APOD: Across the Center of Centaurus A (2011 Nov 29)

Comments and questions about the APOD on the main view screen.
Post Reply
User avatar
APOD Robot
Otto Posterman
Posts: 5345
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 3:27 am
Contact:

APOD: Across the Center of Centaurus A (2011 Nov 29)

Post by APOD Robot » Tue Nov 29, 2011 5:05 am

Image Across the Center of Centaurus A

Explanation: A fantastic jumble of young blue star clusters, gigantic glowing gas clouds, and imposing dark dust lanes surrounds the central region of the active galaxy Centaurus A. This image from the Hubble Space Telescope has been processed to present a natural color picture of this cosmic maelstrom. Infrared images from the Hubble have also shown that hidden at the center of this activity are what seem to be disks of matter spiraling into a black hole with a billion times the mass of the Sun. Centaurus A itself is apparently the result of a collision of two galaxies and the left over debris is steadily being consumed by the black hole. Astronomers believe that such black hole central engines generate the radio, X-ray, and gamma-ray energy radiated by Centaurus A and other active galaxies. But for an active galaxy Centaurus A is close, a mere 10 million light-years away, and is a relatively convenient laboratory for exploring these powerful sources of energy.

<< Previous APODDiscuss Any APOD Next APOD >>
[/b]

User avatar
Indigo_Sunrise
Science Officer
Posts: 439
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 1:40 pm
Location: Md

Re: APOD: Across the Center of Centaurus A (2011 Nov 29)

Post by Indigo_Sunrise » Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:33 am

What a great APOD!
Fantastic image....
Tons of great links.....


SUPERB!



8-)
Forget the box, just get outside.

User avatar
orin stepanek
Plutopian
Posts: 8200
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: Nebraska

Re: APOD: Across the Center of Centaurus A (2011 Nov 29)

Post by orin stepanek » Tue Nov 29, 2011 1:47 pm

It's great that we can look at other galaxies almost as well as our own Milky Way! 8-)
Orin

Smile today; tomorrow's another day!

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Say "Active Galactic Nucleus" three times fast.

Post by neufer » Tue Nov 29, 2011 3:29 pm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_galactic_nucleus wrote: <<An active galactic nucleus (AGN) is a compact region at the centre of a galaxy that has a much higher than normal luminosity over at least some portion, and possibly all, of the electromagnetic spectrum. Such excess emission has been observed in the radio, infrared, optical, ultra-violet, X-ray and gamma ray wavebands. A galaxy hosting an AGN is called an active galaxy. The radiation from AGN is believed to be a result of accretion of mass by the supermassive black hole at the centre of the host galaxy. AGN are the most luminous persistent sources of electromagnetic radiation in the universe, and as such can be used as a means of discovering distant objects; their evolution as a function of cosmic time also provides constraints on models of the cosmos.

The issue of the activity of nuclei of galaxies (AGN) was first raised by Soviet-Armenian physicist Prof. Victor Ambartsumian in the early 1950s. Although the idea concerning the activity of galactic nuclei for the first time was accepted very skeptically, after many years, as a result of the pressure of observations (the discovery of quasars, radio outbursts of galaxies, consequences of explosions in nuclei, ejection from nuclei, etc.) it did gain recognition. The concept of AGN now is widely accepted.

For a long time it has been argued that AGN must be powered by accretion onto massive black holes (with masses between 106 and 1010 times that of the Sun). AGN are both compact and persistently extremely luminous; accretion can potentially give very efficient conversion of potential and kinetic energy to radiation, and a massive black hole has a high Eddington luminosity, so that it can provide the observed high persistent luminosity. Central supermassive black holes are now believed to exist in the centers of most or all massive galaxies: the mass of the black hole correlates well with the velocity dispersion of the galaxy bulge (the M-sigma relation) or with bulge luminosity. Thus AGN-like characteristics are expected whenever a supply of material for accretion comes within the sphere of influence of the central black hole.

In the standard model of AGN, cold material close to the central black hole forms an accretion disc. Dissipative processes in the accretion disc transport matter inwards and angular momentum outwards, while causing the accretion disc to heat up. The expected spectrum of an accretion disc around a supermassive black hole peaks in the optical-ultraviolet waveband; in addition, a corona of hot material forms above the accretion disc and can inverse-Compton scatter photons up to X-ray energies. The radiation from the accretion disc excites cold atomic material close to the black hole and this radiates via emission lines. A large fraction of the AGN's primary output may be obscured by interstellar gas and dust close to the accretion disc, but (in a steady-state situation) this will be re-radiated at some other waveband, most likely the infrared.

At least some accretion discs produce jets, twin highly collimated and fast outflows that emerge in opposite directions from close to the disc (the direction of the jet ejection must be determined either by the angular momentum axis of the disc or the spin axis of the black hole). The jet production mechanism and indeed the jet composition on very small scales are not known at present, as observations cannot distinguish between the various theoretical models that exist. The jets have the most obvious observational effects in the radio waveband, where Very Long Baseline Interferometry can be used to study the synchrotron radiation they emit down to sub-parsec scales. However, they radiate in all wavebands from the radio through to the gamma-ray via the synchrotron and inverse-Compton process, and so AGN with jets have a second potential source of any observed continuum radiation.

There exists a class of 'radiatively inefficient' solutions to the equations that govern accretion. The most widely known of these is the Advection Dominated Accretion Flow (ADAF), but others exist. In this type of accretion, which is important for accretion rates well below the Eddington limit, the accreting matter does not form a thin disc and consequently does not radiate away the energy that it has acquired in moving close to the black hole. Radiatively inefficient accretion has been used to explain the lack of strong AGN-type radiation from massive black holes in the centres of elliptical galaxies in clusters, where otherwise we might expect high accretion rates and corresponding high luminosities. Radiatively inefficient AGN would be expected to lack many of the characteristic features of standard AGN with an accretion disc.

There is no single observational signature of an AGN. The list below covers some of the historically important features that have allowed systems to be identified as AGN.
  • Nuclear optical continuum emission. This is visible whenever we have a direct view of the accretion disc. Jets can also contribute to this component of the AGN emission. The optical emission has a roughly power-law dependence on wavelength.

    Nuclear infra-red emission. This is visible whenever the accretion disc and its environment are obscured by gas and dust close to the nucleus and then re-emitted ('reprocessing'). As it is thermal emission, it can be distinguished from any jet or disc-related component.

    Broad optical emission lines. These come from cold material close to the central black hole. The lines are broad because the emitting material is revolving around the black hole with high speeds, emitting photons at varying Doppler shifts.

    Narrow optical emission lines. These come from more distant cold material, and so are narrower than the broad lines.

    Radio continuum emission. This is always due to a jet. It shows a spectrum characteristic of synchrotron radiation.

    X-ray continuum emission. This can arise both from a jet and from the hot corona of the accretion disc via scattering processes: in both cases it shows a power-law spectrum. In some radio-quiet AGN there is a `soft excess' in the X-ray emission in addition to the power-law component. The origin of the soft excess is not clear at present.

    X-ray line emission. This is a result of illumination of cold heavy elements by the X-ray continuum. Fluorescence gives rise to various emission lines, the best-known of which is the iron feature around 6.4 keV. This line may be narrow or broad: relativistically broadened iron lines can be used to study the dynamics of the accretion disc very close to the nucleus and therefore the nature of the central black hole.
It is convenient to divide AGN into two classes, conventionally called radio-quiet and radio-loud. In the radio-loud objects a contribution from the jet(s) and the lobes they inflate dominates the luminosity of the AGN, at least at radio wavelengths but possibly at some or all others. Radio-quiet objects are simpler since jet and jet-related emission can be neglected.

AGN terminology is often confusing, since the distinctions between different types of AGN sometimes reflect historical differences in how objects were discovered or initially classified, rather than real physical differences.

These galaxies can be broadly summarised by the following table:

Code: Select all

_____  Differences between active galaxy types and normal galaxies.

_________ 	Active	Emission Lines _______   Excess of     Strong  _________    Radio
 Galaxy Type  Nuclei   Narrow  Broad   X-rays   UV  Far-IR    Radio  Jets Variable  loud

Normal 	      no 	weak 	 none 	weak 	none  none 	none   none 	 no 	 no
Starburst       no 	yes 	   no 	 some 	no 	 yes    some 	no 	  no 	 no
Seyfert I      yes 	yes 	  yes 	 some 	some   yes 	few 	 no 	 yes 	 no
Seyfert II     yes 	yes 	   no 	 some 	some   yes 	few 	yes 	 yes 	 no
Quasar 	     yes 	yes 	  yes 	 some 	yes 	yes 	some   some 	yes 	10%
Blazar 	     yes 	no 	  some 	  yes 	yes 	 no 	yes 	yes 	 yes 	yes
BL Lac 	     yes 	no   none/faint   yes 	yes 	 no 	yes 	yes 	 yes 	yes
OVV   	      yes 	no   > BL Lac 	 yes 	yes 	 no 	yes 	yes 	 yes 	yes
Radio galaxy   yes 	some 	some 	 some 	some   yes 	yes 	yes 	 yes 	yes
Unified models of AGN unite two or more classes of objects, based on the traditional observational classifications, by proposing that they are really a single type of physical object observed under different conditions. The currently favoured unified models are 'orientation-based unified models' meaning that they propose that the apparent differences between different types of objects arise simply because of their different orientations to the observer.

For a long time, active galaxies held all the records for the highest-redshift objects known, because of their high luminosity (either in the optical or the radio): they still have a role to play in studies of the early universe, but it is now recognised that by its nature an AGN gives a highly biased picture of the 'typical' high-redshift galaxy.

More interesting is the study of the evolution of the AGN population. Most luminous classes of AGN (radio-loud and radio-quiet) seem to have been much more numerous in the early universe. This suggests (1) that massive black holes formed early on and (2) that the conditions for the formation of luminous AGN were more readily available in the early universe — for example, that there was a much higher availability of cold gas near the centre of galaxies than there is now. It also implies, of course, that many objects that were once luminous quasars are now much less luminous, or entirely quiescent. The evolution of the low-luminosity AGN population is much less well constrained because of the difficulty of detecting and observing these objects at high redshifts.>>
Last edited by neufer on Tue Nov 29, 2011 3:37 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Art Neuendorffer

nstahl
Science Officer
Posts: 233
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 4:08 am

Re: APOD: Across the Center of Centaurus A (2011 Nov 29)

Post by nstahl » Tue Nov 29, 2011 3:30 pm

For those who've been wanting natural color, this apparently is one. Nice APOD.

That graduate assistantship sounds like a neat opportunity for some youngish researcher. And if you like waterfalls, da UP is the place to be.

User avatar
Psnarf
Science Officer
Posts: 320
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:19 pm

Re: APOD: Across the Center of Centaurus A (2011 Nov 29)

Post by Psnarf » Tue Nov 29, 2011 4:47 pm

Hunting for details of the black hole, I came across this image:

http://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/images/1 ... haped-Meal

How do you change a spiral galaxy into a parallelogram?!

Pardon me, my head just exploded.... :b:

User avatar
bystander
Apathetic Retiree
Posts: 21573
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Re: APOD: Across the Center of Centaurus A (2011 Nov 29)

Post by bystander » Tue Nov 29, 2011 5:16 pm

Psnarf wrote:How do you change a spiral galaxy into a parallelogram?!
The obvious answer is collide it with a large elliptical galaxy. :wink:
Know the quiet place within your heart and touch the rainbow of possibility; be
alive to the gentle breeze of communication, and please stop being such a jerk.
— Garrison Keillor

User avatar
bystander
Apathetic Retiree
Posts: 21573
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Re: Say "Active Galactic Nucleus" three times fast.

Post by bystander » Tue Nov 29, 2011 5:20 pm

neufer wrote:Say "Active Galactic Nucleus" three times fast
http://asterisk.apod.com/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=25990

Not really AGNs, but there are three central black holes.
Know the quiet place within your heart and touch the rainbow of possibility; be
alive to the gentle breeze of communication, and please stop being such a jerk.
— Garrison Keillor

saturn2

Re: APOD: Across the Center of Centaurus A (2011 Nov 29)

Post by saturn2 » Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:53 pm

Centaurus A is a galaxy many active.
In the center of Centaurus A has a black hole of 1 billion times the mass of the our Sun.
1 billion times :!:

judi

Re: APOD: Across the Center of Centaurus A (2011 Nov 29)

Post by judi » Thu Dec 01, 2011 2:05 am

i really appreciate whoever does apod this year. thank you. j

User avatar
owlice
Guardian of the Codes
Posts: 8406
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 4:18 pm
Location: Washington, DC

Re: APOD: Across the Center of Centaurus A (2011 Nov 29)

Post by owlice » Thu Dec 01, 2011 2:25 am

The same two people who are doing APOD this year have done it since it began in 1995: Robert Nemiroff and Jerry Bonnell.
A closed mouth gathers no foot.

User avatar
geckzilla
Ocular Digitator
Posts: 9180
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: Modesto, CA
Contact:

Re: APOD: Across the Center of Centaurus A (2011 Nov 29)

Post by geckzilla » Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:48 pm

AKA Baffled Boffin A and Baffled Boffin B
Just call me "geck" because "zilla" is like a last name.

Charlie Patriot

Re: APOD: Across the Center of Centaurus A (2011 Nov 29)

Post by Charlie Patriot » Thu Dec 01, 2011 3:48 pm

Now I'm getting more confused. I have read in these APODs that collisions between stars when galaxies collide is extremely rare. Now this looks like one HECK of a lot of debris to me, so what generated it.?

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: APOD: Across the Center of Centaurus A (2011 Nov 29)

Post by neufer » Thu Dec 01, 2011 3:53 pm

Charlie Patriot wrote:
Now I'm getting more confused. I have read in these APODs that collisions between stars when galaxies collide is extremely rare. Now this looks like one HECK of a lot of debris to me, so what generated it.?
Supernova?
Art Neuendorffer

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18113
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: APOD: Across the Center of Centaurus A (2011 Nov 29)

Post by Chris Peterson » Thu Dec 01, 2011 4:41 pm

Charlie Patriot wrote:Now I'm getting more confused. I have read in these APODs that collisions between stars when galaxies collide is extremely rare. Now this looks like one HECK of a lot of debris to me, so what generated it.?
When galaxies collide, their dust and gas interacts to produce shock fronts, which creates zones where new stars form. Many of those stars are massive and short-lived, and quickly explode as supernovas, creating even more dust and gas. That's what we're seeing here: the "debris" is a mix of dust and gas from the original galaxies, as well as newly created material formed post-collision. None of it comes from stars that collided. As you note, the frequency of such collisions is insignificant.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: APOD: Across the Center of Centaurus A (2011 Nov 29)

Post by neufer » Tue Jun 24, 2014 6:09 pm

Click to play embedded YouTube video.
Art Neuendorffer

Post Reply