Hyperion; Destroyed Moon? (APOD 27 Jan 2007)

Comments and questions about the APOD on the main view screen.
cheech
Asternaut
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 1:52 pm

Hyperion; Destroyed Moon? (APOD 27 Jan 2007)

Post by cheech » Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:08 am

that's what hyperion looks like it's made of.
like solid "rock foam".

User avatar
orin stepanek
Plutopian
Posts: 8200
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: Nebraska

Post by orin stepanek » Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:38 am

I think we discussed Hyperion once before. It is probably a captured comet; notice that the craters look like they may be vents.
Orin
Orin

Smile today; tomorrow's another day!

videograham
Asternaut
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 9:10 am
Location: UK

hyperion

Post by videograham » Mon Jan 29, 2007 8:47 am

Has anyone noticed this? On the picture of Hyperion for the 28th of January (or any picture for that matter!), there seems to be the shape of a much larger crater covering nearly the whole face of the body. The crater edge (or rim) is comprised of the very light egg-shaped band running from the top to the bottom almost along the edge of the body. There also seems to be a well-rounded and slightly flattened central peak. I'm quite open to the fact that this might be an optical illusion or human perception or something.

User avatar
orin stepanek
Plutopian
Posts: 8200
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: Nebraska

Post by orin stepanek » Mon Jan 29, 2007 2:04 pm

Orin

Smile today; tomorrow's another day!

craterchains
Commander
Posts: 807
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 2:57 pm
Location: On a boat near Tacoma, WA, usa
Contact:

Hyperion; Destroyed Moon? APOD 27 Jan. 07

Post by craterchains » Mon Jan 29, 2007 3:02 pm

Read carefully the paragraph below the image. I just love it when the scientists are left
scratching their , , , heads.

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070128.html

Now what are the odds of any object in our solar system having that many craters?
Especially a so called "moon" of Saturn? "Might house a vast system of caverns"? Like
the sections of the IST maybe? I and many others think this may be a destroyed space
construct. What say you?

Norval :roll:
"It's not what you know, or don't know, but what you know that isn't so that will hurt you." Will Rodgers 1938

l3p3r
Science Officer
Posts: 142
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 12:47 pm
Location: Hobart, Australia

Post by l3p3r » Mon Jan 29, 2007 3:18 pm

I think you might be jumping the gun a little on that one :)

I don't see any features that suggest it was made for a purpose.

Hollowed out, maybe... but that wouldn't explain the craters...

Looks to me more like a chunk of rock that got caught up in a very turbulent part of the system's past and made it into orbit :)

User avatar
NoelC
Creepy Spock
Posts: 876
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 2:30 am
Location: South Florida, USA; I just work in (cyber)space
Contact:

Post by NoelC » Mon Jan 29, 2007 4:17 pm

It's a beautiful image.

It seems pretty clear to me that the part facing the camera has taken a HUGE impact, and the whole side of Hyperion has collapsed (or been pushed in) as a result. I wonder if the other side appears blown out.

Definitely a satellite with more holes than swiss cheese!

-Noel

kovil
Science Officer
Posts: 351
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:58 pm

Post by kovil » Mon Jan 29, 2007 4:47 pm

It sort of has the appearance of the kind of crystals I would find as a kid near the riverbed in the dirt. A low quality quartz of some kind maybe, I never did know, or gypsum!

It looks to my eye that the deep craters with very steep sidewalls, are the result of high velocity impact of very small objects. Hyperion was caught in a storm of high velocity small objects,, shotgunned if you will !

There is a stepdown area in the central region, yes, with a small volcano structure in the middle, or that is the rebound from the large impact in the center of the crater.

Like a comet body that is covered in a deep layer of ice of some kind, shotgunned by high velocity small objects and left for dead to orbit Saturn.

The highly chaotic rotation indicates the center of mass is off-center to the diameter? That may indicate a void inside, or a density imbalance, and that indicates it could be an accumulation of debris, like one big chunk of iron meteorite and the rest stoney or icey material. Or a stoney and the rest icy material. Or whatever impacted and left the big crater in the center of the photo and was captured by Hyperion, is now what is causing the mass imbalance, added to the void on the viewing side we see.

Andy Wade
Science Officer
Posts: 219
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 7:55 am
Location: Oakworth, Yorkshire, England
Contact:

Post by Andy Wade » Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:36 pm

kovil wrote:It sort of has the appearance of the kind of crystals I would find as a kid near the riverbed in the dirt. A low quality quartz of some kind maybe, I never did know, or gypsum!

It looks to my eye that the deep craters with very steep sidewalls, are the result of high velocity impact of very small objects. Hyperion was caught in a storm of high velocity small objects,, shotgunned if you will !

There is a stepdown area in the central region, yes, with a small volcano structure in the middle, or that is the rebound from the large impact in the center of the crater.

Like a comet body that is covered in a deep layer of ice of some kind, shotgunned by high velocity small objects and left for dead to orbit Saturn.

The highly chaotic rotation indicates the center of mass is off-center to the diameter? That may indicate a void inside, or a density imbalance, and that indicates it could be an accumulation of debris, like one big chunk of iron meteorite and the rest stoney or icey material. Or a stoney and the rest icy material. Or whatever impacted and left the big crater in the center of the photo and was captured by Hyperion, is now what is causing the mass imbalance, added to the void on the viewing side we see.
I was thinking that it looked like a piece of knapped flint, like arrow or spear heads that you see in museums.
Flint is very hard and as a result is also quite brittle and impacts made on it can cause thin slivers to fly off, leaving sharp edges and concave depressions. It looks to be covered with these in places.
Of course I'm not saying that Hyperion is made of flint! But it may be quite brittle.

Have a look at these knapped flint spearheads and see what I mean:

http://flintknapping.com/3HORNS.jpg
Regards,
Andy.

FieryIce
Science Officer
Posts: 334
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 3:06 pm
Location: Vancouver Island, BC
Contact:

Post by FieryIce » Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:19 am

Hyperion has all the earmarks of being an artificial construct, low density, octahedral oblate spheroid shape. Reminds me of other artificial constructs. Phobos for example, and the research done by Isoef Shmuelovich Shklovskii that was substantiated by the Mars Express (JPL) MRSC/SRC investigative teams.
Tic Toc

User avatar
BMAONE23
Commentator Model 1.23
Posts: 4076
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 6:55 pm
Location: California

Post by BMAONE23 » Tue Jan 30, 2007 3:26 am

To me, the Hyperion craters appear to be Out Gassing Vents as one might expect to see on a comet. The vent should naturally resemble a funnel shape like the nozzle of a rocket engine. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Soyu ... ngines.jpg As the gas is forced out of the vent it expands causing the nozzle apperance like the back of the Soyuz Rocket. this would be the most efficient form to take given how the energy is applied in an outgassing event.

harry
G'day G'day G'day G'day
Posts: 2881
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 8:04 am
Location: Sydney Australia

Post by harry » Tue Jan 30, 2007 5:55 am

Hello All

This is the same image as in Oct 2005.

It is a beutiful moon.
Harry : Smile and live another day.

User avatar
iamlucky13
Commander
Posts: 515
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 7:28 pm
Location: Seattle, WA

Post by iamlucky13 » Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:27 pm

I think the contrast and natural lines in this picture are somewhat deceiving, making the craters appear deeper than they really are. The shadowed crater floors make some look really deep. Also, the lines along the edges of the huge frontal depression (which suggest to me material knocked down the slopes from later impacts) play tricks with my eyes, too.

If you look at this closeup, taking by Cassini from only 500km away, its features look much more natural, although the incredible number of craters continues to astound. It definitely looks like it flew through quite a bit of stuff during its life.

Hyperion closeup
"Any man whose errors take ten years to correct is quite a man." ~J. Robert Oppenheimer (speaking about Albert Einstein)

User avatar
orin stepanek
Plutopian
Posts: 8200
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: Nebraska

Post by orin stepanek » Tue Jan 30, 2007 7:39 pm

I believe the dark at the bottom of many of the craters are holes from material venting out as would be expected from a comet as it heats up in it's journey around the sun. :) That is why I believe Hyperion is a captured comet.
Orin
Orin

Smile today; tomorrow's another day!

User avatar
BMAONE23
Commentator Model 1.23
Posts: 4076
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 6:55 pm
Location: California

Post by BMAONE23 » Tue Jan 30, 2007 8:28 pm

Also, The many small craters could be caused by return orbits through its own debris field as comets might be expected to do.

User avatar
iamlucky13
Commander
Posts: 515
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 7:28 pm
Location: Seattle, WA

Post by iamlucky13 » Tue Jan 30, 2007 8:42 pm

orin stepanek wrote:I believe the dark at the bottom of many of the craters are holes from material venting out as would be expected from a comet as it heats up in it's journey around the sun. :) That is why I believe Hyperion is a captured comet.
Orin
Well, I personally can't rule that out, but the craters are pretty big. Many of them kilometers across. That would be a pretty major outgassing event. Water turning to vapor from solar heating kilometers under the surface.

I personally think it's more likely that they're all genuine impact features, but that doesn't preclude the possibility of Hyperion being a captured comet, especially given it's low density. The big depression could be from a major impact that initially drove it into the proximity with Saturn.

I wonder if the great number of craters could be the result of Hyperion being around during the formation of Saturn's rings.
"Any man whose errors take ten years to correct is quite a man." ~J. Robert Oppenheimer (speaking about Albert Einstein)

User avatar
orin stepanek
Plutopian
Posts: 8200
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: Nebraska

Post by orin stepanek » Tue Jan 30, 2007 9:17 pm

Hyperion kind of reminds me of a sunflower head with most of the seeds fallen out. :P
Orin
Orin

Smile today; tomorrow's another day!

FieryIce
Science Officer
Posts: 334
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 3:06 pm
Location: Vancouver Island, BC
Contact:

Post by FieryIce » Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:27 am

iamlucky13 wrote:
Hyperion closeup
Could you please give the link to the page with the write-up on this image, I don't think it is Hyperion.
Tic Toc

User avatar
Qev
Ontological Cartographer
Posts: 576
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:20 pm

Post by Qev » Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:53 am

Don't just stand there, get that other dog!

kovil
Science Officer
Posts: 351
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:58 pm

Hyperion's hyperbole decoded

Post by kovil » Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:09 pm

Absolutely outstanding closeup !!!!!

It takes the illusion right out of the picture. Clicking the + view is such a shocker !! Now we see Hyperion in its trueness. A land of Moon like material, the bright white luster is the glass beads from impact vaporization congealing to form glass beads like hiway paint uses to reflect sunlight back to the direction of incidence, from the headlights of passing motorists and spacecraft.

The craters are black in shadow, looking like carbon deposits before in the long range view. The steep sides show dust and landslide like sand dunes, under low gravity, making very steep angles, more than under earth grav.

It's truly a matter of perspective !!

ps, there is a crater 28% down from the scroll starting at the top of the photo,
and 35% to the right from starting at the left of the photo,
which appears to have the blackness at the bottom, not a result of the shadow effect, unlike most all other of the craters. I'm not sure how to bookmark that area of the photo and paste it into a specific screenshot.
It looks like there is a substrata of dark material. Making Hyperion look like a dark object covered in 2-3 miles thick (maybe more like 10-20 kilometers thick) ice of some kind, and maybe the ice crystals are making the light look like the 'glass bead effect'.

User avatar
Qev
Ontological Cartographer
Posts: 576
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:20 pm

Post by Qev » Thu Feb 01, 2007 7:25 pm

I have to admit that image is really brain-burning for me. I can't seem to stop my brain from interpreting the light and shadows the wrong way 'round. :lol:
Don't just stand there, get that other dog!

craterchains
Commander
Posts: 807
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 2:57 pm
Location: On a boat near Tacoma, WA, usa
Contact:

Post by craterchains » Fri Feb 02, 2007 4:15 am

To some these images leave all kinds of questions, some cant even grasp their true implications. These images have given me all kinds of answers. They have given me the truth of what really happend and why.

Rant on folks, :roll:

Norval
"It's not what you know, or don't know, but what you know that isn't so that will hurt you." Will Rodgers 1938

User avatar
iamlucky13
Commander
Posts: 515
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 7:28 pm
Location: Seattle, WA

Post by iamlucky13 » Fri Feb 02, 2007 11:56 pm

Thanks Qev. That's where I found the original. Also, here's an intermediate range and angle shot of the surface. It gives an impression in between the sponginess of the APOD and "moon-ness" of the head-on shot. Foreshortening due to the camera zoom can make some features look distorted at different angles. Contrast and brightness enhancements can also play tricks with the eyes.

Kovil, the APOD caption does mention "At the bottom of most craters lies some type of unknown dark material." I think a lot of what we see on the global image of Hyperion is shadow, but taking a closer look we can distinguish between shadow and material darkness more easily.

I think your strata idea is probably the best guess. Over so many years of violent impacts, a lot of dust and fine rock would be kicked up, basically creating sedimentary layers.
"Any man whose errors take ten years to correct is quite a man." ~J. Robert Oppenheimer (speaking about Albert Einstein)

User avatar
BMAONE23
Commentator Model 1.23
Posts: 4076
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 6:55 pm
Location: California

Post by BMAONE23 » Sat Feb 03, 2007 2:03 pm

iamlucky13,
It looks to me like the area shown in the original picture http://www.planetary.org/image/N00040378.jpg you posted that FieryIce was questioning is located in the upper right corner of the picture
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA07741 you have just linked

craterchains
Commander
Posts: 807
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 2:57 pm
Location: On a boat near Tacoma, WA, usa
Contact:

Post by craterchains » Mon Feb 05, 2007 4:32 pm

I think yer right there BMA.

And it is not shadows causing the black on the bottoms, that is for sure. :roll:

Norval
"It's not what you know, or don't know, but what you know that isn't so that will hurt you." Will Rodgers 1938

Post Reply