Comments and questions about the
APOD on the main view screen.
-
Ann
- 4725 Å
- Posts: 13099
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am
Post
by Ann » Tue Jan 17, 2012 5:52 am
Double, double toil and trouble - Gimmi Ratto and Davide Bardini had to suffer a lot of toil and trouble to collect enough light to produce this very fine picture of the Witch Head Nebula. Congratulations on having your picture chosen as a well-deserved Astronomy Picture of the Day!
Ann+
Color Commentator
-
Nightfly
Post
by Nightfly » Tue Jan 17, 2012 10:41 am
FYI, the date listing here is incorrectly identifying it as Jan 17th 2011 (instead of 2012)
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/
The archive listings show the right 2012 dates but the individual pages for this year are still showing "2011"
-
owlice
- Guardian of the Codes
- Posts: 8406
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 4:18 pm
- Location: Washington, DC
Post
by owlice » Tue Jan 17, 2012 10:57 am
Thanks, Nightfly; the editor has been notified.
A closed mouth gathers no foot.
-
orin stepanek
- Plutopian
- Posts: 8200
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:41 pm
- Location: Nebraska
Post
by orin stepanek » Tue Jan 17, 2012 2:00 pm
Orin
Smile today; tomorrow's another day!
-
KCM
Post
by KCM » Tue Jan 17, 2012 2:02 pm
So if the nebula is reflecting blue light, what type of filter would be helpful to observe the Nebula? Or is any necessary?
-
Ann
- 4725 Å
- Posts: 13099
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am
Post
by Ann » Tue Jan 17, 2012 5:27 pm
My guess is that this nebula will be very hard to observe.
Since the nebula is a reflection nebula, it reflects much of the light that hits it more or less equally. Admittedly it reflects blue light far better than red light. That still leaves a broad range of wavelengths that are reflected by this nebula. You may try to use an OIII or an H beta filter, which will let through some of the blue-green light from the nebula and block a lot of the background light, but you will still miss a lot of the light from the nebula this way.
A wide wavelength blue filter might be the best, if there are any such filters. But a problem is that many of the stars in the vicinity are blue themselves, and the blue filter will let through most of their light. So the light from the stars will overwhelm the light of the nebula, which is fairly faint anyway.
Ann
Color Commentator
-
neufer
- Vacationer at Tralfamadore
- Posts: 18805
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
- Location: Alexandria, Virginia
Post
by neufer » Tue Jan 17, 2012 6:10 pm
KCM wrote:
So if the nebula is reflecting blue light, what type of filter would be helpful to observe the Nebula? Or is any necessary?
You want to let light in
NOT reduce it.
So why would a filter be necessary (or even desired)?
(Unless, of course, your name is Ann and you don't want to risk the possibility of seeing any red.

)
Art Neuendorffer
-
Ann
- 4725 Å
- Posts: 13099
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am
Post
by Ann » Tue Jan 17, 2012 6:33 pm
neufer wrote:KCM wrote:
So if the nebula is reflecting blue light, what type of filter would be helpful to observe the Nebula? Or is any necessary?
You want to let light in
NOT reduce it.
So why would a filter be necessary (or even desired)?
(Unless, of course, your name is Ann and you don't want to risk the possibility of seeing any red.

)
You've got it, Art!
Ann
Color Commentator
-
Boomer12k
- :---[===] *
- Posts: 2691
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 12:07 am
Post
by Boomer12k » Tue Jan 17, 2012 9:44 pm
Take cream in your coffee?
:---[===] *
-
owlice
- Guardian of the Codes
- Posts: 8406
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 4:18 pm
- Location: Washington, DC
Post
by owlice » Tue Jan 17, 2012 11:35 pm
Boomer12k wrote:Take cream in your coffee?
And jam on your brakes?
A closed mouth gathers no foot.
-
TNT
- Science Officer
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 1:57 am
- Location: Heart of America
Post
by TNT » Wed Jan 18, 2012 12:01 am
I'll pass on the brakes, owlice-but how about toast? Or even better, a muffin?
I think this is a very interesting image. I need to start looking for these objects myself, if it isn't so cold.
The following statement is true.
The above statement is false.
-
wbd
- Ensign
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 10:57 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Post
by wbd » Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:18 am
G'day all.
Pardon my ignorance here but I cannot, for the life of me, identify the "witches head" in this APOD?
Should I be standing on my head to see it, or perhaps on my left ear (yes, I've tried both!) but still can't seem to see anything resembling a witch...
Thanks in advance.
-
Ann
- 4725 Å
- Posts: 13099
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am
Post
by Ann » Wed Jan 18, 2012 12:14 pm
The nose of the witch is the bluest protrusion pointing down in the middle of the picture. To the left of the nose is a "wavy line" which is the upper lip, the open mouth and the lower lip of the witch. (The witch has a large yellow "pimple", a bright yellow star, on her upper lip.) At lower left if the witch's chin. Her forehead and hat are presumably at upper right.
Ann
Color Commentator
-
Indigo_Sunrise
- Science Officer
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 1:40 pm
- Location: Md
Post
by Indigo_Sunrise » Wed Jan 18, 2012 1:53 pm
wbd wrote:G'day all.
Pardon my ignorance here but I cannot, for the life of me, identify the "witches head" in this APOD?
Should I be standing on my head to see it, or perhaps on my left ear (yes, I've tried both!) but still can't seem to see anything resembling a witch...
Thanks in advance.
Try standing on your RIGHT ear.....

Or just tilt your head to the right and (hopefully) the witch's profile will become apparent.

Forget the box, just get outside.
-
wbd
- Ensign
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 10:57 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Post
by wbd » Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:13 pm
Thanks for that explanation - I can now see some semblance of a witch's head... just!
