - doesn't mean I know anything but I might be able to help!

Post Reply