APOD: In Ganymede's Shadow (2022 Oct 07)

Comments and questions about the APOD on the main view screen.
Post Reply
User avatar
APOD Robot
Otto Posterman
Posts: 5344
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 3:27 am
Contact:

APOD: In Ganymede's Shadow (2022 Oct 07)

Post by APOD Robot » Fri Oct 07, 2022 4:05 am

Image In Ganymede's Shadow

Explanation: At opposition, opposite the Sun in Earth's sky, late last month Jupiter is also approaching perihelion, the closest point to the Sun in its elliptical orbit, early next year. That makes Jupiter exceptionally close to our fair planet, currently resulting in excellent views of the Solar System's ruling gas giant. On September 27, this sharp image of Jupiter was recorded with a small telescope from a backyard in Florence, Arizona. The stacked video frames reveal the massive world bounded by planet girdling winds. Dark belts and light zones span the gas giant, along with rotating oval storms and its signature Great Red Spot. Galilean moon Ganymede is below and right in the frame. The Solar System's largest moon and its shadow are in transit across the southern Jovian cloud tops.

<< Previous APOD This Day in APOD Next APOD >>

beryllium732
Ensign
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2021 12:24 am

Re: APOD: In Ganymede's Shadow (2022 Oct 07)

Post by beryllium732 » Fri Oct 07, 2022 7:58 am

Does gas giants always form in the outer colder parts of a star system or do they wander in as the time passes by? I guess it's due to gas not being able to be captured if the body is near the star?

User avatar
Ann
4725 Å
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am

Re: APOD: In Ganymede's Shadow (2022 Oct 07)

Post by Ann » Fri Oct 07, 2022 9:08 am

beryllium732 wrote: Fri Oct 07, 2022 7:58 am Does gas giants always form in the outer colder parts of a star system or do they wander in as the time passes by? I guess it's due to gas not being able to be captured if the body is near the star?
Our own solar system is unusual in many ways, and Jupiter is one of the planets that makes it unusual.
Ross Pomeroy of Real Clear Science wrote:

To us, our solar system, situated in the suburbs of the Milky Way, seems normal, almost mundane. It's home after all, the only one we've ever known. But when astronomers began gazing earnestly at our stellar neighbors a few decades ago, they soon realized that, in many respects, our solar system contrasted sharply with others out there. In fact, it's downright strange. Here are four reasons why.

1....

2....

3....

4. What's Up With Jupiter? Jupiter is the juggernaut of our solar system, with a mass more than two and a half times that of all the other planets combined. The simple fact that our solar system hosts a gas giant of this size sets us apart, says astrophysicist Sean Raymond. Just 10-15% of Sun-like stars have one. Moreover, he writes, most gas giants in other solar systems have tight, eccentric orbits around their stars, while Jupiter's is wide and nearly circular. "Only about one in a hundred stars like the Sun has a Jupiter like ours," he wrote.
So it is more common with Jupiters near their sun than it is with Jupiters in large orbits much farther away from their sun, like our own giant planet.

That said, many astronomers do believe that Jupiter has indeed "moved around" in the solar system until it came to a halt in its current position. More precisely, the leading hypothesis is that Jupiter formed at 3.5 AU (closer to the Sun than today), then moved inwards to a position of 1.5 AU (halfway between the current positions of the Earth and Mars), where it was caught in a resonance with Saturn, which made it "move back out" to where it is now, at 5.2 AU.

This is called the Grand tack hypothesis.

Ann
Color Commentator

User avatar
Case
Commander
Posts: 616
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 10:08 pm
Location: (52°N, 06°E)

Re: APOD: In Ganymede's Shadow (2022 Oct 07)

Post by Case » Fri Oct 07, 2022 10:10 am

Ann wrote: Fri Oct 07, 2022 9:08 am
Ross Pomeroy of Real Clear Science wrote:

4. What's Up With Jupiter? […] Moreover, he writes, most gas giants in other solar systems have tight, eccentric orbits around their stars, while Jupiter's is wide and nearly circular. "Only about one in a hundred stars like the Sun has a Jupiter like ours," he wrote.
I’d say that has all the signs of discovery bias. Exoplanet discovery methods finds close orbits more easily. That says very little about the amount of planets out there in wide 12-earth-years orbits.
[Just because you can see better in a lamp’s glow, that doesn’t mean that is were lost items are (Streetlight effect).]

User avatar
orin stepanek
Plutopian
Posts: 8200
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: Nebraska

Re: APOD: In Ganymede's Shadow (2022 Oct 07)

Post by orin stepanek » Fri Oct 07, 2022 12:17 pm

JovianEclipse1024c.jpg
Don't you wish there were a cutaway view that accurately showed
through the clouds to Jupiter's surface? :shock: Does Jupiter even have a
surface?
Orin

Smile today; tomorrow's another day!

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18103
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: APOD: In Ganymede's Shadow (2022 Oct 07)

Post by Chris Peterson » Fri Oct 07, 2022 1:43 pm

orin stepanek wrote: Fri Oct 07, 2022 12:17 pm JovianEclipse1024c.jpg
Don't you wish there were a cutaway view that accurately showed
through the clouds to Jupiter's surface? :shock: Does Jupiter even have a
surface?
Define "surface". Jupiter almost certainly has a solid core, deep in its interior, which you would reach by descending through the gases and then exotic fluid layers. Whether that should be called its "surface" or not is debatable.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

User avatar
orin stepanek
Plutopian
Posts: 8200
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: Nebraska

Re: APOD: In Ganymede's Shadow (2022 Oct 07)

Post by orin stepanek » Fri Oct 07, 2022 3:27 pm

Chris Peterson wrote: Fri Oct 07, 2022 1:43 pm
orin stepanek wrote: Fri Oct 07, 2022 12:17 pm JovianEclipse1024c.jpg
Don't you wish there were a cutaway view that accurately showed
through the clouds to Jupiter's surface? :shock Does Jupiter even have a
surface?
Define "surface". Jupiter almost certainly has a solid core, deep in its interior, which you would reach by descending through the gases and then exotic fluid layers. Whether that should be called its "surface" or not is debatable.
You're most certainly correct and a lot of the liquid is probably solid with gasses being liquid! :shock: Still!!!
Orin

Smile today; tomorrow's another day!

De58te
Commander
Posts: 583
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2013 6:35 pm

Re: APOD: In Ganymede's Shadow (2022 Oct 07)

Post by De58te » Fri Oct 07, 2022 5:51 pm

Sometimes the physics of astronomy simply astonishes you. I am referring to a comment by Ann that Jupiter once moved inward in the solar system to 1.5 AU, but then was pulled out by Saturn to its present position. That is even though the mass of Jupiter is over 3 times the mass of Saturn! It defies what I learned in school about Newtonian physics. It is like the wrestler Hulk Hogan getting into a tug-of-war match with 90 pound Twiggy - and Twiggy wins! You wonder why the much heavier Jupiter didn't pull Saturn in?

heehaw

Re: APOD: In Ganymede's Shadow (2022 Oct 07)

Post by heehaw » Fri Oct 07, 2022 6:16 pm

Yes! I was flabbergasted when the first extra-solar planets turned out to be "Jupiters in Mercury orbits". But apparently under gravitation, planets can and do migrate. Whoda thunkit?

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18103
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: APOD: In Ganymede's Shadow (2022 Oct 07)

Post by Chris Peterson » Fri Oct 07, 2022 7:34 pm

De58te wrote: Fri Oct 07, 2022 5:51 pm Sometimes the physics of astronomy simply astonishes you. I am referring to a comment by Ann that Jupiter once moved inward in the solar system to 1.5 AU, but then was pulled out by Saturn to its present position. That is even though the mass of Jupiter is over 3 times the mass of Saturn! It defies what I learned in school about Newtonian physics. It is like the wrestler Hulk Hogan getting into a tug-of-war match with 90 pound Twiggy - and Twiggy wins! You wonder why the much heavier Jupiter didn't pull Saturn in?
It did. The movements were caused by resonances. Small forces applied at the right time can make big changes in orbits (not unlike pushing someone on a swing). Jupiter was the dominant player in all of the shifting of orbits.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

stevie

Re: APOD: In Ganymede's Shadow (2022 Oct 07)

Post by stevie » Sat Oct 08, 2022 3:33 am

The shadow makes Ganymede looks so close to Jupiter. Perspective is crazy fun. Great pic!

User avatar
Ann
4725 Å
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am

Re: APOD: In Ganymede's Shadow (2022 Oct 07)

Post by Ann » Sat Oct 08, 2022 5:09 am

Case wrote: Fri Oct 07, 2022 10:10 am
Ann wrote: Fri Oct 07, 2022 9:08 am
Ross Pomeroy of Real Clear Science wrote:

4. What's Up With Jupiter? […] Moreover, he writes, most gas giants in other solar systems have tight, eccentric orbits around their stars, while Jupiter's is wide and nearly circular. "Only about one in a hundred stars like the Sun has a Jupiter like ours," he wrote.
I’d say that has all the signs of discovery bias. Exoplanet discovery methods finds close orbits more easily. That says very little about the amount of planets out there in wide 12-earth-years orbits.
[Just because you can see better in a lamp’s glow, that doesn’t mean that is were lost items are (Streetlight effect).]

Ethan Siegel has written an interesting article on observation bias in our search for exoplanets:
Ethan Siegel wrote:

In a surprising find, the most abundant type of planet discovered so far is neither a gas giant nor a rocky planet, but rather a new class of planet in between the two: best known as super-Earths. But are super-Earths really the most common type of planet in the Universe, or is this simply a way that our current data and capabilities are fooling us?
...

In other words, we disproportionately detected the easiest types of planets that we could detect with the specific method we were using.
...
I highly recommend the rest of Ethan Siegel's text. Anyway, you are right: Finding Jupiter-like planets (or any planets) in Jupiter-like orbits is sufficiently hard that we are going to find disproportionately fewer of them than we find planets in tighter orbits. If a planet is in a large orbit, even if its orbit is perfectly aligned with its sun from our perspective, we are likely to have to wait for many years to catch it crossing the face of its sun. If we use the stellar wobble method, we will have to wait for a planet to make three orbits before we can know if the star is wobbling because of a planet tugging at it - and for a planet moving at the speed of Jupiter in an orbit the size of Jupiter's orbit, we would have to wait - well, would it be 36 years?

I also think, although I may certainly wrong about that, that a planet in a tight orbit has a greater chance of being seen transiting the disk of its sun than a planet in a large orbit, simply because it seems to me that the effects of the "misalignment" of the orbit would grow, the larger the size of the orbit is.


I also very much recommend what Ethan Siegel has to say about so called "super-Earths". Very interesting!

Ann
Color Commentator

User avatar
VictorBorun
Captain
Posts: 1025
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2020 10:25 pm
Contact:

Re: APOD: In Ganymede's Shadow (2022 Oct 07)

Post by VictorBorun » Sun Oct 09, 2022 3:19 pm

Chris Peterson wrote: Fri Oct 07, 2022 1:43 pm
orin stepanek wrote: Fri Oct 07, 2022 12:17 pm JovianEclipse1024c.jpg
Don't you wish there were a cutaway view that accurately showed
through the clouds to Jupiter's surface? :shock: Does Jupiter even have a
surface?
Define "surface". Jupiter almost certainly has a solid core, deep in its interior, which you would reach by descending through the gases and then exotic fluid layers. Whether that should be called its "surface" or not is debatable.
An evident way to define surface of a galaxy or a galaxy cluster is to mark all the points of maximum free fall acceleration.
However for a planet it gives such absurd as proclaiming Earth's core/mantle interface as surface
Image

I think we humans readily sympathise with birds, squirrels, fish and moles. For us a surface is a relief that exists for years while the air and water masses come and go in a week or sooner.

The Red Spot, rather orange in this APOD, is there for a hundred years; therefore it is an island drifting in the ocean

User avatar
johnnydeep
Commodore
Posts: 2777
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 8:57 pm

Re: APOD: In Ganymede's Shadow (2022 Oct 07)

Post by johnnydeep » Sun Oct 09, 2022 3:51 pm

VictorBorun wrote: Sun Oct 09, 2022 3:19 pm
Chris Peterson wrote: Fri Oct 07, 2022 1:43 pm
orin stepanek wrote: Fri Oct 07, 2022 12:17 pm JovianEclipse1024c.jpg
Don't you wish there were a cutaway view that accurately showed
through the clouds to Jupiter's surface? :shock: Does Jupiter even have a
surface?
Define "surface". Jupiter almost certainly has a solid core, deep in its interior, which you would reach by descending through the gases and then exotic fluid layers. Whether that should be called its "surface" or not is debatable.
An evident way to define surface of a galaxy or a galaxy cluster is to mark all the points of maximum free fall acceleration.
However for a planet it gives such absurd as proclaiming Earth's core/mantle interface as surface
Image

I think we humans readily sympathise with birds, squirrels, fish and moles. For us a surface is a relief that exists for years while the air and water masses come and go in a week or sooner.

The Red Spot, rather orange in this APOD, is there for a hundred years; therefore it is an island drifting in the ocean
Very interesting definition of "surface"! I found that graph and corresponding discussion with math here - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_of_Earth#Depth
--
"To B̬̻̋̚o̞̮̚̚l̘̲̀᷾d̫͓᷅ͩḷ̯᷁ͮȳ͙᷊͠ Go......Beyond The F͇̤i̙̖e̤̟l̡͓d͈̹s̙͚ We Know."{ʲₒʰₙNYᵈₑᵉₚ}

Post Reply