by Ken Croswell
Recent discoveries of record-breaking quasars have pushed the boundaries of our understanding. In 2021, astronomers reported the most distant quasar ever seen and, in 2024, the most luminous quasar known.
Link: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Extreme Quasars Illuminate the Fast Lives of the First Black Holes
-
- Ensign
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 4:26 pm
-
- Science Officer
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2023 10:37 pm
Re: Extreme Quasars Illuminate the Fast Lives of the First Black Holes
500 trillion times the luminosity of the Sun! 20 000 times more than the entire Milky Way...
-
- Ensign
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 4:26 pm
Re: Extreme Quasars Illuminate the Fast Lives of the First Black Holes
From the fourth paragraph:
“The Astrophysical Journal has up till now not recognized the term ‘quasar’; and it regrets that it must now concede,” the editor lamented.
“The Astrophysical Journal has up till now not recognized the term ‘quasar’; and it regrets that it must now concede,” the editor lamented.
-
- Commander
- Posts: 802
- Joined: Tue May 28, 2019 12:24 pm
- AKA: multiwavelength traveller
- Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Re: Extreme Quasars Illuminate the Fast Lives of the First Black Holes
...The comment dates from 1970 and is therefore purely historical in nature...
S. Chandrasekhar, Footnote. Astrophys. J. 162, 371 (1970)
-
- Ensign
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 4:26 pm
Re: Extreme Quasars Illuminate the Fast Lives of the First Black Holes
True. But it's amusing that six years elapsed from the coining of "quasar" to that journal's usage of it. The full paragraph:
The next year [in 1964], American astrophysicist Hong-Yee Chiu called these objects quasars, a term that initially made a bigger hit with the public than with his peers. Only in 1970—well after the introduction of Quasar televisions—did a leading astronomical publication allow the word: “The Astrophysical Journal has up till now not recognized the term ‘quasar’; and it regrets that it must now concede,” the editor lamented.
The editor, by the way, was Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar, who later won a Nobel Prize.
The next year [in 1964], American astrophysicist Hong-Yee Chiu called these objects quasars, a term that initially made a bigger hit with the public than with his peers. Only in 1970—well after the introduction of Quasar televisions—did a leading astronomical publication allow the word: “The Astrophysical Journal has up till now not recognized the term ‘quasar’; and it regrets that it must now concede,” the editor lamented.
The editor, by the way, was Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar, who later won a Nobel Prize.