Comments and questions about the
APOD on the main view screen.
-
AVAO
- Science Officer
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Tue May 28, 2019 12:24 pm
- AKA: multiwavelength traveller
- Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Post
by AVAO » Tue May 23, 2023 7:41 pm
Chris Alex wrote: ↑Tue May 23, 2023 12:29 pm
Chris Peterson wrote: ↑Tue May 23, 2023 6:54 am
Ann wrote: ↑Mon May 22, 2023 7:06 pm
What about the new supernova in M101, SN 2023ifx? Well... it looks a bit on the faint side to me. Of course, it is still brightening.
Indeed. Just imaging it right now. It's currently 20 times brighter than the core of M101!
_
m101_2023.05.23.jpg
I second Ann's "wow!" Thanks for sharing this picture! (I also like how it brings out how thick and massive M101 is) - I wonder: what is the size of the area covered by the supernova? If that bright spot were instead, say, a star cluster, what would its dimension approximately be?
...Nice area...
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/529 ... bcaf_o.jpg
jac berne (flickr)
-
VictorBorun
- Commander
- Posts: 877
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2020 10:25 pm
Post
by VictorBorun » Fri May 26, 2023 11:59 am
If only we could add neutrino and gravitation wave signals…
Imagine a scenario
1) where SN 2023ixf is first forming two or three neutron stars that then spiral down and form a black hole
2) where some yet-to-be-discovered process generate some dark matter particles helping to shed energy and spin
3) where a two neutron stars in a blink of eye merge, but having co-directional spins have to pinch the space-time fabric, fire a one-direction graviwaves packet and recoil so strongly, that the emerged black hole is kicked out of the supernova remnant and first out of the supernova flash cloud
-
Chris Peterson
- Abominable Snowman
- Posts: 17387
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Post
by Chris Peterson » Fri May 26, 2023 12:57 pm
VictorBorun wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 11:59 am
If only we could add neutrino and gravitation wave signals…
Imagine a scenario
1) where SN 2023ixf is first forming two or three neutron stars that then spiral down and form a black hole
2) where some yet-to-be-discovered process generate some dark matter particles helping to shed energy and spin
3) where a two neutron stars in a blink of eye merge, but having co-directional spins have to pinch the space-time fabric, fire a one-direction graviwaves packet and recoil so strongly, that the emerged black hole is kicked out of the supernova remnant and first out of the supernova flash cloud
While such observations would be great, this particular event involves a type II core collapse supernova, which isn't associated with a binary precursor.
-
VictorBorun
- Commander
- Posts: 877
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2020 10:25 pm
Post
by VictorBorun » Fri May 26, 2023 1:51 pm
Chris Peterson wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 12:57 pm
VictorBorun wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 11:59 am
If only we could add neutrino and gravitation wave signals…
Imagine a scenario
1) where SN 2023ixf is first forming two or three neutron stars that then spiral down and form a black hole
2) where some yet-to-be-discovered process generate some dark matter particles helping to shed energy and spin
3) where a two neutron stars in a blink of eye merge, but having co-directional spins have to pinch the space-time fabric, fire a one-direction graviwaves packet and recoil so strongly, that the emerged black hole is kicked out of the supernova remnant and first out of the supernova flash cloud
While such observations would be great, this particular event involves a type II core collapse supernova, which isn't associated with a binary precursor.
I was trying to say that a collapse may form a neutron star binary inside the collapsing stellar core, in a tight orbit in a dense disk or ring.
Of course, the progenitor has to possess enough mass for all, like 10 suns
-
Chris Peterson
- Abominable Snowman
- Posts: 17387
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Post
by Chris Peterson » Fri May 26, 2023 2:18 pm
VictorBorun wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 1:51 pm
Chris Peterson wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 12:57 pm
VictorBorun wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 11:59 am
If only we could add neutrino and gravitation wave signals…
Imagine a scenario
1) where SN 2023ixf is first forming two or three neutron stars that then spiral down and form a black hole
2) where some yet-to-be-discovered process generate some dark matter particles helping to shed energy and spin
3) where a two neutron stars in a blink of eye merge, but having co-directional spins have to pinch the space-time fabric, fire a one-direction graviwaves packet and recoil so strongly, that the emerged black hole is kicked out of the supernova remnant and first out of the supernova flash cloud
While such observations would be great, this particular event involves a type II core collapse supernova, which isn't associated with a binary precursor.
I was trying to say that a collapse may form a neutron star binary inside the collapsing stellar core, in a tight orbit in a dense disk or ring.
Of course, the progenitor has to possess enough mass for all, like 10 suns
I can't think of any reason that a core collapse would form a binary neutron star.
-
VictorBorun
- Commander
- Posts: 877
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2020 10:25 pm
Post
by VictorBorun » Fri May 26, 2023 5:16 pm
Chris Peterson wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 2:18 pm
VictorBorun wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 1:51 pm
Chris Peterson wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 12:57 pm
While such observations would be great, this particular event involves a type II core collapse supernova, which isn't associated with a binary precursor.
I was trying to say that a collapse may form a neutron star binary inside the collapsing stellar core, in a tight orbit in a dense disk or ring.
Of course, the progenitor has to possess enough mass for all, like 10 suns
I can't think of any reason that a core collapse would form a binary neutron star.
everywhere you look many stars and multiple stellar systems form in a random cloud once the gravitation overcomes the pressure.
Why not mirror it, in a rapid mode, where a massive star core collapses once the fuel is exhausted and the pressure loses to the gravitation?
-
Chris Peterson
- Abominable Snowman
- Posts: 17387
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Post
by Chris Peterson » Fri May 26, 2023 7:52 pm
VictorBorun wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 5:16 pm
Chris Peterson wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 2:18 pm
VictorBorun wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 1:51 pm
I was trying to say that a collapse may form a neutron star binary inside the collapsing stellar core, in a tight orbit in a dense disk or ring.
Of course, the progenitor has to possess enough mass for all, like 10 suns
I can't think of any reason that a core collapse would form a binary neutron star.
everywhere you look many stars and multiple stellar systems form in a random cloud once the gravitation overcomes the pressure.
Why not mirror it, in a rapid mode, where a massive star core collapses once the fuel is exhausted and the pressure loses to the gravitation?
The dynamics are radically different. Stellar systems form from slow viscous planar processes. A supernova is a rapid (relativistic) spherical collapse.
-
VictorBorun
- Commander
- Posts: 877
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2020 10:25 pm
Post
by VictorBorun » Fri May 26, 2023 10:06 pm
Chris Peterson wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 7:52 pm
VictorBorun wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 5:16 pm
Chris Peterson wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 2:18 pm
I can't think of any reason that a core collapse would form a binary neutron star.
everywhere you look many stars and multiple stellar systems form in a random cloud once the gravitation overcomes the pressure.
Why not mirror it, in a rapid mode, where a massive star core collapses once the fuel is exhausted and the pressure loses to the gravitation?
The dynamics are radically different. Stellar systems form from slow viscous planar processes. A supernova is a rapid (relativistic) spherical collapse.
If the collapse is spherical, the spin of the progenitor transfers to one neutron star, but it can not take that much, can it? Mostly the spin has to be shed off in a massive blow up.
But if a ring forms in the collapsing stellar core and the ring breaks into 2 or 3 neutron stars, the spin of the progenitor transfers to the their orbital spin, and that can absorb much more of the mass and spin. As the 2 or 3 NSs feed, their total mass grow and the gravitation pull to the centre grows like mass*mass, so the acceleration grows like mass and the square of the orbiting velocity grows like mass; it lets the NSs take more and more of the spin.
Well, if they are 3, then the least massive is eventually kicked off carrying away the spin and the other 2 finally merge. There is got to be a runaway NS then.
Last edited by VictorBorun on Fri May 26, 2023 10:11 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
Chris Peterson
- Abominable Snowman
- Posts: 17387
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Post
by Chris Peterson » Fri May 26, 2023 10:10 pm
VictorBorun wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 10:06 pm
Chris Peterson wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 7:52 pm
VictorBorun wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 5:16 pm
everywhere you look many stars and multiple stellar systems form in a random cloud once the gravitation overcomes the pressure.
Why not mirror it, in a rapid mode, where a massive star core collapses once the fuel is exhausted and the pressure loses to the gravitation?
The dynamics are radically different. Stellar systems form from slow viscous planar processes. A supernova is a rapid (relativistic) spherical collapse.
If the collapse is spherical, the spin of the progenitor transfers to one neutron star, but it can not take that much, can it? Mostly the spin has to be shed off in a massive blow up.
But if a ring forms in the collapsing stellar core and the ring breaks into 2 or 3 neutron stars, the spin of the progenitor transfers to the their orbital spin, and that can absorb much more of the mass and spin. As the 2 or 3 NSs feed, their total mass grow and the gravitation pull to the centre grows like mass*mass, so the acceleration grows like mass and the square of the orbiting velocity grows like mass; it lets the NSs take more and more of the spin.
Why does the spin need to be "shed off"? The explosion is a bounce. I don't see any mechanism, given a substantially spherically symmetric event, for there to somehow be two cores produced.
-
VictorBorun
- Commander
- Posts: 877
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2020 10:25 pm
Post
by VictorBorun » Fri May 26, 2023 10:13 pm
Chris Peterson wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 10:10 pm
VictorBorun wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 10:06 pm
Chris Peterson wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 7:52 pm
The dynamics are radically different. Stellar systems form from slow viscous planar processes. A supernova is a rapid (relativistic) spherical collapse.
If the collapse is spherical, the spin of the progenitor transfers to one neutron star, but it can not take that much, can it? Mostly the spin has to be shed off in a massive blow up.
But if a ring forms in the collapsing stellar core and the ring breaks into 2 or 3 neutron stars, the spin of the progenitor transfers to the their orbital spin, and that can absorb much more of the mass and spin. As the 2 or 3 NSs feed, their total mass grow and the gravitation pull to the centre grows like mass*mass, so the acceleration grows like mass and the square of the orbiting velocity grows like mass; it lets the NSs take more and more of the spin.
Why does the spin need to be "shed off"? The explosion is a bounce. I don't see any mechanism, given a substantially spherically symmetric event, for there to somehow be two cores produced.
because a compact thing like neutron star or black hole has a small radius, and spin is mass*velocity*radius
-
Chris Peterson
- Abominable Snowman
- Posts: 17387
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Post
by Chris Peterson » Fri May 26, 2023 10:17 pm
VictorBorun wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 10:13 pm
Chris Peterson wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 10:10 pm
VictorBorun wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 10:06 pm
If the collapse is spherical, the spin of the progenitor transfers to one neutron star, but it can not take that much, can it? Mostly the spin has to be shed off in a massive blow up.
But if a ring forms in the collapsing stellar core and the ring breaks into 2 or 3 neutron stars, the spin of the progenitor transfers to the their orbital spin, and that can absorb much more of the mass and spin. As the 2 or 3 NSs feed, their total mass grow and the gravitation pull to the centre grows like mass*mass, so the acceleration grows like mass and the square of the orbiting velocity grows like mass; it lets the NSs take more and more of the spin.
Why does the spin need to be "shed off"? The explosion is a bounce. I don't see any mechanism, given a substantially spherically symmetric event, for there to somehow be two cores produced.
because a compact thing like neutron star or black hole has a small radius, and spin is mass*velocity*radius
Yes. And they often have absurdly high spin rates as a consequence. Because angular momentum is conserved, and because such spin rates, hundreds of revolutions per second, don't disrupt the body.