Comments and questions about the
APOD on the main view screen.
-
APOD Robot
- Otto Posterman
- Posts: 5606
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 3:27 am
Post
by APOD Robot » Tue Nov 01, 2022 4:05 am
NGC 6357: The Lobster Nebula
Explanation: Why is the Lobster Nebula forming some of the most massive stars known?
No one is yet sure. Cataloged as NGC 6357, the Lobster Nebula houses the open star cluster
Pismis 24 near its center -- a home to unusually bright and
massive stars. The overall red glow near the inner star forming region results from the
emission of
ionized hydrogen gas. The surrounding nebula,
featured here, holds a
complex tapestry of gas,
dark dust, stars still forming, and newly born
stars. The intricate patterns are caused by
complex interactions between
interstellar winds,
radiation pressures,
magnetic fields, and
gravity. The image was taken with
DOE's
Dark Energy Camera on the 4-meter
Blanco Telescope at the
Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory in
Chile. NGC 6357 spans about 400 light years and lies about 8,000
light years away toward the constellation of the
Scorpion.
-
beryllium732
- Ensign
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2021 12:24 am
Post
by beryllium732 » Tue Nov 01, 2022 7:58 am
Where is the star located exactly relative to the image? It doesn't resemble the picture from two years ago
https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap200830.html
-
Ann
- 4725 Å
- Posts: 13871
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am
Post
by Ann » Tue Nov 01, 2022 9:30 am
APOD 1 November 2022 annotated.png
APOD 1 November 2022 detail.png
The star cluster in NGC 6357 is "upside down" compared to a previous APOD. Or maybe it is the previous APOD that is upside down.
Ann
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Color Commentator
-
Ann
- 4725 Å
- Posts: 13871
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am
Post
by Ann » Tue Nov 01, 2022 9:47 am
APOD Robot wrote:
NGC 6357 spans about 400 light years and lies about 8,000 light years away toward the constellation of the Scorpion.
Wikipedia wrote about NGC 6357:
It is located about
~5,500 light years away from Earth.
ESA's Gaia satellite has measured a parallax of 0.4923 ±0.0286 milliarcseconds for the bright Pismis 24 star HD 157504, as reported by
Simbad Astronomical Database. This corresponds to a distance of
~6,600 light-years.
Take your pick as to how far away NGC 6357 is.
Ann
Color Commentator
-
orin stepanek
- Plutopian
- Posts: 8200
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:41 pm
- Location: Nebraska
Post
by orin stepanek » Tue Nov 01, 2022 1:00 pm
model-decam.jpg
Dark Energy Camera!
If we can't see dark energy; how can we take pictures of it???
toiletpaperdog.jpg
I didn't make this mess! I was framed~
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by orin stepanek on Tue Nov 01, 2022 2:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Orin
Smile today; tomorrow's another day!
-
Chris Peterson
- Abominable Snowman
- Posts: 18620
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Post
by Chris Peterson » Tue Nov 01, 2022 1:14 pm
orin stepanek wrote: ↑Tue Nov 01, 2022 1:00 pm
model-decam.jpg
Dark Energy Camera!
If we can't see dark energy; how cac we take pictures of it???
What does "see" mean? Almost everything we think we know about the Universe is from stuff that we can't really see. We can't see hydrogen, all we get is photons that have a certain energy and from which we infer the presence of that element... never measured or detected directly. Astronomy is the science of indirect detection. Other than a few bits of matter from our own solar system, pretty much everything is photons and energetic particles, and what we can conclude from measuring them. We "see" hydrogen by making assumptions about radio waves and red light. We "see" dark matter by measuring Doppler shifts to derive the motion of material, and make inferences about the gravitational fields that produce such motion. We "see" dark energy by measuring cosmological redshifts and making inferences about the relationships between distance and expansion rates, and conclude something about the forces or properties that drive them.
This camera was constructed for a project that surveyed millions of distant galaxies to add to the database of information used to clarify theory regarding dark energy. Hence, its name.
-
HellCat
- Ensign
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 1:30 am
- Location: Cleveland, Ohio USA (Zulu -5)
Post
by HellCat » Tue Nov 01, 2022 1:48 pm
The star cluster in NGC 6357 is "upside down" compared to a previous APOD. Or maybe it is the previous APOD that is upside down.
Ann
I prefer to think that we are the ones who are upside down. The universe knows what it's doing.
Steve
PS - Oh yes! I logged in to find out why the stars in the bottom of the image are "fuzzy." I'm assuming a digital artifact?
-
Chris Peterson
- Abominable Snowman
- Posts: 18620
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Post
by Chris Peterson » Tue Nov 01, 2022 2:00 pm
HellCat wrote: ↑Tue Nov 01, 2022 1:48 pm
The star cluster in NGC 6357 is "upside down" compared to a previous APOD. Or maybe it is the previous APOD that is upside down. :wink:
Ann
I prefer to think that we are the ones who are upside down. The universe knows what it's doing.
Steve
PS - Oh yes! I logged in to find out why the stars in the bottom of the image are "fuzzy." I'm assuming a digital artifact?
What stars are "fuzzy"? All the stars in the image look the same to me.
-
orin stepanek
- Plutopian
- Posts: 8200
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:41 pm
- Location: Nebraska
Post
by orin stepanek » Tue Nov 01, 2022 2:35 pm
Chris Peterson wrote: ↑Tue Nov 01, 2022 1:14 pm
orin stepanek wrote: ↑Tue Nov 01, 2022 1:00 pm
model-decam.jpg
Dark Energy Camera!
If we can't see dark energy; how cac we take pictures of it???
What does "see" mean? Almost everything we think we know about the Universe is from stuff that we can't really see. We can't see hydrogen, all we get is photons that have a certain energy and from which we infer the presence of that element... never measured or detected directly. Astronomy is the science of indirect detection. Other than a few bits of matter from our own solar system, pretty much everything is photons and energetic particles, and what we can conclude from measuring them. We "see" hydrogen by making assumptions about radio waves and red light. We "see" dark matter by measuring Doppler shifts to derive the motion of material, and make inferences about the gravitational fields that produce such motion. We "see" dark energy by measuring cosmological redshifts and making inferences about the relationships between distance and expansion rates, and conclude something about the forces or properties that drive them.
This camera was constructed for a project that surveyed millions of distant galaxies to add to the database of information used to clarify theory regarding dark energy. Hence, its name.
Wow! Thanks for the explanation Chris!
Never too old to learn!
Orin
Smile today; tomorrow's another day!
-
johnnydeep
- Commodore
- Posts: 3259
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 8:57 pm
Post
by johnnydeep » Tue Nov 01, 2022 8:49 pm
Ann wrote: ↑Tue Nov 01, 2022 9:30 am
APOD 1 November 2022 annotated.png
APOD 1 November 2022 detail.png
The star cluster in NGC 6357 is "upside down" compared to a previous APOD. Or maybe it is the previous APOD that is upside down.
Ann
So how do the two fit? I'm still not seeing any resemblance or commonality at all:
ngc 6357.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
--
"To B̬̻̋̚o̞̮̚̚l̘̲̀᷾d̫͓᷅ͩḷ̯᷁ͮȳ͙᷊͠ Go......Beyond The F͇̤i̙̖e̤̟l̡͓d͈̹s̙͚ We Know."{ʲₒʰₙNYᵈₑᵉₚ}
-
HellCat
- Ensign
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 1:30 am
- Location: Cleveland, Ohio USA (Zulu -5)
Post
by HellCat » Tue Nov 01, 2022 8:58 pm
Lobster_Blanco_960_some_stars_circled.jpg
Chris Peterson wrote: ↑Tue Nov 01, 2022 2:00 pm
HellCat wrote: ↑Tue Nov 01, 2022 1:48 pm
The star cluster in NGC 6357 is "upside down" compared to a previous APOD. Or maybe it is the previous APOD that is upside down.
Ann
I prefer to think that we are the ones who are upside down. The universe knows what it's doing.
Steve
PS - Oh yes! I logged in to find out why the stars in the bottom of the image are "fuzzy." I'm assuming a digital artifact?
What stars are "fuzzy"? All the stars in the image look the same to me.
Hi Chris. Poor wording on my part. Several of the stars in the lower center of the image appear over exposed.
I've annotated the image to show these. Unless they are all diffuse galaxies, I don't think I've seen stars like this.
Steve
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
Ann
- 4725 Å
- Posts: 13871
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am
Post
by Ann » Tue Nov 01, 2022 9:15 pm
johnnydeep wrote: ↑Tue Nov 01, 2022 8:49 pm
Ann wrote: ↑Tue Nov 01, 2022 9:30 am
APOD 1 November 2022 annotated.png
APOD 1 November 2022 detail.png
The star cluster in NGC 6357 is "upside down" compared to a previous APOD. Or maybe it is the previous APOD that is upside down.
Ann
So how do the two fit? I'm still not seeing any resemblance or commonality at all:
ngc 6357.JPG
Take a look at these two pictures:
APOD 1 November 2022 November detail annoted.png
As you can see in the annotated detail of the APOD, the bright nebula is "above" the line of bright stars. In the other picture, the bright nebula is "below" the line of bright stars.
Ann
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Color Commentator
-
Chris Peterson
- Abominable Snowman
- Posts: 18620
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Post
by Chris Peterson » Tue Nov 01, 2022 9:17 pm
johnnydeep wrote: ↑Tue Nov 01, 2022 8:49 pm
So how do the two fit? I'm still not seeing any resemblance or commonality at all:
That's because they are at very different scales. Today's APOD is a few degrees across. The HST image is a few arcminutes across.
_
Lobster_Blanco_4000+HST.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
Chris Peterson
- Abominable Snowman
- Posts: 18620
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Post
by Chris Peterson » Tue Nov 01, 2022 9:20 pm
HellCat wrote: ↑Tue Nov 01, 2022 8:58 pm
Lobster_Blanco_960_some_stars_circled.jpg
Chris Peterson wrote: ↑Tue Nov 01, 2022 2:00 pm
HellCat wrote: ↑Tue Nov 01, 2022 1:48 pm
I prefer to think that we are the ones who are upside down. The universe knows what it's doing.
Steve
PS - Oh yes! I logged in to find out why the stars in the bottom of the image are "fuzzy." I'm assuming a digital artifact?
What stars are "fuzzy"? All the stars in the image look the same to me.
Hi Chris. Poor wording on my part. Several of the stars in the lower center of the image appear over exposed.
I've annotated the image to show these. Unless they are all diffuse galaxies, I don't think I've seen stars like this.
Steve
Ah. Just scattered light around the bright stars. It's pretty common in astronomical images with bright stars in them. (Most of the scatter is probably in the optics, although some may be atmospheric, as well.)
-
johnnydeep
- Commodore
- Posts: 3259
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 8:57 pm
Post
by johnnydeep » Tue Nov 01, 2022 9:30 pm
Chris Peterson wrote: ↑Tue Nov 01, 2022 9:17 pm
johnnydeep wrote: ↑Tue Nov 01, 2022 8:49 pm
So how do the two fit? I'm still not seeing any resemblance or commonality at all:
That's because they are at very different scales. Today's APOD is a few degrees across. The HST image is a few arcminutes across.
_
Lobster_Blanco_4000+HST.jpg
Thanks. Yeah, I figured it out from Ann's reply just before I saw your post. Here's my side-by-side partially overlayed view:
ngc 6357 scaled.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
--
"To B̬̻̋̚o̞̮̚̚l̘̲̀᷾d̫͓᷅ͩḷ̯᷁ͮȳ͙᷊͠ Go......Beyond The F͇̤i̙̖e̤̟l̡͓d͈̹s̙͚ We Know."{ʲₒʰₙNYᵈₑᵉₚ}
-
Cosmic ducks in a row
Post
by Cosmic ducks in a row » Tue Nov 01, 2022 10:38 pm
I find the near-perfect alignment of those four big stars just provocative. The odds that it's just random? It's one thing to be in a birth cluster; here they look like they've been shot out of a pipe.
-
Chris Peterson
- Abominable Snowman
- Posts: 18620
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Post
by Chris Peterson » Tue Nov 01, 2022 11:02 pm
Cosmic ducks in a row wrote: ↑Tue Nov 01, 2022 10:38 pm
I find the near-perfect alignment of those four big stars just provocative. The odds that it's just random? It's one thing to be in a birth cluster; here they look like they've been shot out of a pipe.
You will find similar cases in almost any astronomical image that is rich in stars. Our brains are desperate to read meaning into patterns, even when there is none.