HOLE IN MARS REVISITED

makc · Post by **makc** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 2:28 pm

craterchains wrote:And, finally today, as a multiple warhead delivery vehicle for modern high yield atomic weapons that can create concise systematic lines of craters, or to different cities in a region.

Funny how you have to use this atomic weapon example when you reject tidally torn comet theory that has exactly the same underlying ballistics.

FieryIce · Post by **FieryIce** » Fri Oct 05, 2007 4:41 am

tidally torn comet theory that has exactly the same underlying ballistics

WRONG!

makc · Post by **makc** » Fri Oct 05, 2007 6:27 pm

Really? What's the difference?

makc · Post by **makc** » Wed Dec 19, 2007 11:39 am

for everyone who will happen to ever read this thread, it appears they took that image from different angle, with following details visible:

(I've found this image at BA blog)

BMAONE23 · Post by **BMAONE23** » Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:18 pm

A nice image of another hole but I don't believe it is the original post aforementioned hole
http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/pdf/PSP_004847_1745.pdf

makc · Post by **makc** » Wed Dec 19, 2007 9:16 pm

no, I think it's the same hole

BMAONE23 · Post by **BMAONE23** » Wed Dec 19, 2007 10:40 pm

It looks like your image is in the midst of a heavily cratered plane with a somewhat sizeable crater toward the top of the image but the PDF file image seems to be of a more sandy plane (like where opportunity is) with little noticeable cratering around the lip of the hole and no sign of the afore mentioned crater

makc · Post by **makc** » Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:20 am

hmm now i think you're right... but why did BA linked this image to http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/PSP_004847_1745

craterchains · Post by **craterchains** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 4:58 pm

Good question makc.