Of course, I'd rather have a 100,000 meteors than one asteroid big enough to kill the dinosaurs! Yes I would! If I only could.
Click to play embedded YouTube video.
And today is the day of another glitter show - the Nobel Prize ceremonies in Stockholm. The winners get their medals and what not, and then all the guests, the winners and their families and a lot of ambassadors and politicians and royalties and other dignitaries sit down for a grand banquet, and then it's time for a dance.
Seem like good luck not just for the meteor shower, but also for clear skies. It was November, not always great weather. Last few meteor showers I've attempted always seem to be cloudy or too much moonlight.
Many planetariums have a way to simulate an intense meteor shower like this, I'm sure it's not really the same, but probably as close as most of us will ever get. If you get a chance to visit a planetarium, the operators are usually happy to take requests.
Driving at night with your high beams on in a moderate snowfall you experience something very similar.
The faster you go the more thrilling it gets until.........
Stupid question: in the impressively scientific looking simulation at https://www.meteorshowers.org/view/Leonids, the individual pieces of comet depicted are not actually measured and tracked objects in space, right? They're just a statistically derived density dispersion of what the total dust cloud must mostly likely look like, yes?
-- "To B̬̻̋̚o̞̮̚̚l̘̲̀᷾d̫͓᷅ͩḷ̯᷁ͮȳ͙᷊͠ Go......Beyond The F͇̤i̙̖e̤̟l̡͓d͈̹s̙͚ We Know."{ʲₒʰₙNYᵈₑᵉₚ}
johnnydeep wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2024 7:37 pm
Stupid question: in the impressively scientific looking simulation at https://www.meteorshowers.org/view/Leonids, the individual pieces of comet depicted are not actually measured and tracked objects in space, right? They're just a statistically derived density dispersion of what the total dust cloud must mostly likely look like, yes?
Meteor showers are analyzed by numerical integration. An ejection model for the parent body creates particles that are then individually propagated (subject to solar radiation pressure, solar wind, gravity, relativistic effects, and more), producing debris streams that are tied to specific perihelia, and which allow the intensity of future showers to be predicted with pretty high accuracy. So here we're seeing a theoretical cloud based on many orbits of the parent.
Chris
*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory https://www.cloudbait.com
johnnydeep wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2024 7:37 pm
Stupid question: in the impressively scientific looking simulation at https://www.meteorshowers.org/view/Leonids, the individual pieces of comet depicted are not actually measured and tracked objects in space, right? They're just a statistically derived density dispersion of what the total dust cloud must mostly likely look like, yes?
Meteor showers are analyzed by numerical integration. An ejection model for the parent body creates particles that are then individually propagated (subject to solar radiation pressure, solar wind, gravity, relativistic effects, and more), producing debris streams that are tied to specific perihelia, and which allow the intensity of future showers to be predicted with pretty high accuracy. So here we're seeing a theoretical cloud based on many orbits of the parent.
-- "To B̬̻̋̚o̞̮̚̚l̘̲̀᷾d̫͓᷅ͩḷ̯᷁ͮȳ͙᷊͠ Go......Beyond The F͇̤i̙̖e̤̟l̡͓d͈̹s̙͚ We Know."{ʲₒʰₙNYᵈₑᵉₚ}